<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gareth Porter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/10/31/gareth-porter-16/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/10/31/gareth-porter-16/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:41:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Federkiel</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/10/31/gareth-porter-16/comment-page-1/#comment-20111</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Federkiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 13:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/10/31/gareth-porter-16/#comment-20111</guid>
		<description>Incredible, the last 17 yrs of warfare with this country was unnecessary: Saddam ( a U.S. ally ) took back Kuwait ( which was once governed out of Basra until broken off by the Brits about 100 yrs ago ) after we gave him the green light ( see Saddam&#039;s meeting with U.S. Ambassador April Glasbie )..Why? Because the Kuwaitis were illegally slant-drilling into Iraqi oil fields and because Saddam needed more oil TO SELL after his war with Iran ( which the neo-con-men are urging the president to do now )..Not because he wanted to hoard the oil...But all we needed was a corny Lee Greenwood song in the background and a desire to flex our muscles after Nam...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredible, the last 17 yrs of warfare with this country was unnecessary: Saddam ( a U.S. ally ) took back Kuwait ( which was once governed out of Basra until broken off by the Brits about 100 yrs ago ) after we gave him the green light ( see Saddam&#8217;s meeting with U.S. Ambassador April Glasbie )..Why? Because the Kuwaitis were illegally slant-drilling into Iraqi oil fields and because Saddam needed more oil TO SELL after his war with Iran ( which the neo-con-men are urging the president to do now )..Not because he wanted to hoard the oil&#8230;But all we needed was a corny Lee Greenwood song in the background and a desire to flex our muscles after Nam&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marycatherine Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/10/31/gareth-porter-16/comment-page-1/#comment-19573</link>
		<dc:creator>Marycatherine Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/10/31/gareth-porter-16/#comment-19573</guid>
		<description>Learning how stupid these warplanners are re the Middle-East makes one want to yell at them:  get a life and leave the rest of us alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Learning how stupid these warplanners are re the Middle-East makes one want to yell at them:  get a life and leave the rest of us alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Federkiel</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/10/31/gareth-porter-16/comment-page-1/#comment-18812</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Federkiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/10/31/gareth-porter-16/#comment-18812</guid>
		<description>The destruction of the non-homogenous, large arab states has ALWAYS been a Zionist goal..&quot; We don&#039;t do nation-building &quot; is a phrase any decent paleo-con can agree with..Well, not to worry, because nation destruction was always the goal of most of the neo-cons in regards to Iraq...Never before in history has a smaller client state so effectively influenced the foreign policy of it&#039;s benefactor..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The destruction of the non-homogenous, large arab states has ALWAYS been a Zionist goal..&#8221; We don&#8217;t do nation-building &#8221; is a phrase any decent paleo-con can agree with..Well, not to worry, because nation destruction was always the goal of most of the neo-cons in regards to Iraq&#8230;Never before in history has a smaller client state so effectively influenced the foreign policy of it&#8217;s benefactor..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

