Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA

The Ashkenazis are not “white Europeans”.

They are descended from the Khazarian tribes who established a regional empire between the Black and Caspian seas and, whose elite converted to Judaism in approximately 750AD to spite the Caliph of Bagdad (ie, civilisation) and Russia (ie barbary) both of which tried to force them into their respective spheres of influence.

The Khazarians are, of course, themselves descended from Turko-Mongolian stock. The Ashkenazis’ “white” appearance is only due to their intermixing with the Slavic peoples of Central Europe.

Rudd is Howard lite I’m afraid. The ALP ceased to be social democrats under Hawke and Rudd’s presidential style will see a continued move to the right. His fawning toward the US/UK/Israeli axis will ensure that the erosion of our sovereignty will continue apace.

The Samson option truly is preposterous Timmy, but needs much more discussion so that the public of the Western world understands what their elites unleashed by supporting this festering little sore of a “state” and its murderous agenda.

And please, stop using the semitic reference when discussing Israel. The Ashkenazis are not a semitic people. They are white Europeans.

Once there, it’s a fait accompli. So Howard and Blair can go. In fact, it’s better if they do go. It makes their countries actually look sovereign and prevents any mass protest from the Australian and British people. Some with the Poles. All these countries have a negligible presence in Iraq. And if they want to they can just hire any Australian, British or Polish soldiers who want to stay back as mercenaries.

1) Chirac was not booted out, he had served 2 terms, was an old man with health issues, and there was never any serious considerations for him to be a candidate again. He was NOT a candidate.

2) Sarkozy is from the same party as Chirac, and while there are subtle differences in their policies and indeed personal rivalries, they have been working together for almost 20 years.

3) Sarkozy is merely using a slightly different set of tactics with the US. Make no mistake, he is not an idiot and he knows full well that Bush is a dimwit, and he is certainly 100% in agreement with the views Chirac had while he was President (which he himself supported during all those years). He has however determined that taking a visibly contrarian attitude (as was the case with Chirac) is too costly economically and politically and that it is easier to placate the fools with some tactically chosen shows of support… up until some limit. He is no idiot or bootlicker and he is just taking advantage of the overly simplist american mantra “you are with us or against us” and of the uneducated, uninformed, manichean and superficial Americans (like you seem to be, Tim, I am sorry).

4) Neither Sarkozy nor Merkel are conservatives, or at least their policies would be considered left of liberal (borderline socialistic) by any objective standards in the US. Take tax regimes, take property rights, take state involvement in the economy, or in health care, or in retirement plan (Sarkozy is spending a good chunk of his time discussing retirement plans with unions of specific state owned companies right now, where some of those unions are communist - how is that?). Calling Merkel or Sarkozy conservative is similar to calling Mrs. Clinton a communist… sounds fun but meaningless.

Altogether, you should stop looking at world politics through the prism of local American politics… that would definitely foster your understanding.

In my judgment you are a bigot, a Jew hater, a fierce anti-semite. To suggest Israel would nuke Germany or other countries is preposterous and needs no more discussion. As to the Talmud, yes, there are some terrible things in there, however, I as a Jew totally repudiate them and I think the majority of Jews, including reform, conservative and even some of the more modern orthodox repudiate any form of racist statements in the Talmud. And by the way, there are also some very sublime statements in the Talmud you might wish to focus on. For instance, Rebbe Akiva in the Ethics of the Fathers says, “Beloved is man for he was created in the image of God.” Notice he says man, all mankind, not just Jews.

And it is also funny how you focus on the Talmud but make no mention of the Quran. Where is your condemnation of Muslims for not speaking out against the vile, racist, sexist, and homophobic passages of the Quran? Where in the Talmud does it say to go an cut peoples body parts off for stealing? Well, it says such things in the Quran but you let the Muslims off the hook while you focus on your hatred of Jews.