<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul Rules Out 3rd Party Run, Scales Down Campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:39:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-144808</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/#comment-144808</guid>
		<description>Ronald Peter,

You must be living on yout own island where you do not have any problems, political etc.

Shame on you for telling the Americans what do do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronald Peter,</p>
<p>You must be living on yout own island where you do not have any problems, political etc.</p>
<p>Shame on you for telling the Americans what do do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-140679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/#comment-140679</guid>
		<description>Who died and made you Mr.Knowall?
Do you live in Utopia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who died and made you Mr.Knowall?<br />
Do you live in Utopia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/comment-page-2/#comment-125862</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/#comment-125862</guid>
		<description>Would it not be interesting, even as an entertainment, to ponder a new national political party that never fields a presidential candidate, but only Congressional ones, and the thrust of which is to limit Executive power and bring it back within limits of the Constitution?

Alas, so lacking in glamor that it might even work.

Among Serbs or Iraqis perhaps, or even Japanese and Germans.

Among Americans it may be a waste of time.

Perhaps Kucinich might be interested.

I am not lightly riveted, nor would I easily have ever called myself a Progressive, and certainly not a Democrat, but I went to the trouble of reading through Kucinich&#039;s well crafted positions on many topics on his website.

I was very surprised how, particularly structurally, he is so far ahead of the curve, not only in regard to Health Care based on a risk pool, and impeachment, where he singularly put his power on the line as a Congressman, and voting machine fraud, but also on many other centrally important topics.

A man, whatever his political coloration, who thinks things through, and thoroughly.

Ah, you say, he is no longer running for the presidency?

As I said when he withdrew--that&#039;s a good sign. He is now much more important than he ever would have been as third or fourth in line in the sham of a national presidential race, and especially as a Democrat.

I have heard, with what reliability I do not know, that Kucinich some time ago sent out feelers to Paul in regard to an independent run, and was refused.

If true, it speaks volumes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it not be interesting, even as an entertainment, to ponder a new national political party that never fields a presidential candidate, but only Congressional ones, and the thrust of which is to limit Executive power and bring it back within limits of the Constitution?</p>
<p>Alas, so lacking in glamor that it might even work.</p>
<p>Among Serbs or Iraqis perhaps, or even Japanese and Germans.</p>
<p>Among Americans it may be a waste of time.</p>
<p>Perhaps Kucinich might be interested.</p>
<p>I am not lightly riveted, nor would I easily have ever called myself a Progressive, and certainly not a Democrat, but I went to the trouble of reading through Kucinich&#8217;s well crafted positions on many topics on his website.</p>
<p>I was very surprised how, particularly structurally, he is so far ahead of the curve, not only in regard to Health Care based on a risk pool, and impeachment, where he singularly put his power on the line as a Congressman, and voting machine fraud, but also on many other centrally important topics.</p>
<p>A man, whatever his political coloration, who thinks things through, and thoroughly.</p>
<p>Ah, you say, he is no longer running for the presidency?</p>
<p>As I said when he withdrew&#8211;that&#8217;s a good sign. He is now much more important than he ever would have been as third or fourth in line in the sham of a national presidential race, and especially as a Democrat.</p>
<p>I have heard, with what reliability I do not know, that Kucinich some time ago sent out feelers to Paul in regard to an independent run, and was refused.</p>
<p>If true, it speaks volumes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/comment-page-2/#comment-125777</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/#comment-125777</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, vote and support for the next King, a man who will dismantle the Kingship from a position of real power, King.

Sound a bit fishy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, vote and support for the next King, a man who will dismantle the Kingship from a position of real power, King.</p>
<p>Sound a bit fishy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/comment-page-2/#comment-125769</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/#comment-125769</guid>
		<description>Oh, were they ads declaring his vigorous support for impeachment and upholding what is left of the Constitution?

Perhaps he should do less marketing of his childish economic ideas and more reading of Paul Craig Roberts and the U.S. Constitution.

As Congressman he already holds a position with Constitutional powers and duties to discharge.

He apparently is reluctant to discharge that power and duty in regard to limiting and holding to account the Executive Branch&#039;s unconstitutional usurpation of powers and privileges.

