<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Iraq at Peace with Its Neighbors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  9 Jul 2008 07:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill K.</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/#comment-152588</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 04:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4304#comment-152588</guid>
		<description>As to voodoo.

Nothing to protest yet? Should we wait until the first corpses are pulled from rubble of a school or a hospital in Iran destroyed by a US made RGM-109 Tomahawk missile?

Violence begets more violence, violence does not solve violence. You cannot kill Iraqis and think you are damaging an organization created by Saudis and fighting "terrorism".

One does not protect one's nation by destroying another without a (good) reason. That is not called protection, that is called AGGRESSION. Those who fight against Aggression are protecting themselves.

"They wanted to serve a country that they loved and respected." - Yeah, so did the Germans(and Italians etc), who joined the Wehrmacht, and killed 40 Million people in Europe. Jingoism can blind men(and women) to horrible acts of violence committed in the name of "defending the Fatherland". "They followed orders given to them by a higher command" - Which was EXACTLY the excuse given by the Axis troops for butchering 40 Million people. "only the jobs they do dont have the option of just up and saying i quit" - of course they do, they can refuse an illegal order and are protected by the Geneva Conventions to do so. 

"What if we had no military and our country had no means of defending itself?" - The US no longer has a Military for Defense, something like the National Guard's original idea. The US has Imperial Legions like the Roman Empire. The Imperial Legions have 700 Garrisons around the globe keeping the "barbarians" in check. The Middle East is America's Gaul, and the Neocons running the US government think they are modern day Caesars.

"will be replaced with and amount far greater than our human minds could ever imagine" - And the best way to avoid this is to leave Iraq now and provide reconstruction help without the 160,000 troops on the ground and beg for forgiveness. And don't feed me that "Civil War" nonsense, Iraqis lived in relative peace until the US attacked them.

"You refer to me a “son’ and “sir”… While in fact i am a female soldier.
I am and officer and i am called “ma’am”" - I don't care if you are the Queen of England. It is US civilians who US troops should be taking orders from not Government Bureaucrats who never served an hour in the Military but now act like Napoleon.

"The military is your government!" - No that is what Fascist states are, the US is a "government of the people, by the people, and for the people", unfortunately it becoming less true with each passing year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to voodoo.</p>
<p>Nothing to protest yet? Should we wait until the first corpses are pulled from rubble of a school or a hospital in Iran destroyed by a US made RGM-109 Tomahawk missile?</p>
<p>Violence begets more violence, violence does not solve violence. You cannot kill Iraqis and think you are damaging an organization created by Saudis and fighting &#8220;terrorism&#8221;.</p>
<p>One does not protect one&#8217;s nation by destroying another without a (good) reason. That is not called protection, that is called AGGRESSION. Those who fight against Aggression are protecting themselves.</p>
<p>&#8220;They wanted to serve a country that they loved and respected.&#8221; - Yeah, so did the Germans(and Italians etc), who joined the Wehrmacht, and killed 40 Million people in Europe. Jingoism can blind men(and women) to horrible acts of violence committed in the name of &#8220;defending the Fatherland&#8221;. &#8220;They followed orders given to them by a higher command&#8221; - Which was EXACTLY the excuse given by the Axis troops for butchering 40 Million people. &#8220;only the jobs they do dont have the option of just up and saying i quit&#8221; - of course they do, they can refuse an illegal order and are protected by the Geneva Conventions to do so. </p>
<p>&#8220;What if we had no military and our country had no means of defending itself?&#8221; - The US no longer has a Military for Defense, something like the National Guard&#8217;s original idea. The US has Imperial Legions like the Roman Empire. The Imperial Legions have 700 Garrisons around the globe keeping the &#8220;barbarians&#8221; in check. The Middle East is America&#8217;s Gaul, and the Neocons running the US government think they are modern day Caesars.</p>
<p>&#8220;will be replaced with and amount far greater than our human minds could ever imagine&#8221; - And the best way to avoid this is to leave Iraq now and provide reconstruction help without the 160,000 troops on the ground and beg for forgiveness. And don&#8217;t feed me that &#8220;Civil War&#8221; nonsense, Iraqis lived in relative peace until the US attacked them.</p>
<p>&#8220;You refer to me a “son’ and “sir”… While in fact i am a female soldier.<br />
I am and officer and i am called “ma’am”&#8221; - I don&#8217;t care if you are the Queen of England. It is US civilians who US troops should be taking orders from not Government Bureaucrats who never served an hour in the Military but now act like Napoleon.</p>
<p>&#8220;The military is your government!&#8221; - No that is what Fascist states are, the US is a &#8220;government of the people, by the people, and for the people&#8221;, unfortunately it becoming less true with each passing year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill K.</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/#comment-152584</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 03:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4304#comment-152584</guid>
		<description>At some point, Turkey's blood will boil. They give the US Air Bases, Ports, and Fuel pipelines, and what do they get in return? US Sponsorship of anti-Turkish terrorists. That is a US government kick in the groin after Turkey extends a hand of friendship. You can only take so many kicks before you start extending loaded guns instead of hands of friendship. Some Turkish Generals may even try to get revenge by attacking US forces, and many Turks would support them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At some point, Turkey&#8217;s blood will boil. They give the US Air Bases, Ports, and Fuel pipelines, and what do they get in return? US Sponsorship of anti-Turkish terrorists. That is a US government kick in the groin after Turkey extends a hand of friendship. You can only take so many kicks before you start extending loaded guns instead of hands of friendship. Some Turkish Generals may even try to get revenge by attacking US forces, and many Turks would support them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill K.</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/#comment-152583</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 03:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4304#comment-152583</guid>
		<description>I agree with Brad and call BS!

