In reviewing this subject matter as a physic viewer for the American Military and the Department of Homeland Defense I am left with only one conclusion.

It is in the form of a nagging question in my mind not sufficiently answered by any actions or inactions of our American Government. It is as follows; Who stood to benefit most from the inclusion of us, the Americans, in the war on Iraq and consequently the war on any countries soil in the tired euphemism called the war on terrorists?

And, the answer is the wealthiest families of Iran, Sudan, and Her Majesty the Queen of England. Both sides in these opposing forces seek one commonality. The inferior prices of foreign oil on the worlds open markets in constant demand in the state of India. Modern India, a British borne former colony still passes as the worlds largest supplier of wheat, corn and barley or livestock feed. Much in demand in these opposing forces countries and yet one which is readily identifiable as the liquidity point of modern oil price infrastructure. ie, The end product.

Who stood most to benefit from the disruption a full scale military style campaign waged in both of these two countries of oil supply, Afghanistan and Iraq? The English Government et al. A country so steeply mired in political hate and the constant target of any and all previous foreign aid in the form of attack and arrest of asset producing countries lying between the east and the west from foreign buyers. An island state with limited capacity to produce corn, food and vegetables it must import all if not nearly all common food staples and these prices must remain effectively low for the nation of England not to become the strangle hold of it’s staples trading partners. Up until very recently as the war progressed both Canada and the EU refused to declare the country of India as a state of emergency even though it is in most clearly dire straights. The long term effect of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and Canada’s willingness to trade with them in opium and ephedra.

Now who had a hand in this. Most certainly not us, the United States, us being one of the most self sufficient corn, oil byproduct and wheat producers on the globe. A country which essentially can in and of itself sustain itself locally and commercially for quite some time to come without any need for basic commodity price structures which prevent or limit the amount of foreign aid capital we are willing to invest in the nature of countries such as India or say even a Tehran.

A country that up until that fateful day and event had no other interest in the middle east other than the normal course of foreign politics, albeit for better or for worse. But certainly not one with any future plan to engage in any long term military affair overseas designed to drain our economy, zap our military might and cause a virtual mutiny aboard the good ship America.

Which brings me back to my very first question. Who stood to benefit most from sucking us into yet another one of their losing wars. Most definitely and certainly not us, not any single one us Americans alive today, not even the crazy White House, at times it seems, would have anything to do with so ludicrous a plan as to demolish two buildings, blow up half of the Pentagon, kill thousands of people, set the world on fire and then deliver the death blow to our nation over time by being the instigator of a war we cannot continue to wage forever, against an army that never shows up, in a world that does not care for us.

But, who did. There is only one country in the world who has been consistently engaged in an extreme war of political, suicidal, racial and bigoted terror on it’s home front, England, and has done and been so for the past twenty five years.

So, when the questions come up of “lone squib” theories I tend to agree. But I can not, do not and will not see a possible future for the Americans at large and the American state to be permanent features of question or doubt in this mad chaos. Only the Government of England and it’s last standing colonial ally Canada stand as a threat to our country in this. Because there is no possible motive for our countries involvement in Al Queda affairs, yet these two countries combined stood to gain the most ground, both militarily, financially and through intelligence of our full scale strengths. These two nations in partnership remain the only unanswered question mark or focal point in my minds eye.

So, in the 9/11 whodunit mystery my answer is to use the coined term “Occam’s Razor.”

Who had the most to lose, us. Who had the most to gain, them; Canada and England. And who had the military intelligence, prowess and afore thought to pull this off besides us. MI5 and CSIS.

Sincerely yours,

Norman Christian Hoffmann