Comments on: The Paradox of Law: The Past as Prologue http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/24/the-paradox-of-law-the-past-as-prologue/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:12:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Sac longchamp http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/24/the-paradox-of-law-the-past-as-prologue/comment-page-1/#comment-265915 Sac longchamp Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:08:54 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5557#comment-265915 Ceci est ma première fois que je visite ici. J'ai trouvé tellement de choses intéressantesdans votre blog, en particulier sa discussion. Du tonnes de commentaires sur vos articles,je suppose que je ne suis pas le seul à avoir tout le plaisir ici! Continuez votre excellent travail. Ceci est ma première fois que je visite ici. J'ai trouvé tellement de choses intéressantesdans votre blog, en particulier sa discussion. Du tonnes de commentaires sur vos articles,je suppose que je ne suis pas le seul à avoir tout le plaisir ici! Continuez votre excellent travail.

]]> By: biomass pellet http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/24/the-paradox-of-law-the-past-as-prologue/comment-page-1/#comment-265675 biomass pellet Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:13:19 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5557#comment-265675 We can survive terrorist acts but we cannot survive the collapse of the rule of law. Third, we would not be simply exposing what when on but punishing it when appropriate. This is loyalty to great ideals. The world will notice. We can survive terrorist acts but we cannot survive the collapse of the rule of law. Third, we would not be simply exposing what when on but punishing it when appropriate. This is loyalty to great ideals. The world will notice.

]]> By: seannielson http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/24/the-paradox-of-law-the-past-as-prologue/comment-page-1/#comment-188695 seannielson Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:21:08 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5557#comment-188695 Amazing, very informational yet straight to the point. <a href="http://www.juliespetportraits.com" target="_blank">http://www.juliespetportraits.com</a> Amazing, very informational yet straight to the point.
http://www.juliespetportraits.com

]]> By: down jackets http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/24/the-paradox-of-law-the-past-as-prologue/comment-page-1/#comment-186429 down jackets Wed, 09 Jun 2010 07:40:32 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5557#comment-186429 Your technology is so terrific! Your technology is so terrific!

]]> By: Prolonged Detention: Obama to Continue Bush Policies | America at War http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/24/the-paradox-of-law-the-past-as-prologue/comment-page-1/#comment-169877 Prolonged Detention: Obama to Continue Bush Policies | America at War Sat, 23 May 2009 20:09:39 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5557#comment-169877 [...] first, watch Rachel Madow explain in the clip below, how President Obama, principled opponent of prosecuting or even investigating past crimes, plans to lock people up for future crimes. Forever. Like the “Pre-Crime” lock-ups [...] [...] first, watch Rachel Madow explain in the clip below, how President Obama, principled opponent of prosecuting or even investigating past crimes, plans to lock people up for future crimes. Forever. Like the “Pre-Crime” lock-ups [...]

]]> By: Antiwar.com Blog · Face It, Progs: Obama’s a Dud http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/24/the-paradox-of-law-the-past-as-prologue/comment-page-1/#comment-169778 Antiwar.com Blog · Face It, Progs: Obama’s a Dud Fri, 22 May 2009 18:10:46 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5557#comment-169778 [...] appears to be a keeper. In the clip below, she explains how President Obama, principled opponent of prosecuting or even investigating past crimes, plans to lock people up for future crimes. [...] [...] appears to be a keeper. In the clip below, she explains how President Obama, principled opponent of prosecuting or even investigating past crimes, plans to lock people up for future crimes. [...]

]]> By: Lester Ness http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/24/the-paradox-of-law-the-past-as-prologue/comment-page-1/#comment-169335 Lester Ness Fri, 08 May 2009 05:02:10 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5557#comment-169335 Which god do they trust in? Their god is their belly, I suspect. Lester Ness Kunming China Which god do they trust in? Their god is their belly, I suspect.

Lester Ness
Kunming
China

]]> By: Lester Ness http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/24/the-paradox-of-law-the-past-as-prologue/comment-page-1/#comment-169334 Lester Ness Fri, 08 May 2009 05:00:53 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5557#comment-169334 A lot of Americans take for granted that it won't happen to THEM -- just other people. Lester Ness Kunming China A lot of Americans take for granted that it won’t happen to THEM — just other people.

Lester Ness
Kunming
China

]]> By: Terry in Sullivan http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/24/the-paradox-of-law-the-past-as-prologue/comment-page-1/#comment-169262 Terry in Sullivan Fri, 01 May 2009 23:59:31 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5557#comment-169262 Laws, regardless of eloquence has never protected anyone. They are a part of the clean up-after the fact. They are a part of the revenge cycle of which prosecutors and police do their work. The laws against murder never stopped the murderer. And it is revenge and I find it telling that they say in God we trust. If they really believe in God, then what they're doing is double-jeopardy. Laws, regardless of eloquence has never protected anyone. They are a part of the clean up-after the fact. They are a part of the revenge cycle of which prosecutors and police do their work. The laws against murder never stopped the murderer.
And it is revenge and I find it telling that they say in God we trust. If they really believe in God, then what they’re doing is double-jeopardy.

]]> By: Lear K http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/24/the-paradox-of-law-the-past-as-prologue/comment-page-1/#comment-169174 Lear K Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:03:30 +0000 http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5557#comment-169174 I happened to turn to the 700 club ,and there was he ,Mr morality himself Pat Robertson saying that Obama should never have released those torture memos becuse there any reason to do so either legal,moral,or otherwise and that actions would show that democrates and Obama were soft on deffense ,and the security of the country! I happened to turn to the 700 club ,and there was he ,Mr morality himself Pat Robertson saying that Obama should never have released those torture memos becuse there any reason to do so either legal,moral,or otherwise and that actions would show that democrates and Obama were soft on deffense ,and the security of the country!

]]>