Liberals Silent on Iraq Atrocities

In New York, you cannot ride a subway without being bombarded with posters about Darfur and now, Tibet. Of course I have sympathy for those killed and displaced in Darfur, though the numbers have been overblown and other specifics of the situation have been exaggerated. And I am a sucker for all plainly legitimate secessionist movements, as in Tibet. But I am quite sick of being guilted into protest and “action” with the purpose of fixing problems my government is in no way (currently) responsible for.

The Tibet march poster I saw yesterday mentioned the “atrocities” perpetrated by the Chinese government. How about the atrocities carried out, abetted, enabled, and inspired by the US Government in Iraq? The death toll in Iraq beats last month’s entire cluster of clashes in Tibet practically every hour. Why, outside of a few stickers on newspaper boxes around town, is no significant mention made of what’s going on non-stop in Iraq? Are mainstream liberals just so cowed by the see-through rhetoric of the now completely debunked War Party that they still refuse to criticize a war their military is currently prosecuting?

Why are they demurely and cowardly “supporting the troops” in Iraq while wasting their rage on bullsh*t like a police crackdown against rioters in Tibet? This goes all the way up to top liberals in the country — the disgusting Nancy Pelosi tells the President he should boycott the Olympics opening ceremony in Beijing. Who is George Bush to express moral indignation about anything? France’s Sarkozy is just as ridiculous — he rubs his face in Bush’s crack as the Decider bends over to destroy another piece of Iraq, but is contemplating a boycott of the Olympics opening ceremonies over a few scuffles in Lhasa?

Sick.

How about some priorities reevaluation?




RSS feed | Trackback URI

149 Comments »

Comment by dan
2008-04-07 16:24:02

exactly. the US government has zero moral authority to lecture any other country about any godda**ed thing.

want to boycott a country that’s perpetrating despicable war crimes in the ME and elsewhere on a daily basis? boycott the US.

 
Comment by Kenneth
2008-04-07 16:26:42

There is much more to this than mere cowardice. These liberals are part of the same elite that the mainstream “conservatives” (a much debased term) are. To call the US out on its atrocities is to threaten one of the ideological cornerstones of American imperialism- the idea that the US is always benign- and, by extension, their own power and privilege. Duplicitous, oleaginous, and disingenuous- that about sums up the modern liberal.

Comment by abraham
2008-04-08 06:17:31

Yeah, those damned liberals. Conservatives NEVER start wars. Not even fake “Conservatives”.

Comment by liberranter
2008-04-08 09:10:50

Abraham:

I’ve seen you post frequently to this blog, so I have to believe that you’re well aware that the terms “liberal” and “conservative” are, to both the authors who post here and their readers, interchangeable and meaningless. I’m also assuming that you’re well aware that “conservatives” are an even more frequent target of criticism on AW.com than “liberals.”

In short, I’m assuming that your post was meant to be read as tongue in cheek.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Kenneth
2008-04-08 14:23:07

Yes, I’m well aware of that. “Liberal” is more a self-designation than anything, and should be understood in that sense.

 
Comment by abraham
2008-04-13 10:11:03

Uh, no, liberranter. I’m not sure what makes you an expert on AW.com’s content, but you’re the one that seems to have mis-read this piece. Vance is clearly focusing on “liberal” moral indignation over the Tibet crackdowns when the war on Iraq ostensibly provides enough fodder for their righteous ire.

“Liberal” and “conservative” are interchangeable here? Where on Earth did you get that silly notion?

 
 
 
 
Comment by Brad Smith
2008-04-07 16:53:05

It’s misdirection. Look over here and not over there, one of the oldest tricks in the book. They are con men (and women) and thats how they operate. Liberal Socialists and Fascist Conservatives what a great combination. It’s getting harder and harder to tell them apart. They both advocate sticking their noses in everyone’s business here and abroad. What is they say? Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Peace.

 
Comment by Johanna Swaag
2008-04-07 17:53:09

People in glass houses………………….

