<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What? Iraq Could Be Better?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:31:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris S</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, the flowers and candy for the parade were being stored in the National Museum of Iraq...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the flowers and candy for the parade were being stored in the National Museum of Iraq&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 02:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Look on the bright side - the stores must be filled with flowers and candy! Not too much of these were expended in the Great Welcome America To Iraq Parade forecast by the likes of Cheney and Wolfowitz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look on the bright side &#8211; the stores must be filled with flowers and candy! Not too much of these were expended in the Great Welcome America To Iraq Parade forecast by the likes of Cheney and Wolfowitz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Barganier</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Barganier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Shingo: Presumably, the French would have helped us kill extra Rackees, which would mean victory. Which we already have anyway. Except when some peaceniks or realists or Euros need a good tongue-lashing. Then we&#039;re just shy of winning -- because of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shingo: Presumably, the French would have helped us kill extra Rackees, which would mean victory. Which we already have anyway. Except when some peaceniks or realists or Euros need a good tongue-lashing. Then we&#8217;re just shy of winning &#8212; because of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shingo</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Shingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Reynolds thinks that we&#039;re not winning in Iraq because we&#039;re not killing enough Iraqis.

http://instapundit.com/archives2/008341.php

A cautionary note: &quot;While we have the will and the resources to fight in this context, we are effectively hamstrung because realities on the ground require measures we will always refuse â€” namely, the widespread use of lethal and brutal force.&quot; That&#039;s been a theme of many milbloggers. I hope it&#039;s wrong, since otherwise it means that we will lose the war as a result of enemy psychological warfare and &quot;lawfare.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reynolds thinks that we&#8217;re not winning in Iraq because we&#8217;re not killing enough Iraqis.</p>
<p><a href="http://instapundit.com/archives2/008341.php" rel="nofollow">http://instapundit.com/archives2/008341.php</a></p>
<p>A cautionary note: &#8220;While we have the will and the resources to fight in this context, we are effectively hamstrung because realities on the ground require measures we will always refuse â€” namely, the widespread use of lethal and brutal force.&#8221; That&#8217;s been a theme of many milbloggers. I hope it&#8217;s wrong, since otherwise it means that we will lose the war as a result of enemy psychological warfare and &#8220;lawfare.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lester</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Jaquese Chirac did help us out.  He advised us strongly against going in to iraq, based in no small part on his own military service in Algeria.  Blair is the one who screwed us.  us being America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaquese Chirac did help us out.  He advised us strongly against going in to iraq, based in no small part on his own military service in Algeria.  Blair is the one who screwed us.  us being America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/08/20/what-iraq-could-be-better/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Before the current Iraq invasion the Iraqi people had elections every bit as reliable and predictable as here in the states, that is, the same people got elected over and over and over.  I understand your sarcasm, just wanted to add a little irony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the current Iraq invasion the Iraqi people had elections every bit as reliable and predictable as here in the states, that is, the same people got elected over and over and over.  I understand your sarcasm, just wanted to add a little irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

