<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Military Presence Worldwide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:51:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: swans</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/comment-page-1/#comment-160081</link>
		<dc:creator>swans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4625#comment-160081</guid>
		<description>Good for Mother Jones.  With Lawrence Vance, I am not holding my breath waiting for Obama-McCain to do much about our warmongering ways.  When it comes to Iraq, they will do what Israel wants.  They haven&#039;t even spoken out about Project Drago, and if Obama had class, he would thank Russia for preventing this international plot against him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for Mother Jones.  With Lawrence Vance, I am not holding my breath waiting for Obama-McCain to do much about our warmongering ways.  When it comes to Iraq, they will do what Israel wants.  They haven&#8217;t even spoken out about Project Drago, and if Obama had class, he would thank Russia for preventing this international plot against him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/comment-page-1/#comment-160038</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4625#comment-160038</guid>
		<description>Sorry Joe but you will find more vets on here than you would think. It may be that when you get back and do some research you will realize that you have been lied to and misused. I also served in combat twice (5/21 light infantry) and when I realized it was all one big lie I was P@ssed off big time. I know at this point you don&#039;t even want to consider that your actions hurt our country. You want to stay in denial about the true facts about our actions in Iraq. But believe me someday it will be made clear to you that we here at Anti-war.com and all the vets in organizations like Veterans for Peace and Iraq Veterans Against the War are on the right side and hopefully you will then join us. Once your eyes have been opened to the facts it will be a shock and you will be outraged at what was done to you and what you have done. You can either use your outrage for good and fight against the war, or have it eat you up in side. Of course you can just stick your head in the sand and continue along your merry path of ingnorance. But if you do some research and wake up I hope you join us. 

Peace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Joe but you will find more vets on here than you would think. It may be that when you get back and do some research you will realize that you have been lied to and misused. I also served in combat twice (5/21 light infantry) and when I realized it was all one big lie I was P@ssed off big time. I know at this point you don&#8217;t even want to consider that your actions hurt our country. You want to stay in denial about the true facts about our actions in Iraq. But believe me someday it will be made clear to you that we here at Anti-war.com and all the vets in organizations like Veterans for Peace and Iraq Veterans Against the War are on the right side and hopefully you will then join us. Once your eyes have been opened to the facts it will be a shock and you will be outraged at what was done to you and what you have done. You can either use your outrage for good and fight against the war, or have it eat you up in side. Of course you can just stick your head in the sand and continue along your merry path of ingnorance. But if you do some research and wake up I hope you join us. </p>
<p>Peace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley Laham</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/comment-page-1/#comment-160028</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley Laham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4625#comment-160028</guid>
		<description>Vassili

Here is a little piece I wrote back in rhe 90&#039;s. What is surprising to me is that it took so long for Russia to realize the US&#039;s game. It took a long time to awaken from its stupor.

