<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC Freedom Rally Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:57:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl </title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/comment-page-1/#comment-173277</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4285#comment-173277</guid>
		<description>A camera sure  can lie.  Did you see it live on CNN?  CBS must have used the same camera you did.  Looked like a sparse turnout.  So much for your page...1st time in, last time out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A camera sure  can lie.  Did you see it live on CNN?  CBS must have used the same camera you did.  Looked like a sparse turnout.  So much for your page&#8230;1st time in, last time out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DianneinVA</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/comment-page-1/#comment-156586</link>
		<dc:creator>DianneinVA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4285#comment-156586</guid>
		<description>Hello,  I want to write about the July 12 rally in Washington DC.
It was another beautiful day, but being July it was very warm.  At least it was &quot;warm&quot; about 0930, when I was waiting for my sister and a 16 year old neighbor to meet at my house en route to DC.  

Even though I live close to the Capitol, we decided to take the train into the city, and so we loaded into the car and drove to the Metro station.  Arriving at the Metro garage, I knew it was going to be a good day.  We parked within view of two cars with Ron Paul bumper stickers.  Inside the station, we waited in line to buy our tickets  and saw a nice looking man wearing a Ron Paul TShirt.  Of course, we said hello.  

It turned out to be John Warnick from Breckenridge, CO.  What a font of knowlege he is.  He and his wife had come to DC for the rally.  We talked during the Metro ride, and wondered what the day would be like.  

Our small band of 5 disembarked at the Smithsonian Metro stop. Almost immediately we were joined by two fellows from www.frestateproject.org.  They gave us bookmarks, and we walked a bunch of strangers united.  On the curbside, we started noticing cars sporting the message.  Each time we saw one, we would yell out &quot;Ron Paul&quot;, like children playing punch buggy.  As we made our way from the Castle to the Capitol, we realized that this was no small event.  Even though we had chosen not to participate in the March, it was impossible not to notice the Ron Paul prescence.  

The Washington Mall is a large piece of land and in July there are American and Global tourists visiting DC.  Yet, in the melange of folks, it seemed every third person was wearing some sort of Ron Paul paraphenilia.   

When we arrived the Capitol grounds...WOW!  People.  Lots of them.  People with children; people in costume; people who believe in liberty.   

We circled the rally, looking for familiar faces.   To be honest, they were all familiar faces.  They were the faces of hope.  Of freedom.  Of liberty.  Of patriotism.   They were the faces of me and you and America.  

But it was hot...and though I had brought sandwiches and cucumbers, we started looking for water and a place to sit down.

Success.  My sister pulled out a $5 federal reserve note, and was told &quot;no charge&quot;.  She donated the paper that in itself has no value...the water was iced and tasted sweet.

Just then, the voice from the stage was singing the National Anthem, as a 9-11 theorist was taking...I heard the beautiful singing and tried to not hear the &quot;f**K&quot; and F**ked up&quot; that the man was using.  I placed my bag at my feet, came to attention and saluted our flag.  Almost as if on cue, the crowd became silent and honored our anthem, our country.  My sister looked at me curiously, and I wispered that Congress had recently authorized veterans to salute the anthem, even if no longer on active duty; even if not in uniform.  The man in front of me raised his right arm in a crisp salute- no words were spoken between us.  

As much as I love this country and as much as I am never ashamed of my 20+ years in the service, I am confused.  How can something as trivial as the right to salute my flag be an issue that is taking up the time of Congress?

Anyway,  the song ended powerfully.  We continued our walk.

I should mention now, that I am 55 years old, and a retired, disabled veteran and it WAS HOT.  We sat on the wall, not far from where I sat on April 15th.  We sat and I watched and I learned.  It was a glorious event so far.  

The loudspeaker system worked perfectly.  We sat and listened to the speaches and watched the Americans-  again, WOW!  Cameron (the 16 year old) decided sitting was too passive, and plunged into the crowd.  I cannot estimate numbers, but it was a crowd.  The Capitol police was out in force, but they had no need to intervene.  They were in fact, helpful Americans offering advice to the participants and aid to those overcome by the heat.  