Comment by gunnerchik6
2008-04-10 05:45:34

I agree Johanna… those whom live in glass houses nedd not be throwing stones.
Most of these posts are because of news reports or media groups adding to a story that isnt very interesting so there for they add a little spin to it. Im sure its safe to say that none of you have even been to the middle east. None of you know what really goes on over there…. so until you do… until you walk in our footsteps as soldiers then the best advice anyone could give is to keep your mouth shut about things you know nothing about.
Its so easy for all of you to sit and slam the military daily because you are not in harms way. There is no ‘QUICK FIX’ when it comes to war. And for anyone who feels there is then you have been sadly mislead. Rome was not built in a day now was it? The magic wands that all of you wish to order must be on back order. So hurry up and wait!
Actions speak louder than words…. so for us soldiers here we are acting while all of you sit safely behind your PCs and take such great time in writting and posting blogs of negative out looks on our country and our military. But if all of this makes any of you feel better about your selves then by all means… type away! But i know for fact that in the back of your minds you know what we as soldiers face each day, and i know that for myself.. I made a choice in life to stand strong for my country and for the people who proudly call them selves American and in knowing that i take pride in what i do.
Not everyone has a negative comment and not everyone feels as you all do… so in knowing that i can do my job and know that there are people out there thankful for what i do.
So for the people out there that approach me with a ‘thank you’… You have my highest respect and it is for you in which i fight daily for our country.
GOD BLESS AMERICAN AND GOD BLESS THE PEOPLE WHO STAND STRONG DAILY FOR IT !

 
 
Comment by Weston
2008-04-07 17:56:28

I’m all for getting our priorities straight, and I agree the Iraq war is worse than “the scuffles” in Tibet. But there’s no reason not to condemn both, and if we never did anything good until we stopped doing everything bad, no good would ever be done. Look, I know everyone’s going to jump on me for saying so, but if stern words and a boycott of the Olympics can stop Chinese human rights abuses, I don’t see much reason not to do it. It’s not like it the war in Iraq would go much worse if we did, and Sapienza’s “waste” comment notwithstanding, there’s plenty of rage to go around.

Comment by liberranter
2008-04-08 09:19:50

…but if stern words and a boycott of the Olympics can stop Chinese human rights abuses, I don’t see much reason not to do it.

“You hypocrite! First take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.” (Matthew 7:5, NIV)

Comment by Weston
2008-04-08 12:15:24

As I said, “…if we never did anything good until we stopped doing everything bad, no good would ever be done.”

I had your lame-ass Biblical principle in mind when I wrote that. Do I need to put it in smaller words, or do you have something other than “divine revelation” to back up your position?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by liberranter
2008-04-08 14:33:23

What else does one need other than a simple, common-sense, time-tested admonition to get one’s own disastrous, toxic mess of a house in order before trying clean up someone else’s? Or do you need something monosyllabic (that means “made up of one-syllable words”) to more clearly explain the point?

 
Comment by Weston
2008-04-08 15:52:40

Hmm. I suppose I deserved the snippy tone, so let me be the first to take the insults down a notch. The problem is that your simple, common-sense admonition runs headlong into an even more simple, common-sense admonition: two wrongs don’t make a right. Would the world be a better place if the US pulled out of Iraq? Let’s stipulate the answer to that is Yes. Would the world be a better place if China stopped abusing Tibet? Also, Yes. Now suppose, counterfactually, that the US is the only state able to both stop the war in Iraq and get China to stop abusing Tibet. Your admonition would say that if the US doesn’t pull out of Iraq, then it ALSO shouldn’t stop China from abusing Tibet. In other words, your express position is that we should commit one wrong because we’re not going to stop committing another one, and that just doesn’t look right.

 
Comment by Bill Rood
2008-04-08 20:11:04

Weston, what must be kept in mind is that each individual has a finite amount of time and energy to expend. The more time and energy expended on issues NOT under our control — such as Darfur or Tibet — the less time will be left to expend on issues that ARE (at least somewhat, as citizens of the perp state) under our control. Darfur, and especially Tibet, are distractions that sap our time and energy so we have less time and energy to devote to putting an end to our own crimes in Iraq and our interventionist foreign policy in general. I do suspect that in some cases the publicity given to these distractions is deliberately intended to have precisely that effect. Tibetans are likely oppressed less than our own Black and Latino underclasses. For that reason, the whining and hand-wringing I hear about human rights abuses in Tibet sometimes infuriates me even more than straight Neocon bullshit from the likes of William Kristol.

 
Comment by Weston
2008-04-09 04:34:26

Bill, I agree that individuals only have a finite amount of time to expend, and of course I’m worried about the possibility that minor issues get play in the media at least in part because its serves someone’s interests to “distract” us from relatively more important issues.

But I’m skeptical of your argument for two reasons. First, efforts to stop the war in Iraq have diminishing returns. If you’re not familiar with economics jargon, that means that at some point, the harder we try, the less effect we have per ounce of effort. The US is heavily committed in Iraq, and I could spend every minute of every day trying to change that fact and just not get anywhere. But if I and others take a few of those minutes to devote to other goals that are less important but easier to accomplish, it seems that more good might be brought about overall.

Second, even if I’m wrong about the first point, there is nothing wrong with a division of labor. There are a lot of people working very hard for justice in the US, and I’m not sure I see any reason why all of them should work on the same issues. There are already people working to help disadvantaged minorities, and there are already people working on stopping the war in Iraq. All of that seems compatible with still other people working to stop China’s violence against Tibet.

