<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More US Troops Deaths than 9/11 Deaths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2006/09/03/more-us-troops-deaths-than-911-deaths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2006/09/03/more-us-troops-deaths-than-911-deaths/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:12:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raven Daegmorgan</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2006/09/03/more-us-troops-deaths-than-911-deaths/comment-page-1/#comment-165292</link>
		<dc:creator>Raven Daegmorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2006/09/03/more-us-troops-deaths-than-911-deaths/#comment-165292</guid>
		<description>The point is examining the insanity of the diminishing returns of violence, in losing more men fighting a war than were lost in the (falsely claimed) cause of the war and which could be expected to be lost later by not going to war. It&#039;s not about exact numbers--&quot;Oh, we lost more men doing some other thing than we did this&quot;--it&#039;s a simple cost-benefit analysis.

If your neighbor&#039;s dog kills your cat, do you gather up your family and assault him in his yard and not stop even though he&#039;s knocked out your daughter&#039;s teeth, broken your son&#039;s arm, and you&#039;ve escalated to putting a stake through his wife&#039;s heart? Especially if you knew it was some stray who actually killed your cat and not your neighbor&#039;s dog?

It forces us to ask: how have those deaths served to give meaning to the deaths of those lost in the 9/11 terrorist attack? Or are we just piling pointless death and misery on-top-of pointless death and misery?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is examining the insanity of the diminishing returns of violence, in losing more men fighting a war than were lost in the (falsely claimed) cause of the war and which could be expected to be lost later by not going to war. It&#8217;s not about exact numbers&#8211;&#8221;Oh, we lost more men doing some other thing than we did this&#8221;&#8211;it&#8217;s a simple cost-benefit analysis.</p>
<p>If your neighbor&#8217;s dog kills your cat, do you gather up your family and assault him in his yard and not stop even though he&#8217;s knocked out your daughter&#8217;s teeth, broken your son&#8217;s arm, and you&#8217;ve escalated to putting a stake through his wife&#8217;s heart? Especially if you knew it was some stray who actually killed your cat and not your neighbor&#8217;s dog?</p>
<p>It forces us to ask: how have those deaths served to give meaning to the deaths of those lost in the 9/11 terrorist attack? Or are we just piling pointless death and misery on-top-of pointless death and misery?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2006/09/03/more-us-troops-deaths-than-911-deaths/comment-page-1/#comment-83448</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 17:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2006/09/03/more-us-troops-deaths-than-911-deaths/#comment-83448</guid>
		<description>We lost more troops on D-Day in Europe than the years we&#039;ve been in Iraq. We are in a &quot;war&quot; people need to stop whinning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We lost more troops on D-Day in Europe than the years we&#8217;ve been in Iraq. We are in a &#8220;war&#8221; people need to stop whinning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

