<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Riding in on a high horse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  9 Jul 2008 07:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-145417</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-145417</guid>
		<description>Al Qaeda fights for the Caliphate it might be near impossible for them to get it but that is why they fight. Al Qaeda will keep fighting as long as the US has diplomatic and trade relations with nations Al Qaeda doesn't approve and votes at the UN in ways that Al Qaeda doesn’t approve of.

Appeasement didn’t work in world war II and it won’t work with Al Qaeda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Qaeda fights for the Caliphate it might be near impossible for them to get it but that is why they fight. Al Qaeda will keep fighting as long as the US has diplomatic and trade relations with nations Al Qaeda doesn&#8217;t approve and votes at the UN in ways that Al Qaeda doesn’t approve of.</p>
<p>Appeasement didn’t work in world war II and it won’t work with Al Qaeda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-145413</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-145413</guid>
		<description>Al Qaeda fights for the Caliphate it might be near impossible for them to get it but that is why they fight. Al Qaeda will keep fighting as long as the US has diplomatic and trade relations and votes at the UN in ways that Al Qaeda doesn't approve of.

Appeasement didn't work in world war II and it won't work with Al Qaeda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Qaeda fights for the Caliphate it might be near impossible for them to get it but that is why they fight. Al Qaeda will keep fighting as long as the US has diplomatic and trade relations and votes at the UN in ways that Al Qaeda doesn&#8217;t approve of.</p>
<p>Appeasement didn&#8217;t work in world war II and it won&#8217;t work with Al Qaeda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-145129</link>
		<dc:creator>8Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-145129</guid>
		<description>correction:  The first "fellow" was actually a woman... Francoise Ducros.  A woman's intuition made the correct call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correction:  The first &#8220;fellow&#8221; was actually a woman&#8230; Francoise Ducros.  A woman&#8217;s intuition made the correct call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-145106</link>
		<dc:creator>8Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-145106</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.japantoday.com/jp/news/240366/all" rel="nofollow"&gt;This fellow&lt;/a&gt; had Bush figured out a long time ago.  And &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/22/AR2008032201020_pf.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;this fellow&lt;/a&gt; shares his experiences in working with the US government during the run-up to operation "Iraqi Freedom".

If you want irony, the essence of the Bush presidency and US foreign policy could be distilled from that one name.

A New England preppie relocates to Texas (excepting a brief period during the Vietnam war)and pretends to be a cowboy. He proceeds to the governorship and then moves on to the the US Presidency.  His father's PR machine and friends in the media are largely responsible for most of this.  Americans should have paid attention to that Canadian fellow...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.japantoday.com/jp/news/240366/all" rel="nofollow">This fellow</a> had Bush figured out a long time ago.  And <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/22/AR2008032201020_pf.html" rel="nofollow">this fellow</a> shares his experiences in working with the US government during the run-up to operation &#8220;Iraqi Freedom&#8221;.</p>
<p>If you want irony, the essence of the Bush presidency and US foreign policy could be distilled from that one name.</p>
<p>A New England preppie relocates to Texas (excepting a brief period during the Vietnam war)and pretends to be a cowboy. He proceeds to the governorship and then moves on to the the US Presidency.  His father&#8217;s PR machine and friends in the media are largely responsible for most of this.  Americans should have paid attention to that Canadian fellow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george in Toronto</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-145054</link>
		<dc:creator>george in Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-145054</guid>
		<description>Did you all this on Newsweek ? Seems the media is turning the corner towards truth telling but as always at the end of the column and Bush regime
  "Perhaps most revealing of all was a tape of Saddam's conversations with his ministers after the World Trade Center bombing in February 1993—a plot linked to a group of Islamic radicals, one of whom, Abdul Rahman Yasin, was an Iraqi-American who fled to Baghdad after the attack. For years Bush administration officials like Cheney and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz charged that Iraq had given "sanctuary" to Yasin, suggesting that the regime may have been complicit in the 1993 bombing. But the newly discovered tape shows that Saddam and his ministers were puzzled by the bombing and wondered whether the "Zionists" or U.S. intelligence were secretly behind it. They also were deeply suspicious of Yasin, whom the Iraqis had in custody and were interrogating. Yasin, Saddam says on the tape, is "too organized in what he is saying and is playing games." The Pentagon researcher said the exchange shows how "paranoid and suspicious" the Iraqis were about their adversaries. They may not have been alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you all this on Newsweek ? Seems the media is turning the corner towards truth telling but as always at the end of the column and Bush regime<br />
  &#8220;Perhaps most revealing of all was a tape of Saddam&#8217;s conversations with his ministers after the World Trade Center bombing in February 1993—a plot linked to a group of Islamic radicals, one of whom, Abdul Rahman Yasin, was an Iraqi-American who fled to Baghdad after the attack. For years Bush administration officials like Cheney and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz charged that Iraq had given &#8220;sanctuary&#8221; to Yasin, suggesting that the regime may have been complicit in the 1993 bombing. But the newly discovered tape shows that Saddam and his ministers were puzzled by the bombing and wondered whether the &#8220;Zionists&#8221; or U.S. intelligence were secretly behind it. They also were deeply suspicious of Yasin, whom the Iraqis had in custody and were interrogating. Yasin, Saddam says on the tape, is &#8220;too organized in what he is saying and is playing games.&#8221; The Pentagon researcher said the exchange shows how &#8220;paranoid and suspicious&#8221; the Iraqis were about their adversaries. They may not have been alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-144856</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 01:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-144856</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The aged, paranoid freaks, who run our so-called government are so afraid of any other culture or faction that poses a threat to their global dominance that they are willing to ruin the country and the world in order to prevent whoever or whatever from cutting into their “action”.&lt;/i&gt;