Who attacked the World Trade Center(and the Pentagon) on 9/11/01 and for what reasons? We know they were Egyptians and Saudis. Why? Both countries are US supported dictatorships where Sharia Law is the law of the land. The locals are brutally suppressed and abused by the US supported regimes, the reasons for retaliation are endless. Go back even further to the 1980's. Who was supporting Osama Bin Laden and who was bombing and shelling cities like Beirut in support of Israel at the same time? Both answers is the US. Muslims saw this as a dagger in one hand hidden behind the back and a false hand of friendship presented. They saw themselves as being used as cannon fodder in US Cold War geopolitics, this was one of the main reasons Bin Laden turned on the US. Nobody likes to be used and discarded. But remember, Bin Laden was a Saudi, and an enemy of Saddam Hussein's non-fundamentalist Ba'ath government.

Why did the US attack Bin Laden's enemy? Is it not said that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend"? So why attack Hussein if he was an enemy of America's enemy? It becomes clear the motives to attack Iraq were not to fight terrorism, they were based on Greed(for oil). Enough of bringing up 9/11 to wash the blood off America's hands, Hitler also would bring up the Reichstag fire to whitewash his Wars of Aggression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Brad and call BS!</p>
<p>Who attacked the World Trade Center(and the Pentagon) on 9/11/01 and for what reasons? We know they were Egyptians and Saudis. Why? Both countries are US supported dictatorships where Sharia Law is the law of the land. The locals are brutally suppressed and abused by the US supported regimes, the reasons for retaliation are endless. Go back even further to the 1980&#8217;s. Who was supporting Osama Bin Laden and who was bombing and shelling cities like Beirut in support of Israel at the same time? Both answers is the US. Muslims saw this as a dagger in one hand hidden behind the back and a false hand of friendship presented. They saw themselves as being used as cannon fodder in US Cold War geopolitics, this was one of the main reasons Bin Laden turned on the US. Nobody likes to be used and discarded. But remember, Bin Laden was a Saudi, and an enemy of Saddam Hussein&#8217;s non-fundamentalist Ba&#8217;ath government.</p>
<p>Why did the US attack Bin Laden&#8217;s enemy? Is it not said that &#8220;the enemy of my enemy is my friend&#8221;? So why attack Hussein if he was an enemy of America&#8217;s enemy? It becomes clear the motives to attack Iraq were not to fight terrorism, they were based on Greed(for oil). Enough of bringing up 9/11 to wash the blood off America&#8217;s hands, Hitler also would bring up the Reichstag fire to whitewash his Wars of Aggression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill K.</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/#comment-152582</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 02:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4304#comment-152582</guid>
		<description>I'm optimistic that the worst kind of blowback to PKK sponsorship will be Turkish sponsorship of Turkmen "freedom fighters" seeking to end the tyranny of the US and its Shia collaborators. And we won't have a 2 front war in Iraq with Turkish Mechanized Forces battling US Marines and Army forces in house to house fighting in Mosul while Shia Militias encircle British and US forces in the South with Mortars raining down on their bases like a sequel to Dien Bien Phu, all this while Iranian Missiles turn the Green Zone into the far side of the Moon. Nope I don't think it will happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m optimistic that the worst kind of blowback to PKK sponsorship will be Turkish sponsorship of Turkmen &#8220;freedom fighters&#8221; seeking to end the tyranny of the US and its Shia collaborators. And we won&#8217;t have a 2 front war in Iraq with Turkish Mechanized Forces battling US Marines and Army forces in house to house fighting in Mosul while Shia Militias encircle British and US forces in the South with Mortars raining down on their bases like a sequel to Dien Bien Phu, all this while Iranian Missiles turn the Green Zone into the far side of the Moon. Nope I don&#8217;t think it will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/#comment-152567</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4304#comment-152567</guid>
		<description>If you have the histroy you say you do you should redirect your anger where it belongs. Iraq did not attack us, we attacked them. You should be ashamed of your gloating in the deaths of innocent people who have done nothing to you or your friends and family. Having strong emotions that are so misdirected will bring you nothing in the long run but frustration. Do some research and you will quickly be able to understand that it is our government you should be angry with not the people of Iraq. Our government invited the attacks on 9/11 by their constant terror campaigns that have been directed against the Arab nations.

