<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Correction: The Terrorist Refused to &#8216;Pal Around&#8217; With Reagan.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:49:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lester Ness</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-162543</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester Ness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4788#comment-162543</guid>
		<description>The Taliban as such did not exist at that time.  It came into existence later, after the Soviets were driven out.  Reagan&#039;s guests were anti-soviet allies.
  
Lester Ness
Kunming
China</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Taliban as such did not exist at that time.  It came into existence later, after the Soviets were driven out.  Reagan&#8217;s guests were anti-soviet allies.</p>
<p>Lester Ness<br />
Kunming<br />
China</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lester Ness</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-162542</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester Ness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4788#comment-162542</guid>
		<description>I must agree with you, Vajs.

Lester Ness
Kunming
China</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree with you, Vajs.</p>
<p>Lester Ness<br />
Kunming<br />
China</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hrebeljanovic</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-162535</link>
		<dc:creator>Hrebeljanovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4788#comment-162535</guid>
		<description>What exactly &quot;freedom&quot; is for you Chris? What exactly expression &quot;everything freedom means&quot; is in your opinion? When someone tosses around that word casually I hear the lyrics by K.K.: &quot;Freedom is just another word for nothing left to loose&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly &#8220;freedom&#8221; is for you Chris? What exactly expression &#8220;everything freedom means&#8221; is in your opinion? When someone tosses around that word casually I hear the lyrics by K.K.: &#8220;Freedom is just another word for nothing left to loose&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hrebeljanovic</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-162534</link>
		<dc:creator>Hrebeljanovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4788#comment-162534</guid>
		<description>Straight answer to your Q: no, no and no! Stop mentioning Dresden because Germans earned that bombing and then some by their SS troops barbaric, ruthless and bestial actions around Europe(not to mention them gassing innocent humans). &quot;Oh, poor Dresden&quot; is a revisionary history purported by Nazi fascist lovers around the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Straight answer to your Q: no, no and no! Stop mentioning Dresden because Germans earned that bombing and then some by their SS troops barbaric, ruthless and bestial actions around Europe(not to mention them gassing innocent humans). &#8220;Oh, poor Dresden&#8221; is a revisionary history purported by Nazi fascist lovers around the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Blalock</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-162525</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Blalock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4788#comment-162525</guid>
		<description>Looks like Chavez got my drift...

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE49F0K720081016?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=topNews&amp;rpc=22&amp;sp=true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Chavez got my drift&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE49F0K720081016?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=topNews&amp;rpc=22&amp;sp=true" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE49F0K720081016?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=topNews&amp;rpc=22&amp;sp=true</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swan</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-162521</link>
		<dc:creator>swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4788#comment-162521</guid>
		<description>Hey, Israel is a mortal enemy of the USA, or what it has left us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Israel is a mortal enemy of the USA, or what it has left us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lear K</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-162513</link>
		<dc:creator>Lear K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4788#comment-162513</guid>
		<description>Sabra and Shatila massacre

&quot;The Sabra and Shatila massacre (or Sabra and Chatila massacre; Arabic: مذبحة صبرا وشاتيلا) was a massacre carried out between the 15 and 16 September 1982 by the Lebanese Forces militia group. It is alleged that Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) allowed Lebanese Christian Phalangist militiamen to enter two Palestinian refugee camps, and that the militia massacred civilians inside. It was argued that the Israelis should have known that a massacre could occur, considering the assassination of Phalangist leader and prospective president Bachir Gemayel the day before, and given the long history of bad blood between the Palestinians and the Phalangists.&quot;


