<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bizarro McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:25:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: indian religion and politics pre 1947</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/comment-page-1/#comment-156114</link>
		<dc:creator>indian religion and politics pre 1947</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/#comment-156114</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;indian religion and politics pre 1947...&lt;/strong&gt;

Sorry, don&#039;t agree 100% with you on this!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>indian religion and politics pre 1947&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Sorry, don&#8217;t agree 100% with you on this!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vassili</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/comment-page-1/#comment-123043</link>
		<dc:creator>Vassili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/#comment-123043</guid>
		<description>Of course Russia has - yet, before SDI system is fully in place - the weapon and gaining will.

But - the separation of Kosovo - although not good for Serbia, is also not good for Europe - an implant of US-backed  jihad in the very middle of it.

And Serbia is not Belorussia - I can&#039;t remember one event when it did something beneficial to Russia - other then in the 90s where Russians clearly saw WHAT is our ideal fate in the Pax Americance. That was stupid of US, but the desire was so strong - to even symbolically do to Russia what was dreamed for decades... so the actions on Serbia/Kosovo became irrational. Well - God Loves Russia.

Now, to me Europe (as the most of the rest of the World is) is US occupation zone. There would be potential unrest in the midst of it.

Why US is doing that? Maybe because Europe is naturally leaning towards affiliation with the rest of Eurasia - be it Russia or Iran or China. It also seems unevitable that it will be gaining more and more independance from the Pax Americana Empire. Since it is inevitable - planting any of the bad stuff in it is good for the US. May weaken euro and what not.

But... why should Russia - AGAIN - sacrifice itself for protecting Europe, that have never been grateful for such efforts? Also, in practical life - Russia has always managed to set better relationship with islamic people. 

Now - I completely fail to understand how Kosovo can benefit the US in the longer run, but I&#039;d just assume that God Loves Russia and that&#039;s it. And then - stepping up heroin production in Afganistan and providing means of transpartation of it to Kosovo by US military planes also does not make sense - in the big picture - but it certainly benefits certain groups in the US. So - the last days of Roman Empire &quot;logic&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Russia has &#8211; yet, before SDI system is fully in place &#8211; the weapon and gaining will.</p>
<p>But &#8211; the separation of Kosovo &#8211; although not good for Serbia, is also not good for Europe &#8211; an implant of US-backed  jihad in the very middle of it.</p>
<p>And Serbia is not Belorussia &#8211; I can&#8217;t remember one event when it did something beneficial to Russia &#8211; other then in the 90s where Russians clearly saw WHAT is our ideal fate in the Pax Americance. That was stupid of US, but the desire was so strong &#8211; to even symbolically do to Russia what was dreamed for decades&#8230; so the actions on Serbia/Kosovo became irrational. Well &#8211; God Loves Russia.</p>
<p>Now, to me Europe (as the most of the rest of the World is) is US occupation zone. There would be potential unrest in the midst of it.</p>
<p>Why US is doing that? Maybe because Europe is naturally leaning towards affiliation with the rest of Eurasia &#8211; be it Russia or Iran or China. It also seems unevitable that it will be gaining more and more independance from the Pax Americana Empire. Since it is inevitable &#8211; planting any of the bad stuff in it is good for the US. May weaken euro and what not.</p>
<p>But&#8230; why should Russia &#8211; AGAIN &#8211; sacrifice itself for protecting Europe, that have never been grateful for such efforts? Also, in practical life &#8211; Russia has always managed to set better relationship with islamic people. </p>
<p>Now &#8211; I completely fail to understand how Kosovo can benefit the US in the longer run, but I&#8217;d just assume that God Loves Russia and that&#8217;s it. And then &#8211; stepping up heroin production in Afganistan and providing means of transpartation of it to Kosovo by US military planes also does not make sense &#8211; in the big picture &#8211; but it certainly benefits certain groups in the US. So &#8211; the last days of Roman Empire &#8220;logic&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vassili</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/comment-page-1/#comment-123016</link>
		<dc:creator>Vassili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/#comment-123016</guid>
		<description>Excuse me, but the deception started even earlier - the very notion of &quot;democracy&quot; is as deceptive as &quot;communism&quot;. In fact - both are theories to camuflage secretive oligopolic regimes as something new, original, &quot;progressive&quot; and good for the majority of the population.

I think humanity lived these terrible last 250 years of suffering and lies to finally start getting back to the basics of personal freedom. I&#039;d say it is the Internet that is doing the job - since for the first time since the invention of the printing press the capabilities of a single, private person to reach the world wide audience are similar in scope with major governments.

Notice though the ferrocity of the attacks on this new media by introduction of &quot;intellectual property&quot; laws, which in effect allow to once again completely silence the individual voice. 

On the other hand - the countries that excersise less of these speach and mind control techniques will be gaining  as we progress into the 21st century. The very good news is that although the suppression of personal freedoms and Orwellian style regimes seem very powerful and solid, they lack the ability to really motivate people and shall share the ill fate of the old Roman Empire. Fortunately, not only wild animals don&#039;t reproduce well in captivity, but human&#039;s as well. Falling fertility rates in the US and the West in general show that clearly. Woman (and man) don&#039;t want to deliver babies into prison cells.