&quot;The Cold War has been officially declared terminated.  The winner by unanimous decision...The United States of America.  The loser, the mighty Soviet Union, disintegrated,  The true story of how this came about may never be fully known.  We were told that it had something to do with the inability of communism to compete with free market economies and to enslave the minds of it&#039;s citizens.  Freedom along with unemployment, poverty, crime, social discontent, economic chaos, and state bankruptcy have been the great rewards for Russia and the Russian people. It is very hard, indeed, to see any benefit from this act of self destruction committed by the Soviet Union.  Yet, that was a country possessing an enormous arsenal of weapons, including twenty-three thousand nuclear warheads. Throughout history, countries with such power simply took what they needed for survival. That is why I say the true  cause of these events may still be unpublished.
	Nevertheless, the benefits for the United States of America have been plenty. The feared Warsaw Pact, the only opponent of NATO, has gone to its grave. The East European countries that formed it have now become client states of the U.S. The former republics of the Soviet Union, such as Kazakstan, are now independent countries. Not satisfied with this state of affairs, the United States has launched a very aggressive campaign against Russia. First in the West, the United States is pushing for the incorporation of it&#039;s former allies into NATO, bringing this formidable military alliance to their very border. In the North, similar protocols have been signed with the Baltic States. In the South, in oil rich Kazakstan and others, American oil companies are attempting to gradually replace the Russians in the exploration and exploitation of the gigantic oil and gas reserves of the Caspian sea. There has even been talk of joint military exercises with the Kazak military. The same policy is being actively pursued with Azerbaijan and Georgia. The extraordinary support given by the U.S. to the Georgian president Eduard Shevarnadze who was the last foreign minister of the Soviet Union and an active participant in its dissolution may give us a hint of the untold story of this momentous event. In any case, it does not take a strategic genius to realize that these geopolitical moves are meant to secure the gigantic oil reserves of the Caspian Sea and a route for it to Turkey and the Black Sea. 	
      This is not a very wise policy, since it will only serve to radicalize Russia, a country that can not be taken for granted since it remains a potent nuclear power.  There is deep concern in Russia about America&#039;s growing economic and military influence in the former Soviet Republics. The Russian military has observed the U.S.&#039;s willingness to use devastating force against Iraq to eradicate any  threat to its oil interest in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. In Grenada and Panama, violent assaults were severely executed to serve notice that the United States would not tolerate any challenge in an area it has traditionally considered its own backyard. Is it not only a question of time before Russia starts to assert itself with force when it feels that  its vital interests in its traditional backyard are being threatened ? And now that more and more Russians are seeing the U.S. as this threat, isn&#039;t the possibility of a military confrontation between Russia and the U.S.  becoming less and less inconceivable ? And the winner of such a confrontation will be the side that can muster the political will to carry on to the brink of global thermonuclear war. My guess is that the side with the greedy multinational corporations that have the most to lose will back down. I often wonder if our mediocre policy makers have ever taken this scenario into account.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vassili</p>
<p>Here is a little piece I wrote back in rhe 90&#8217;s. What is surprising to me is that it took so long for Russia to realize the US&#8217;s game. It took a long time to awaken from its stupor.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Cold War has been officially declared terminated.  The winner by unanimous decision&#8230;The United States of America.  The loser, the mighty Soviet Union, disintegrated,  The true story of how this came about may never be fully known.  We were told that it had something to do with the inability of communism to compete with free market economies and to enslave the minds of it&#8217;s citizens.  Freedom along with unemployment, poverty, crime, social discontent, economic chaos, and state bankruptcy have been the great rewards for Russia and the Russian people. It is very hard, indeed, to see any benefit from this act of self destruction committed by the Soviet Union.  Yet, that was a country possessing an enormous arsenal of weapons, including twenty-three thousand nuclear warheads. Throughout history, countries with such power simply took what they needed for survival. That is why I say the true  cause of these events may still be unpublished.<br />
	Nevertheless, the benefits for the United States of America have been plenty. The feared Warsaw Pact, the only opponent of NATO, has gone to its grave. The East European countries that formed it have now become client states of the U.S. The former republics of the Soviet Union, such as Kazakstan, are now independent countries. Not satisfied with this state of affairs, the United States has launched a very aggressive campaign against Russia. First in the West, the United States is pushing for the incorporation of it&#8217;s former allies into NATO, bringing this formidable military alliance to their very border. In the North, similar protocols have been signed with the Baltic States. In the South, in oil rich Kazakstan and others, American oil companies are attempting to gradually replace the Russians in the exploration and exploitation of the gigantic oil and gas reserves of the Caspian sea. There has even been talk of joint military exercises with the Kazak military. The same policy is being actively pursued with Azerbaijan and Georgia. The extraordinary support given by the U.S. to the Georgian president Eduard Shevarnadze who was the last foreign minister of the Soviet Union and an active participant in its dissolution may give us a hint of the untold story of this momentous event. In any case, it does not take a strategic genius to realize that these geopolitical moves are meant to secure the gigantic oil reserves of the Caspian Sea and a route for it to Turkey and the Black Sea.<br />
      This is not a very wise policy, since it will only serve to radicalize Russia, a country that can not be taken for granted since it remains a potent nuclear power.  There is deep concern in Russia about America&#8217;s growing economic and military influence in the former Soviet Republics. The Russian military has observed the U.S.&#8217;s willingness to use devastating force against Iraq to eradicate any  threat to its oil interest in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. In Grenada and Panama, violent assaults were severely executed to serve notice that the United States would not tolerate any challenge in an area it has traditionally considered its own backyard. Is it not only a question of time before Russia starts to assert itself with force when it feels that  its vital interests in its traditional backyard are being threatened ? And now that more and more Russians are seeing the U.S. as this threat, isn&#8217;t the possibility of a military confrontation between Russia and the U.S.  becoming less and less inconceivable ? And the winner of such a confrontation will be the side that can muster the political will to carry on to the brink of global thermonuclear war. My guess is that the side with the greedy multinational corporations that have the most to lose will back down. I often wonder if our mediocre policy makers have ever taken this scenario into account.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gee</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/comment-page-1/#comment-160026</link>
		<dc:creator>Gee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4625#comment-160026</guid>
		<description>Yeah, real difference, more people hate you and the US now then ever before! Thats your Difference!!!By the way, did you enjoy killing those people for not having the WMD and for not having anythink to do with 9/11? You are the real hero! Has new Rambo movie come out yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, real difference, more people hate you and the US now then ever before! Thats your Difference!!!By the way, did you enjoy killing those people for not having the WMD and for not having anythink to do with 9/11? You are the real hero! Has new Rambo movie come out yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/comment-page-1/#comment-160023</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4625#comment-160023</guid>
		<description>Joe, the job of the U.S. armed forces should be to defend America, not &quot;make a difference in the world&quot;. Your not a social worker with a machine-gun. Iraq didn&#039;t attack America. Do you understand the meaning of the word defense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, the job of the U.S. armed forces should be to defend America, not &#8220;make a difference in the world&#8221;. Your not a social worker with a machine-gun. Iraq didn&#8217;t attack America. Do you understand the meaning of the word defense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lear k</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/comment-page-1/#comment-160019</link>
		<dc:creator>Lear k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4625#comment-160019</guid>
		<description>What a difference!