I don&#039;t bring a camera to events, but in this case I wish I had.  In retrospect, I would have liked to have made a visual journal of all the Tshirts and signs.  They are a facinating gallery of living art, of living commentary.   But, I didn&#039;t, so I have to rely on the pictures in my mind.  They are always in focus, and will stay with me forever.  I thank my sister and my young friend Cameron and the many other supporters who captured the day in photography.   


On the grass, behind me was a a charismatic man using a puppet to record the event for SCTV.  I had to laugh...Next to me was a man from Pennsylvania, dressed in velvet in the style of the revolution (#1)  I am sure you will see his picture on the internet.  

The speakers were incredible.  All of them.  But in particular, I have new curiousity about Chuck Baldwin, and will learn more about him.   

Around 4 oclock, Dr Paul appeared at the stage. He looked comfortable and relaxed in a short sleeve, blue knit shirt.  I only mention that, because other speakers had warn suits and ties.  Carol was not with him.  (God bless you, Ms. Paul), but two of his daughters were there.  

He was funny, sharp and brilliant.  Some have said that he spoke of nothing new, but isn&#039;t that his whole message?  He is consistent in his love of America, his praise of his family, his thanks for his supporters, and his values:  our values.  And he spoke loving words about his friend, Kent Snyder.

He spoke for about half an hour, and then the most amazing thing.  He was done  and HE WAS GONE!  I mean he was gone!  He finished and literally sprinted away...up the Capitol steps taking two or three at a time, like an athelite in training.  I wasn&#039;t the only one who noticed.  My sister, who had moved closer to the stage said in awe &quot;did you see that?&quot;  My sixteen year old friend, who had gone to take pictures...could not keep up with him. The young family in torquise T-shirts commented on it,as did a young man from Texas sitting near by.  Everyone noticed and spoke out loud...sort of a communal &quot;ooohhh!&quot;   I can only compare it to what Dorothy said when Glenda popped away in her bubble---&quot;people come and go so quickly here.&quot;   

The day was far from over,  but it was time for Dianne to go home!  The Metro was a happy fantisy, filled with Ron Paul Tshirts, buttons, signs, and stickers.   A woman on the seat in front of me asked &quot;what was the rally about?&quot;  I answered &quot;Freedom.  Do you know Ron Paul?&quot;  She said yes, she was a Libertarian.  I smiled and told her Chuck Baldwin was there, too.  She asked who he was....***sigh***.  Maybe she will read about the day in the mass media.  OH!  I guess not.  

I want to thank everyone who came, everyone who worked to make it happen, everyone who believes in the Constitution.  

I wish I could go to Minneapolis, but think that is out of my realm of possiblitiy.  I hope someone will go, and be my eyes and my ears.  