Viva la resistance :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me, but the deception started even earlier &#8211; the very notion of &#8220;democracy&#8221; is as deceptive as &#8220;communism&#8221;. In fact &#8211; both are theories to camuflage secretive oligopolic regimes as something new, original, &#8220;progressive&#8221; and good for the majority of the population.</p>
<p>I think humanity lived these terrible last 250 years of suffering and lies to finally start getting back to the basics of personal freedom. I&#8217;d say it is the Internet that is doing the job &#8211; since for the first time since the invention of the printing press the capabilities of a single, private person to reach the world wide audience are similar in scope with major governments.</p>
<p>Notice though the ferrocity of the attacks on this new media by introduction of &#8220;intellectual property&#8221; laws, which in effect allow to once again completely silence the individual voice. </p>
<p>On the other hand &#8211; the countries that excersise less of these speach and mind control techniques will be gaining  as we progress into the 21st century. The very good news is that although the suppression of personal freedoms and Orwellian style regimes seem very powerful and solid, they lack the ability to really motivate people and shall share the ill fate of the old Roman Empire. Fortunately, not only wild animals don&#8217;t reproduce well in captivity, but human&#8217;s as well. Falling fertility rates in the US and the West in general show that clearly. Woman (and man) don&#8217;t want to deliver babies into prison cells.</p>
<p>Viva la resistance :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cedar</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/comment-page-1/#comment-121087</link>
		<dc:creator>cedar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 06:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/#comment-121087</guid>
		<description>&quot;Obamba, the big phony that he is, said something like “Of couse people should learn English but those questions are too devisive.” Devisive? What is devisive is millions of people living in a country and not speaking the language!&quot;

Tim, it&#039;s spelled DIVISIVE.  Maybe you should take some time and learn your own damn language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Obamba, the big phony that he is, said something like “Of couse people should learn English but those questions are too devisive.” Devisive? What is devisive is millions of people living in a country and not speaking the language!&#8221;</p>
<p>Tim, it&#8217;s spelled DIVISIVE.  Maybe you should take some time and learn your own damn language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lowell</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/comment-page-1/#comment-121065</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/#comment-121065</guid>
		<description>I thought you might like that, The Die Hard. The simile is something of a specialty here. You need to be able to reach a bit where McCain is concerned. The pedestrian just won&#039;t do. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you might like that, The Die Hard. The simile is something of a specialty here. You need to be able to reach a bit where McCain is concerned. The pedestrian just won&#8217;t do. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/comment-page-1/#comment-120925</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/#comment-120925</guid>
		<description>And I hear good English-Navajo translators come very, very dear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I hear good English-Navajo translators come very, very dear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/comment-page-1/#comment-120923</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/#comment-120923</guid>
		<description>In fact, even if there is not move toward an Official English, the Navajo could still demand the same thing anytime they want.

So glad you Neo-Know-Nothings brought the matter up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, even if there is not move toward an Official English, the Navajo could still demand the same thing anytime they want.</p>
<p>So glad you Neo-Know-Nothings brought the matter up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/comment-page-1/#comment-120917</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/#comment-120917</guid>
		<description>Have all the relevant local, state, and federal statute books been translated into Navajo or Apache yet?  You Official English Only Neo-Nativists, including the  recent arrivals, better get started finding the translators--it&#039;s going to be a very big and time-consuming  and expensive job..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have all the relevant local, state, and federal statute books been translated into Navajo or Apache yet?  You Official English Only Neo-Nativists, including the  recent arrivals, better get started finding the translators&#8211;it&#8217;s going to be a very big and time-consuming  and expensive job..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/comment-page-1/#comment-120916</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/#comment-120916</guid>
		<description>Imagone the annual translation expenses and the jobs for translators.

Probably the cost of two hours of the Iraq War.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagone the annual translation expenses and the jobs for translators.</p>
<p>Probably the cost of two hours of the Iraq War.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/comment-page-1/#comment-120913</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/#comment-120913</guid>
		<description>In fact, not only do the Navajos have the right to have every document from the Federal government in their own language, if a Navajo gets elected to Congress he or she would have the implicit right to have all oral and written proceedings translated into Navajo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, not only do the Navajos have the right to have every document from the Federal government in their own language, if a Navajo gets elected to Congress he or she would have the implicit right to have all oral and written proceedings translated into Navajo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/comment-page-1/#comment-120904</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/#comment-120904</guid>
		<description>And if you want to go the &quot;official&quot; route, the minimum number of official languages in the US might look something like the list below: 

English
French
Spanish
German
Dutch
Russian
Swedish
Inuit
All Amerindian Tribal Languages
Creole

And that&#039;s just a quick and superficial sketch--there might be other additions someone else would like to make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you want to go the &#8220;official&#8221; route, the minimum number of official languages in the US might look something like the list below: </p>
<p>English<br />
French<br />
Spanish<br />
German<br />
Dutch<br />
Russian<br />
Swedish<br />
Inuit<br />
All Amerindian Tribal Languages<br />
Creole</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s just a quick and superficial sketch&#8211;there might be other additions someone else would like to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/comment-page-1/#comment-120857</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/04/4166/#comment-120857</guid>
		<description>Corr:&quot;certainly do not want to&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corr:&#8221;certainly do not want to&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
