<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neocon Blankley Wants to Bring Back the Draft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/01/13/neocon-blankley-wants-to-bring-back-the-draft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/01/13/neocon-blankley-wants-to-bring-back-the-draft/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:24:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancel</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/01/13/neocon-blankley-wants-to-bring-back-the-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-263468</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5157#comment-263468</guid>
		<description>Merci de prendre le temps de discuter de cela, je crois fermement &#224; ce sujet et de l&#039;amour en apprendre davantage sur ce sujet. Si possible, comme vous acqu&#233;rir de l&#039;expertise, auriez-vous l&#039;esprit la mise &#224; jour de votre blog avec plus d&#039;informations? Il est extr&#234;mement utile pour moi. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merci de prendre le temps de discuter de cela, je crois fermement &agrave; ce sujet et de l&#039;amour en apprendre davantage sur ce sujet. Si possible, comme vous acqu&eacute;rir de l&#039;expertise, auriez-vous l&#039;esprit la mise &agrave; jour de votre blog avec plus d&#039;informations? Il est extr&ecirc;mement utile pour moi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prada</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/01/13/neocon-blankley-wants-to-bring-back-the-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-262952</link>
		<dc:creator>prada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5157#comment-262952</guid>
		<description>Bene, questa &#232; la mia prima visita al tuo blog! Siamo un gruppo di volontari e di iniziare una nuova iniziativa in una comunit&#224; nella stessa nicchia. Il tuo blog ci ha fornito preziose informazioni su cui lavorare. Avete fatto un lavoro meraviglioso! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bene, questa &egrave; la mia prima visita al tuo blog! Siamo un gruppo di volontari e di iniziare una nuova iniziativa in una comunit&agrave; nella stessa nicchia. Il tuo blog ci ha fornito preziose informazioni su cui lavorare. Avete fatto un lavoro meraviglioso!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/01/13/neocon-blankley-wants-to-bring-back-the-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-167525</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5157#comment-167525</guid>
		<description>Dylan Hales has an excellent article on Tony Blankley for Taki&#039;s Magazine: http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/the_commissar_of_grit/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dylan Hales has an excellent article on Tony Blankley for Taki&#8217;s Magazine: <a href="http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/the_commissar_of_grit/" rel="nofollow">http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/the_commissar_of_grit/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Living proof that Neo-Cons are flippin&#8217; stupid &#124; Political Byline</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/01/13/neocon-blankley-wants-to-bring-back-the-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-167044</link>
		<dc:creator>Living proof that Neo-Cons are flippin&#8217; stupid &#124; Political Byline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5157#comment-167044</guid>
		<description>[...] (Via Anti-War) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Via Anti-War) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill K.</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/01/13/neocon-blankley-wants-to-bring-back-the-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-166937</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5157#comment-166937</guid>
		<description>Nothing at this point can justify Conscription. No Megalomaniac with a 20 Million Men Army is preparing to invade the United States of America.

In fact the Megalomaniacs seem to be writing books about forming the population of the US into Legions of Stormtroopers to expand &quot;American Nationalism&quot; to &quot;win in the 21st Century&quot;.

This sounds like good &quot;old fashioned&quot; Fascism to me. The Nazis were talking about creating a 1,000 year Reich and a &quot;Germanic&quot; Europe, just like Blankley wants to expand an American Empire.