Invaded,destroyed,and occupied a country never was a threat to you attacked you,brought death and destruction to millions of people,and made millions more refugees that war crimes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a difference!</p>
<p>Invaded,destroyed,and occupied a country never was a threat to you attacked you,brought death and destruction to millions of people,and made millions more refugees that war crimes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Raico</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/comment-page-1/#comment-160018</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Raico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4625#comment-160018</guid>
		<description>comment by Ralph

With today&#039;s technology there is no reason at all for the U.S. to have embassies and consulates in any country---except for the age-old reason, they create taxpayer-funded jobs for the state&#039;s favorites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comment by Ralph</p>
<p>With today&#8217;s technology there is no reason at all for the U.S. to have embassies and consulates in any country&#8212;except for the age-old reason, they create taxpayer-funded jobs for the state&#8217;s favorites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obvious Guy Says</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/comment-page-1/#comment-160017</link>
		<dc:creator>Obvious Guy Says</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4625#comment-160017</guid>
		<description>oops meant tiny-minority but that should be self-evident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant tiny-minority but that should be self-evident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obvious Guy Says</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/comment-page-1/#comment-160016</link>
		<dc:creator>Obvious Guy Says</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4625#comment-160016</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t some of us join you in your building of an empire... probably because we have more IQ points than the average GI and know an illegal war when we see one.  

Sorry to break it to you but the ones who truly hate America are the ones you support. You know the ones - the ones that shred the constitution, engage in illegal wars, drain the treasury, curtail American citizen&#039;s freedoms, out CIA agents, jerry-rig elections etc etc etc.

