<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Neocons: An Illustrated Progression</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:12:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FirstCasualty</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/comment-page-1/#comment-119170</link>
		<dc:creator>FirstCasualty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 05:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/#comment-119170</guid>
		<description>Why would it raise that question at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would it raise that question at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/comment-page-1/#comment-118785</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/#comment-118785</guid>
		<description>Whatever you say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley Laham</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/comment-page-1/#comment-118620</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley Laham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/#comment-118620</guid>
		<description>So unacquainted with history??
Pretended moral outrage?? 

Such totally baseless pontificating and lashing out are the symptoms of the failed &quot;prima dona&quot; syndrom. Go have a session with your analyst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So unacquainted with history??<br />
Pretended moral outrage?? </p>
<p>Such totally baseless pontificating and lashing out are the symptoms of the failed &#8220;prima dona&#8221; syndrom. Go have a session with your analyst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley Laham</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/comment-page-1/#comment-118616</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley Laham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/#comment-118616</guid>
		<description>Cfountain72
I am really not trying to present a case for communism. Just emphasizing its acute differences with capitalism and their motives.

The Philippines chain was essential in controlling the sea lanes for vital commerce. It was an essential as a base in the Pacific. That of course is why the Japanese empire zeroed in on its conquest and later its defense at all cost. They never bothered to invade Hawaii that laid beyond the operational radius of the time with the weapons of war available at the time. 

The Philippines were also an agricultural paradise that Americans quickly took over from the former Spanish masters. Enormous wealth was derived from these plantations. As Fidel Castro aptly pointed out: â€œCuba and the Philippines were ripe fruits ready to fall off Spainâ€™s colonial tree into the mouth of the Yankees.â€

Do a little reseach into the insurgency that followed the US&#039;s &quot;liberation&quot; of the Philippines.

Peace and health be with you too brother/sister.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cfountain72<br />
I am really not trying to present a case for communism. Just emphasizing its acute differences with capitalism and their motives.</p>
<p>The Philippines chain was essential in controlling the sea lanes for vital commerce. It was an essential as a base in the Pacific. That of course is why the Japanese empire zeroed in on its conquest and later its defense at all cost. They never bothered to invade Hawaii that laid beyond the operational radius of the time with the weapons of war available at the time. </p>
<p>The Philippines were also an agricultural paradise that Americans quickly took over from the former Spanish masters. Enormous wealth was derived from these plantations. As Fidel Castro aptly pointed out: â€œCuba and the Philippines were ripe fruits ready to fall off Spainâ€™s colonial tree into the mouth of the Yankees.â€</p>
<p>Do a little reseach into the insurgency that followed the US&#8217;s &#8220;liberation&#8221; of the Philippines.</p>
<p>Peace and health be with you too brother/sister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dani.a</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/comment-page-1/#comment-118179</link>
		<dc:creator>dani.a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/#comment-118179</guid>
		<description>kristol is so stupid and so false.when a state invests in army is said always that it does it to improve its defensive capacity.such ,improving all the time is defensive capacity the state should become,according with kristol,imperialistic.therefore the nature of a state is defensive-imperialist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kristol is so stupid and so false.when a state invests in army is said always that it does it to improve its defensive capacity.such ,improving all the time is defensive capacity the state should become,according with kristol,imperialistic.therefore the nature of a state is defensive-imperialist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/comment-page-1/#comment-118089</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/#comment-118089</guid>
		<description>You have it backwards, and I know my Herods.

It is quite easy to explain it all to a civilized nation, secular and urbane, literally decimated by the United States.

The Americans are barbarians, like the Mongols, and will soon pass.

Besides destruction what do they have to offer except force and death, and killing civilians, even women and children at a distance, because they are so few in number, and so fearful of death, that they cannot afford killed in action and casualties.

Or are you so unacquainted with history not to realize that much technology, even as with the Mongols, is often invented or mastered in new ways by barbarians.

Unlike the Mongols, however, the American troops, in the way they fight, have also proved themselves cowards.

And what imperium do you know that is run by cowards, except over other cowards?

That explanation, which is partial, will have to do for the nonce.