R3volution.  Dianne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,  I want to write about the July 12 rally in Washington DC.<br />
It was another beautiful day, but being July it was very warm.  At least it was &#8220;warm&#8221; about 0930, when I was waiting for my sister and a 16 year old neighbor to meet at my house en route to DC.  </p>
<p>Even though I live close to the Capitol, we decided to take the train into the city, and so we loaded into the car and drove to the Metro station.  Arriving at the Metro garage, I knew it was going to be a good day.  We parked within view of two cars with Ron Paul bumper stickers.  Inside the station, we waited in line to buy our tickets  and saw a nice looking man wearing a Ron Paul TShirt.  Of course, we said hello.  </p>
<p>It turned out to be John Warnick from Breckenridge, CO.  What a font of knowlege he is.  He and his wife had come to DC for the rally.  We talked during the Metro ride, and wondered what the day would be like.  </p>
<p>Our small band of 5 disembarked at the Smithsonian Metro stop. Almost immediately we were joined by two fellows from <a href="http://www.frestateproject.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.frestateproject.org</a>.  They gave us bookmarks, and we walked a bunch of strangers united.  On the curbside, we started noticing cars sporting the message.  Each time we saw one, we would yell out &#8220;Ron Paul&#8221;, like children playing punch buggy.  As we made our way from the Castle to the Capitol, we realized that this was no small event.  Even though we had chosen not to participate in the March, it was impossible not to notice the Ron Paul prescence.  </p>
<p>The Washington Mall is a large piece of land and in July there are American and Global tourists visiting DC.  Yet, in the melange of folks, it seemed every third person was wearing some sort of Ron Paul paraphenilia.   </p>
<p>When we arrived the Capitol grounds&#8230;WOW!  People.  Lots of them.  People with children; people in costume; people who believe in liberty.   </p>
<p>We circled the rally, looking for familiar faces.   To be honest, they were all familiar faces.  They were the faces of hope.  Of freedom.  Of liberty.  Of patriotism.   They were the faces of me and you and America.  </p>
<p>But it was hot&#8230;and though I had brought sandwiches and cucumbers, we started looking for water and a place to sit down.</p>
<p>Success.  My sister pulled out a $5 federal reserve note, and was told &#8220;no charge&#8221;.  She donated the paper that in itself has no value&#8230;the water was iced and tasted sweet.</p>
<p>Just then, the voice from the stage was singing the National Anthem, as a 9-11 theorist was taking&#8230;I heard the beautiful singing and tried to not hear the &#8220;f**K&#8221; and F**ked up&#8221; that the man was using.  I placed my bag at my feet, came to attention and saluted our flag.  Almost as if on cue, the crowd became silent and honored our anthem, our country.  My sister looked at me curiously, and I wispered that Congress had recently authorized veterans to salute the anthem, even if no longer on active duty; even if not in uniform.  The man in front of me raised his right arm in a crisp salute- no words were spoken between us.  </p>
<p>As much as I love this country and as much as I am never ashamed of my 20+ years in the service, I am confused.  How can something as trivial as the right to salute my flag be an issue that is taking up the time of Congress?</p>
<p>Anyway,  the song ended powerfully.  We continued our walk.</p>
<p>I should mention now, that I am 55 years old, and a retired, disabled veteran and it WAS HOT.  We sat on the wall, not far from where I sat on April 15th.  We sat and I watched and I learned.  It was a glorious event so far.  </p>
<p>The loudspeaker system worked perfectly.  We sat and listened to the speaches and watched the Americans-  again, WOW!  Cameron (the 16 year old) decided sitting was too passive, and plunged into the crowd.  I cannot estimate numbers, but it was a crowd.  The Capitol police was out in force, but they had no need to intervene.  They were in fact, helpful Americans offering advice to the participants and aid to those overcome by the heat.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t bring a camera to events, but in this case I wish I had.  In retrospect, I would have liked to have made a visual journal of all the Tshirts and signs.  They are a facinating gallery of living art, of living commentary.   But, I didn&#8217;t, so I have to rely on the pictures in my mind.  They are always in focus, and will stay with me forever.  I thank my sister and my young friend Cameron and the many other supporters who captured the day in photography.   </p>
<p>On the grass, behind me was a a charismatic man using a puppet to record the event for SCTV.  I had to laugh&#8230;Next to me was a man from Pennsylvania, dressed in velvet in the style of the revolution (#1)  I am sure you will see his picture on the internet.  </p>
<p>The speakers were incredible.  All of them.  But in particular, I have new curiousity about Chuck Baldwin, and will learn more about him.   </p>
<p>Around 4 oclock, Dr Paul appeared at the stage. He looked comfortable and relaxed in a short sleeve, blue knit shirt.  I only mention that, because other speakers had warn suits and ties.  Carol was not with him.  (God bless you, Ms. Paul), but two of his daughters were there.  </p>
<p>He was funny, sharp and brilliant.  Some have said that he spoke of nothing new, but isn&#8217;t that his whole message?  He is consistent in his love of America, his praise of his family, his thanks for his supporters, and his values:  our values.  And he spoke loving words about his friend, Kent Snyder.</p>
<p>He spoke for about half an hour, and then the most amazing thing.  He was done  and HE WAS GONE!  I mean he was gone!  He finished and literally sprinted away&#8230;up the Capitol steps taking two or three at a time, like an athelite in training.  I wasn&#8217;t the only one who noticed.  My sister, who had moved closer to the stage said in awe &#8220;did you see that?&#8221;  My sixteen year old friend, who had gone to take pictures&#8230;could not keep up with him. The young family in torquise T-shirts commented on it,as did a young man from Texas sitting near by.  Everyone noticed and spoke out loud&#8230;sort of a communal &#8220;ooohhh!&#8221;   I can only compare it to what Dorothy said when Glenda popped away in her bubble&#8212;&#8221;people come and go so quickly here.&#8221;   </p>
<p>The day was far from over,  but it was time for Dianne to go home!  The Metro was a happy fantisy, filled with Ron Paul Tshirts, buttons, signs, and stickers.   A woman on the seat in front of me asked &#8220;what was the rally about?&#8221;  I answered &#8220;Freedom.  Do you know Ron Paul?&#8221;  She said yes, she was a Libertarian.  I smiled and told her Chuck Baldwin was there, too.  She asked who he was&#8230;.***sigh***.  Maybe she will read about the day in the mass media.  OH!  I guess not.  </p>
<p>I want to thank everyone who came, everyone who worked to make it happen, everyone who believes in the Constitution.  </p>
<p>I wish I could go to Minneapolis, but think that is out of my realm of possiblitiy.  I hope someone will go, and be my eyes and my ears.  </p>
<p>R3volution.  Dianne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dianne Moen</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/comment-page-1/#comment-155686</link>
		<dc:creator>Dianne Moen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4285#comment-155686</guid>
		<description>I am DianneinVA.  I attended and wrote about the Freedom Rally in Washington DC, April 15th, 2008. And now the supporters of Liberty are planning another rally on July 12th.  I will be there.  Hope for America...  Dianne Moen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am DianneinVA.  I attended and wrote about the Freedom Rally in Washington DC, April 15th, 2008. And now the supporters of Liberty are planning another rally on July 12th.  I will be there.  Hope for America&#8230;  Dianne Moen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfountain72</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/comment-page-1/#comment-150666</link>
		<dc:creator>cfountain72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4285#comment-150666</guid>
		<description>Gene Coast, you have once again claimed that Dr. Paul has somehow &#039;defused&#039; the antiwar vote, yet have offered precious little evidence for your supposition. 
Has he succeeded? Not yet, certainly not to the level that he or his supporters would like. But &#039;defused&#039; means he has weakened it somehow. I would argue that, more than merely focusing on this particular war (as Obama or Billary have), he has argued for a more comprehensive and philosophical antiwar view, based on non-interventionism. I would also say that most of his antiwar supporters war have strong economic reservations against B or O, and would not have been in their camp either way.
Is he has as good of a comunicator as an MLK or a Reagan? He would be the first to say No. 
However, is he as loquacious as you? Thankfully no.