Why would anyone who takes the Constitution seriously wish to support just another prospective King?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, were they ads declaring his vigorous support for impeachment and upholding what is left of the Constitution?</p>
<p>Perhaps he should do less marketing of his childish economic ideas and more reading of Paul Craig Roberts and the U.S. Constitution.</p>
<p>As Congressman he already holds a position with Constitutional powers and duties to discharge.</p>
<p>He apparently is reluctant to discharge that power and duty in regard to limiting and holding to account the Executive Branch&#8217;s unconstitutional usurpation of powers and privileges.</p>
<p>Why would anyone who takes the Constitution seriously wish to support just another prospective King?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/comment-page-2/#comment-125667</link>
		<dc:creator>Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/#comment-125667</guid>
		<description>BTW, Ron just bought $700,000 in ads here, so he&#039;s obviously not out. He could have chosen his words more wisely in his email, but we&#039;re still in it regardless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, Ron just bought $700,000 in ads here, so he&#8217;s obviously not out. He could have chosen his words more wisely in his email, but we&#8217;re still in it regardless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/comment-page-2/#comment-125665</link>
		<dc:creator>Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/#comment-125665</guid>
		<description>He isn&#039;t out of the race. We&#039;re still campaigning for him in Texas.

The conservatives in the GOP won&#039;t abide McCain, period. If McCain doesn&#039;t have enough delegates to win the convention, he can&#039;t win. A brokered convention is still in play which would result, most likely, in a non-candidate being nominated. If Ron has enough delegates (he currently has around 50, and can pick up loads more in TX), he will have a say in who the nominee will be.

You have to understand this esoteric process to work the system. 

Are you just going to sit back and get more war? Get off your arse and help Ron win more delegates!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He isn&#8217;t out of the race. We&#8217;re still campaigning for him in Texas.</p>
<p>The conservatives in the GOP won&#8217;t abide McCain, period. If McCain doesn&#8217;t have enough delegates to win the convention, he can&#8217;t win. A brokered convention is still in play which would result, most likely, in a non-candidate being nominated. If Ron has enough delegates (he currently has around 50, and can pick up loads more in TX), he will have a say in who the nominee will be.</p>
<p>You have to understand this esoteric process to work the system. </p>
<p>Are you just going to sit back and get more war? Get off your arse and help Ron win more delegates!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big M</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/comment-page-2/#comment-125394</link>
		<dc:creator>Big M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/#comment-125394</guid>
		<description>Well, maybe things aren&#039;t always what they seem. I just came across this interesting tidbit:

http://newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter118.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, maybe things aren&#8217;t always what they seem. I just came across this interesting tidbit:</p>
<p><a href="http://newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter118.htm" rel="nofollow">http://newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter118.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-124697</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/#comment-124697</guid>
		<description>What &quot;conspiracy theory&quot; are you talking about, my dear fellow--you sound like a Neo-Con.

If you own yourself, as Paul argues, you can sell yourself to someone else.

Or even sell yourself to yourself.

The latter transaction will likely keep you occupied for some days.

If this isn&#039;t childish, as analysis of person, self, ownership and property rights, what is?

You are invited to argue out all the details with yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What &#8220;conspiracy theory&#8221; are you talking about, my dear fellow&#8211;you sound like a Neo-Con.</p>
<p>If you own yourself, as Paul argues, you can sell yourself to someone else.</p>
<p>Or even sell yourself to yourself.</p>
<p>The latter transaction will likely keep you occupied for some days.</p>
<p>If this isn&#8217;t childish, as analysis of person, self, ownership and property rights, what is?</p>
<p>You are invited to argue out all the details with yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-123694</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/08/ron-paul-rules-out-3rd-party-run-scales-down-campaign/#comment-123694</guid>
		<description>You seem to know nothing about impeachment.

The penalty for successful impeachment is removal from office.  There is no pardon.

Impeaching Bush before he pardons the other criminals in office wholesale is another high recommendation for impeaching both of them immediately.

But obviously that sort of accountability is not what you are interested in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to know nothing about impeachment.</p>
<p>The penalty for successful impeachment is removal from office.  There is no pardon.</p>
<p>Impeaching Bush before he pardons the other criminals in office wholesale is another high recommendation for impeaching both of them immediately.</p>
<p>But obviously that sort of accountability is not what you are interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

