Realty lesson no. one deal with truth not your imagination

If we all followed her example of how she lives, it would bd “THe End of Civilization”

Let’s put this gal to rest in the nearst graveyard

RP08

1. Give me the names of the Fascists who gave tax cuts and supported the free market economy during their rule?
2. She claims that there are many definitions of Fascism, which give her an escape from the subject, if confronted on the historical facts. The idea that Fascism was the invention of Mussolini or of the Italian mind is a fable. A group of students formulated this idea at Oxford University and named it under the guise of Guild Socialism, which was a total failure from it’s beginning. It was Mussolini who adopted it and renamed it Fascism. The other definitions come from the socialist left who refer to it as right wing capitalism, as for instance, Stalin referred to Nazi Germany as botched up capitalism. Nothing could be further from the truth! Nazism was complete at the turn of the 20th century, not in the 1930’s.
3. Rights have been slipping away for decades now, not due to President Bush and his administration, but rather, due to the so called progressives.
A. Group rights undermine individual rights under the guise of more freedoms, and thus, undermines the Constitution and the rule of law.
B. Diversity: As in Germany, if you spoke outside the box, you were sent to a retraining camp. Today we send them to sensitivity classes, not just in our universities, but in the work places also.
C. Women’s rights were enhanced by the professors of the 1960s by preaching the writings of Bebel’s book,“ Women and Socialism.’ published in the latter part of the 19th century. It promoted free love in Germany in the rise toward Nazism.
4. The Formal Rule of Law: Law before action and with blind ends for all, and thus, not for group rights! Naomi uses this word a lot loosely without defining it at all.
5. Firing of attorneys: She never mentioned that Clinton fired all Ninety three!
6, Torture and interment camps: This Administration has suspended less rights than any war time president in American history. Prisoners in out own penal system are treated worst than the terrorists. If anything, we’re too easy on these terrorists.
7. Founding Fathers: What would the think of hate crimes, gay rights, open boarders, smoking bans and the government telling us what we can say, eat and drink? What would they think of affirmative action? What would they think of raising a minority group to a majority status? Naomi talks as though she’s all for the views of our Founders, but she never really talks about what they believed in. It seems to me that she twists thing toward her make believe world. Here’s what our Founders thought of national health care as they read about its failure in the fall of the Roman Empire. This was written in the early 1700s in the Cato’s Letters:
The definition of liberty was well accepted, I think by Tories and Whigs, on the continent as well, and we find, perhaps our best definition today, in terms of the harmonizing sentiments of Jefferson today, in Cato’s Letters. These were a series of newspaper articles, written in the first part of the eighteenth century, ( published between 1720 and 1723), by John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon and they became one of the foundations, the staples of the literature of liberty, when one of the early firebrands of the revolution, Josiah Quincy died, he left his letters of Cato, as they were called, to his son with the admonition, “May the spirit of liberty be upon you”. And these letters, Cato’s letters, as they are called, named after the great Roman patriot, who defied Caesar, defined liberty as the right to live as you choose, as long, as you harm no one else. It is freedom to live your life to enjoy the fruits of your property, to do what you know to be right and without being obliged to do something you know to be wrong. So upon this concept of freedom, I think we would be generally agreed of life and liberty, and freedom to live as you choose. But Cato’s letter and I think Jefferson, as well, go on to add to this. For Cato’s Letters, it is a fundamental denial of freedom to be restricted in your actions, when you do something that harms no one else.

So we wonder how an eighteenth century Whig, the authors of Cato’s Letters or Jefferson himself, might respond to laws about second hand smoking, or the demand that we wear seatbelts. Are we really harming others? In fact, in an effort to reduce the idea of government intervention to an absurdity, Cato’s Letters say, “What if we went to the extreme of having every person looked after by a national college of physicians, now that would be true lunacy. The idea that it’s the government’s Prerogative and need to take care of people’s health, surely that must be the individuals decision.”2

But we have moved very far from those notions, very far from Jefferson’s concept of liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. When we looked at the Declaration of Independence, we saw how the concept, pursuit of happiness was chosen pacifically by Jefferson, not property, but the pursuit of happiness. The mandate that we finalize, that are a benefit to ourselves and the community. Natural law is also founded on an ideal of universal truths and absolutes, absolute right and wrong, absolute justice.

These are concepts we no longer accept as society . As a society, we believe that actions and values and what is right and wrong is determined by the circumstances, that there are no absolutes. So it challenges the very concepts of natural law, in fact, it denies the essence of natural law. To speak of the law itself, for the great jurist Blackstone, “natural law was expressed through the common law, no law could become a true law if it violated reason, justice or common sense”. But, to us as a society, the law is not a set of absolutes, but a set of tricks. And yet, it was in the diverse, multicultural empire of Rome, with many sects of religion, philosophies and ideas, that natural law based on absolute truths, that provided the binding nexus, and that set of shared values essential to the survival of a free nation. And natural law offers that same challenge today, if we have the courage to grasp it.
BY: J. RUFUS FEARS 1
WORLD HISTORY: UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA
8. Chili: Naomi leaves out the rest of the story of this subject and slams the United States. She is totally slanted on the history as to whether they were better off after the coup or before and where would they be today without the coup.. I don’t think she cares! Watch these two short videos and understand the rest of the story:
Part one:
Windows Media:low high
QuickTime 5:low high
RealVideo:low high

Part Two:
Windows Media:low high
QuickTime 5:low high
RealVideo:low high

Anyway as always,
From your old friend,
Dennis Lamb,
May you and yours have a very Merry Christmas and a rewarding New Year!
Enjoy!

.

Lists, I have also had my baggage searched, been selected several times while traveling to extra scrutany by TSA. The only way for americans to get the country back now is unfortunately by force, but I honestly don’t think you could get enough citizens to rise up and take it back.
It would really be good if we could get copies of the TSA lists,
and the RED,BLUE YELLOW AND GREEN lists too. They are all secret

i have a friend who has worked as a sniper for black water, and they killed many citizens in New Orleans. He is normally a fine fellow, but????? I wonder about his choices when picking jobs.
We are not just watching fashism, but also the new world order, mentioned in so many of daddy bush’s speeches.
God Bless You, Keep sounding the trumpet and call to the true colors of America… or we will soon be called CANAMERCO
I only wonder what the flag will look like.