I don’t hold with single-issue politics, and those are only a couple reasons why. The bottom line is that the US is a big and powerful country, and it can do a lot of things at once. We shouldn’t miss the chance to do a few easier, smaller good things just because we’re simultaneously hung up on one enormous bad thing.

 
Comment by Weston
2008-04-09 04:47:39

Sorry, all of that was premised on the thought that the Tibet situation is at least partially under our control, which I see that you deny. I think it’s an interesting question whether international condemnation and a boycott of the Olympics will actually get China to do something it doesn’t want to do. If you’ve read my previous posts carefully you’ll see that I never committed myself to the view that this would work, although I disagree with you to the extent that I think it could–for reasons I admit are not entirely clear to me, international actors take the Olympics very seriously. Unlike the recent House Resolution condemning the alleged Russian assassination of a political dissident, for example, a boycott of the games at the very least sends a potent message to the host that its behavior is unacceptable.

 
 
 
Comment by optimist
2008-04-09 03:38:47

With Weston: The repression of Tibetans by the state of China must be confronted. Simple as that. To rate atrocities in terms of relative atrociousness, is an repulsive pursuit. Tibetans at the end of the lash/gun/baton feel the blows not one ounce less than do Iraqis.

At issue is the absurd hypocrisy of “anti-war” democrats selecting the easy road (many of whom have, and will continue to make fortunes off of the war machine)–but not their purpose in calling out the PRC. What needs to be increased is direct confrontation with congressmen, not merely the “scorn of the intellectuals.”

 
 
Comment by 8Ball
2008-04-07 18:45:31

As long as we continue to pay our taxes without complaint then we will remain the warmonger’s slaves. They know it and no matter how much we protest without substance, they will just keep on doing what they are doing. Most Americans are cowed, afraid of crossing “the man” and they keep their heads buried in the sand.

“No taxation without representation”: That is the spirit that made the country and for all practical purposes the general population no longer has any representation in Washington. It has been given over to the highest bidder long ago…

We have become a nation of whiners.

 
Comment by Tim Mitchum
2008-04-07 19:38:12

The real atrocities are happening in Palestine and Iraq and are being commited by Israel/US. The zionist neo-cons want to divert our attention and look for other conflicts which are not our business.

 
Comment by AlexLawyer
2008-04-07 19:54:57

Our educational system, like that of most countries, does its job in thoroughy vaccinating the young with nationalism and collective narcissism. This immunizes most people to acknowledgement of our wrongdoing and creates virulent reactivity to those who do not share our views or bend immediately to our demands. When someone like Reverend Wright or Noam Chomsky dare to point out the glaringly obvious, they elicit an overwhelming inflammatory response. Go back and think of your history classes in school, and how they glossed over slavery, the genocide of the Native Americans, the Spanish-American War and other outrages. For far too long we’ve confused jingoism for patriotism, greed for sound economics, bigotry for religious principles and warmongering for self defense.

 
Comment by Steve Hogan
2008-04-07 20:01:24

We should speak out against wrongs wherever they occur, no matter who the victims or the victimizers are. By all means, our priorities should be to halt the debacle in Iraq. The extent of the killing and our government’s criminal behavior demand it.

That said, the thugs in Beijing are doing what they’ve always done: lording over their helpless subjects. I feel for the people of Tibet. They were dealt a very crappy hand.

 
Comment by Rex in Australia
2008-04-07 20:53:52

Great comments all round (no Tim today :)

Recently my mother-in-law bought some Tibetan flags and gave them to friends and family to display. It got me thinking how trendy it is to support Tibet’s independence, but displaying a Palestinian flag will get you all sorts of trouble thse days (and probably a visit from the lcoal Gestapo). And we rarely get news of Palestinian deaths on mainstream commercial news although they greatly surpass China’s killing of Tibetans, just like the Iraqi deaths get less coverage than some angry monks shouting in Tibet. And speaking of independence, is anyone boldly supporting Iraq’s independence?!?

Comment by abraham
2008-04-08 06:14:45

Well, because Tibetans are cute and fuzzy with their bald heads, while Palestinians are murderous terrorists.

 
 
Comment by Jack Huang
2008-04-07 21:47:46

Thanks for the antiwar website for pointing out the so plainly obvious. Many innocent people died in the recent Tibetan riot, but most of them are ethnic Han and Hui (i.e., Chinese Muslim), including an eight-month old baby. These facts will never be shown on the main-stream Western media, but a few key strokes of search will find some of the details in Google or YouTube… Remind me how the Iraq war is flamed by the same media…

Please also visit the anti-cnn.com website, where all the distortion and mis-information of the western media in reporting the recent Tibetan riot is analyzed and documented by volunteers.

