<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain Means War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:24:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymousource</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/comment-page-1/#comment-153858</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymousource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 08:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/#comment-153858</guid>
		<description>Steve....that is exactly right on target. McCain is a very stupid, sluggish slow-talking slow-thinking fellow who is mentally and/or intellectually incompetent. It doesn&#039;t much matter if it&#039;s a result of Vietnam/POW, genetics or the oncoming of Alzeimer&#039;s.
Having a mumbling idiot for President is dangerous, just look at Junior Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve&#8230;.that is exactly right on target. McCain is a very stupid, sluggish slow-talking slow-thinking fellow who is mentally and/or intellectually incompetent. It doesn&#8217;t much matter if it&#8217;s a result of Vietnam/POW, genetics or the oncoming of Alzeimer&#8217;s.<br />
Having a mumbling idiot for President is dangerous, just look at Junior Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/comment-page-1/#comment-105572</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/#comment-105572</guid>
		<description>&quot;One of the biggest threats to US security may now come from within Europe, US Homeland Security head Michael Chertoff has told the BBC....&quot; {BBC January 15, 2008]

Yep, a strong and stable Euro, displacing the U.S. dollar as the alternate currency for oil revenues is quite a threat indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One of the biggest threats to US security may now come from within Europe, US Homeland Security head Michael Chertoff has told the BBC&#8230;.&#8221; {BBC January 15, 2008]</p>
<p>Yep, a strong and stable Euro, displacing the U.S. dollar as the alternate currency for oil revenues is quite a threat indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/comment-page-1/#comment-102565</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/#comment-102565</guid>
		<description>In regard to Europe and the Euro, an intriguing train of events over the last three days:

(1) J.P. Morgan announced that it had hired Tony Blair part time in some vague capacity, similar to Major&#039;s at Carlyle, and at a huge annual salary.

(2) Blair today fueled rumors that he might run for President of the EU.

(3) Sarkozy at one point suggested Blair was one of two prominent candidates.

Were one German or Italian one might be a bit anxious to lock up the silverware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regard to Europe and the Euro, an intriguing train of events over the last three days:</p>
<p>(1) J.P. Morgan announced that it had hired Tony Blair part time in some vague capacity, similar to Major&#8217;s at Carlyle, and at a huge annual salary.</p>
<p>(2) Blair today fueled rumors that he might run for President of the EU.</p>
<p>(3) Sarkozy at one point suggested Blair was one of two prominent candidates.</p>
<p>Were one German or Italian one might be a bit anxious to lock up the silverware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/comment-page-1/#comment-99325</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/#comment-99325</guid>
		<description>There is a common sense to &quot;Machiavellian&quot; in English reaching back to the Elizabethan stage.

It has little or nothing to do with Machiavelli himself, or his political analysis and theories, but everything to do with the way &quot;The Prince&quot; was understood.

Using that sense, how Machiavellian are the various factions behind the Bush administration?

If, as I suspect, thoroughly so, someone or several are already desperately considering ways the US might destabilize the Euro.

To do so, on the other hand, would also be cutting their own throat.

The &quot;asymmetry&quot; the Russian Defense Minister recently threatened in response to the Bush administration&#039;s provocations against the Russian Federation no doubt includes both oil and the dollar.

About the only people still in the dark are Americans, including the Corporatists and Neo-Cons, who think they control policy in both the US and over the world.

Whether they do or not, they no longer control the value of the dollar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a common sense to &#8220;Machiavellian&#8221; in English reaching back to the Elizabethan stage.</p>
<p>It has little or nothing to do with Machiavelli himself, or his political analysis and theories, but everything to do with the way &#8220;The Prince&#8221; was understood.</p>
<p>Using that sense, how Machiavellian are the various factions behind the Bush administration?</p>
<p>If, as I suspect, thoroughly so, someone or several are already desperately considering ways the US might destabilize the Euro.</p>
<p>To do so, on the other hand, would also be cutting their own throat.</p>
<p>The &#8220;asymmetry&#8221; the Russian Defense Minister recently threatened in response to the Bush administration&#8217;s provocations against the Russian Federation no doubt includes both oil and the dollar.</p>
<p>About the only people still in the dark are Americans, including the Corporatists and Neo-Cons, who think they control policy in both the US and over the world.</p>
<p>Whether they do or not, they no longer control the value of the dollar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/comment-page-1/#comment-99314</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/#comment-99314</guid>
		<description>There is something new and revolutionary on the scene--a strong and stable Euro.

