<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libertarian Party Nominates Bob Barr for President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/25/libertarian-party-nominates-bob-barr-for-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/25/libertarian-party-nominates-bob-barr-for-president/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralph lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/25/libertarian-party-nominates-bob-barr-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-275551</link>
		<dc:creator>ralph lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4337#comment-275551</guid>
		<description>Tchad Blanc interpr&#233;tation du lookbook de are generally Rugby Ralph lauren Hommes 2012 Spg, l&#039;interpr&#233;tation du furthermore pur model relaxed am&#233;ricaine. Coup&#233;s de taille et d&#039;autres d&#233;tails deviennent souligne 2012Ralph printemps Lauren. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tchad Blanc interpr&eacute;tation du lookbook de are generally Rugby Ralph lauren Hommes 2012 Spg, l&#039;interpr&eacute;tation du furthermore pur model relaxed am&eacute;ricaine. Coup&eacute;s de taille et d&#039;autres d&eacute;tails deviennent souligne 2012Ralph printemps Lauren.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sac longchamp</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/25/libertarian-party-nominates-bob-barr-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-265918</link>
		<dc:creator>Sac longchamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4337#comment-265918</guid>
		<description>Ceci est ma premi&#232;re fois que je visite ici. J&#039;ai trouv&#233; tellement de choses int&#233;ressantesdans votre blog, en particulier sa discussion. Du tonnes de commentaires sur vos articles,je suppose que je ne suis pas le seul &#224; avoir tout le plaisir ici! Continuez votre excellent travail. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ceci est ma premi&egrave;re fois que je visite ici. J&#039;ai trouv&eacute; tellement de choses int&eacute;ressantesdans votre blog, en particulier sa discussion. Du tonnes de commentaires sur vos articles,je suppose que je ne suis pas le seul &agrave; avoir tout le plaisir ici! Continuez votre excellent travail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancel</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/25/libertarian-party-nominates-bob-barr-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-263471</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4337#comment-263471</guid>
		<description>J&#039;ai besoin de le souligner, que dans tous les temps que j&#039;ai pass&#233; en ligne, sites d&#039;information suivants, je n&#039;ai pas lu un aussi utile et bien con&#231;u que celui-ci, je n&#039;ai pas souvent des commentaires sur internet des journaux n&#233;anmoins pour vous-m&#234;me, jeressenti le besoin de faire une exception, ce n&#039;est certainement travail vraiment haut et totalement oppos&#233; &#224; l&#039;imb&#233;cillit&#233;, qui je passe beaucoup de mon temps sur la ligne, la lecture. Merci de prendre le temps et investir l&#039;effort de pr&#233;senter &#224; vos lecteurs avec un rapport de 1&#232;re classe. J&#039;ai h&#226;te de lire beaucoup plus de votre travail, &#224; nouveau des acclamations. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J&#039;ai besoin de le souligner, que dans tous les temps que j&#039;ai pass&eacute; en ligne, sites d&#039;information suivants, je n&#039;ai pas lu un aussi utile et bien con&ccedil;u que celui-ci, je n&#039;ai pas souvent des commentaires sur internet des journaux n&eacute;anmoins pour vous-m&ecirc;me, jeressenti le besoin de faire une exception, ce n&#039;est certainement travail vraiment haut et totalement oppos&eacute; &agrave; l&#039;imb&eacute;cillit&eacute;, qui je passe beaucoup de mon temps sur la ligne, la lecture. Merci de prendre le temps et investir l&#039;effort de pr&eacute;senter &agrave; vos lecteurs avec un rapport de 1&egrave;re classe. J&#039;ai h&acirc;te de lire beaucoup plus de votre travail, &agrave; nouveau des acclamations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prada</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/25/libertarian-party-nominates-bob-barr-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-262957</link>
		<dc:creator>prada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4337#comment-262957</guid>
		<description>Ho pensato che sarebbe stato noioso alcuni post vecchi, ma in realt&#224; compensato per il mio tempo. Io posto un link a questa pagina sul mio blog. Sono sicuro che i miei visitatori troveranno che molto utile. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ho pensato che sarebbe stato noioso alcuni post vecchi, ma in realt&agrave; compensato per il mio tempo. Io posto un link a questa pagina sul mio blog. Sono sicuro che i miei visitatori troveranno che molto utile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sac longchamp</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/25/libertarian-party-nominates-bob-barr-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-236093</link>
		<dc:creator>sac longchamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 08:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4337#comment-236093</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scarpehogan-it.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hogan&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is the most famous brand in the world. Now this is a good news for you that our Hogan Outlet offer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scarpehogan-it.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hogan Sito Ufficiale&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scarpehogan-it.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Scarpe Hogan&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.You can visit our website.We promise it will satisry you well.Because its latest technology and fashionable patterns </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scarpehogan-it.net" rel="nofollow"><b>Hogan</b></a> is the most famous brand in the world. Now this is a good news for you that our Hogan Outlet offer <a href="http://www.scarpehogan-it.net" rel="nofollow"><b>Hogan Sito Ufficiale</b></a> and <a href="http://www.scarpehogan-it.net" rel="nofollow"><b>Scarpe Hogan</b></a>.You can visit our website.We promise it will satisry you well.Because its latest technology and fashionable patterns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/25/libertarian-party-nominates-bob-barr-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-158612</link>
		<dc:creator>James Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4337#comment-158612</guid>
		<description>I need a candidate who will end the war at home and the war in Iraq. And who has the sense not to start a THIRD foreign war at the same time!