It is a critical historical time. These biased reports on the Tibetan riot, are for the first time, widely accessible to the common Chinese people. Remember, all Chinese students undergoing English education from grade one, and >99% of western media are freely assessable from China. People in China are just shocked by the open hostility that the major western media displayed against China. Ironically, the government propaganda machine has always emphasized on the good wills of the outside world towards China, which is largely true in the rest of the world besides the few countries that have committed the most crimes in war, slavery and injustice in recent human history. It is really a wake up call to the common people in China.

By the way, I was an old activist in the 1989 Chinese student movement. But shortly after a few years of living in US convinced me that China is much better off without the western politicians’ concern and passion for the Chinese “human rights” and “democracy”.

Comment by Eugene Costa
2008-04-08 14:51:34

Thanks so much for your comment–a mountain of doubts melt away as ice.

 
 
Comment by Sam W
2008-04-07 22:18:09

The thoughts of Mr. Sapienza and all of the comments above give me some hope that the people of America can actually think logically. If this webpage could just be shown on every computer in every college and high school in the country, the next generation might turn things around.

 
Comment by ganzhuolin
2008-04-08 01:57:31

Brad Smith says,”Liberal Socialists and Fascist Conservatives what a great combination. It’s getting harder and harder to tell them apart.”

Reminds me of what the late English playwright Joe Orton said, “Scratch a Liberal and you find a fascist.” And correct me if I’m mistaken but weren’t a few of the neo-cons once Liberals, if not outright socialists?

And, of course, Sapienza is quite right about the blatant hypocrisy. When the Olympics Torch Relay goes through San Fran you will of course see the protests. Curiously you won’t see any protests about what the U.S. is doing in Iraq.

Which makes you wonder if ‘freedom’ and ‘human rights’ are the real issues where these protesters are concerned. In my opinion they are not! They never were! The issue is pure, unadulterated racism. Yup, I said it and no apologises…

Their hypocrisy and behaviour says it all…

 
Comment by Eric
2008-04-08 02:49:44

And how about the longtime and ongoing atrocities carried out by the Israelis but funded and otherwise abetted, enabled, encouraged, and praised by the US Government?

 
Comment by richard vajs
2008-04-08 05:02:11

In my observation, pro-war liberals are generally Zionists. And the target of choice is always Islamic. As an example, the crisis in Darfur is presented as the Arabs in Northern Sudan persecuting blacks in Southern Sudan, when it is actually a civil war. Several years ago, an armistice between the two factions was arranged, but the southern faction refused to stop fighting. Of course, our media never really dealt with that disjointed fact, preferring to stick with the old “bad Arab” theme. And, can you imagine a Hollywood fund raiser for the “starving Palestinians”?
I don’t believe that our Congress will generate many resolutions condemning China - a guy deep in debt does not usually spit on his creditors. Probably they will blame Iran for interfering in Tibet.
Zionist control of our media and our Congress is so strong that I doubt anything will change until this whole ediface of lies and deceit comes crashing down around us. You can accelerate this by avoiding paying taxes as much as possible

 
Comment by Piers
2008-04-08 05:33:08

Why single out liberals? All such hypocrites (left or right) should be described with an appropriate term: interventionists, statists, warmongers, etc.

How about some labels reevaluation?

 
Comment by Paul
2008-04-08 05:49:25

What’s the point of the accusation? And just what is the authors definition of liberal? I never really had a label until the warmongers dubbed me a liberal and now this piece of tripe!
I’ve been opposing the Iraq war since before it started. 5 years of howling at the moon about the atrocities, writing my congressman, standing on street corners with signs, telling any one who would listen. I’ve lost business over this thing, practically lost my mind in the process and now I’m a hypocrite?

Comment by Jeremy
2008-04-08 07:31:40

Clearly, you are not a part of mainstream liberalism. So come off it. Some people just love to look for insult where there is none.

Comment by Paul
2008-04-08 13:05:22

Jeremy, you made no distinction. If you meant no insult, perhaps you should be a little more succinct in your writing.
As far as your tag….”mainstream liberalism”, there is no such thing. Liberal is just another over used term that encompasses a multitude of philosophies of people who oppose
“conservative” policies, whatever that is.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Piers
2008-04-09 06:04:54

Antiwar.com deserves better than this arrogant response.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Skulz Fontaine
2008-04-08 06:44:41