And how is pointing out that America has troops stationed around the world &quot;hating America&quot;? Seriously now - think about what you are saying. You are clearly stating that any and all exercising of long-standing rights to freedom of speech are not to be used in any fashion that can be construed by the tiny-majority(that&#039;s you) as anti-American. It&#039;s you that hates America because you don&#039;t want anybody to exercise their right to free speech.

Joe use your GI bill to get an education - you need it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t some of us join you in your building of an empire&#8230; probably because we have more IQ points than the average GI and know an illegal war when we see one.  </p>
<p>Sorry to break it to you but the ones who truly hate America are the ones you support. You know the ones &#8211; the ones that shred the constitution, engage in illegal wars, drain the treasury, curtail American citizen&#8217;s freedoms, out CIA agents, jerry-rig elections etc etc etc.</p>
<p>And how is pointing out that America has troops stationed around the world &#8220;hating America&#8221;? Seriously now &#8211; think about what you are saying. You are clearly stating that any and all exercising of long-standing rights to freedom of speech are not to be used in any fashion that can be construed by the tiny-majority(that&#8217;s you) as anti-American. It&#8217;s you that hates America because you don&#8217;t want anybody to exercise their right to free speech.</p>
<p>Joe use your GI bill to get an education &#8211; you need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/comment-page-1/#comment-160015</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4625#comment-160015</guid>
		<description>America should take over the whole world you anti war freaks are a bunch of anti americans iam a marine who just got back from my second tour in iraq and believe it or not we are making a difference in the world. Instead of sitting at home on your computer talking about how much you hate America. Why dont you get off your lazy ass&#039; and do something about it. I DID!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America should take over the whole world you anti war freaks are a bunch of anti americans iam a marine who just got back from my second tour in iraq and believe it or not we are making a difference in the world. Instead of sitting at home on your computer talking about how much you hate America. Why dont you get off your lazy ass&#8217; and do something about it. I DID!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/comment-page-1/#comment-160006</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4625#comment-160006</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the links Brad. It says the &#039;police&#039; handcuffed a five year old kid. We are living in a police state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links Brad. It says the &#8216;police&#8217; handcuffed a five year old kid. We are living in a police state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/30/us-military-presence-worldwide/comment-page-1/#comment-160003</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4625#comment-160003</guid>
		<description>Could it be he doesn&#039;t want his home and office raided for &quot;Conspiracy to start a riot&quot;? None of the people targeted in these raids were advocating violence, yet they were subjected to a smash and grab campaign by our state mandated thugs. I imagine Justin Raimondo has to walk a fairly fine line. Our state and corporate (same thing) controlled media ignores or diminishes all protest to the point where it appears to be non-existant. Conspiracy sites such as rense.com can get away with just about anything because they are just conspiracy nuts, so I guess they feel a little more free to print what they feel like. Sites like this and lewrockwell.com do a great job getting information out about the militery/state/corporate fascism. But they would run the risk of being labled as nuts like Jeff Rense or shut down completely if they go too far (i.e. publishing information about 9/11 truth movements).

Peace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be he doesn&#8217;t want his home and office raided for &#8220;Conspiracy to start a riot&#8221;? None of the people targeted in these raids were advocating violence, yet they were subjected to a smash and grab campaign by our state mandated thugs. I imagine Justin Raimondo has to walk a fairly fine line. Our state and corporate (same thing) controlled media ignores or diminishes all protest to the point where it appears to be non-existant. Conspiracy sites such as rense.com can get away with just about anything because they are just conspiracy nuts, so I guess they feel a little more free to print what they feel like. Sites like this and lewrockwell.com do a great job getting information out about the militery/state/corporate fascism. But they would run the risk of being labled as nuts like Jeff Rense or shut down completely if they go too far (i.e. publishing information about 9/11 truth movements).</p>
<p>Peace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
