Comments on: Bogus War Party Propaganda

By: Ron

Ron — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:33:36 +0000

Fighting for freedom is one thing, but the Iraq war is not about freedom. Oil, greed and profit at the expense of thousands of lives on both sides. Our troops are being cheated by bush and his evil cronies. Anyone can see this.

By: arabic music

arabic music — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:19:53 +0000

arabic music…

I’m not sure if I understand it completely. Thank you anyway….

By: the legendary Bill

the legendary Bill — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:45:28 +0000

Russia must be consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary because it was requested by Our Lady at Fatima…that means Heaven itself wants it..so it doesn’t matter what you or anyone else thinks..The Orthodox Church has a lovely Mass and a valid priesthood but there must be “one flock and one shephard”..The only unity is with Rome and Russia must be consecrated by the Pope on one holy day in union with all the bishops of the world…then Russia will be converted whether or not YOU think it needs to be..

By: M. Woerl

M. Woerl — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 05:30:21 +0000

“Things” wont get “better” just because the Pope “consecrates” a country-Russia-that has been a bulwark of Christianity for more than 1,000 years (even during the Soviet period, the Catacomb Church strengthened th Russian people with the Holy Orthodox Faith!) Keep catholic piety an U.S> politics where it belongs-out of countries that have been Christian for hundreds of years longer than the U.S. has even existed!

By: Ty Harris

Ty Harris — Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:22:50 +0000

Mr. Federkiel- I posted a response to some of your comments over at my blog ( comment section of “The Most Worthless Generation” ).

http://tyharris.wordpress.com

I find the wordpress comment sections to be preferable, because apparently there are charachter-limits on these comments here, but they dont tell you when you have reached those limits. Being something of a windbag, I would hate for any of my comments to be cut short or lost again.

- sincerely, Ty

By: Bill Federkiel

Bill Federkiel — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:09:31 +0000

Perhaps you’re right MOT..Still, I believe the First Crusade was a just and gallant war to protect Christian pilgrims..And I will always think that the IDEAL is for the land where Christ walked to be ruled by his modern day apostles..And, for the life of me, I can never look upon the route of the Way of the Cross where Christ dripped His most prescious Blood on the way to Golgotha as just a piece of real estate…Or the hill where He was crucified..Or the manger ( actually a cave according to Blessed Anne Catherine Emerich in her mystical visions-a nun who bore the stigmata ) where he was born…Or the town where he grew up…No, not just property….
When the Ottoman Turks controlled the Holy Land the women were always modest ( but look at women’s fashions just 100 yrs ago with the loose flowing styles and they could have been recognized by the Blessed Mother or Pilates wife and now? )and the Turks did not allow any prostitution…Now with the Zionists in control of the Holy Land there is prostitution in Nazareth, in Bethlehem and in Jerusalem..So perhaps it does matter who controls the Holy Land ( IDEALLY )…
I feel the First Crusade was a blessed undertaking and if the Christians had behaved more like Christians-after their initial victories-many of the Muslims would have converted..But things went downhill and the Fourth Crusade ( which was re-directed towards Constantinople ) was an abomination…They disobeyed the Pope and those responsible for the sack of Constantinople were excommunicated…
But we’ll agree to disagree….Pax Christi be unto our country as soon as possible…….

By: MOT

MOT — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 17:37:34 +0000

Bill, any “true” Christian wouldn’t care at all who was in control of a piece of property. They had Romans controlling the territories at the time and never called for revolution or acts of violence. Purely a message of love and reconciliation. Something so simple and powerful that it turned the world upside down. It was only later, through the passage of time and mans own innate evil ability to “F” things up, that a corrupt politicized church began bellowing about holy lands etc. The land is irrelevant, the message is everything. So either we focus on the essential basic message or get caught up in historically twisted arguments that lead nowhere. And you are absolutely correct in pointing out the supposed “freedoms” people bellow about. Just what freedoms are we defending? The freedom to produce more degenerate “entertainment”? The freedom to sell more death dealing devices to corrupt and evil governments abroad? The freedom to twist any nations arm and do as we say even though we don’t abide by the same? Is that what life in these States is all about? Hypocrisy is Americas middle name.

By: Bill Federkiel

Bill Federkiel — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:38:58 +0000

And please stop using the disingenuous and propagandistic phrase ” Islamo-Fascism”..They’re not fascists…Some leftists and statists became fascists when they saw the threat of international communism and came up with a really, really bad cure…Fascists and communists are of the same ideoogical ilk.
It must be said, to their credit, at least the Muslims reject the worst of modernity; bad fashion, bad music, porno, birth control…At least they have children..At least they’re anti-Zionist unlike the “Christians” who view the Talmudic, Pharasaical Zionists as allies…Give a true Christian an army and he’ll drive the Muslims and the Pharisees out of the Holy Land and allow them back whenever he saw fit to do so..The Holy Land should be controlled ( ideally ) by those who believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ…Anything less is not the ideal…If you’re really a Christian..And if you’re not then what exactly are you so eager to die for: you’re materialist, naturalist, souless Ayn Randian concept of ” freedom”….

By: Bill Federkiel

Bill Federkiel — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:50:51 +0000

” take care ” not take take “tare “..

By: Bill Federkiel

Bill Federkiel — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:48:39 +0000

Of course I meant Czar ” Nicholas “, not Nichols..