Darfur is trendy ala George Clooney. Tibet is trendy ala Richard Gere. Afghanistan is trendy ala all that heroin. Nothing says Hollywood chic like an Afghan warlord and several thousand kilos of raw opium on it’s way to ‘cookdown kitchen’. After all, those Hollywood trendy types DO love their heroin. They don’t like to talk about it, but they do love to geez it.
Moral authority is vanished from the global stage. Moral authority has rotted away courtesy of war mongering lunatics like George Bush, Tony Blair, John Howard, and even Nico the Sark. It WAS sort of trendy how the Sark helped burn the Muslim youth in France. Moral authority has made a greedy transformation into moral expedience. We’ll now hold up the corrupt United Nations as our ‘power point presentation’ on corruption and comprehensive collapse of moral authority. Can we all say U.N. Security Council and irrelevant in the same breath? Israel and Palestine? Annapolis? Farce? Condo Rice and cannibalism?
Most liberals are hypocritical and most conservatives are hypocritical. I use the classic Democrat and Republican phrase in an interchangeable motif. However, the voices of sane leadership are STILL silenced and marginalized. Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Chuck Hagel, and Joe Biden. Biden? Yup, the man does have some fascinating and germane things to say. However, the Biden tends to shoot his own balloons directly off the stage and that’s comical but sad.
The stranglehold on media is what MUST be broken. Without access, ANY message will die of simple neglect.

Comment by Bill Rood
2008-04-08 20:22:35

Not sure what you meant by, “…Biden tends to shoot his own balloons directly off the stage…,” but it reminds me of listening to him during the debate in October, 2002. The clown raised all sorts of really good, germaine questions. What would the war cost? How long would we be there? Etc, etc. He said we really ought to have the answers to all those questions before voting for the resolution, and that we really didn’t have all the answers. As he spoke, I was convinced he intended to vote, “No.” Then he voted, “Yes.” I was absolutely flabbergasted.

 
 
Comment by jack
2008-04-08 06:59:50

Tibet is a long term tragedy,with a popular spokesman,the Deli Lama.In Palistine most leaders are murdered or imprisoned.Any outside spokesman is ignored or discredited by being called a terrorist or an antisemite.

Comment by A. G. Phillbin
2008-04-08 08:53:21

You said:

Tibet is a long term tragedy,with a popular spokesman,the Deli Lama.

I say:

The “Deli Lama?” Does he make a good pastrami sandwich?

 
 
Comment by Cous Cous
2008-04-08 07:00:16

Why, outside of a few stickers on newspaper boxes around town, is no significant mention made of what’s going on non-stop in Iraq?

Because propaganda outlets like the NYT, Antiwar.com, CNN, et cetera have spent the last 4 years desperately spinning the hopeless guerrilla war in Iraq into something more palatable.

The deindustrialization of Iraq and the mass murder, ethnic cleansing, death squads, and torture inflicted on the Iraqis for resisting the occupation has been replaced with the fable of noble America virtuously trying to hold the country together and make the savage darkies stop killing each other. This has enabled Americans to cheerfully forget their ongoing atrocities and begin braying for new ones.

Comment by Eugene Costa
2008-04-08 13:59:40

As far as I can recall, you are singular in using the term “deindustrialization” in regard to Iraq on this site.

Right on target, and obviously part of Israel’s and the Neo-Cons’ game plan from the beginning fro Iraq, with idiots in the Marine Corps who have defined themselves as do-gooders building schools and improving the quality of life in Mesopotamia doing their dirty work for them.

Comment by Eugene Costa
2008-04-08 14:00:14

corr: “for Iraq”.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Cous Cous
2008-04-09 09:29:19

It appears to be a forbidden concept in the American press. They’ll occasionally mention that the reconstruction has been sluggish or inefficient, but will never state that the reason many Iraqis still lack water, electricity, and fuel is because the occupation wants it that way. The same thing is happening in Gaza, but that’s a non-issue here as well.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Joe
2008-04-08 07:02:43

I grew up in the sixties, and remember our own gov’t gunning down peaceful college students, Kent State, Orangeburg S,C, and L.A. just to name a few. And they want the U.S. to protest China; get real.. What a nuerotic and forgetful nation we have become.

 
Comment by peace
2008-04-08 08:05:45

So appreciate this strong truth-telling from Jeffrey Sapienza above, and I agree with him every inch of the way. Freaking correct is he!

 
Comment by InchoateDetail
2008-04-08 08:52:11

Darfur is just an excuse for a USRael oil grab, and “liberals” with their “Save Darfur” nonsense are playing right into the fascists’ hands. Darfur is a war for resources between nomads (conveniently portrayed by the U.S. Zionist media as “Arabs” when in fact they are ethnically African) and village dwellers.