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sabra and Shatila massacre</p>
<p>&#8220;The Sabra and Shatila massacre (or Sabra and Chatila massacre; Arabic: مذبحة صبرا وشاتيلا) was a massacre carried out between the 15 and 16 September 1982 by the Lebanese Forces militia group. It is alleged that Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) allowed Lebanese Christian Phalangist militiamen to enter two Palestinian refugee camps, and that the militia massacred civilians inside. It was argued that the Israelis should have known that a massacre could occur, considering the assassination of Phalangist leader and prospective president Bachir Gemayel the day before, and given the long history of bad blood between the Palestinians and the Phalangists.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lear K</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-162512</link>
		<dc:creator>Lear K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4788#comment-162512</guid>
		<description>Or the barbarians  Israelis who at that time under the confessed terrorists Manchem Begin  and Sharon were turninning most of Lebnanon and espacially Beirut  into ghost town of destruction and death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or the barbarians  Israelis who at that time under the confessed terrorists Manchem Begin  and Sharon were turninning most of Lebnanon and espacially Beirut  into ghost town of destruction and death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim R.</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-162511</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4788#comment-162511</guid>
		<description>The fact that Ronald Reagan met with the Taliban is a disgrace. No doubt about it. However, we must remember that at the time Reagan viewed the Soviet Union as an existential threat to the United States. The Taliban were fighting the Soviets (who had invaded their country lest we forget) and I suppose Reagan was following the dictum that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Nevertheless, I find that photograph to be disgusting. I don&#039;t care if its Reagan, Clinton, Bush or anybody else--the White House should not play host to ruthless barbarians like the Taliban, the Saudi Royal family or anyone of their ilk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that Ronald Reagan met with the Taliban is a disgrace. No doubt about it. However, we must remember that at the time Reagan viewed the Soviet Union as an existential threat to the United States. The Taliban were fighting the Soviets (who had invaded their country lest we forget) and I suppose Reagan was following the dictum that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.<br />
Nevertheless, I find that photograph to be disgusting. I don&#8217;t care if its Reagan, Clinton, Bush or anybody else&#8211;the White House should not play host to ruthless barbarians like the Taliban, the Saudi Royal family or anyone of their ilk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Blalock</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-162502</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Blalock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4788#comment-162502</guid>
		<description>@Eugene
You obviously missed my facetious intent in the comment about Chavez.
I guess it was over your head or perhaps beyond your fascist sense
of humor which incidentally is the first casualty of hubris.

Get over yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eugene<br />
You obviously missed my facetious intent in the comment about Chavez.<br />
I guess it was over your head or perhaps beyond your fascist sense<br />
of humor which incidentally is the first casualty of hubris.</p>
<p>Get over yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard vajs</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-162493</link>
		<dc:creator>richard vajs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4788#comment-162493</guid>
		<description>Eugene,
        I have been a Libertarian for a long time. But, I am beginning to believe that I may have bought into a real line of crap. Libertarians generally believe that rich people are harder working (and hence more virtuous) than the poor. But, what if you have a clever, hard working, rich sociopath? Is he better than a stupid, lazy, poor sociopath? Probably not for the simple reason that the clever, hard working, rich sociopath can and does do infinitely more damage than his poorer less ambitious brother. I now realize how shallow Ayn Rand&#039;s worldview was. All of those highly capable, principled capitalists in Galt&#039;s Gulch and not a one of them was a greedy, lying, cheating bastard. Try finding that same distribution of character on Wall Street.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eugene,<br />
        I have been a Libertarian for a long time. But, I am beginning to believe that I may have bought into a real line of crap. Libertarians generally believe that rich people are harder working (and hence more virtuous) than the poor. But, what if you have a clever, hard working, rich sociopath? Is he better than a stupid, lazy, poor sociopath? Probably not for the simple reason that the clever, hard working, rich sociopath can and does do infinitely more damage than his poorer less ambitious brother. I now realize how shallow Ayn Rand&#8217;s worldview was. All of those highly capable, principled capitalists in Galt&#8217;s Gulch and not a one of them was a greedy, lying, cheating bastard. Try finding that same distribution of character on Wall Street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/10/13/correction-the-terrorist-refused-to-pal-around-with-reagan/comment-page-1/#comment-162491</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4788#comment-162491</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, as will become clear soon enough, oil is much more reliable an investment than bank

It is an illness of the Capitalist to believe that &quot;money and investment&quot; is actually productive, rather than parasitic.

And however some of the more idealistic of the Libertarian &quot;free marketers&quot; try to avoid it, Paulson and Bernanke and so forth are the essence of Capitalists, who always buy the state wherever it is buyable.

Free enterprise and &quot;Capitalism&quot; are two utterly different kettles of fish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, as will become clear soon enough, oil is much more reliable an investment than bank</p>
<p>It is an illness of the Capitalist to believe that &#8220;money and investment&#8221; is actually productive, rather than parasitic.</p>
<p>And however some of the more idealistic of the Libertarian &#8220;free marketers&#8221; try to avoid it, Paulson and Bernanke and so forth are the essence of Capitalists, who always buy the state wherever it is buyable.</p>
<p>Free enterprise and &#8220;Capitalism&#8221; are two utterly different kettles of fish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
