<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Icing on the Yellowcake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/06/the-icing-on-the-yellowcake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/06/the-icing-on-the-yellowcake/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Energy Net &#187; Top Nuclear Stories (Aug 7th- 11th)</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/06/the-icing-on-the-yellowcake/#comment-158833</link>
		<dc:creator>The Energy Net &#187; Top Nuclear Stories (Aug 7th- 11th)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4500#comment-158833</guid>
		<description>[...] Antiwar.com Blog· The Icing on the Yellowcake It was brought to my attention this morning that some people have recently been using last monthâ€™s Iraqi government sale of Yellowcake uranium to a Canadian company as vindication for starting everyoneâ€™s favorite Middle East quagmire thatâ€™s totally going less awful now that most of the integrated neighborhoods in Iraq have been violently purged of one group or another. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Antiwar.com Blog· The Icing on the Yellowcake It was brought to my attention this morning that some people have recently been using last monthâ€™s Iraqi government sale of Yellowcake uranium to a Canadian company as vindication for starting everyoneâ€™s favorite Middle East quagmire thatâ€™s totally going less awful now that most of the integrated neighborhoods in Iraq have been violently purged of one group or another. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Energy Net &#187; Top Nuclear Stories (Aug 3rd-7th)</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/06/the-icing-on-the-yellowcake/#comment-158705</link>
		<dc:creator>The Energy Net &#187; Top Nuclear Stories (Aug 3rd-7th)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4500#comment-158705</guid>
		<description>[...] Antiwar.com Blog · The Icing on the Yellowcake It was brought to my attention this morning that some people have recently been using last monthâ€™s Iraqi government sale of Yellowcake uranium to a Canadian company as vindication for starting everyoneâ€™s favorite Middle East quagmire thatâ€™s totally going less awful now that most of the integrated neighborhoods in Iraq have been violently purged of one group or another. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Antiwar.com Blog · The Icing on the Yellowcake It was brought to my attention this morning that some people have recently been using last monthâ€™s Iraqi government sale of Yellowcake uranium to a Canadian company as vindication for starting everyoneâ€™s favorite Middle East quagmire thatâ€™s totally going less awful now that most of the integrated neighborhoods in Iraq have been violently purged of one group or another. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fear Of Future</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/06/the-icing-on-the-yellowcake/#comment-158605</link>
		<dc:creator>Fear Of Future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 22:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4500#comment-158605</guid>
		<description>With all the DU "extreme delivery efforts" that went on the Iraqis can certainly produce another few barrels of yellowcake. 

Anyway why did it take um.... 5 years to finally shift the material?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the DU &#8220;extreme delivery efforts&#8221; that went on the Iraqis can certainly produce another few barrels of yellowcake. </p>
<p>Anyway why did it take um&#8230;. 5 years to finally shift the material?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/06/the-icing-on-the-yellowcake/#comment-158602</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4500#comment-158602</guid>
		<description>"Aha we told you so!" Yeah and these people will also continue to miss the real question which was "Was he a threat?" Nevermind the fact that you just can't make accusations towards sovereign governmments without any proof whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Aha we told you so!&#8221; Yeah and these people will also continue to miss the real question which was &#8220;Was he a threat?&#8221; Nevermind the fact that you just can&#8217;t make accusations towards sovereign governmments without any proof whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hjmaiere</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/06/the-icing-on-the-yellowcake/#comment-158598</link>
		<dc:creator>hjmaiere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4500#comment-158598</guid>
		<description>I remember reading about the yellowcake already in Iraq at the time the Niger forgeries were getting so much attention. (Probably on antiwar.com) Back then, the point that was completely being ignored by the mainstream media was: Why would the Iraqi government bother to buy yellowcake from Niger when they already had it?

Of course, now that the fact can be spun differently...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading about the yellowcake already in Iraq at the time the Niger forgeries were getting so much attention. (Probably on antiwar.com) Back then, the point that was completely being ignored by the mainstream media was: Why would the Iraqi government bother to buy yellowcake from Niger when they already had it?</p>
<p>Of course, now that the fact can be spun differently&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hide Behind</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/06/the-icing-on-the-yellowcake/#comment-158594</link>
		<dc:creator>Hide Behind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4500#comment-158594</guid>
		<description>For you nuke freaks here is a tidbit, there is more potential nuclear energy contained within coal to be extracted than by any means of the best technolgical burning of coal gasification methods.
Why the continuing use of burning coal and accepting its pollution when the means to extract cleaner energy by processing it for nuclear means?
You have to aks your politcal leaders and their partners the coal mining industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For you nuke freaks here is a tidbit, there is more potential nuclear energy contained within coal to be extracted than by any means of the best technolgical burning of coal gasification methods.<br />
Why the continuing use of burning coal and accepting its pollution when the means to extract cleaner energy by processing it for nuclear means?<br />
You have to aks your politcal leaders and their partners the coal mining industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hide Behind</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/06/the-icing-on-the-yellowcake/#comment-158593</link>
		<dc:creator>Hide Behind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4500#comment-158593</guid>
		<description>You want yellow cake, then head to midwest of USA and old uranium mining sites, where it is still visible and in the open.
If anyone takes the trouble to follow link you would see mention of it being a prcess of breaking down the ore into a more concewntrated form and nothing more.
Radioactive yes, but in only very concentrated amounts, such as using unclean old storage barrels to store drnking water and most of the danger being only long term usage.
Much made of it in reference to Iraq  and even in Iran but it takes the centrfuges just to make it capable of energy use and tonnes to make it inot one weapons grade low yield weapon.Many countrys have concentrated weapons grade and yellow cake raw material sotckpiled from just their nuke plants; countries such as Uk, France and Japan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want yellow cake, then head to midwest of USA and old uranium mining sites, where it is still visible and in the open.<br />
If anyone takes the trouble to follow link you would see mention of it being a prcess of breaking down the ore into a more concewntrated form and nothing more.<br />
Radioactive yes, but in only very concentrated amounts, such as using unclean old storage barrels to store drnking water and most of the danger being only long term usage.<br />
Much made of it in reference to Iraq  and even in Iran but it takes the centrfuges just to make it capable of energy use and tonnes to make it inot one weapons grade low yield weapon.Many countrys have concentrated weapons grade and yellow cake raw material sotckpiled from just their nuke plants; countries such as Uk, France and Japan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Infamous Oregon Lawhobbit</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/06/the-icing-on-the-yellowcake/#comment-158592</link>
		<dc:creator>The Infamous Oregon Lawhobbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4500#comment-158592</guid>
		<description>I doubt it will make a difference to the True Believers.  I've already seen forum postings that boil down to "AHA!!!  WE TOLD YOU SO!!!!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it will make a difference to the True Believers.  I&#8217;ve already seen forum postings that boil down to &#8220;AHA!!!  WE TOLD YOU SO!!!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
