<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Behind the Firefox 3 numbers for Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:20:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Firefox download statistics &#187; Doctor Recommended</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-155510</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox download statistics &#187; Doctor Recommended</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4371#comment-155510</guid>
		<description>[...] I discussed the global trends of Firefox 3.0 downloads. Some people questioned my methodology (1 2) that I was grasping at straws regarding Iraq. But I believe the following graph, done after 7 days [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I discussed the global trends of Firefox 3.0 downloads. Some people questioned my methodology (1 2) that I was grasping at straws regarding Iraq. But I believe the following graph, done after 7 days [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cous Cous</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-155346</link>
		<dc:creator>Cous Cous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4371#comment-155346</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;His solution to the US created problems in Iraq, is not much difference from what the neo-cons had planned for Iraq from the beginning.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes.  If the neoconservatives and &lt;strike&gt;anti&lt;/strike&gt;war.com are both demanding that Iraq gets partitioned, then something is very wrong with this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>His solution to the US created problems in Iraq, is not much difference from what the neo-cons had planned for Iraq from the beginning.</i></p>
<p>Yes.  If the neoconservatives and <strike>anti</strike>war.com are both demanding that Iraq gets partitioned, then something is very wrong with this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lear K</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-155291</link>
		<dc:creator>Lear K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4371#comment-155291</guid>
		<description>He might be an excellent writer ,but his knowldge about Iraq and its people is quite lacking.He is no difference from so many in the west who think that they got the  solutions to other non- western countries problems .Many of these problems were the results of the west imposed or thought of solutions to begin with.His solution to the US created problems in Iraq,is not much difference from what the neo-cons had planned for Iraq from the begging.And once again,the Iraqi people are totally ignored as if Iraq belongs to some one else.And once again,the future of Iraq is being decided by people in Wsahington Dc,London,or San Fransico!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He might be an excellent writer ,but his knowldge about Iraq and its people is quite lacking.He is no difference from so many in the west who think that they got the  solutions to other non- western countries problems .Many of these problems were the results of the west imposed or thought of solutions to begin with.His solution to the US created problems in Iraq,is not much difference from what the neo-cons had planned for Iraq from the begging.And once again,the Iraqi people are totally ignored as if Iraq belongs to some one else.And once again,the future of Iraq is being decided by people in Wsahington Dc,London,or San Fransico!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-155289</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4371#comment-155289</guid>
		<description>Ivan Lelnad is an excellent writer and a credit to antiwar.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ivan Lelnad is an excellent writer and a credit to antiwar.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cous Cous</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-155269</link>
		<dc:creator>Cous Cous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4371#comment-155269</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.antiwar.com/eland/?articleid=13024&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Ivan Eland article in Today’s Highlights is vile nonsense.&lt;/a&gt;  By demanding that the Arab population be ethnically cleansed into homogeneous religious enclaves in the mistaken belief that it will stop the guerrilla war, the site is effectively advocating massive war crimes.  Amusingly, the Kurds don’t need to have their families and neighborhoods destroyed to suit American whims, but they’re more tolerant of the occupation so they don’t need to be collectively punished (which is also a war crime).

He piously laments that the occupation has forcibly expelled millions of Iraqis from their homes but insists they’ll be slaughtered if they return.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.antiwar.com/ips/fadhily.php?articleid=11303&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;You got that one right Ivan!&lt;/a&gt;  He also revives the canard that the Baath party was “Sunni” (presumably exclusively) when in reality it was mainly Shia and quite secular.  Then there’s the ludicrous threat that there’ll be “an all-out civil war” if America ever stops murdering, torturing, and exiling millions of recalcitrant Iraqis. 

Unfortunately, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.antiwar.com/eland/?articleid=12239&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this isn’t the first time he has advocated ethnically cleansing millions of people to aid the American colonization of Iraq.&lt;/a&gt;