When there is a choice between putatively stable currencies, no one currency dominates as the &quot;petrodollar&quot;.

Which means, completely independently of what any American Corporatist or Federal official might want or like or need or may do, every time oil goes up, the dollar is devalued in terms of the Euro and a barrel of oil.

Meanwhile, under a different set of compulsions, Bernanke lowers interest rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something new and revolutionary on the scene&#8211;a strong and stable Euro.</p>
<p>When there is a choice between putatively stable currencies, no one currency dominates as the &#8220;petrodollar&#8221;.</p>
<p>Which means, completely independently of what any American Corporatist or Federal official might want or like or need or may do, every time oil goes up, the dollar is devalued in terms of the Euro and a barrel of oil.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, under a different set of compulsions, Bernanke lowers interest rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe B</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/comment-page-1/#comment-99210</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/#comment-99210</guid>
		<description>The real reason these nutcases &quot;love&quot; war is because their ideals have been hijacked by the right-wing and the profiteering bankers.

In the past 100 or so years, wars have been started and continued because of their profitability.  The minders for McCain (should he be chosen as president) will keep whispering into his ear that the war &#039;needs to keep going&#039;.  There are massive industries depending on its continuance.  Perpetual wars for perpetual peace for perpetual profits.  That&#039;s what its all about.

Since the government is owned by heavy hitter corporations that are neck deep in war money, they will pull all the strings necessary to keep the likes of McCain (and others like him) on the warpath.  All the other candidates (save for Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich) are mentally weak and will give in to their influences.

That is the sad state of affairs we live in today.  That is the sad state of affairs we&#039;ve had to live in for the past 100 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real reason these nutcases &#8220;love&#8221; war is because their ideals have been hijacked by the right-wing and the profiteering bankers.</p>
<p>In the past 100 or so years, wars have been started and continued because of their profitability.  The minders for McCain (should he be chosen as president) will keep whispering into his ear that the war &#8216;needs to keep going&#8217;.  There are massive industries depending on its continuance.  Perpetual wars for perpetual peace for perpetual profits.  That&#8217;s what its all about.</p>
<p>Since the government is owned by heavy hitter corporations that are neck deep in war money, they will pull all the strings necessary to keep the likes of McCain (and others like him) on the warpath.  All the other candidates (save for Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich) are mentally weak and will give in to their influences.</p>
<p>That is the sad state of affairs we live in today.  That is the sad state of affairs we&#8217;ve had to live in for the past 100 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/comment-page-1/#comment-99200</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/#comment-99200</guid>
		<description>Write it all off.

Structurally, if there is no impeachment, it really does not matter much which of the Corporate candidates, left or right, wins the presidential election.

Start working toward what comes after the fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Write it all off.</p>
<p>Structurally, if there is no impeachment, it really does not matter much which of the Corporate candidates, left or right, wins the presidential election.</p>
<p>Start working toward what comes after the fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe C</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/comment-page-1/#comment-99171</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/#comment-99171</guid>
		<description>I am so not worried about McCain. I don&#039;t care if he is a nutcase, he cannot win. Not against Clinton, not against Obama. 

Actually I&#039;m not that worried about any of the so-called republicans making it (as opposed to Paul, actual republican...but I don&#039;t think he&#039;ll make it either), you will not see a President Huckabee, Romney, McCain, or Giuliani. They were already screwed this cycle, and those are not choices that would throw any balances off. I want Huckabee to win the nomination, I just think it would be funny and since the process is already hopeless we ight as well have a few yucks along the way. Same with Giuliani...a republican candidate in a dress, you couldn&#039;t make this stuff up. 