Peace be with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gene Coast, you have once again claimed that Dr. Paul has somehow &#8216;defused&#8217; the antiwar vote, yet have offered precious little evidence for your supposition.<br />
Has he succeeded? Not yet, certainly not to the level that he or his supporters would like. But &#8216;defused&#8217; means he has weakened it somehow. I would argue that, more than merely focusing on this particular war (as Obama or Billary have), he has argued for a more comprehensive and philosophical antiwar view, based on non-interventionism. I would also say that most of his antiwar supporters war have strong economic reservations against B or O, and would not have been in their camp either way.<br />
Is he has as good of a comunicator as an MLK or a Reagan? He would be the first to say No.<br />
However, is he as loquacious as you? Thankfully no.</p>
<p>Peace be with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/comment-page-1/#comment-150292</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4285#comment-150292</guid>
		<description>Come again:

&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;“The fact that president Clinton will most likely escape removal from office I find less offensive than the Congress’ and media’s lack of interest in dealing with the serious charges of flagrant abuse of power, threatening political revenge, issuing unconstitutional Executive Orders, sacrificing US sovereignty to world government, bribery, and illegal acts of war, along with the routine flaunting of the constitutional restraints that were placed there to keep our federal government small and limited in scope.”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

[Ron Paul]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come again:</p>
<p><b><i>“The fact that president Clinton will most likely escape removal from office I find less offensive than the Congress’ and media’s lack of interest in dealing with the serious charges of flagrant abuse of power, threatening political revenge, issuing unconstitutional Executive Orders, sacrificing US sovereignty to world government, bribery, and illegal acts of war, along with the routine flaunting of the constitutional restraints that were placed there to keep our federal government small and limited in scope.”</i></b></p>
<p>[Ron Paul]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/comment-page-1/#comment-150291</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4285#comment-150291</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; WASHINGTON, DC [Ron Paul&#039;s Congressional Office December 16, 1998] -- In voting for all four Articles of Impeachment today, US Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) said he did so because the charges are &quot;serious and straight forward: lying, perjury, obstructions of justice and abuse of power.&quot;

Rep. Paul placed a statement in the Record during debate. In that statement, he said that while the process is flawed, no one should remain above the law.