By: Bill Federkiel

Bill Federkiel — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:47:16 +0000

4. Yeah the Austrian-Hungarian probably would have shrunk even if the war had ended a couple of years earlier but at least it would have gotten a decent burial..For the record Emperor Charles was trying to give the different regions more autonomy..And he was the only ruler out of all who truly wanted peace. To be fair, the Czar originally wanted to keep his country out of the conflict but two of his generals ” took the initiative” so to speak…Why bemoan these Christian monarchies? Well would you rather have Kaiser Wilhelm or the National Socialist scum that came after? Would you rather have Czar Nichols-a decent man canonized by the Orthodox Church-or the Judeo-Bolsheviks who came after? The Austr-Hung was keeping the different groups in the Balkans at peace, no simple task and it was an enlightened Catholic monarchy…
WW I was a disaster for Christian Europe, it’s never been the same..Pope Pius X tried to prevent and seeing it come killed him..Pope Benedict XV tried to stop it and Pres Wilson’s response? ” What’s he wanna butt in for? ” Dark forces WANTED that war..Read that transcript of the trial of the man who killed the Archduke ( his name was Princip ) it’s pretty revealing….
And with the Balfour Declaration the Zionists had their first sponsor for their eventual takeover of the Holy Land-in exchange for helping get the U.S. in the war…
Still think WW II was a good war? What did we have to show for it? 50 million people dead. The Soviets have 1/2 of Europe..The communists are poised to take over China..and the Zionists a little later create their state in Palestine through massacres, ethnic cleansing, target assassinations and terror……
That bother you? Well consider this: when the Catholic Croations have to deal with the Bosnian Muslims they’re supposed to use kid gloves…When the Orthodox Serbs have to deal with the terrorist Albanian Muslims in Kosovo they mustn’t drive them back to Albania…When the Orthodox Russians have to deal with the Muslim Chechnyans they should take tare ( Not that the Chechnyans don’t have legitimate grievances )..But the spiritual descendents of the Pharisees can be as brutal as they want when dealing with the Muslim and Christian arabs……
Bill Federkiel vet./USMC Semper Fi..God / Corps / and Country…In that order because you can trust a Marine Corps general more than you can an American president.

By: Bill Federkiel

Bill Federkiel — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 02:57:09 +0000

America is the “greatest hope for the world” ? Not the love of Jesus Christ and the Sacraments and Doctrine of His Church? I’m sorry but the world won’t be saved by Burger king, MTV, the Gap, abortion on demand and pay-per-view porno…Not to mention Extreme Fighting, monster truck shows and Monday Night Football…A materialistic, naturalist world-view is not going to appeal to a world that is more sceptical of modernity and is yearning a more transecendent faith…I know that’s all up for grabs in the grand marketplace of ideas where everything is pretty subjective and ” freedom ” for the sake of freedom is all that matters…
Actually I usually encounter more naive, school-boy patriotism than a loathing for our country..( Which, of course, is wrong..You should love everything that’s lovely about your country and should love it even if there’s nothing lovely about..because it sustained you fm birth and because of it’s potential..Of course, there is much that is lovely ) On the other hand:
1. Was the Mexican-American War anything more than just a land grab?
2. Was the ” Civil War ” ( actually the War for Southern Independence ) anything more than coercion to keep the continental empire intact? To keep the South a captive customer base behind a high-tariff wall?
3. Did the Spaniards blow up the Maine? Not likely..,Ask who benefited and you’ll likely have your answer..Did we do the right thing killing thousands of Philipinos to bring those pagan Catholics Christianity?
4. Was the Lusitania not carrying a ton of munitions? Did the Germans not attempt to put ads in papers warning people of the danger? Didn’t our involvement prolong the war? Could that have contributed to the fall of the Christian Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Judeo-Bolshevik takeover of Russia?
5. Did not the the Roosevelt Admin do everything it could to provoke the Japanese? See Lt. Commander McCollums 8 Point Plan memorandum in Oct of 1940 designed to get the Japs to make the first move..Pop-up cruises in Japanese waters, oil embargo..Read Day of Deceit by Fleming and you will have no doubt that Eddie Layton and the rest new of the coming attack far in advance and didn’t warn Kimmel and Short..( The enemy was counting on total surprise-the meaning of the code ” Tora, tora, tora ” and would have turned back if we had gotten our ships out of the harbor and our planes in the air…
6. Did we not say that Korea was outside our sphere of influence and then dive right in? And then made our best general of the modern era, Douglas MacArthur walk a tightrope by telling him to save S. Korea but not allowing him to do what he needed to do to keep the Chinese out of Korea?
7. Wasn’t the gulf of Tonkin story a lie?
8. Did Ambassador April Glasbie not tell Saddam that ” we have no interest in arab to arab border disputes such as the one you have with Kuwait, in fact….” Why go on? Do you ever question the morality of tipping munitions with depleted uranium and poisoning a country forever? Dropping white phosphorous on civilians? Destroying a country under false pretenses? For what? To make nuclear Israel feel safer? War profits for defense and reconstruction co.’s, empire, the ” privatization” of Iraqi oil?
9. Oh yes, and JFK was killed by Oswald, who was behind him in the book depository..Yeah, that was the first boomerang bullet I ever heard of…
I agree…Sniveling teenagers who aren’t fit to shine General Lee’s boots do bother me..but naive, schoolboy patriots who watch only Fox Noise and can turn a president into an Emperor are perhaps worse..Especially since they can generate much more unnecessary blood…..Bill Federkiel vet./USMC