Dhimmitude, You Got Some #%$@ing Dhimmitude

Matt Barganier, February 12, 2008

In a post sure to infuriate cons and libs, neos and paleos, progs and trogs alike, IOZ seconds the archbishop of Canterbury. Agree or disagree, it’s worth a read.



5 Responses to “Dhimmitude, You Got Some #%$@ing Dhimmitude”

  1. peace
    February 12th, 2008 at 6:26 pm

    No to the archbishop of Canterbury, from me.

  2. Kenneth
    February 12th, 2008 at 7:03 pm

    This had to be said.

  3. Lester Ness
    February 12th, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    Well, the British legal system has long accomodated Common Law in England, Roman Law in Scotland, Feudal Law in the Channel Isle., G-d knows what system in the Isle of Man, and (for the last century) Rabbinic Law, for Jews and anyone else who cares to settle their disputes at a Beth Din. Why not Islamic courts for those who want them? Unless one is an insane Muslim hater, in which case nothing will be good enough, anyway.

    Lester Ness
    Kunming
    China

  4. Ball
    February 13th, 2008 at 6:15 pm

    Except when women born into one system decide to leave…then honor is at stake (followed soon by heads…)

    Preferable, perhaps, is the rule of the patriarch to the rule of state. However, I don’t see how systems of law can co-exist without a common principle such as the inviolability of an individual’s right to choose her law system.

  5. 2c6c630b7e13
    May 9th, 2008 at 10:48 am

    2c6c630b7e13…

    2c6c630b7e139a7ca18a…