&quot;(M)any of our colleagues are not pleased with the investigative process; some believing it to have been overly aggressive and petty, while others are convinced it has been unnecessarily limited and misdirected. It certainly raises the question of whether or not the special prosecutor rather than the Congress itself should be doing this delicate work of oversight,&quot; wrote Rep. Paul. &quot;The long delays and sharp criticism of the special prosecutor could have been prevented if Congress had not been dependent on the actions of an Attorney General&#039;s appointee.&quot;

For as serious as the charges listed in the Articles are, Rep. Paul wrote in his statement that more serious crimes should have been more thoroughly investigated.

&quot;The process has helped make the President appear to be a victim of government prosecutorial overkill while ignoring the odious significance of the 1,000 FBI files placed for political reasons in the White House.&quot; Rep. Paul also cited mounting evidence of illegal campaign contributions given to the president&#039;s 1996 campaign by the communist Chinese government in exchange for secret military technology.

&quot;There is a major irony in this impeachment proceeding. A lot has been said the last two months by members of the Judiciary Committee on both sides of the aisle regarding the Constitution and how it must be upheld. But if we are witnessing… a serious move toward obeying the constitutional restraints, I will anxiously look forward to the next session when 80 percent of our routine legislation will be voted down.&quot;

Rep. Paul said that he believes the public&#039;s perceived disgust with the process is most likely a reflection their disdain for &quot;government&#039;s intrusion into our personal privacy,&quot; and not an endorsement of this administration.

&quot;The President, this Administration and the Congress have been hypocritical for demanding privacy for themselves yet are the arch enemies of our privacy. Although other Administrations have abused the FBI and IRS, this Administration has systematically abused these powers like none other.&quot;

Rep. Paul also condemned the president for initiating military action against foreign nations to divert attention from his personal problems, first, in attacking a legitimate pharmaceutical plant in Sudan on the day Monica Lewinsky testified before a Grand Jury, and the second, last week when he attacked Iraq to delay impeachment.

&quot;Those acts alone should be enough for a serious consideration of impeachment, but it&#039;s never mentioned -- mainly because leadership of both parties for decades have fully endorsed our jingoism and bellicosity directed toward other nations when they do not do our bidding.&quot;

Rep. Paul said that while he believes this President must be removed from office quickly, he is doubtful the Senate will do so.