Who would Jesus Bomb? You say God bless so I assume you are Christian, where does it say Bomb thy neighbor? I thought it was Love thy neighbor, silly me!

Peace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have the histroy you say you do you should redirect your anger where it belongs. Iraq did not attack us, we attacked them. You should be ashamed of your gloating in the deaths of innocent people who have done nothing to you or your friends and family. Having strong emotions that are so misdirected will bring you nothing in the long run but frustration. Do some research and you will quickly be able to understand that it is our government you should be angry with not the people of Iraq. Our government invited the attacks on 9/11 by their constant terror campaigns that have been directed against the Arab nations.</p>
<p>Who would Jesus Bomb? You say God bless so I assume you are Christian, where does it say Bomb thy neighbor? I thought it was Love thy neighbor, silly me!</p>
<p>Peace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/#comment-152566</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4304#comment-152566</guid>
		<description>It's a little funny how you don't wish to be steriotyped but at the same time allude to your belief that "female soldiers fight with more heart and more compassion for a country we love and respect than any man you will come across". Sorry but that is a load of you know what. As for calling you Ma'am your mistaken on two fronts. As an officer you can be addressed as Sir whether your male or female. Furthermore, as a civilian you should adress me as Sir and I am allowed to address you anyway I wish. 

Again I am also saddened by your total lack of knowledge. If you believe that this current war has anything to do with "freedom of speech" you show yourself to be ignorant of the facts as they are. As for your belief that "The military is your government" what an absolutely sorry thought. The Government is supposed to be for the people, of the people and by the people not for the Mlitary, of the Military, and by the Military. You Sir are part of the problem not part of the solution. If your a typical example of today's modern military I am doubly glad I got out when I did.

You have obviusly forgotten the lessons you where supposed to have been taught as far back as Basic training. YOU are supposed to treat civilians with respect and dignity regardless of how they have treated or addressed you. Furthermore, If you are who you say you are why not post your actual name, rank, and unit. Somehow from your comments I think I was a little gullible to have believed that you are actually serving. Given your unprofessional comments I doubt if you are on the up and up.