Save all your fear for Hillary...although you have to admit, and it pains me to say this, she&#039;s a better choice than any Huckabee, Romney, McCain, or Giuliani. She may be part of The Machine, but at least she and her husband know how to work the damned thing. 

McCain in dress whites instead of a bamboo cage? You know he does bring it up on the campaign trail...and it&#039;s not like G Bush would have missed a chance to bring that up along with the make-believe black baby. And there would have to be some plausible reason why he would be the first POW I ever heard of to be treated in that way. 

I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s impossible, I believe a lot of crazy stuff, but this one fails any common-sense test. Are you suggesting that McCain is VietCong sleeper agent posing as a right-wing militarist? That might explain why he&#039;s always showing up on the Daily Show...appealing to both sides, those crafty little MoFos!! 

I did a google search and while yeah there might be some circumstantial evidence the veracity I have no way of knowing...I had forgotten that he was one of the Keating 5!!!!!! How can taking bribes in return for legislative favors not prevent you from being president? Yeah I know the Clintons are just as dirty but the taxpayers never had to bail them out with millions of dollars, instead we got a $6 trillion surplus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so not worried about McCain. I don&#8217;t care if he is a nutcase, he cannot win. Not against Clinton, not against Obama. </p>
<p>Actually I&#8217;m not that worried about any of the so-called republicans making it (as opposed to Paul, actual republican&#8230;but I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll make it either), you will not see a President Huckabee, Romney, McCain, or Giuliani. They were already screwed this cycle, and those are not choices that would throw any balances off. I want Huckabee to win the nomination, I just think it would be funny and since the process is already hopeless we ight as well have a few yucks along the way. Same with Giuliani&#8230;a republican candidate in a dress, you couldn&#8217;t make this stuff up. </p>
<p>Save all your fear for Hillary&#8230;although you have to admit, and it pains me to say this, she&#8217;s a better choice than any Huckabee, Romney, McCain, or Giuliani. She may be part of The Machine, but at least she and her husband know how to work the damned thing. </p>
<p>McCain in dress whites instead of a bamboo cage? You know he does bring it up on the campaign trail&#8230;and it&#8217;s not like G Bush would have missed a chance to bring that up along with the make-believe black baby. And there would have to be some plausible reason why he would be the first POW I ever heard of to be treated in that way. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s impossible, I believe a lot of crazy stuff, but this one fails any common-sense test. Are you suggesting that McCain is VietCong sleeper agent posing as a right-wing militarist? That might explain why he&#8217;s always showing up on the Daily Show&#8230;appealing to both sides, those crafty little MoFos!! </p>
<p>I did a google search and while yeah there might be some circumstantial evidence the veracity I have no way of knowing&#8230;I had forgotten that he was one of the Keating 5!!!!!! How can taking bribes in return for legislative favors not prevent you from being president? Yeah I know the Clintons are just as dirty but the taxpayers never had to bail them out with millions of dollars, instead we got a $6 trillion surplus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.Kurtz</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/comment-page-1/#comment-99170</link>
		<dc:creator>G.Kurtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/#comment-99170</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s depressing to see the trash that&#039;s lining up to be the next president of our country. Collectively, they comprise traitors, criminals and pathological liers. Only Dr. Paul represents anything remotely honest. I fear for our country&#039;s future if any of the other idiots get elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s depressing to see the trash that&#8217;s lining up to be the next president of our country. Collectively, they comprise traitors, criminals and pathological liers. Only Dr. Paul represents anything remotely honest. I fear for our country&#8217;s future if any of the other idiots get elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/comment-page-1/#comment-99349</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/05/mccain-means-war/#comment-99349</guid>
		<description>corr: &quot;little to do with Macchiavelli&quot;. &quot;Machiavel&quot; is the English form. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>corr: &quot;little to do with Macchiavelli&quot;. &quot;Machiavel&quot; is the English form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

