Comments on: The Problem with the Blackwater Indictments http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/12/08/the-problem-with-the-blackwater-indictments/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:20:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ralph lauren http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/12/08/the-problem-with-the-blackwater-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-275505 ralph lauren Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:33:07 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4990#comment-275505 Costume outfit de marin, comme la tentation, couleurs éclatantes et intervalle blanc, haut profil élément homosexual strain stimuler vos glandes surrénales. Ralph lauren Printemps 2012 Exposition Mme maillots de bain, du coup de maître à l'aquarelle de l'inspiration, l'utilisation de couleurs solubles dans l'eau apparaissent l'ensemble des effets magiques, strain être imprimé sur the maillot de bain, mis sur elle, peu importe où vous êtes à la recherche strain la mise au factor. Costume outfit de marin, comme la tentation, couleurs éclatantes et intervalle blanc, haut profil élément homosexual strain stimuler vos glandes surrénales. Ralph lauren Printemps 2012 Exposition Mme maillots de bain, du coup de maître à l'aquarelle de l'inspiration, l'utilisation de couleurs solubles dans l'eau apparaissent l'ensemble des effets magiques, strain être imprimé sur the maillot de bain, mis sur elle, peu importe où vous êtes à la recherche strain la mise au factor.

]]> By: Sac longchamp http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/12/08/the-problem-with-the-blackwater-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-265925 Sac longchamp Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:10:49 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4990#comment-265925 Une fois de plus grand poste. Vous semblez avoir une bonne compréhension de cesthemes.Come sur et garder sur votre écriture blog.expecting pour quelque chose de plus attrayant. Une fois de plus grand poste. Vous semblez avoir une bonne compréhension de cesthemes.Come sur et garder sur votre écriture blog.expecting pour quelque chose de plus attrayant.

]]> By: Lancel http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/12/08/the-problem-with-the-blackwater-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-263426 Lancel Fri, 18 Nov 2011 06:55:52 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4990#comment-263426 Merci de prendre le temps de discuter de cela, je crois fermement à ce sujet et de l'amour en apprendre davantage sur ce sujet. Si possible, comme vous acquérir de l'expertise, auriez-vous l'esprit la mise à jour de votre blog avec plus d'informations? Il est extrêmement utile pour moi. Merci de prendre le temps de discuter de cela, je crois fermement à ce sujet et de l'amour en apprendre davantage sur ce sujet. Si possible, comme vous acquérir de l'expertise, auriez-vous l'esprit la mise à jour de votre blog avec plus d'informations? Il est extrêmement utile pour moi.

]]> By: prada http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/12/08/the-problem-with-the-blackwater-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-262917 prada Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:02:29 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4990#comment-262917 Ho pensato che sarebbe stato noioso alcuni post vecchi, ma in realtà compensato per il mio tempo. Io posto un link a questa pagina sul mio blog. Sono sicuro che i miei visitatori troveranno che molto utile. Ho pensato che sarebbe stato noioso alcuni post vecchi, ma in realtà compensato per il mio tempo. Io posto un link a questa pagina sul mio blog. Sono sicuro che i miei visitatori troveranno che molto utile.

]]> By: Cous Cous http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/12/08/the-problem-with-the-blackwater-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-165273 Cous Cous Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:55:31 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4990#comment-165273 <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2005/10/02/us_car_theft_rings_probed_for_ties_to_iraq_bombings/" rel="nofollow">>“Those market and mosque bombing terrorists” got their cars from an interesting place. If one were cynical…</a <i>The FBI's counterterrorism unit has launched a broad investigation of US-based theft rings after discovering that some of the vehicles used in deadly car bombings in Iraq, including attacks that killed US troops and Iraqi civilians, were probably stolen in the United States, according to senior government officials.</i></a> >“Those market and mosque bombing terrorists” got their cars from an interesting place. If one were cynical…</a

The FBI’s counterterrorism unit has launched a broad investigation of US-based theft rings after discovering that some of the vehicles used in deadly car bombings in Iraq, including attacks that killed US troops and Iraqi civilians, were probably stolen in the United States, according to senior government officials.

