<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robert Stinnett</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  7 Jul 2008 03:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chad Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-79580</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-79580</guid>
		<description>Richard J. Maybury's book World War II offers a lot of information about the "surprise" attack on Pearl Harbor, and the myth that Germany would have "taken over the world" if the USA had not entered the war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard J. Maybury&#8217;s book World War II offers a lot of information about the &#8220;surprise&#8221; attack on Pearl Harbor, and the myth that Germany would have &#8220;taken over the world&#8221; if the USA had not entered the war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Block</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-78332</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-78332</guid>
		<description>There are many annoying aspects about this era and the Japanese attacks on Dec. 7, 1941. I thing I found annoying when visiting England was hearing many people there throwing it up in the faces of all Americans "You only joined in the war because of the attack on Pearl Harbor." Actually, it was impossible to stay out of intervening considering the activities of Churchill and FDR to get the U.S. involved. Churchill could not keep this quiet because after they got the U.S. into the war he boasted of his efforts. Actually, I often wonder why Japan never attacked a year earlier when you consider the insulting notes and demands Washington was sending Tokyo. FDR's successful tactics were so successful that they have been duplicated several times since to get us into the Vietnam War and into both wars against Iraq. Remembering that FDR was confronted with a congress and public 80% against intervening in the European War. But if a leader is determined to wage war nothing will stop them be it our Constitution, congress or public opinion. Hollywood played large pro-war role in 1940 and that should not forgotten. Steve, USN, WW2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many annoying aspects about this era and the Japanese attacks on Dec. 7, 1941. I thing I found annoying when visiting England was hearing many people there throwing it up in the faces of all Americans &#8220;You only joined in the war because of the attack on Pearl Harbor.&#8221; Actually, it was impossible to stay out of intervening considering the activities of Churchill and FDR to get the U.S. involved. Churchill could not keep this quiet because after they got the U.S. into the war he boasted of his efforts. Actually, I often wonder why Japan never attacked a year earlier when you consider the insulting notes and demands Washington was sending Tokyo. FDR&#8217;s successful tactics were so successful that they have been duplicated several times since to get us into the Vietnam War and into both wars against Iraq. Remembering that FDR was confronted with a congress and public 80% against intervening in the European War. But if a leader is determined to wage war nothing will stop them be it our Constitution, congress or public opinion. Hollywood played large pro-war role in 1940 and that should not forgotten. Steve, USN, WW2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-77785</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 07:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-77785</guid>
		<description>It's an unusual pleasure to read exchanges continuing so long while sustaining civility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an unusual pleasure to read exchanges continuing so long while sustaining civility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peace</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-77367</link>
		<dc:creator>peace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-77367</guid>
		<description>That is quite a cogent quote, whoever said it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is quite a cogent quote, whoever said it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price: The Despised Redneck of Barstow</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-75654</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price: The Despised Redneck of Barstow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-75654</guid>
		<description>...Al...Dude...No offense, in fact I think your objectivity is as salient as it is direct. Nonetheless: In a Political context? You're throwing up way too much flak, way too soon. You don't wanna shoot your barrel smooth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Al&#8230;Dude&#8230;No offense, in fact I think your objectivity is as salient as it is direct. Nonetheless: In a Political context? You&#8217;re throwing up way too much flak, way too soon. You don&#8217;t wanna shoot your barrel smooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mace Price: The Despised Redneck of Barstow</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-75626</link>
		<dc:creator>Mace Price: The Despised Redneck of Barstow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-75626</guid>
		<description>...In regard to The Treachery of The Roosevelt Administration's allowing the attack on Pearl Harbor. I believe it was Winston Churchill who once remarked that: "On occasion a man will happen to stumble across the truth. He then picks himself up, brushes it from his clothes...and continues walking." Truer words were never spoken. Thus if Mr. Stinnett's work is a revolation for some. They may care to add the late John Toland's 1982 treatise on the events leading to, and the execution of the Japanese attack. Toland's comprehensive effort is accurately titled: "Infamy"...and trust me, it was Infamy indeed...Example? Navy crewman trapped aboard the capsized USS Oklahoma, were said to have been heard pounding on the ship's bulkheads and compartments below, until Xmas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;In regard to The Treachery of The Roosevelt Administration&#8217;s allowing the attack on Pearl Harbor. I believe it was Winston Churchill who once remarked that: &#8220;On occasion a man will happen to stumble across the truth. He then picks himself up, brushes it from his clothes&#8230;and continues walking.&#8221; Truer words were never spoken. Thus if Mr. Stinnett&#8217;s work is a revolation for some. They may care to add the late John Toland&#8217;s 1982 treatise on the events leading to, and the execution of the Japanese attack. Toland&#8217;s comprehensive effort is accurately titled: &#8220;Infamy&#8221;&#8230;and trust me, it was Infamy indeed&#8230;Example? Navy crewman trapped aboard the capsized USS Oklahoma, were said to have been heard pounding on the ship&#8217;s bulkheads and compartments below, until Xmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al gomas</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-75611</link>
		<dc:creator>al gomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-75611</guid>
		<description>OK, it would appear factual that the US slaughtered its own troops in order to bring the public on board for WWII.  In short PH was an inside job.  The why of this treasonous plot was not addressed in depth in this interview.
 