What&#039;s the logic behind invading Pakistan? Do we really need Nuclear Truck Bombs wiping out whole US Army/Marine Divisions? Because that is likely what will happen. We don&#039;t need Nuclear Weapons Engineers going to work for Militant Groups. If the US Military tries to occupy Pakistan the Government will lose control instantly, then you have 50 Million potential &quot;martyrs&quot; waiting for their chance to inflict heavy losses on the &quot;Great Satan&quot; that is trying to dominate them. China isn&#039;t going to support this, and they have tons of &quot;surplus&quot; weapons they can provide to Marxist or Socialist Resistance Organizations that would likely appear because of a US Invasion. And what&#039;s next? Iran? Syria? That&#039;s over 300 Million people(Iraq + Afghanistan + Pakistan + Iran + Syria), the US Government would have to conscript/draft every able bodied male citizen over the Long Term to control that kind of population. And we never know what the reaction will be in Egypt, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia(add another 140 Million if things get out of control). At that point it can easily become a War of Attrition and the side that runs out of resources first - loses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing at this point can justify Conscription. No Megalomaniac with a 20 Million Men Army is preparing to invade the United States of America.</p>
<p>In fact the Megalomaniacs seem to be writing books about forming the population of the US into Legions of Stormtroopers to expand &#8220;American Nationalism&#8221; to &#8220;win in the 21st Century&#8221;.</p>
<p>This sounds like good &#8220;old fashioned&#8221; Fascism to me. The Nazis were talking about creating a 1,000 year Reich and a &#8220;Germanic&#8221; Europe, just like Blankley wants to expand an American Empire.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the logic behind invading Pakistan? Do we really need Nuclear Truck Bombs wiping out whole US Army/Marine Divisions? Because that is likely what will happen. We don&#8217;t need Nuclear Weapons Engineers going to work for Militant Groups. If the US Military tries to occupy Pakistan the Government will lose control instantly, then you have 50 Million potential &#8220;martyrs&#8221; waiting for their chance to inflict heavy losses on the &#8220;Great Satan&#8221; that is trying to dominate them. China isn&#8217;t going to support this, and they have tons of &#8220;surplus&#8221; weapons they can provide to Marxist or Socialist Resistance Organizations that would likely appear because of a US Invasion. And what&#8217;s next? Iran? Syria? That&#8217;s over 300 Million people(Iraq + Afghanistan + Pakistan + Iran + Syria), the US Government would have to conscript/draft every able bodied male citizen over the Long Term to control that kind of population. And we never know what the reaction will be in Egypt, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia(add another 140 Million if things get out of control). At that point it can easily become a War of Attrition and the side that runs out of resources first &#8211; loses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill K.</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/01/13/neocon-blankley-wants-to-bring-back-the-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-166935</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5157#comment-166935</guid>
		<description>Why is it this picture came to mind when seeing this guy?

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/c/c1/Insidious_Smile.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it this picture came to mind when seeing this guy?</p>
<p><a href="http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/c/c1/Insidious_Smile.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/c/c1/Insidious_Smile.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill K.</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/01/13/neocon-blankley-wants-to-bring-back-the-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-166898</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5157#comment-166898</guid>
		<description>Well Stalin started fewer Wars than the Neocons, the Neocons can only be accurately compared to the Nazis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Stalin started fewer Wars than the Neocons, the Neocons can only be accurately compared to the Nazis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Clore</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/01/13/neocon-blankley-wants-to-bring-back-the-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-166760</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Clore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5157#comment-166760</guid>
		<description>This prick should be sentenced to a lifetime of listening to the Dicks&#039; song &quot;I Hope You Get Drafted&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This prick should be sentenced to a lifetime of listening to the Dicks&#8217; song &#8220;I Hope You Get Drafted&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blankley's not so bad</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/01/13/neocon-blankley-wants-to-bring-back-the-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-166735</link>
		<dc:creator>Blankley's not so bad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5157#comment-166735</guid>
		<description>Because unlike perle, and wolfowitz, tony is as dumb as a bucket of warm spit.

He thinks a draft is a way to get &quot;war-fighters&quot; (the dehumanizing term used mainly by military contractors to describe the flesh and blood component inserted into their tanks, ships, uniforms and behind their rifles).

Actually, in this country, you combine a truly hideously stupid war with a draft and that miracle of civil disobedience and friends soon appear: the draft resister.

I say bring it on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because unlike perle, and wolfowitz, tony is as dumb as a bucket of warm spit.</p>
<p>He thinks a draft is a way to get &#8220;war-fighters&#8221; (the dehumanizing term used mainly by military contractors to describe the flesh and blood component inserted into their tanks, ships, uniforms and behind their rifles).</p>
<p>Actually, in this country, you combine a truly hideously stupid war with a draft and that miracle of civil disobedience and friends soon appear: the draft resister.</p>
<p>I say bring it on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/01/13/neocon-blankley-wants-to-bring-back-the-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-166712</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5157#comment-166712</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s time for us to speak frankly
Of an old warmonger named Blankley.
He himself&#039;s not so daft,
As to sign up for the draft.
Better to talk to the Fox babe who&#039;s skanky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s time for us to speak frankly<br />
Of an old warmonger named Blankley.<br />
He himself&#8217;s not so daft,<br />
As to sign up for the draft.<br />
Better to talk to the Fox babe who&#8217;s skanky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