]]> By: FD http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/12/08/the-problem-with-the-blackwater-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-165102 FD Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:45:50 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4990#comment-165102 JD says: "You idiots are still stuck in 2003" JD says: "We started the war, yes…but that war was against Saddam Hussain… not the Iraqi people." Hmm, was that not in 2003? What am I missing? JD says:
“You idiots are still stuck in 2003″

JD says:
“We started the war, yes…but that war was against Saddam Hussain… not the Iraqi people.”

Hmm, was that not in 2003? What am I missing?

]]> By: FD http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/12/08/the-problem-with-the-blackwater-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-165101 FD Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:41:26 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4990#comment-165101 JD, how about you answer on facts? Many have been cited above. You make a fool of yourself. JD, how about you answer on facts? Many have been cited above. You make a fool of yourself.

]]> By: FD http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/12/08/the-problem-with-the-blackwater-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-165100 FD Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:39:43 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4990#comment-165100 Why not? who pulls the triggers? Please re-read this from the above posted Nuremberg principles: <i>Principle IV The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.</i> JD is a criminal. He might also be an endoctrinated self justifying idiot, but he is a criminal. Why not? who pulls the triggers? Please re-read this from the above posted Nuremberg principles:

Principle IV
The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.

JD is a criminal. He might also be an endoctrinated self justifying idiot, but he is a criminal.

]]> By: FD http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/12/08/the-problem-with-the-blackwater-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-165099 FD Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:36:05 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4990#comment-165099 So "we" started the war (I did not but you did and so did the US governement) - and it was against Saddam Hussain. Why? Are you so naive you believe what you were told - that he was Satan and Hitler combined? And even in that case, what gives you the right to go to a foreign country change the ruler? What if others had decided Bush needed to be removed by force, would you call that "war" or "terrorism"? Would you not be one of the first ones in the streets of Washington DC fighting an occupation force? Clearly the situation now is even worse than it was then, wonder whose fault it is... could it not be, Pottery Barn style, the fault of those like you who went in? "War is hell but sometimes it is necessary" you say. You fail completely to explain why this one was. I would very much like to know... I think it was necessary to drive the career of generals and the egos of politicians, to sell weaponry, to comfort cowardly morons who feared browned muslims, and for you to make your living. Yes, you made your money and living on an illegal war. I don't see how that qualifies you to analyze foreign policy, in the contrary, I could see clear conflict of interest. Add to that Stockholm syndrom since you would of course not want to have been wounded in vain for a futile illegal war of aggression... You are not a victim or a hero, you are an aggressor and a criminal. And one who can't see the light. Brainwashed and self justifying. So “we” started the war (I did not but you did and so did the US governement) – and it was against Saddam Hussain. Why? Are you so naive you believe what you were told – that he was Satan and Hitler combined? And even in that case, what gives you the right to go to a foreign country change the ruler? What if others had decided Bush needed to be removed by force, would you call that “war” or “terrorism”? Would you not be one of the first ones in the streets of Washington DC fighting an occupation force?
Clearly the situation now is even worse than it was then, wonder whose fault it is… could it not be, Pottery Barn style, the fault of those like you who went in?
“War is hell but sometimes it is necessary” you say. You fail completely to explain why this one was. I would very much like to know…
I think it was necessary to drive the career of generals and the egos of politicians, to sell weaponry, to comfort cowardly morons who feared browned muslims, and for you to make your living. Yes, you made your money and living on an illegal war. I don’t see how that qualifies you to analyze foreign policy, in the contrary, I could see clear conflict of interest. Add to that Stockholm syndrom since you would of course not want to have been wounded in vain for a futile illegal war of aggression…
You are not a victim or a hero, you are an aggressor and a criminal. And one who can’t see the light. Brainwashed and self justifying.

]]> By: FD http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/12/08/the-problem-with-the-blackwater-indictments/comment-page-1/#comment-165098 FD Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:18:45 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4990#comment-165098 The reason there were no more attacks is that the US has turned into a police, fascist state, where the citizen-sheep have gratefully turned over accountability and freedom alike to an ill-defined but ever more present governing power. The reason there were no more attacks is that the US has turned into a police, fascist state, where the citizen-sheep have gratefully turned over accountability and freedom alike to an ill-defined but ever more present governing power.

]]>