<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some of FDD&#8217;s Bigger Donors and Another Defection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/29/some-of-fdd%e2%80%99s-bigger-donors-and-another-defection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/29/some-of-fdd%e2%80%99s-bigger-donors-and-another-defection/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:49:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: van</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/29/some-of-fdd%e2%80%99s-bigger-donors-and-another-defection/comment-page-1/#comment-135738</link>
		<dc:creator>van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/29/some-of-fdd%e2%80%99s-bigger-donors-and-another-defection/#comment-135738</guid>
		<description>Bill, Right on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, Right on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the legendary Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/29/some-of-fdd%e2%80%99s-bigger-donors-and-another-defection/comment-page-1/#comment-135211</link>
		<dc:creator>the legendary Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 02:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/29/some-of-fdd%e2%80%99s-bigger-donors-and-another-defection/#comment-135211</guid>
		<description>Better than McCain ( &quot;there will be more wars&quot; ) though, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better than McCain ( &#8220;there will be more wars&#8221; ) though, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Rood</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/29/some-of-fdd%e2%80%99s-bigger-donors-and-another-defection/comment-page-1/#comment-134729</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Rood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/29/some-of-fdd%e2%80%99s-bigger-donors-and-another-defection/#comment-134729</guid>
		<description>Lest I be misunderstood, I want to make it clear I&#039;m not an Obamamaniac. I&#039;ve liked some (not all) of the things he&#039;s said, but the more I hear about his actual record, the more skeptical I become. Matt Gonzales (Yes, Nader&#039;s running mate) has an interesting article over on Counterpunch that catalogues a lot of it. I&#039;ve known about a lot of his past positions since entering the Senate, so this was not all news to me. In particular, he reminded me of Obama&#039;s statement in 2004 that now that we&#039;re actually in Iraq, his position wasn&#039;t all that different from Bush&#039;s. He thought we needed to see it through. On the other hand, I think if we&#039;d have withdrawn in 2004-2005, we wouldn&#039;t have seen anywhere near the level of sectarian violence we&#039;ve seen, which frankly had been largely due to our adoption of the &quot;El Salvador option&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lest I be misunderstood, I want to make it clear I&#8217;m not an Obamamaniac. I&#8217;ve liked some (not all) of the things he&#8217;s said, but the more I hear about his actual record, the more skeptical I become. Matt Gonzales (Yes, Nader&#8217;s running mate) has an interesting article over on Counterpunch that catalogues a lot of it. I&#8217;ve known about a lot of his past positions since entering the Senate, so this was not all news to me. In particular, he reminded me of Obama&#8217;s statement in 2004 that now that we&#8217;re actually in Iraq, his position wasn&#8217;t all that different from Bush&#8217;s. He thought we needed to see it through. On the other hand, I think if we&#8217;d have withdrawn in 2004-2005, we wouldn&#8217;t have seen anywhere near the level of sectarian violence we&#8217;ve seen, which frankly had been largely due to our adoption of the &#8220;El Salvador option&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Rood</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/29/some-of-fdd%e2%80%99s-bigger-donors-and-another-defection/comment-page-1/#comment-134717</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Rood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/29/some-of-fdd%e2%80%99s-bigger-donors-and-another-defection/#comment-134717</guid>
		<description>Let them spend their money on TV ads. It&#039;s one way to redistribute their wealth, and perhaps once they&#039;ve spent enough of it they&#039;ll decide they can&#039;t afford any more. I sense the American people are no longer listening to the fear mongering and racism. There&#039;s no question the Clinton campaign played the race card and I think they paid dearly for it. As for a 3 am phone call, I&#039;d much prefer to be talking to someone who had the judgement -- and courage when getting ready to launch a US Senate campaign at a time when the solid majority of Americans and US media were in the midst of war fever -- to make the right call the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let them spend their money on TV ads. It&#8217;s one way to redistribute their wealth, and perhaps once they&#8217;ve spent enough of it they&#8217;ll decide they can&#8217;t afford any more. I sense the American people are no longer listening to the fear mongering and racism. There&#8217;s no question the Clinton campaign played the race card and I think they paid dearly for it. As for a 3 am phone call, I&#8217;d much prefer to be talking to someone who had the judgement &#8212; and courage when getting ready to launch a US Senate campaign at a time when the solid majority of Americans and US media were in the midst of war fever &#8212; to make the right call the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