The War on Drugs is the biggest policy failure in American history.  It has cost us the Rule of Law, and corrupted every part of our government including the last 3 Presidents and EVERY law enforcement agency.  The effort of the LP to oppose it has been right.  It will bear fruit this year, as Michigan will become the 13th state to recognize the legitimacy of medical marijuana. 

What a queer choice Bob Barr is!  I am far more comfortable writing in Ron Paul, although I have toyed with the idea of Nader as the least of 4 evils, or with Barr if I can believe his conversion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need a candidate who will end the war at home and the war in Iraq. And who has the sense not to start a THIRD foreign war at the same time!</p>
<p>The War on Drugs is the biggest policy failure in American history.  It has cost us the Rule of Law, and corrupted every part of our government including the last 3 Presidents and EVERY law enforcement agency.  The effort of the LP to oppose it has been right.  It will bear fruit this year, as Michigan will become the 13th state to recognize the legitimacy of medical marijuana. </p>
<p>What a queer choice Bob Barr is!  I am far more comfortable writing in Ron Paul, although I have toyed with the idea of Nader as the least of 4 evils, or with Barr if I can believe his conversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fascist Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/25/libertarian-party-nominates-bob-barr-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-153600</link>
		<dc:creator>Fascist Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4337#comment-153600</guid>
		<description>Yes, I saw V.  I was sitting behind him in the AZ delegation.  He wasn&#039;t pleased.  Kept talking about a vendetta.  Me, I don&#039;t think the &quot;reformers&quot; are worth the bother.  Let them have the party was my feeling in 2004.  Nothing has changed since.  If the party is not useful as a tool against the state, let the statists run with it without those possessing standards.  In 2008, I was there helping the same friend run for LNC.  He got his ass kicked again.  But never let it be said that a libertarian wasn&#039;t running on the ballot.  He was.  And he was the first to go.  It was fun to reminisce with some of the old anarchists I haven&#039;t seen in some time who wanted to see if the reformers would win or the anarchist would rise.  Verdict: There ain&#039;t no A in Libertrin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I saw V.  I was sitting behind him in the AZ delegation.  He wasn&#8217;t pleased.  Kept talking about a vendetta.  Me, I don&#8217;t think the &#8220;reformers&#8221; are worth the bother.  Let them have the party was my feeling in 2004.  Nothing has changed since.  If the party is not useful as a tool against the state, let the statists run with it without those possessing standards.  In 2008, I was there helping the same friend run for LNC.  He got his ass kicked again.  But never let it be said that a libertarian wasn&#8217;t running on the ballot.  He was.  And he was the first to go.  It was fun to reminisce with some of the old anarchists I haven&#8217;t seen in some time who wanted to see if the reformers would win or the anarchist would rise.  Verdict: There ain&#8217;t no A in Libertrin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Evergood</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/25/libertarian-party-nominates-bob-barr-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-153585</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Evergood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4337#comment-153585</guid>
		<description>While I realize orthodox Libertarians would dislike her economic platform, on the critical issues of withdrawing from Iraq and winding down the imperialist foreign policy, on the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act and other assaults on civil liberties, on DOMA, Cynthia McKinney was never &quot;duped&quot;, has, unlike Barr, Obama, Clinton and McCain alike, been right the first time every time on all those issues.  She has also shown by her direct action on Capitol Hill where she stands on the ever-intensifying encroachments of the Police State.  I certainly hope the Greens are wise enough to give her their endorsement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I realize orthodox Libertarians would dislike her economic platform, on the critical issues of withdrawing from Iraq and winding down the imperialist foreign policy, on the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act and other assaults on civil liberties, on DOMA, Cynthia McKinney was never &#8220;duped&#8221;, has, unlike Barr, Obama, Clinton and McCain alike, been right the first time every time on all those issues.  She has also shown by her direct action on Capitol Hill where she stands on the ever-intensifying encroachments of the Police State.  I certainly hope the Greens are wise enough to give her their endorsement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Magno</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/25/libertarian-party-nominates-bob-barr-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-153565</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Magno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 05:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4337#comment-153565</guid>