From antiwar.com itself:

DARFUR’S WAR OF DEFINITIONS
Ramzy Baroud
Antiwar.com
8/26/04

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/baroud.php?articleid=3445

“Alex de Waal is not one of those journalists, but an author recognized in Western media circles as a leading authority on Sudan. He wrote in the Observer on July 25: “Characterizing the Darfur war as ‘Arabs’ versus ‘Africans’ obscures the reality. Darfur’s Arabs are black, indigenous, African Muslims – just like Darfur’s non-Arabs.”"

The USRael government wants eastern (if not all of) Africa, its natural resources, including its water. That’s why *our* government is starting an AfricaCom.

The genocide in Congo is MUCH worse, but we hear nary a peep from the “progressives.”

Comment by Kenneth
2008-04-08 14:25:36

Correct you are. Typical “liberal humanitarians”…

 
 
Comment by Tim R.
2008-04-08 09:49:22

Perhaps I’m mistaken but it seems to me that certain people are down right obsessed with hating and blaming America and Israel for all of the worlds problems. Therefore, if there is a genocide (and it IS a genocide) in Darfur these folks will acknowledge it but then they will minimize it and say let’s turn our attention back to the evil US of A and Israel. Or they will try to find some way to blame the US for it. I was at a Darfur rally and you’d think they would have posters to criticize the President of Sudan, Mr. Al Bashir. Oh they had a few, but mostly a lot of the protesters just wanted to turn the Darfur rally into a blame Bush hate festival. If there is an ethnic cleansing and deliberate destruction of the Tibeten culture and people at the hands of the ruthless Chinese Communist Party, these folks will again acknowledge it, say its a bad thing too, but again they will minimize it and shift attention back to the big bad and evil USA and Israel. If there terrible atrocities being committed in Burma they will minimize it so they can keep hating America and Israel.

In short, if an atrocity or human rights violation can’t be directly blamed on America or Israel some folks don’t really seem to give a damn about it. But if they can find a way to implicate Israel or America these same folks will have an immediate apoplexy.

Comment by richard vajs
2008-04-08 10:15:34

Tim R,
Consider the possibility that Israel and America REALLY are at fault for the destruction/occupation of Iraq/Palestine. And if so, who should be the ones to do something about that? Should the Chinese worry about the occupations of Iraq and Palestine and we worry about Tibet? Reminds me of the the old Groucho Marx comic line - “I have Addison’s disease .. and he has mine”. Doctor, heal yourself.

 
Comment by Nick
2008-04-08 15:01:11

You are really missing the point here aren’t you Tim?

It’s not about who commits what atrocities but how these atrocities are reported. No one is minimizing what is happening in Tibet, but it really does pale in comparison to what is happening in Iraq. No one can deny this.

The Iraqi war began back in 2003 over a pack of lies for the sake of oil. Over 4000 dead American soldiers and probably half a million dead Iraqis (most likely conservative estimates)and still counting.

The point is, the media has been in a reporting frenzy over Tibet when we get so little converage on the tragedy that is Iraq. The above facts speak for themselves on the magnitude of atrocities being committed. It’s obvious that you are turning a blind eye to this when the “minimizing” is actually being done on the Iraqi War.

 
 
Comment by InchoateDetail
2008-04-08 12:01:29

At the moment, the U.S. and Israeli governments (and Israel’s fan club) are responsible for much of U.S.’ foreign policy. This extends into their meddling into Africa and Pakistan.

Sudan has huge oil reserves which China and France have already negotiated deals to get access to. Israel wants a piece of that action and with its U.S. supporters, like the late, unlamented, Tom Lantos, manipulated U.S. public opinion, especially on the “left” to generate the “Save Darfur” campaign.

BTW: it turns out that Israel is buying Iran’s oil, this while Israel and its fan club (including the U.S. Zionist controlled media) do their best to manufacture a pretext for war on Iran.

Don’t believe me, here’s the proof (from today’s Democracy Now!)

Report: Israel Is Secretly Importing Iranian Oil

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/4/8/headlines#9

“An Israeli energy newsletter has revealed Israel is secretly buying oil from Iran despite an official boycott. The newsletter EnergiaNews reports Israeli companies get around the boycott by having the oil delivered to European ports, where it is then bought by Israelis. The oil is then imported into Israel by the Eilat-Ashkelon Pipeline Company, which keeps its oil sources secret.”

Americans are suckers. GET ISRAEL AND ITS FAN CLUB OUT OF U.S. FOREIGN POLICY NOW!!!!!

 
Comment by Tim R.
2008-04-08 12:08:00

Richard Vajs,

Yes, if you are right and we are responsible for the destruction/occcupation of Iraq and Palestine then we should concern ourselves about it. But as Martin Luther King said, “An injustice anywhere, is a threat to justice everywhere.” So why only focus on Iraq/Palestine?
And by the way, the United States does an awful lot of business with China and we gave them “most favored nation” trading status and all sorts of perks, so we are responsible.

