<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Scheuer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:41:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commentary &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Scheuer Charade</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/comment-page-1/#comment-127463</link>
		<dc:creator>Commentary &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Scheuer Charade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/#comment-127463</guid>
		<description>[...] When he is talking to or writing for the non-mainstream media, he heads for zany territory. One only has to read his diatribes on antiwar.com or listen to him on antiwar radio talking about Israel&#8217;s covert-action programs in this country to get a good sense of what kind ofÂ crackpot he is. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When he is talking to or writing for the non-mainstream media, he heads for zany territory. One only has to read his diatribes on antiwar.com or listen to him on antiwar radio talking about Israel&#8217;s covert-action programs in this country to get a good sense of what kind ofÂ crackpot he is. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter kirsch</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5297</link>
		<dc:creator>peter kirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/#comment-5297</guid>
		<description>Dear Ryan Lohman,

I recommend that you read ON A DAILY BASIS the BBC Online, AL Jazeera Online, HAARETZ Online, LE MONDE Online, DEUTSCHE WELLE Online  and most important the Asia TImes online @ www.atimes.com and RIA Novosti Online - a new Russian newspaper. All these are available in English.
Books - anything by Kissinger, the arch-politician who said that &quot;Countries don&#039;t have friends, they have interests.&quot; He is thoroughly dishonest and very devious, but is worth a read. Another VITAL book is THE RISE AND FALL OF THE GREAT POWERS by Paul Kennedy. Yet another great book is THE DECLINE OF THE WEST by Oswald Spengler (original in German - Die Untergang des Abendlandes). Another good book is THE RISE AND FALL OF THE THIRD REICH by William Shirer. Yet another comes to mind - INSIDE THE THIRD REICH By Albert Speer.
I also recommend anything by Richard Nixon except his memoirs which of course are self-serving. But he was a shrewd politician in international affairs and wrote intelligently and effectively on such matters.
All of these books deal with the causes and/or effects of war.
Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ryan Lohman,</p>
<p>I recommend that you read ON A DAILY BASIS the BBC Online, AL Jazeera Online, HAARETZ Online, LE MONDE Online, DEUTSCHE WELLE Online  and most important the Asia TImes online @ <a href="http://www.atimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.atimes.com</a> and RIA Novosti Online &#8211; a new Russian newspaper. All these are available in English.<br />
Books &#8211; anything by Kissinger, the arch-politician who said that &#8220;Countries don&#8217;t have friends, they have interests.&#8221; He is thoroughly dishonest and very devious, but is worth a read. Another VITAL book is THE RISE AND FALL OF THE GREAT POWERS by Paul Kennedy. Yet another great book is THE DECLINE OF THE WEST by Oswald Spengler (original in German &#8211; Die Untergang des Abendlandes). Another good book is THE RISE AND FALL OF THE THIRD REICH by William Shirer. Yet another comes to mind &#8211; INSIDE THE THIRD REICH By Albert Speer.<br />
I also recommend anything by Richard Nixon except his memoirs which of course are self-serving. But he was a shrewd politician in international affairs and wrote intelligently and effectively on such matters.<br />
All of these books deal with the causes and/or effects of war.<br />
Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marycatherine Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3954</link>
		<dc:creator>Marycatherine Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/#comment-3954</guid>
		<description>I have posted Washington&#039;s farewell address in my officek and indeed everything you have said is so true, and it is heart warming to know that you would choose the brig over slaughter-in-Iraq abomination on earth.  I try to let people know that, for at least a long while the most well known man in the world, Muhammad Ali, did that same thing when he refused to slaughter-in-Vietnam, not only giving up his title.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have posted Washington&#8217;s farewell address in my officek and indeed everything you have said is so true, and it is heart warming to know that you would choose the brig over slaughter-in-Iraq abomination on earth.  I try to let people know that, for at least a long while the most well known man in the world, Muhammad Ali, did that same thing when he refused to slaughter-in-Vietnam, not only giving up his title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3832</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/#comment-3832</guid>
		<description>http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/2007/0911.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/2007/0911.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/2007/0911.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3831</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/#comment-3831</guid>
		<description>Kent Conrad, D-ND, ran for U.S. Senate promising to term limit himself.  When it came time for him to leave his office, he reneged.  He still gets re-elected because he is good at &quot;fighting for North Dakota&quot; which translates to $1.92 per capita back from Washington, D.C. for every $1.00 per capita sent by tax.

