<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Imperial Class, Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:19:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-127579</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/#comment-127579</guid>
		<description>Aye.  A military in the hands of a corrupt elite is much worse than no military at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aye.  A military in the hands of a corrupt elite is much worse than no military at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-125631</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/#comment-125631</guid>
		<description>What matters is not every American, but every American establishment official</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What matters is not every American, but every American establishment official</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nike</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-125383</link>
		<dc:creator>Nike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/#comment-125383</guid>
		<description>We schmucks on our keyboards can unite on ending the war in Iraq until the cows come home, but neither my opinion nor yours will make one whit of difference to those in power. Until The People are ready for some real change and give a man like Ron Paul a chance, it seems likely that the future holds only more of the same...or worse.
   On the other hand, it sure would be funny to witness the scene when AIPAC showed up with giant cheque for Congressman Raimondo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We schmucks on our keyboards can unite on ending the war in Iraq until the cows come home, but neither my opinion nor yours will make one whit of difference to those in power. Until The People are ready for some real change and give a man like Ron Paul a chance, it seems likely that the future holds only more of the same&#8230;or worse.<br />
   On the other hand, it sure would be funny to witness the scene when AIPAC showed up with giant cheque for Congressman Raimondo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad smith</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-125358</link>
		<dc:creator>brad smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/#comment-125358</guid>
		<description>You have a good point, but it seems more likely for the Republicans than the Dems. But who knows. Hiliary does get much of her support from Isreal. I guess I would trust Obama the most of the &quot;front&quot; runners. However, that is saying much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a good point, but it seems more likely for the Republicans than the Dems. But who knows. Hiliary does get much of her support from Isreal. I guess I would trust Obama the most of the &#8220;front&#8221; runners. However, that is saying much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peace</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-125145</link>
		<dc:creator>peace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/#comment-125145</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Rick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Rick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peace</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-125144</link>
		<dc:creator>peace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/#comment-125144</guid>
		<description>We should unite on the issue of ending the war in Iraq, not try to divide the vote against Pelosi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should unite on the issue of ending the war in Iraq, not try to divide the vote against Pelosi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peace</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-125143</link>
		<dc:creator>peace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/#comment-125143</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you think that Hillary plans to bomb Iran?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you think that Hillary plans to bomb Iran?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peace</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-125140</link>
		<dc:creator>peace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/#comment-125140</guid>
		<description>The US soldiers are not doing the job of protecting the USA.  I part company with Raimondo re his first sentence in his second paragraph above.  I call on my fellow Americans to presently stop enlisting in the US military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US soldiers are not doing the job of protecting the USA.  I part company with Raimondo re his first sentence in his second paragraph above.  I call on my fellow Americans to presently stop enlisting in the US military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-125100</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/#comment-125100</guid>
		<description>If one has ever been in the military, he or she would readily understand why the troops and the officer corps will not throw down their weapons and refuse to deploy.  The potential penalties for such a resistance is not only life altering, but criminal under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.  

Like many ideals, the suggestion of insubordination by the military is far easier said than done and would require a most uncommon degree of moral courage.  Why should anyone expect an individual service member to risk so much, when the citizenry, generally, refuses to risk so little by exercising their most basic rights of free speech and informed and vigilant political activism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If one has ever been in the military, he or she would readily understand why the troops and the officer corps will not throw down their weapons and refuse to deploy.  The potential penalties for such a resistance is not only life altering, but criminal under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.  </p>
<p>Like many ideals, the suggestion of insubordination by the military is far easier said than done and would require a most uncommon degree of moral courage.  Why should anyone expect an individual service member to risk so much, when the citizenry, generally, refuses to risk so little by exercising their most basic rights of free speech and informed and vigilant political activism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-124742</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/11/the-imperial-class-revisited/#comment-124742</guid>
		<description>&quot;the rank-and-file military are not automatically inducted into the ranks of the imperial class..&quot;

If the military is so opposed to the government&#039;s policy, but chooses to carry it out anyway under the excuse of &quot;serving the country&quot;, then what difference does it make if they are opposed to it? They are the ones carrying it out. 

I believe if the military was REALLY OPPOSED to the govt.&#039;s policies, they would rebel. Throw down their guns. Refuse to deploy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the rank-and-file military are not automatically inducted into the ranks of the imperial class..&#8221;</p>
<p>If the military is so opposed to the government&#8217;s policy, but chooses to carry it out anyway under the excuse of &#8220;serving the country&#8221;, then what difference does it make if they are opposed to it? They are the ones carrying it out. </p>
<p>I believe if the military was REALLY OPPOSED to the govt.&#8217;s policies, they would rebel. Throw down their guns. Refuse to deploy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