When the PNAC stated a "new Pearl Harbor" would be necessary, this is exactly what they meant.  A false flag operation intended to stampede the public into accepting the unacceptable. 
 
A Corporate conspiracy to overthrow our Constitution to enable economic rape and pillage, free from the constraints of law.  They were abetted by a loose coalition of criminal elements in states such as
Pakistan,Israel,Britain,Italy, Spain,Saudi Arabia,Turkey,the Gulf States,Australia,Canada and non state players like drug traffickers and gun runners.  

Mostly, i see Israeli Zionists as the prime mover in this conspiracy.  They have infiltrated our government and media at the highest levels and are so powerful that no congressperson will cross them.  
One of the most interesting is Dov Zakheim, a dual citizen who controlled the Pentagon budget from which 3 Trillion dollars went missing.  His other job was on the board of a company (SPC International) that made remote control technology for aircraft.  Just one of the hundreds of little coincidences that make a logical person ask, WTF.

"In the document called "Rebuilding America's Defenses" published by The American Enterprise's "Project for a New American Century", SPC International executive, Dov Zakheim, called for a 'Pearl Harbor' type of incident being necessary to foster the frame of mind needed for the American public to support a war in the Middle East that would politically and culturally reshape the region. A respected and established voice in the intelligence community, his views were eagerly accepted, and Dov went from his position at Systems Planning Corporation to become the Comptroller of the Pentagon in May 2001. Tridata, a subsidiary of Systems Planning Corporation, was in charge of the investigation after the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 1993."

 Scott Horton thinks problems like these with the official 911 story are unimportant.  Conspiracy kooks cherry pick these loose ends just like neo-cons do when furthering their agenda.  He apparently believes our government would never do such a horrible thing to its own citizens.  To ask questions about 911 is to display ones laughable ignorance, in fact in Scott's mind only an idiot would entertain such delusions.