Go back to your misreading, your pretended moral outrage, and your jumping to easy ideological conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have it backwards, and I know my Herods.</p>
<p>It is quite easy to explain it all to a civilized nation, secular and urbane, literally decimated by the United States.</p>
<p>The Americans are barbarians, like the Mongols, and will soon pass.</p>
<p>Besides destruction what do they have to offer except force and death, and killing civilians, even women and children at a distance, because they are so few in number, and so fearful of death, that they cannot afford killed in action and casualties.</p>
<p>Or are you so unacquainted with history not to realize that much technology, even as with the Mongols, is often invented or mastered in new ways by barbarians.</p>
<p>Unlike the Mongols, however, the American troops, in the way they fight, have also proved themselves cowards.</p>
<p>And what imperium do you know that is run by cowards, except over other cowards?</p>
<p>That explanation, which is partial, will have to do for the nonce.</p>
<p>Go back to your misreading, your pretended moral outrage, and your jumping to easy ideological conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley Laham</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/comment-page-1/#comment-118027</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley Laham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 05:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/#comment-118027</guid>
		<description>I would like you to explain to those Iraqis grieving for over a million of their kins blown to bits, buried alive, incinerated with napalm, poisoned with depleted uranium, starved to death or gunned down at intersections routinely, while the so-called civilized world participated or complicitly turned the other way, that there is no such thing as the American empire. 

Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are occupied territories. Their monarchies were created as mere facades for western oil companies. They are the Herods of the Roman empire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like you to explain to those Iraqis grieving for over a million of their kins blown to bits, buried alive, incinerated with napalm, poisoned with depleted uranium, starved to death or gunned down at intersections routinely, while the so-called civilized world participated or complicitly turned the other way, that there is no such thing as the American empire. </p>
<p>Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are occupied territories. Their monarchies were created as mere facades for western oil companies. They are the Herods of the Roman empire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/comment-page-1/#comment-117880</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/#comment-117880</guid>
		<description>Indeed--the Lieberman of the Gore and Lieberman ticket, is it not?

It may or may not ever dawn on Gore to thank his lucky stars that he was not elected president.

After all, not only has he got a Nobel Prize, but he was not assassinated in office.

Imagine the war in the Near East that would have ensued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed&#8211;the Lieberman of the Gore and Lieberman ticket, is it not?</p>
<p>It may or may not ever dawn on Gore to thank his lucky stars that he was not elected president.</p>
<p>After all, not only has he got a Nobel Prize, but he was not assassinated in office.</p>
<p>Imagine the war in the Near East that would have ensued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: real_democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/comment-page-1/#comment-117827</link>
		<dc:creator>real_democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/#comment-117827</guid>
		<description>Joseph Lieberman was left out of list of &quot;The Committee on the Present Danger&quot;. As Honorary Co-Chair of this organized paranoia creation machine, he is hard to miss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph Lieberman was left out of list of &#8220;The Committee on the Present Danger&#8221;. As Honorary Co-Chair of this organized paranoia creation machine, he is hard to miss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfountain72</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/comment-page-1/#comment-117762</link>
		<dc:creator>cfountain72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/03/the-neocons-an-illustrated-progression/#comment-117762</guid>
		<description>Stanley,

I am not sure that your analysis is entirely accurate. Indeed, in Iraq as well as Afghanistan (in both of our misadventures there), it is safe to say that net/net, we are spending far more than we are taking in. 

With respect to the Philipines, please tell me again what great natural resource are we getting from that chain of tropical islands?

The fact that the USSR was forced to subsidize its &#039;less fortunate&#039; client states (weren&#039;t they all less fortunate?) points to the abject failure that was Communism. Contrary to your implication, I would choose private &#039;business&#039; over collectivist &#039;principle and ideology&#039; everytime.

None of this is in any way meant to justify the inherent evils of imperialism. Nations and their peoples should certainly be allowed self-determination. Even though we would love to see contitutional republics the world over, citizens must come to that conclusion on their own and not at the  open end of gun. We certainly can not and should not force that ideal upon them.

Peace be with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stanley,</p>
<p>I am not sure that your analysis is entirely accurate. Indeed, in Iraq as well as Afghanistan (in both of our misadventures there), it is safe to say that net/net, we are spending far more than we are taking in. </p>
<p>With respect to the Philipines, please tell me again what great natural resource are we getting from that chain of tropical islands?</p>
<p>The fact that the USSR was forced to subsidize its &#8216;less fortunate&#8217; client states (weren&#8217;t they all less fortunate?) points to the abject failure that was Communism. Contrary to your implication, I would choose private &#8216;business&#8217; over collectivist &#8216;principle and ideology&#8217; everytime.</p>
<p>None of this is in any way meant to justify the inherent evils of imperialism. Nations and their peoples should certainly be allowed self-determination. Even though we would love to see contitutional republics the world over, citizens must come to that conclusion on their own and not at the  open end of gun. We certainly can not and should not force that ideal upon them.</p>
<p>Peace be with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