&quot;The fact that president Clinton will most likely escape removal from office I find less offensive than the Congress&#039; and media&#039;s lack of interest in dealing with the serious charges of flagrant abuse of power, threatening political revenge, issuing unconstitutional Executive Orders, sacrificing US sovereignty to world government, bribery, and illegal acts of war, along with the routine flaunting of the constitutional restraints that were placed there to keep our federal government small and limited in scope.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> WASHINGTON, DC [Ron Paul's Congressional Office December 16, 1998] &#8212; In voting for all four Articles of Impeachment today, US Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) said he did so because the charges are &#8220;serious and straight forward: lying, perjury, obstructions of justice and abuse of power.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rep. Paul placed a statement in the Record during debate. In that statement, he said that while the process is flawed, no one should remain above the law.</p>
<p>&#8220;(M)any of our colleagues are not pleased with the investigative process; some believing it to have been overly aggressive and petty, while others are convinced it has been unnecessarily limited and misdirected. It certainly raises the question of whether or not the special prosecutor rather than the Congress itself should be doing this delicate work of oversight,&#8221; wrote Rep. Paul. &#8220;The long delays and sharp criticism of the special prosecutor could have been prevented if Congress had not been dependent on the actions of an Attorney General&#8217;s appointee.&#8221;</p>
<p>For as serious as the charges listed in the Articles are, Rep. Paul wrote in his statement that more serious crimes should have been more thoroughly investigated.</p>
<p>&#8220;The process has helped make the President appear to be a victim of government prosecutorial overkill while ignoring the odious significance of the 1,000 FBI files placed for political reasons in the White House.&#8221; Rep. Paul also cited mounting evidence of illegal campaign contributions given to the president&#8217;s 1996 campaign by the communist Chinese government in exchange for secret military technology.</p>
<p>&#8220;There is a major irony in this impeachment proceeding. A lot has been said the last two months by members of the Judiciary Committee on both sides of the aisle regarding the Constitution and how it must be upheld. But if we are witnessing… a serious move toward obeying the constitutional restraints, I will anxiously look forward to the next session when 80 percent of our routine legislation will be voted down.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rep. Paul said that he believes the public&#8217;s perceived disgust with the process is most likely a reflection their disdain for &#8220;government&#8217;s intrusion into our personal privacy,&#8221; and not an endorsement of this administration.</p>
<p>&#8220;The President, this Administration and the Congress have been hypocritical for demanding privacy for themselves yet are the arch enemies of our privacy. Although other Administrations have abused the FBI and IRS, this Administration has systematically abused these powers like none other.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rep. Paul also condemned the president for initiating military action against foreign nations to divert attention from his personal problems, first, in attacking a legitimate pharmaceutical plant in Sudan on the day Monica Lewinsky testified before a Grand Jury, and the second, last week when he attacked Iraq to delay impeachment.</p>
<p>&#8220;Those acts alone should be enough for a serious consideration of impeachment, but it&#8217;s never mentioned &#8212; mainly because leadership of both parties for decades have fully endorsed our jingoism and bellicosity directed toward other nations when they do not do our bidding.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rep. Paul said that while he believes this President must be removed from office quickly, he is doubtful the Senate will do so.</p>
<p>&#8220;The fact that president Clinton will most likely escape removal from office I find less offensive than the Congress&#8217; and media&#8217;s lack of interest in dealing with the serious charges of flagrant abuse of power, threatening political revenge, issuing unconstitutional Executive Orders, sacrificing US sovereignty to world government, bribery, and illegal acts of war, along with the routine flaunting of the constitutional restraints that were placed there to keep our federal government small and limited in scope.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim R.</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/comment-page-1/#comment-150281</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4285#comment-150281</guid>
		<description>Maybe Ron Paul, and others, while disagreeing with President Bush don&#039;t necessarily believe his actions warrant impeachment. Whether you like it or not an impeachment is simply a charge, an accusation. And perhaps Mr. Paul does not believe there is enough evidence to convict in a Senate Trial. Just because he does not agree with your reading of events does not mean he does mean he does not have a proper understanding of the Constitution or does not have principles. I think it is high-handed and rather arrogant of folks like you to make these statements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Ron Paul, and others, while disagreeing with President Bush don&#8217;t necessarily believe his actions warrant impeachment. Whether you like it or not an impeachment is simply a charge, an accusation. And perhaps Mr. Paul does not believe there is enough evidence to convict in a Senate Trial. Just because he does not agree with your reading of events does not mean he does mean he does not have a proper understanding of the Constitution or does not have principles. I think it is high-handed and rather arrogant of folks like you to make these statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JanColdwater</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/comment-page-1/#comment-150256</link>
		<dc:creator>JanColdwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4285#comment-150256</guid>
		<description>I agree. In the beginning, when people were debating over which day it should be, I chose the 4th of July because school is out and there would be more ability for people to go.  I still think that this would have been a better day and a much better turn-out but those who were all fired up, didn&#039;t want to listen.  To me, the message of liberty and freedom from a Central Bank can be just as effective on the 4th of July, as it is on April 15th! 

I agree with you that there is a revolution going on, people are waking every day but for many, they must be pushed further into a corner to react and pushed they will be.  Pushed, all will be but it is just a matter of how far and then we will see our Revolution indeed.

