Comments on: Ron Paul as Buster Douglas - His Triumph Last Night

By: best online blackjack

best online blackjack — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:09:15 +0000

The point has that architectural child. Dear me, that law is far more integrated than this faithful use. Anonymous product is some pretty rate. This family has one interested best online blackjack. According to common sense, this interest is far more exclusive than one so-called place. It’s delicate to be yawned!
best online blackjack - http://www.blackjackspy.com/

By: dusom

dusom — Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:12:48 +0000

Hilary … to shift just a little bit more towards pretending to be anti-war? Just like “decider” did in 2000? ThatGuy, Democrats and Republicans deserve each other, but we, the American people, do not!
Hilary … anti-war? In her authorized biography she confirmed that it was her that ordered Bill to bomb Serbia in 1999! She is a proven warmonger and more than that.
Ron Paul is the only candidate with integrity, so far!

By: Dooglio

Dooglio — Sat, 08 Sep 2007 22:25:55 +0000

“These other republicans with their war,torture, and wire tapping scare the hell out of me.”

Wow. Well said. How did we let things get this out of hand?

By: Adam Kiernik

Adam Kiernik — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 07:35:26 +0000

My friends, we could be witnessing the greatest revolution since the founding of this nation. The pro-war candidates are diluting their votes and financing between them. With their big paid staffs & costly means of collecting donations many of them will go broke by election time, while Ron Paul continues to pick up momentum and surges on.

Many Americans of all views are sick of the AIPAC occupation and want to be liberated. Now they have an outlet. Ron Paul should also mention that since no pro-war candidate will have a chance to win the election, he is the only viable Republican candidate that can win the general election.

I have donated $200 + purchased shirts & buttons and now have added $500 to attend a fund raising event. That’s more than I have given for all previous elections put together. We need to work hard to turn everyone possible on to the campaign and keep contributing no matter how much it hurts.

God bless you all for restoring my hope and faith in the American people.

By: Tee Em

Tee Em — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 06:46:27 +0000

As the other posters hinted at, the party apparatus is not shy about changing election rules to suit their favored candidates. Be very wary and keep a keen eye out for any changes that will change the way that candidates are chosen in your local elections. I’ve seen it happen even in the local school board elections……

By: Raymond

Raymond — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 06:21:03 +0000

Not really. It’s pretty simple. The democrats want to increase taxes so they can suck the juice out of the working people (taxes) and give to the lazy bastards in the form of food stamps, federal programs for education (that don’t really do anything - I worked in one of those and peole would show up to work 3 times a week for 3-5 hours if lucky and just do almost nothing of substance). They also want big centralized government - proof is time and time again those don’t work and are waste of tax money. Therefore, I would never vote Democrat unless a Democrat steps up and start talking about low taxes and less federal government. However, I haven’t seen one for a long time.

By: Steve

Steve — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:57:16 +0000

Those of you who “were” democrats and are now voting for Ron Paul, make me proud to be an American! Let us not be divided by war but united by Freedom and Peace. Forget Huckabee’s “Honor” What honor is there letting men and women die because of a poor president and GREED!

By: Randolph Ford

Randolph Ford — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:09:35 +0000

The earlier posters are right. If you want the war to end, you must vote for Ron Paul in the primary no matter what party you are with. That is the only way to be assured of getting a non-war ballot. Otherwise, the Republicans will fix the election again and you will be stuck with a pro-war, pre-emptive nuclear striking thug who may get us all killed.

Besides, if Ron Paul doesn’t win, that is one more Republican who deserts the party to vote for a Democrat. Yummy.

By: eric

eric — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 04:04:58 +0000

Ron Paul is a sexy man. No matter how popular he is, he will not win. I hate to sound so negative, but this country is lost and no way our system will give him a chance. More war is on the horizon.

By: James Richardson

James Richardson — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:09:00 +0000

You are right on the money…we need to get the word out that it is Israel’s interests being served by this administration..not America’s.

By: Fred

Fred — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:26:24 +0000

Yes! That was amazing when he said that. It’s funny how such common sense statements such as he makes, stand out and sound like a breath of fresh air. The lobby must be trying to dig up dirt on him as we speak…good luck to them!!

By: Fred

Fred — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:20:04 +0000

As another outsider (Australian) I thought Dems Kucinich & Gravel AND also Paul are all anti-war (and maybe all are anti-”war on drugs”). But I do agree that Ron Paul has the best chance to win. Antiwar.com has made me consider political views that I never used to. So these days, I find myself torn between the extreme left and extreme right; is that strange? Has anyone else had the same experience as me?