Peace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a little funny how you don&#8217;t wish to be steriotyped but at the same time allude to your belief that &#8220;female soldiers fight with more heart and more compassion for a country we love and respect than any man you will come across&#8221;. Sorry but that is a load of you know what. As for calling you Ma&#8217;am your mistaken on two fronts. As an officer you can be addressed as Sir whether your male or female. Furthermore, as a civilian you should adress me as Sir and I am allowed to address you anyway I wish. </p>
<p>Again I am also saddened by your total lack of knowledge. If you believe that this current war has anything to do with &#8220;freedom of speech&#8221; you show yourself to be ignorant of the facts as they are. As for your belief that &#8220;The military is your government&#8221; what an absolutely sorry thought. The Government is supposed to be for the people, of the people and by the people not for the Mlitary, of the Military, and by the Military. You Sir are part of the problem not part of the solution. If your a typical example of today&#8217;s modern military I am doubly glad I got out when I did.</p>
<p>You have obviusly forgotten the lessons you where supposed to have been taught as far back as Basic training. YOU are supposed to treat civilians with respect and dignity regardless of how they have treated or addressed you. Furthermore, If you are who you say you are why not post your actual name, rank, and unit. Somehow from your comments I think I was a little gullible to have believed that you are actually serving. Given your unprofessional comments I doubt if you are on the up and up.</p>
<p>Peace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lifeless9</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/#comment-152556</link>
		<dc:creator>lifeless9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4304#comment-152556</guid>
		<description>My comment is about the US military and the war in Iraq.
I support all of you in what you do for me and my family.  I am a survivor of the attacks on the World Trade Center. I was a computer programmer, and worked in the north tower on the 36th floor that housed computer com links.
And yes most will say my emotions are out of anger....THEY ARE!!
Im sure you all have heard the stories.. heard the cries..saw all of the heartache.  Unless you lived it will never know the level of fear and wondering if the end of your life has come. The terrorists that carried out these acts are people that were spawn from pure and complete evil. I search everyday for some sort of balance in this roller coaster ride we call life, but to have people bring forth such blood shed is something our human minds will never be able to understand. 
I am proud that our government and President acted swiftly as to what had happened. President Bush felt our pain and yes we wanted revenge. I still to this day hungery for revenge for the lives lost. I pray that will take this hunger from me but so far my pain remains.
It maybe wrong of me and i maybe punished for such emotions but i gain comfort in the knowing that our military are in this war and fighting back on my behalf. They know i am not strong enough, so i am so thankful for such brave men and women who fight for me.
And i know that our government and military will see to it that no one inside those towers that die will have died in vain. 
And if this statment cause people to hate me and how i feel then so be it. Im not ashamed of how i feel or my emotions on this subject. 
God bless our military and their families ... and i thank each and everyone of you for stepping forward and doing a job that most can not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment is about the US military and the war in Iraq.<br />
I support all of you in what you do for me and my family.  I am a survivor of the attacks on the World Trade Center. I was a computer programmer, and worked in the north tower on the 36th floor that housed computer com links.<br />
And yes most will say my emotions are out of anger&#8230;.THEY ARE!!<br />
Im sure you all have heard the stories.. heard the cries..saw all of the heartache.  Unless you lived it will never know the level of fear and wondering if the end of your life has come. The terrorists that carried out these acts are people that were spawn from pure and complete evil. I search everyday for some sort of balance in this roller coaster ride we call life, but to have people bring forth such blood shed is something our human minds will never be able to understand.<br />
I am proud that our government and President acted swiftly as to what had happened. President Bush felt our pain and yes we wanted revenge. I still to this day hungery for revenge for the lives lost. I pray that will take this hunger from me but so far my pain remains.<br />
It maybe wrong of me and i maybe punished for such emotions but i gain comfort in the knowing that our military are in this war and fighting back on my behalf. They know i am not strong enough, so i am so thankful for such brave men and women who fight for me.<br />
And i know that our government and military will see to it that no one inside those towers that die will have died in vain.<br />
And if this statment cause people to hate me and how i feel then so be it. Im not ashamed of how i feel or my emotions on this subject.<br />
God bless our military and their families &#8230; and i thank each and everyone of you for stepping forward and doing a job that most can not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voodoo south</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/#comment-152521</link>
		<dc:creator>voodoo south</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 22:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4304#comment-152521</guid>
		<description>You refer to me a "son' and "sir"... While in fact i am a female soldier.
I am and officer and i am called "ma'am".
It just proves my point that soldiers are stereo-typed. Only an man can be a true soldier? Only and man can stand for a country in which he serves? Only a man is mental strong enough to defend his nation? --------- I think not ! And i know for fact that the female soldiers fight with more heart and more compassion for a country we love and respect than any man you will come across. We will not go away, We will not be silenced by web sites like this. 
You are right though... You have been given the freedom of speech by the blood, sweat and tears of many soldiers and we vow to never let you forget it. 
For everytime our military is called out by hate comments or disrespect we will come back stronger than ever. The military is your government! So continue on in your lives filled with bubble gum and roses while we keep it all stable and in tacted for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You refer to me a &#8220;son&#8217; and &#8220;sir&#8221;&#8230; While in fact i am a female soldier.<br />
I am and officer and i am called &#8220;ma&#8217;am&#8221;.<br />
It just proves my point that soldiers are stereo-typed. Only an man can be a true soldier? Only and man can stand for a country in which he serves? Only a man is mental strong enough to defend his nation? &#8212;&#8212;&#8212; I think not ! And i know for fact that the female soldiers fight with more heart and more compassion for a country we love and respect than any man you will come across. We will not go away, We will not be silenced by web sites like this.<br />
You are right though&#8230; You have been given the freedom of speech by the blood, sweat and tears of many soldiers and we vow to never let you forget it.<br />
For everytime our military is called out by hate comments or disrespect we will come back stronger than ever. The military is your government! So continue on in your lives filled with bubble gum and roses while we keep it all stable and in tacted for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/#comment-152409</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4304#comment-152409</guid>
		<description>Hopefully you surivive the war voodoo, but to the people making policy like Henry Kissinger “Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”—Henry Kissinger, quoted in “Kiss the Boys Goodbye: How the United States Betrayed Its Own POW’s in Vietnam”