In light of this interview, do you still feel that way, Scott?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, it would appear factual that the US slaughtered its own troops in order to bring the public on board for WWII.  In short PH was an inside job.  The why of this treasonous plot was not addressed in depth in this interview.</p>
<p>When the PNAC stated a &#8220;new Pearl Harbor&#8221; would be necessary, this is exactly what they meant.  A false flag operation intended to stampede the public into accepting the unacceptable. </p>
<p>A Corporate conspiracy to overthrow our Constitution to enable economic rape and pillage, free from the constraints of law.  They were abetted by a loose coalition of criminal elements in states such as<br />
Pakistan,Israel,Britain,Italy, Spain,Saudi Arabia,Turkey,the Gulf States,Australia,Canada and non state players like drug traffickers and gun runners.  </p>
<p>Mostly, i see Israeli Zionists as the prime mover in this conspiracy.  They have infiltrated our government and media at the highest levels and are so powerful that no congressperson will cross them.<br />
One of the most interesting is Dov Zakheim, a dual citizen who controlled the Pentagon budget from which 3 Trillion dollars went missing.  His other job was on the board of a company (SPC International) that made remote control technology for aircraft.  Just one of the hundreds of little coincidences that make a logical person ask, WTF.</p>
<p>&#8220;In the document called &#8220;Rebuilding America&#8217;s Defenses&#8221; published by The American Enterprise&#8217;s &#8220;Project for a New American Century&#8221;, SPC International executive, Dov Zakheim, called for a &#8216;Pearl Harbor&#8217; type of incident being necessary to foster the frame of mind needed for the American public to support a war in the Middle East that would politically and culturally reshape the region. A respected and established voice in the intelligence community, his views were eagerly accepted, and Dov went from his position at Systems Planning Corporation to become the Comptroller of the Pentagon in May 2001. Tridata, a subsidiary of Systems Planning Corporation, was in charge of the investigation after the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 1993.&#8221;</p>
<p> Scott Horton thinks problems like these with the official 911 story are unimportant.  Conspiracy kooks cherry pick these loose ends just like neo-cons do when furthering their agenda.  He apparently believes our government would never do such a horrible thing to its own citizens.  To ask questions about 911 is to display ones laughable ignorance, in fact in Scott&#8217;s mind only an idiot would entertain such delusions.</p>
<p>In light of this interview, do you still feel that way, Scott?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-75337</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-75337</guid>
		<description>One can only wonder..what other dirty lies are still buried in amerikas so called glorious short history...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One can only wonder..what other dirty lies are still buried in amerikas so called glorious short history&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamDi</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-74950</link>
		<dc:creator>SamDi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-74950</guid>
		<description>Your comments are most interesting.  Can you please refer me to any books or history references making such comments.  I have read many books on Eisenhower and have not come across such comments.

Thank you.  My email is pep303@bellsouth.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comments are most interesting.  Can you please refer me to any books or history references making such comments.  I have read many books on Eisenhower and have not come across such comments.</p>
<p>Thank you.  My email is <a href="mailto:pep303@bellsouth.net">pep303@bellsouth.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zhu Bajie</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-74251</link>
		<dc:creator>Zhu Bajie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-74251</guid>
		<description>Don't assume that, eg, Samuel Eliot Morison was dishonest, merely because he disbelieved "it was Roosevelt's fault" conspiracy theories.

After all, there are probably some people out there who still blame Roosevelt every time a fox gets into their hen house.

Zhu Bajie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t assume that, eg, Samuel Eliot Morison was dishonest, merely because he disbelieved &#8220;it was Roosevelt&#8217;s fault&#8221; conspiracy theories.</p>
<p>After all, there are probably some people out there who still blame Roosevelt every time a fox gets into their hen house.</p>
<p>Zhu Bajie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peace</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-74179</link>
		<dc:creator>peace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-74179</guid>
		<description>And the six months since you wrote this concise article give even more credence to your fears about the directions in which the US is heading, Mr. Horton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the six months since you wrote this concise article give even more credence to your fears about the directions in which the US is heading, Mr. Horton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zhu Bajie</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-73997</link>
		<dc:creator>Zhu Bajie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/12/07/robert-stinnett/#comment-73997</guid>
		<description>What I've learned from many years studying history is that Giant Cock-ups are far more common than Giant Conspiracies.  

As for Japan, they lusted for the resources of Indo-China, Indonesia, etc., on their own.

Zhu Bajie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;ve learned from many years studying history is that Giant Cock-ups are far more common than Giant Conspiracies.  </p>
<p>As for Japan, they lusted for the resources of Indo-China, Indonesia, etc., on their own.</p>
<p>Zhu Bajie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
