<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NH Voters Thought McCain Opposed the Iraq War?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:05:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SOG knives</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/comment-page-2/#comment-157445</link>
		<dc:creator>SOG knives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/#comment-157445</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SOG knives...&lt;/strong&gt;

Interesting ideas... I wonder how the Hollywood media would portray this?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SOG knives&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Interesting ideas&#8230; I wonder how the Hollywood media would portray this?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: american consumer opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/comment-page-2/#comment-153918</link>
		<dc:creator>american consumer opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/#comment-153918</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;american consumer opinion...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thanks for creating this blog. I thought it was a very interesting read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>american consumer opinion&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thanks for creating this blog. I thought it was a very interesting read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: be712cbe594c</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/comment-page-2/#comment-152810</link>
		<dc:creator>be712cbe594c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 17:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/#comment-152810</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;be712cbe594c...&lt;/strong&gt;

be712cbe594c703ee709...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>be712cbe594c&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>be712cbe594c703ee709&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/comment-page-2/#comment-109100</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/#comment-109100</guid>
		<description>It seems Tim R. has seen his narrow repertoire of arguments shot down one by one and is thus reduced to reciting permutations of the &quot;anti-American&quot; insult.  Perhaps he should leave this site and read up on the history of American foreign policy to avoid further ignominy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems Tim R. has seen his narrow repertoire of arguments shot down one by one and is thus reduced to reciting permutations of the &#8220;anti-American&#8221; insult.  Perhaps he should leave this site and read up on the history of American foreign policy to avoid further ignominy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NinaBr</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/comment-page-2/#comment-108746</link>
		<dc:creator>NinaBr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/#comment-108746</guid>
		<description>McCain Anti-War??? Last time I read, McCain was expressing his support of turning Iraq into another &quot;100 Years War&quot; if necessary...  
But what if he does win the election? Would Americans opt to move to Canada in order to avoid this potential &quot;100 Years&#039; War?&quot; I heard Canada was ramping up its immigration centers in expectation of another wave of &quot;Blue Staters&quot; in the event of a Republican victory: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/index.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/index.asp&lt;/a&gt; 
In the independent film &quot;Blue State,&quot; the protagonist does exactly that. He decides to flee the United States after another republican victory in 2004, due to strong liberal ideals: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluestate.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.bluestate.com &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain Anti-War??? Last time I read, McCain was expressing his support of turning Iraq into another &quot;100 Years War&quot; if necessary&#8230; </p>
<p>But what if he does win the election? Would Americans opt to move to Canada in order to avoid this potential &quot;100 Years&#039; War?&quot; I heard Canada was ramping up its immigration centers in expectation of another wave of &quot;Blue Staters&quot; in the event of a Republican victory: <a href="http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/index.asp" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/index.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/index.asp</a></p>
<p>In the independent film &quot;Blue State,&quot; the protagonist does exactly that. He decides to flee the United States after another republican victory in 2004, due to strong liberal ideals: <a href="http://www.bluestate.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.bluestate.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bluestate.com</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley Laham</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/comment-page-2/#comment-107630</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley Laham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/#comment-107630</guid>
		<description>Tim,

What you are attempting to do here with your circular argument is what is known in mathematics as proof by reductio ad absurdum. You start with a premise that denies a hypothesis and show that it inevitably leads to a contradiction. Therefore the premise must be false and the hypothesis true. And by doing this you have proved yourself absurd. Let me demonstrate:

I assert that the US is guilty of expansionism and imperialism therefore you hypothesize that it means that I donâ€™t believe the US should exist. Since this leads to an absurdity(a world without the US), your hypothesis must be wrong. So you see Tim, it is not my assertion that is wrong but your extrapolation of it that leads to an absurdity and is therefore anathema. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>What you are attempting to do here with your circular argument is what is known in mathematics as proof by reductio ad absurdum. You start with a premise that denies a hypothesis and show that it inevitably leads to a contradiction. Therefore the premise must be false and the hypothesis true. And by doing this you have proved yourself absurd. Let me demonstrate:</p>
<p>I assert that the US is guilty of expansionism and imperialism therefore you hypothesize that it means that I donâ€™t believe the US should exist. Since this leads to an absurdity(a world without the US), your hypothesis must be wrong. So you see Tim, it is not my assertion that is wrong but your extrapolation of it that leads to an absurdity and is therefore anathema. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim R.</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/comment-page-2/#comment-107612</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/#comment-107612</guid>
		<description>Stanley Laham writes:
&quot;The Alamo, the Lucitania, the Maine, Pearl Harbour and the Gulf of Tonkin were as convenient as 9/11 for the causes of expansionism or imperialism.&quot;

Yes, you are right. Our whole country was built on lies and has only been a force for evil in the world. We never did anything good whatsoever. We should just call it quits as a nation and the world would be better off. In fact, since most of western civilization was &quot;expansionist&quot; and &quot;imperialist&quot; at some point, they should call it quits too. 

Just think about it: A world without western nations and their imperialism! A world where there is no United States of America, no Canada, no France, no Britain, no Australia. Heck, what a great world we would have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stanley Laham writes:<br />
&#8220;The Alamo, the Lucitania, the Maine, Pearl Harbour and the Gulf of Tonkin were as convenient as 9/11 for the causes of expansionism or imperialism.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, you are right. Our whole country was built on lies and has only been a force for evil in the world. We never did anything good whatsoever. We should just call it quits as a nation and the world would be better off. In fact, since most of western civilization was &#8220;expansionist&#8221; and &#8220;imperialist&#8221; at some point, they should call it quits too. </p>
<p>Just think about it: A world without western nations and their imperialism! A world where there is no United States of America, no Canada, no France, no Britain, no Australia. Heck, what a great world we would have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/comment-page-1/#comment-107542</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/#comment-107542</guid>
		<description>Only 2 million watch Faux, that&#039;s a tiny fraction of the middle class</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 2 million watch Faux, that&#8217;s a tiny fraction of the middle class</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: formerbeltwaywonk</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/comment-page-2/#comment-104812</link>
		<dc:creator>formerbeltwaywonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/#comment-104812</guid>
		<description>An analysis of the anti-Paul smear campaign on the day of the New Hampshire primary, including its odd association with a Washington, DC subway line:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://formerbeltwaywonk.wordpress.com/2008/01/15/the-orange-line-anatomy-of-a-smear-campaign/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Orange Line: anatomy of a smear campaign&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An analysis of the anti-Paul smear campaign on the day of the New Hampshire primary, including its odd association with a Washington, DC subway line:</p>
<p><a href="http://formerbeltwaywonk.wordpress.com/2008/01/15/the-orange-line-anatomy-of-a-smear-campaign/" rel="nofollow">The Orange Line: anatomy of a smear campaign</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill K.</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/comment-page-2/#comment-104175</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/01/09/nh-voters-thought-mccain-opposed-the-iraq-war/#comment-104175</guid>
		<description>Correction. &quot;Does he want to implement&quot;

I am actually against illegal immigration. But I am for preventing the conditions that are the causes of illegal immigration. I am against the unequal distribution of wealth in Central and South America. I am against the Crime lords and Elite families who gain huge fortunes in those countries. US Corporations make the situation worse by cooperating with these elements and many times subverting change in a positive direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction. &#8220;Does he want to implement&#8221;</p>
<p>I am actually against illegal immigration. But I am for preventing the conditions that are the causes of illegal immigration. I am against the unequal distribution of wealth in Central and South America. I am against the Crime lords and Elite families who gain huge fortunes in those countries. US Corporations make the situation worse by cooperating with these elements and many times subverting change in a positive direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