Comment by richard vajs
2008-04-08 18:02:45

Tim R,
Why only focus on the destruction/occupation of Iraq/Palestine? Friend, isn’t that enough to put on your plate? What greater tragedy has ever happened to America compared to the descent into Hell that our association with that racist, criminal country of Israel has led us? In the 60 years that Israel has stolen land from the Palestinians, not one word has been spoken out loud in our U S Congress in protest. Not one word. But over $150 Billion in direct aid and several Trillion $ in associated costs have been spent on behalf of that dirtbag country. American taxes pay for the cluster bombs that killed Lebanese civilians. American taxes paid for the resettlement of Russian Jews into the West Bank dispossessing the natives. American taxes paid for the outrages that fueled 9-11. American taxes pay for the Mossad goons who taught us how to torture our prisoners.
And for us few, who know the truth, we are assaulted everyday by having to watch the deferrment to, the pandering to, and the slavish devotion to this criminal country by our media, our Government and even our religous leaders.
Why should I care about the mal odors coming from far off Tibet when we are up to our noses in a Zionist sewer right here in the USA?

Comment by Peace
2008-04-09 09:07:07

So well said, fr. richard vajs. Much thanks.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Tim R.
2008-04-10 14:53:53

Richard Vajs,

We clearly have a huge difference of opinion on the Israel issue. I do agree that Israel has not treated the Palestinians well and they certainly have a share of the blame. However, you keep insisting the all the land was “stolen.” But isn’t it true that the land was fought for and won in several wars? From the beginning of civilization nations have had wars over land, and the winner generally gets to keep the land. So Israel had wars in 48, 67, and 73 and they won. Period. It is the law of conquest. Israel has no more stolen the land from Palestinians than the United States has stolen it from the Native Americans. If Israel has to give back land then you should also be calling on the United States to give back the land to the Native Americans.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Gregory Purcell
2008-04-08 13:23:08

Being in part a liberal hippy type myself, I can attest to the youthful idealism of wanting to save the world and to do good. The energy and drive to make a difference can be usurped by evil powers that want to misdirect it as has happened with the Save Darfur fund, ( most likely a CIA mind control program, or maybe a fund by people who profit off mis-channeling the liberal desire to make a positive difference)

This all became clear to me one day while listening to Democracy Now

http://www.democracynow.org/2007/6/4/mahmood_mamdani_on_darfur_the_politics

MAHMOOD MAMDANI: And I’m struck by the innocence of those who are part of the Save Darfur—of the foot soldiers in the Save Darfur Coalition, not the leadership, simply because this is not discussed.

Let me tell you, when I went to Sudan in Khartoum, I had interviews with the UN humanitarian officer, the political officer, etc., and I asked them, I said, “What assistance does the Save Darfur Coalition give?” He said, “Nothing.” I said, “Nothing?” He said, “No.” And I would like to know. The Save Darfur Coalition raises an enormous amount of money in this country. Where does that money go? Does it go to other organizations which are operative in Sudan, or does it go simply to fund the advertising campaign?

AMY GOODMAN: To make people aware of what’s going on in Darfur.

MAHMOOD MAMDANI: To make people aware of what is going on, but people who then, out of awareness, give money not to fuel a commercial campaign, but expecting that this money will go to do something about the pain and suffering of those who are the victims in Darfur, so how much of that money is going to actually—how much of it translates into food or medicine or shelter? And how much of it is being recycled?

Comment by Virginia
2008-05-13 14:37:04

War-mongering in the NYT

This war-mongering column by Nicholas D. Kristof, Op-Ed columnist for the New York Times, appeared on April 10.

Memo to Bush on Darfur
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/10/opinion/10kristof.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Kristof, expresses frustration that Bush hasn’t yet invaded Darfur “Mr. Bush backs off and does nothing” which, according to Kristof, is because “[Bush thinks he] can’t invade a third Muslim country, especially one with oil”.

Oh yes, there is lots of oil sitting under the ground in Darfur, and yes, Bush wants to get his hands on it.

Under the guise of recommending “practical steps for Darfur” to President Bush, Kristof casually slips in these militaristic suggestions:

excerpts from Memo to Bush on Darfur:

-The U.N. and U.S. should take South Sudan up on its offers in 2004 and 2005 to provide up to 10,000 [armed] peacekeepers for Darfur.

-The U.S. should impose a no-fly zone over Darfur from the air base in Abeche, Chad (or even from our existing base in Djibouti). We wouldn’t keep planes in the air or shoot down Sudanese aircraft. Rather, the next time Sudan breaches the U.N. ban on offensive military flights, we would wait a day or two and then destroy a Sudanese Antonov bomber on the ground.