Stop loss policies are not voluntary servitude, that is slavery. If Greenspan and McCain are right and "the war is about oil" the cost of the war is enough to subsidize oil at over $180 per barrel...there were many superior ways to get us energy than subsidizing oil at $180/ barrel. You are fighting for the military industrial complex...read about Marine General Smedley Butler , "War Is A Racket". That man was a real warrior, you are under the misconception that a real warrior doesn't use his head he just follows orders. It is understandable that you think this way(the empire has intentionally created your drone like attitude), but it is sheer folly and if you have children they will not be happy that you have taken up this sickness called state-worship. 

Sacrifice of your life to merely increase Haliburton contracts is NOT the highest ideal in a sane person's mind. All of your hard work has only increased Al Quada recruiting, we are no safer than when you started...if you are guaranteeing attacks I believe they will come, but not without approval from our government just like the last ones...ever work with anthrax?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully you surivive the war voodoo, but to the people making policy like Henry Kissinger “Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”—Henry Kissinger, quoted in “Kiss the Boys Goodbye: How the United States Betrayed Its Own POW’s in Vietnam”</p>
<p>Stop loss policies are not voluntary servitude, that is slavery. If Greenspan and McCain are right and &#8220;the war is about oil&#8221; the cost of the war is enough to subsidize oil at over $180 per barrel&#8230;there were many superior ways to get us energy than subsidizing oil at $180/ barrel. You are fighting for the military industrial complex&#8230;read about Marine General Smedley Butler , &#8220;War Is A Racket&#8221;. That man was a real warrior, you are under the misconception that a real warrior doesn&#8217;t use his head he just follows orders. It is understandable that you think this way(the empire has intentionally created your drone like attitude), but it is sheer folly and if you have children they will not be happy that you have taken up this sickness called state-worship. </p>
<p>Sacrifice of your life to merely increase Haliburton contracts is NOT the highest ideal in a sane person&#8217;s mind. All of your hard work has only increased Al Quada recruiting, we are no safer than when you started&#8230;if you are guaranteeing attacks I believe they will come, but not without approval from our government just like the last ones&#8230;ever work with anthrax?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/#comment-152354</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4304#comment-152354</guid>
		<description>Edit:

"@voodoo south,

I used to like you and like you I volunteered for the first Gulf war."

This should be read as "I used to &lt;b&gt;be&lt;/b&gt; like you and like you..." 

Sorry for not properly proofreading this. Other than that, best of luck to you and your buddies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edit:</p>
<p>&#8220;@voodoo south,</p>
<p>I used to like you and like you I volunteered for the first Gulf war.&#8221;</p>
<p>This should be read as &#8220;I used to <b>be</b> like you and like you&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>Sorry for not properly proofreading this. Other than that, best of luck to you and your buddies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bert</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/#comment-152338</link>
		<dc:creator>bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 09:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4304#comment-152338</guid>
		<description>I'm amazed to hear people saying that being a soldier at war is like "doing a job, as all of us do"...No! being a soldier and killing people is not "a job", and certainly not a "usual job"!
I know two kind of people being paid for killing people, murderers and mercenaries. I hope the huge majority of US soldiers at war won't recognize itself in one kind or the other!

Words are importants! You're fighting a war because the ennemy is threatening you. Back in 2003, there were no threat from Iraq, and the US administration invented some in order to sell the war. If, more than five years after and one million of dead people, millions of wounded or displaced, you can feel some anger from Iraq and arab world, it does not seem that strange! And the US still are the main offender.