Ron Paul has a better idea than term limits.  Get back on the gold standard, when government runs out of gold they&#039;ll be forced to make the unpopular choices thereby getting voted out of office if they screw up.

Jefferson, Madison, et. al. were smart guys.  We should obey the laws they wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kent Conrad, D-ND, ran for U.S. Senate promising to term limit himself.  When it came time for him to leave his office, he reneged.  He still gets re-elected because he is good at &#8220;fighting for North Dakota&#8221; which translates to $1.92 per capita back from Washington, D.C. for every $1.00 per capita sent by tax.</p>
<p>Ron Paul has a better idea than term limits.  Get back on the gold standard, when government runs out of gold they&#8217;ll be forced to make the unpopular choices thereby getting voted out of office if they screw up.</p>
<p>Jefferson, Madison, et. al. were smart guys.  We should obey the laws they wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: v for vendetta</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3824</link>
		<dc:creator>v for vendetta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 02:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/#comment-3824</guid>
		<description>I was suprised about Mikes comments about the authenticity of the Bin Laden video.  He was sure it was authentic because he recognizes the voice?

I can&#039;t believe he is not versed on the current voice duplication technology!

ps. PNAC must be exposed to the American masses and tried for conspiracy to defraud Congress!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was suprised about Mikes comments about the authenticity of the Bin Laden video.  He was sure it was authentic because he recognizes the voice?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe he is not versed on the current voice duplication technology!</p>
<p>ps. PNAC must be exposed to the American masses and tried for conspiracy to defraud Congress!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Federkiel</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3817</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Federkiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 01:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/#comment-3817</guid>
		<description>And, by the way, I&#039;m a former Marine and I wouldn&#039;t have gone to Iraq..the brig yes, Iraq no...I took an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States and all enemies foreign and domestic...Not to fight an enemy of Al-Quaeda ( Hussein ) and not to enhance the long-term security of nulcear Israel..And not for the privatization ( foreign ownership ) of Iraqi oil..And not for the profits of &quot;defense&quot; contractors or mercenaries or war reconstruction co.&#039;s...
     To read anti-war.com and not be pursuaded by it ( by anyone ) is an example of intellectual inertia..And that&#039;s the problem w/most Americans..they just adopt the position ( on ANY issue ) that they&#039;re most comfortable with, facts be damned...
     Which is another reason to read Washington&#039;s Farewell Address; in it he warns aginst the mentality that is bred by political parties........Semper Fi!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, by the way, I&#8217;m a former Marine and I wouldn&#8217;t have gone to Iraq..the brig yes, Iraq no&#8230;I took an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States and all enemies foreign and domestic&#8230;Not to fight an enemy of Al-Quaeda ( Hussein ) and not to enhance the long-term security of nulcear Israel..And not for the privatization ( foreign ownership ) of Iraqi oil..And not for the profits of &#8220;defense&#8221; contractors or mercenaries or war reconstruction co.&#8217;s&#8230;<br />
     To read anti-war.com and not be pursuaded by it ( by anyone ) is an example of intellectual inertia..And that&#8217;s the problem w/most Americans..they just adopt the position ( on ANY issue ) that they&#8217;re most comfortable with, facts be damned&#8230;<br />
     Which is another reason to read Washington&#8217;s Farewell Address; in it he warns aginst the mentality that is bred by political parties&#8230;&#8230;..Semper Fi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Federkiel</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3779</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Federkiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/#comment-3779</guid>
		<description>&quot; by our &quot; of course..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; by our &#8221; of course..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Federkiel</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3777</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Federkiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/#comment-3777</guid>
		<description>Ryan just read Washington&#039;s Farewell Address and the foreign policy espoused our best President..He would be against this war...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan just read Washington&#8217;s Farewell Address and the foreign policy espoused our best President..He would be against this war&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marycatherine Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/comment-page-1/#comment-3755</link>
		<dc:creator>Marycatherine Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/09/10/michael-scheuer-3/#comment-3755</guid>
		<description>There would not be a political establishment marching to Bin Laden&#039;s beat if such establishment would let the American citzenry have what the vast majority of them want, term limits for our federal lawmakers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There would not be a political establishment marching to Bin Laden&#8217;s beat if such establishment would let the American citzenry have what the vast majority of them want, term limits for our federal lawmakers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