		<description>I believe that you are correct about Barr maybe the LP also. The idea is to draw votes away from McCain in order to insure the election of Obama. According to a former American intelligence operative there has been a silent coup with Zbignew Brezhinski as the brain and Jay Rockefeller (global warming hoax) as the oligarch in charge. The media is obviously all for Obama. David Rockefeller (war on terror hoax) seems to have lost out to Jay. But does it matter? The Rockefellers are junior partners to the British Rothschilds. The Illuminati are determined to get their way. However, if Benjamin Fulford is right (check out http://www.rense.com/) they are all scheduled to have their comeuppance shortly unless they decide to tow the new line recently laid down by the Asians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that you are correct about Barr maybe the LP also. The idea is to draw votes away from McCain in order to insure the election of Obama. According to a former American intelligence operative there has been a silent coup with Zbignew Brezhinski as the brain and Jay Rockefeller (global warming hoax) as the oligarch in charge. The media is obviously all for Obama. David Rockefeller (war on terror hoax) seems to have lost out to Jay. But does it matter? The Rockefellers are junior partners to the British Rothschilds. The Illuminati are determined to get their way. However, if Benjamin Fulford is right (check out <a href="http://www.rense.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rense.com/</a>) they are all scheduled to have their comeuppance shortly unless they decide to tow the new line recently laid down by the Asians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Magno</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/25/libertarian-party-nominates-bob-barr-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-153564</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Magno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 04:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4337#comment-153564</guid>
		<description>Libertarianism is an ideal. I watched the proceedings after Mike Gravel&#039;s campaign alerted me to the C-Span coverage. I listened to all the candidates. When I got to Jingosian I favored him with Nuwart a close second but then Jingosian nominated Gravel and Nuwart became my favorite. I like Gravel&#039;s national referendum project but not as a Libertarian nominee for President. 

I believe that Barr was favored by the majority because his candidacy will attract many conservatives and increase the vote totals in state contests thus assuring permanent ballot access to many Libertarian state parties, a practical consideration. The two women candidates were the ideological purists. Mary Nuwart would have been an good choice, in my estimation. 

A big turnoff to me (I literally turned off the TV) was the nominating speech for Gillies by a homosexual. Libertarians are down big-time on so-called identity politics yet they all seem to welcome sexual-identity politics (including Gravel)! What they are really against is ethno-racial identity politics. (See my post above for my view on ethno-racial identity politics.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Libertarianism is an ideal. I watched the proceedings after Mike Gravel&#8217;s campaign alerted me to the C-Span coverage. I listened to all the candidates. When I got to Jingosian I favored him with Nuwart a close second but then Jingosian nominated Gravel and Nuwart became my favorite. I like Gravel&#8217;s national referendum project but not as a Libertarian nominee for President. </p>
<p>I believe that Barr was favored by the majority because his candidacy will attract many conservatives and increase the vote totals in state contests thus assuring permanent ballot access to many Libertarian state parties, a practical consideration. The two women candidates were the ideological purists. Mary Nuwart would have been an good choice, in my estimation. </p>
<p>A big turnoff to me (I literally turned off the TV) was the nominating speech for Gillies by a homosexual. Libertarians are down big-time on so-called identity politics yet they all seem to welcome sexual-identity politics (including Gravel)! What they are really against is ethno-racial identity politics. (See my post above for my view on ethno-racial identity politics.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