9/11 was a job done by saudis, and despite the lack of inquiry results (sorry, I believe in justice and inquiries, and don't believe Bush's lies anymore), seem to have been decided by a saudi. No afghans attacked the US, and the whole afghan population was eager to see the destruction of the taleban regime before 2001. But they don't ask for bombing, they asked for the end of support to this regime, by both the Pakistan and its allies, that is to say US and saudis! Up until july 2001, the taleban had a bureau in New York, and Leila Helms, niece of former CIA boss, was their PR agent!

Today, in a desperate move, the US administration would like to bomb Iran...Why? Where is the threat? How would the US decide if Iran has the right to have nuclear reactors? International treaties? But, then, why should Israel could have nuclear power against the same treaties?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed to hear people saying that being a soldier at war is like &#8220;doing a job, as all of us do&#8221;&#8230;No! being a soldier and killing people is not &#8220;a job&#8221;, and certainly not a &#8220;usual job&#8221;!<br />
I know two kind of people being paid for killing people, murderers and mercenaries. I hope the huge majority of US soldiers at war won&#8217;t recognize itself in one kind or the other!</p>
<p>Words are importants! You&#8217;re fighting a war because the ennemy is threatening you. Back in 2003, there were no threat from Iraq, and the US administration invented some in order to sell the war. If, more than five years after and one million of dead people, millions of wounded or displaced, you can feel some anger from Iraq and arab world, it does not seem that strange! And the US still are the main offender.</p>
<p>9/11 was a job done by saudis, and despite the lack of inquiry results (sorry, I believe in justice and inquiries, and don&#8217;t believe Bush&#8217;s lies anymore), seem to have been decided by a saudi. No afghans attacked the US, and the whole afghan population was eager to see the destruction of the taleban regime before 2001. But they don&#8217;t ask for bombing, they asked for the end of support to this regime, by both the Pakistan and its allies, that is to say US and saudis! Up until july 2001, the taleban had a bureau in New York, and Leila Helms, niece of former CIA boss, was their PR agent!</p>
<p>Today, in a desperate move, the US administration would like to bomb Iran&#8230;Why? Where is the threat? How would the US decide if Iran has the right to have nuclear reactors? International treaties? But, then, why should Israel could have nuclear power against the same treaties?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lowell</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/#comment-152309</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 03:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4304#comment-152309</guid>
		<description>Protest what, you ask? Protest quite specifically this absolutely mindless disquisition of yours, this paen to just about every cliche ever uttered when people in the military are caught up with a need to justify the unjustifiable and to rationalize their own involvement with it. You speak of the motivation of those who serve voluntarily out of their love of country, when in as many cases the service is motivated by a desire for some kind of employment and the opportunities afforded by a federally financed education. You speak of the need for support when instead of considering your future thoughtfully when doing so might have been genuinely beneficial, you placed yourself in the hands of a madman and now struggle to make sense of it all. That in my mind, sir, isn't patriotism, its just rank stupidity. 

There are many of us here who would like to see you extricated from your dilema and very quickly, son. And I suspect that there's likely a very good reason that you may have chosen Antiwar.com as a place to express yourself. When you're home and safe from the insanity with which you're involved at the moment, there will be a time for reflection and, hopefully, some thorough-going soul searching. Its then that you'll likely come to know the meaning of the word, "crisis", and require support of a kind that all the yahooing in the world will never provide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Protest what, you ask? Protest quite specifically this absolutely mindless disquisition of yours, this paen to just about every cliche ever uttered when people in the military are caught up with a need to justify the unjustifiable and to rationalize their own involvement with it. You speak of the motivation of those who serve voluntarily out of their love of country, when in as many cases the service is motivated by a desire for some kind of employment and the opportunities afforded by a federally financed education. You speak of the need for support when instead of considering your future thoughtfully when doing so might have been genuinely beneficial, you placed yourself in the hands of a madman and now struggle to make sense of it all. That in my mind, sir, isn&#8217;t patriotism, its just rank stupidity. </p>
<p>There are many of us here who would like to see you extricated from your dilema and very quickly, son. And I suspect that there&#8217;s likely a very good reason that you may have chosen Antiwar.com as a place to express yourself. When you&#8217;re home and safe from the insanity with which you&#8217;re involved at the moment, there will be a time for reflection and, hopefully, some thorough-going soul searching. Its then that you&#8217;ll likely come to know the meaning of the word, &#8220;crisis&#8221;, and require support of a kind that all the yahooing in the world will never provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