I personally can not believe it is taking the masses this long. We endured the lies of 9/11, many needless wars, trampling of the Constitution, wars on our rights, deaths, debt, inflation, illegal aliens, tyranny etc, all because the people refuse to do a little research and understand the treasonous acts committed against us because a FRAUDULENT Central Bank has been allowed to rob us of everything!

The call to freedom beckons us to STOP swallowing the mass drugs that dumb us down, including the propaganda and wake up from our lazy stupor and REVOLT!  We need not separate ourselves into factions of unhappy citizens for this reason or that!  We must understand that the war is against us as a people in every faction of unhappiness and because of this, we must rise together as ONE on the Capitol and take it back.  Simply put, there is no other way our null and void Government will hear us because they no longer work for us.  I for one am hoping that the people wake up sooner.

In Solidarity,
A Fed Up Citizen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. In the beginning, when people were debating over which day it should be, I chose the 4th of July because school is out and there would be more ability for people to go.  I still think that this would have been a better day and a much better turn-out but those who were all fired up, didn&#8217;t want to listen.  To me, the message of liberty and freedom from a Central Bank can be just as effective on the 4th of July, as it is on April 15th! </p>
<p>I agree with you that there is a revolution going on, people are waking every day but for many, they must be pushed further into a corner to react and pushed they will be.  Pushed, all will be but it is just a matter of how far and then we will see our Revolution indeed.</p>
<p>I personally can not believe it is taking the masses this long. We endured the lies of 9/11, many needless wars, trampling of the Constitution, wars on our rights, deaths, debt, inflation, illegal aliens, tyranny etc, all because the people refuse to do a little research and understand the treasonous acts committed against us because a FRAUDULENT Central Bank has been allowed to rob us of everything!</p>
<p>The call to freedom beckons us to STOP swallowing the mass drugs that dumb us down, including the propaganda and wake up from our lazy stupor and REVOLT!  We need not separate ourselves into factions of unhappy citizens for this reason or that!  We must understand that the war is against us as a people in every faction of unhappiness and because of this, we must rise together as ONE on the Capitol and take it back.  Simply put, there is no other way our null and void Government will hear us because they no longer work for us.  I for one am hoping that the people wake up sooner.</p>
<p>In Solidarity,<br />
A Fed Up Citizen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/comment-page-1/#comment-150225</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4285#comment-150225</guid>
		<description>&quot;Your cowardice is astounding!&quot;

Hehe--learned that in the kindergarten schoolyard, eh?

You are quite the specimen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Your cowardice is astounding!&#8221;</p>
<p>Hehe&#8211;learned that in the kindergarten schoolyard, eh?</p>
<p>You are quite the specimen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dano</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/comment-page-1/#comment-150224</link>
		<dc:creator>Dano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4285#comment-150224</guid>
		<description>Your cowardice is astounding!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your cowardice is astounding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/comment-page-1/#comment-150222</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4285#comment-150222</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The fact that you won’t try to answer any of them shows more about your character than all your responses to date.&lt;/i&gt;

Pure rhetoric, and clumsy rhetoric at that.

Does this two-bit kindergarten attempt at psychological manipulation and interrogation actually work with your audience of yahoos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The fact that you won’t try to answer any of them shows more about your character than all your responses to date.</i></p>
<p>Pure rhetoric, and clumsy rhetoric at that.</p>
<p>Does this two-bit kindergarten attempt at psychological manipulation and interrogation actually work with your audience of yahoos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bovard</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/15/dc-freedom-rally-today/comment-page-1/#comment-150221</link>
		<dc:creator>James Bovard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4285#comment-150221</guid>
		<description>Since this commentor asserted that I undercounted the number of attendees by more than 90%, I note that the front page of the www.dailypaul.com website continues to highlight the photo I took of the rally (The photo is used without permission or attribution).  This photo and other photos posted at http://www.flickr.com/photos/bovard/   show the crowd size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since this commentor asserted that I undercounted the number of attendees by more than 90%, I note that the front page of the <a href="http://www.dailypaul.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailypaul.com</a> website continues to highlight the photo I took of the rally (The photo is used without permission or attribution).  This photo and other photos posted at <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bovard/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/bovard/</a>   show the crowd size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
