Our shop supply sac longchamp, you can pay a cheap price for nice longchamp sac, also you can find it would be preferential treatment for you to get sacs longchamp from us. ?Come to our website. You can find it would be preferential treatment for you to get sacs longchamp pas cher from us.

Any of the peace candidates mentioned — Paul, Kucinich, Gravel, Nader or McKinney — would support the above 5 policies, which are precisely the policies required to save the nation and the Constitution. None of them can possibly succeed without support from BOTH “left” and “right”. Calling one or another a Socialist, Nazi, racist or slug divides the peace movement and serves nobody but the War Party Republocrats.

Besides, why do you try so hard to obfuscate your own argument with such bile? Are you afraid to stand up explicitly and make your case? On re-reading your post, it seems your real objection is abortion. Well, here’s a news flash, John: War is not pro-life. We kill a hell of a lot more Iraqis, not to mention Afghans, Serbs and Somalis, than we do fetuses. For that matter, we kill a lot of people every year by denying them health care. A lady died of neglect in an LA emergency room just a few months ago. I have no problem with someone preferring a pro-life peace candidate, but the death and destruction rained down by our bombs should long since have eliminated abortion as a litmus test on either side of that issue, just as single-payer healthcare should not be a litmus test.

I’ll not call Ron Paul a slug because he opposes reform of our health care system (thus causing the early deaths of many already born human beings), nor call him a racist because he received a donation from one or failed to read an article published under his by-line. I’ll vote for him if he’s on the ballot and appears to be the most viable of peace candidates. To do otherwise is to give the War Party the wedges they need to divide and rule.

Little Green Footballs, the hawkish and rigidly empiricist blog that first furnished evidence of memo-forging in the Rathergate case, has started due diligence…

Anyone who can describe LGF as “rigidly empiricist” does not deserve the dignity of Justin’s insult: “airhead.” She is far more lightweight than that. Try “helium head.” Calling LGF “rigidly empiricist” is like calling Jeffrey Dahmer a “strict vegetarian.” I hope her editor chewed her dumb ass out for relying on – and PRAISING – such a source as LGF. She should be dispatched to do stories more within her talents – like feature stories on hair salons for dogs.

Given such ties, any claims need to be examined; Ron Paul himself has given their credibility a foothold.