-We should warn Sudan that if it provokes a war with the South, attacks camps for displaced people or invades a neighboring country, we will destroy its air force.

Send in 10,000 “peacekeeping” armed troops? Destroying bombers? Destroying Sudan’s air force?? This does NOT sound like “practical” approaches to me, these are all violent!

This is war-mongering!! Kristof should be severely reprimanded by his peers AND his editors, for this column and blog. He even offers readers to respond to his Facebook - this guy is way too internet saavy, obviously looking to drum up support for a war by any method he can.

And look at this! Kristof has hopped on the anti-Olympics bandwagon as well [there has to be a script somewhere we don't know about]. Look for his column in which he refers to the Beijing Olympics as “The Genocide Olympics”(how original…)

Could it possibly be because George Bush is afraid that China will get to the oil in Sudan first?

This places deep suspicion on the entire “Save Darfur” campaign.

 
 
Comment by Eugene Costa
2008-04-08 13:32:03

US water pipelines are breaking

NEW YORK (Long AP April 8, 2008)- Two hours north of New York City, a mile-long stream and a marsh the size of a football field have mysteriously formed along a country road. They are such a marvel that people come from miles around to drink the crystal-clear water, believing it is bubbling up from a hidden natural spring.

….The water is coming from a cracked 70-year-old tunnel hundreds of feet below ground, scientists say.

The tunnel is leaking up to 36 million gallons a day as it carries drinking water from a reservoir to the big city. It is a powerful warning sign of a larger problem around the country: The infrastructure that delivers water to the nation’s cities is badly aging and in need of repairs.

The Environmental Protection Agency says utilities will need to invest more than $277 billion over the next two decades on repairs and improvements to drinking water systems. Water industry engineers put the figure drastically higher, at about $480 million….

Engineers say this is a crucial era for the nation’s water systems, especially in older cities like New York, where some pipes and tunnels were built in the 1800s and are now nearing the end of their life expectancies….

Catastrophic problems can arise when infrastructure fails. An 84-year-old steam pipe erupted beneath a New York street last year, creating a mammoth geyser that rained mud and debris down on the city.

In Chicago, an 80-year-old cast-iron water main broke earlier this year, spilling thousands of gallons and opening up a 25-foot hole in the street.

In Denver, up to 4 million gallons of water gushed from a ruptured 30-year-old pipeline in February, gouging a sinkhole across three lanes of Interstate 25. The lanes were shut down for nearly two weeks.

Cleveland has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on infrastructure in the past 20 years but still must repair daily breaks. Last month, a break in a 2 1/2-foot-diameter water main turned a downtown square into a watery crater and knocked out other utilities.

The amount of wasted water from these breaches is staggering.

The 36 million gallons a day that leak from the 85-mile Delaware Aqueduct in New York state amounts to more than 1 billion gallons a month. That may be a drop in the bucket compared to the hundreds of billions of water consumed in New York City every year, but the daily leak in the tunnel would meet the daily demands of drought-ravaged Raleigh, N.C.

Residents in Wawarsing, about 100 miles from New York City, blame tunnel leaks for the constant flooding in their yards and basements. Department of Environmental Protection engineers are trying to determine whether the aqueduct is really responsible for the soggy mess along Route 209 that has gotten considerably worse over the last 10 years….

New York has spent decades digging a new $6 billion tunnel that will create an alternative source of water delivery and allow for easier inspection and repair of the other tunnels. It is expected to be completed by 2020.

Around the country, water rates are going up to help pay for the repairs, estimated at anywhere between $550 and $7,000 per household during the next three decades.

Augusta, Ga., raised rates 11 percent from 2001 through 2007 for a $300 million program to improve the deteriorating water system. Cleveland gradually increased rates by about 6 percent for more than 15 years to fund a $750 million project to address aging and inefficient pipes. Springfield, Mass., doubled rates for its 250,000 customers. Philadelphia, Kenosha, Wis., Portsmouth, Va., and other cities have followed suit.

Many engineers and water utilities say water bills around the country are too low. In New York City, where a studio apartment can rent for more than $3,000 a month, the cost of water and sewage is about $60 for an entire single-family home….

[excerpted]

Comment by Eugene Costa
2008-04-08 13:34:10

At this rate, how will the US ever be able to complete the proposed undersea water pipeline to Israel?

Tick tock tick tock–save water shower together.

Comment by Eugene Costa
2008-04-08 13:42:09

I note also that the various bureaucratic entities are phrasing this largely as a residential drinking water issue–invariably speaking of per capita consumption, as if industrial and commercial consumption were not the part of the issue.

Junk mail anyone?

(Comments wont nest below this level)