Thereby expediting the process whereby competing imperialist powers like China and the EU gain ascendancy and ensuring their own decline.  The irony- it kills, it kills!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The aged, paranoid freaks, who run our so-called government are so afraid of any other culture or faction that poses a threat to their global dominance that they are willing to ruin the country and the world in order to prevent whoever or whatever from cutting into their “action”.</i></p>
<p>Thereby expediting the process whereby competing imperialist powers like China and the EU gain ascendancy and ensuring their own decline.  The irony- it kills, it kills!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-144821</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-144821</guid>
		<description>George Bush. Making Americans safe. One unneccesarry war at a time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Bush. Making Americans safe. One unneccesarry war at a time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glendon Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-144702</link>
		<dc:creator>Glendon Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-144702</guid>
		<description>Color code the empire red
Full spectrum stupidity is just ahead
Don't threat about pi 
or what's left of the pie
Read them ''My Pet Goat'  instead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Color code the empire red<br />
Full spectrum stupidity is just ahead<br />
Don&#8217;t threat about pi<br />
or what&#8217;s left of the pie<br />
Read them &#8221;My Pet Goat&#8217;  instead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-144114</link>
		<dc:creator>8Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-144114</guid>
		<description>US Über Alles!  That is all you need to know to understand the basis of American foreign policy. The aged, paranoid freaks, who run our so-called government are so afraid of any other culture or faction that poses a threat to their global dominance that they are willing to ruin the country and the world in order to prevent whoever or whatever from cutting into their "action".

Regardless, they have set the country on a course that will be hard if not impossible to reverse. The handwriting is on the wall and it is just a matter of time and choice as to whether we go out kicking &#38; screaming or with a bump &#38; whimper... My bet is that the idiot-in-chief, whoever it may be, will choose door #1.

America's "leaders" have no interest in &lt;i&gt;"getting along"&lt;/i&gt; with the rest of the world on a quid pro quo basis, their only desire is to dominate and to exploit whoever and whatever.  Understand this and you will understand US foreign policy.  Try to imagine what things would be like if Bush had decided (as if he actually &lt;i&gt;"decides"&lt;/i&gt; anything!) to spend $3T on America instead of pissing it into the sands of Iraq, imagine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US Über Alles!  That is all you need to know to understand the basis of American foreign policy. The aged, paranoid freaks, who run our so-called government are so afraid of any other culture or faction that poses a threat to their global dominance that they are willing to ruin the country and the world in order to prevent whoever or whatever from cutting into their &#8220;action&#8221;.</p>
<p>Regardless, they have set the country on a course that will be hard if not impossible to reverse. The handwriting is on the wall and it is just a matter of time and choice as to whether we go out kicking &amp; screaming or with a bump &amp; whimper&#8230; My bet is that the idiot-in-chief, whoever it may be, will choose door #1.</p>
<p>America&#8217;s &#8220;leaders&#8221; have no interest in <i>&#8220;getting along&#8221;</i> with the rest of the world on a quid pro quo basis, their only desire is to dominate and to exploit whoever and whatever.  Understand this and you will understand US foreign policy.  Try to imagine what things would be like if Bush had decided (as if he actually <i>&#8220;decides&#8221;</i> anything!) to spend $3T on America instead of pissing it into the sands of Iraq, imagine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-143952</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-143952</guid>
		<description>Show how you feel. I have an anti-Iraq war sticker and some other right leaning stickers. www.goodoleboybumperstickers.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Show how you feel. I have an anti-Iraq war sticker and some other right leaning stickers. <a href="http://www.goodoleboybumperstickers.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.goodoleboybumperstickers.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-143814</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-143814</guid>
		<description>People tend to forget that eight years had lapsed between the first attack on the World Trade Center and the second fatal one.  These guys tend to bide their time until it's ripe, thoroughly planned, and funded. Just because nothing major has occured within the US since 9/11 doesn't mean a damn thing regarding the 'effectiveness' of Bush's security strategy...if there is a strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People tend to forget that eight years had lapsed between the first attack on the World Trade Center and the second fatal one.  These guys tend to bide their time until it&#8217;s ripe, thoroughly planned, and funded. Just because nothing major has occured within the US since 9/11 doesn&#8217;t mean a damn thing regarding the &#8216;effectiveness&#8217; of Bush&#8217;s security strategy&#8230;if there is a strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-143597</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/03/19/riding-in-on-a-high-horse/#comment-143597</guid>
		<description>I do think that technically Mr Laden cannot issue a "Fatwa" as he is not widely consider a scholar of Islamic Law. Or is he?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think that technically Mr Laden cannot issue a &#8220;Fatwa&#8221; as he is not widely consider a scholar of Islamic Law. Or is he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