While getting Anti(?)war.com to stop linking to prowar gibberish is obviously a forlorn task, perhaps you could at least stop paying people to write it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.antiwar.com/eland/?articleid=13024" rel="nofollow">The Ivan Eland article in Today’s Highlights is vile nonsense.</a>  By demanding that the Arab population be ethnically cleansed into homogeneous religious enclaves in the mistaken belief that it will stop the guerrilla war, the site is effectively advocating massive war crimes.  Amusingly, the Kurds don’t need to have their families and neighborhoods destroyed to suit American whims, but they’re more tolerant of the occupation so they don’t need to be collectively punished (which is also a war crime).</p>
<p>He piously laments that the occupation has forcibly expelled millions of Iraqis from their homes but insists they’ll be slaughtered if they return.  <a href="http://www.antiwar.com/ips/fadhily.php?articleid=11303" rel="nofollow">You got that one right Ivan!</a>  He also revives the canard that the Baath party was “Sunni” (presumably exclusively) when in reality it was mainly Shia and quite secular.  Then there’s the ludicrous threat that there’ll be “an all-out civil war” if America ever stops murdering, torturing, and exiling millions of recalcitrant Iraqis. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, <a href="http://www.antiwar.com/eland/?articleid=12239" rel="nofollow">this isn’t the first time he has advocated ethnically cleansing millions of people to aid the American colonization of Iraq.</a></p>
<p>While getting Anti(?)war.com to stop linking to prowar gibberish is obviously a forlorn task, perhaps you could at least stop paying people to write it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-155199</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4371#comment-155199</guid>
		<description>Fascinating breakdown...here are the top downloaders over 100,000 as of about ten minutes ago (I just cut and pasted the data from the page source, opened it in Excel, and sorted).  Iran is #7.

United States	3,751,302
Germany	1,046,038
Japan	674,829
United Kingdom	480,056
Spain	433,622
France	427,298
Iran	371,689
Lithuania	361,360
Italy	357,551
Canada	348,076
Poland	305,208
Brazil	274,878
China	257,589
Netherlands	225,006
Australia	196,459
Romania	171,247
Russia	156,392
India	141,196
Turkey	136,615
Mexico	131,432
Hungary	124,984
Switzerland	120,896
Taiwan	113,788
Austria	107,696
Argentina	102,929
Sweden	100,744</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating breakdown&#8230;here are the top downloaders over 100,000 as of about ten minutes ago (I just cut and pasted the data from the page source, opened it in Excel, and sorted).  Iran is #7.</p>
<p>United States	3,751,302<br />
Germany	1,046,038<br />
Japan	674,829<br />
United Kingdom	480,056<br />
Spain	433,622<br />
France	427,298<br />
Iran	371,689<br />
Lithuania	361,360<br />
Italy	357,551<br />
Canada	348,076<br />
Poland	305,208<br />
Brazil	274,878<br />
China	257,589<br />
Netherlands	225,006<br />
Australia	196,459<br />
Romania	171,247<br />
Russia	156,392<br />
India	141,196<br />
Turkey	136,615<br />
Mexico	131,432<br />
Hungary	124,984<br />
Switzerland	120,896<br />
Taiwan	113,788<br />
Austria	107,696<br />
Argentina	102,929<br />
Sweden	100,744</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KinkyKathy</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-155197</link>
		<dc:creator>KinkyKathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4371#comment-155197</guid>
		<description>How many firefox downloaders in happy states, sad states and failed ones went to serious news sites? Prolly like 2 percent. I have serious tits if anyone&#039;s interested--LUUUUUUUUUV my absolute FREEEEEEEEEEDOM!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many firefox downloaders in happy states, sad states and failed ones went to serious news sites? Prolly like 2 percent. I have serious tits if anyone&#8217;s interested&#8211;LUUUUUUUUUV my absolute FREEEEEEEEEEDOM!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lear K</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-155190</link>
		<dc:creator>Lear K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4371#comment-155190</guid>
		<description>Soon the Mozilla Foundation will be accused of giving aid and support for a terrorist nation!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soon the Mozilla Foundation will be accused of giving aid and support for a terrorist nation!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberranter</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-155182</link>
		<dc:creator>liberranter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4371#comment-155182</guid>
		<description>And don&#039;t forget FireFight 1.0 for the warmongers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And don&#8217;t forget FireFight 1.0 for the warmongers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-155179</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4371#comment-155179</guid>
		<description>Yes.  And the Iranians are Mozillo-fascists!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  And the Iranians are Mozillo-fascists!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetaCynic</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-155178</link>
		<dc:creator>MetaCynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4371#comment-155178</guid>
		<description>The Neocon version will be named ChickenFox 1.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Neocon version will be named ChickenFox 1.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/18/behind-the-firefox-3-numbers-for-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-155177</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4371#comment-155177</guid>
		<description>&quot;Freedomfox 3.0.&quot;  Good one, Piers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Freedomfox 3.0.&#8221;  Good one, Piers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
