Comments on: American Conservative Website Attacked

By: sohbet

sohbet — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:48:15 +0000

thank you very much executives like you, I yemek tariflerireally like your blog verymetin2 pvp clean and reliable link to a web site trying to get the ban I hope I do not eat many thanks Web sites with the music here is actually fun, chat, friendship, bi kind of people that I'm mt2 pvptrying to create an ideal environment for fusion with each other and chat environments, chatand sexual issues, as well as food, drink, and even my own social networking areas, such as creating bayan giyima single goal is to serve our valuable administrators chathope you understand If you need to make

By: ezhanebrand

ezhanebrand — Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:22:32 +0000

Oh, his aging mother's peach ah – how not to bloom. Zhou Chen-chen singing on his back down on the bed, up the quilt to sleep. http://www.allcheapuggsale.com” target=”_blank”>www.allcheapuggsale.com Until the sixth day at noon, Dong Xiaokui usual in Jincheng, Block A, North Building, hopeless waiting for the door. Sure enough, more than the drama of life results idea that more powerful. She picked up the paper bags lost a gentleman. And the gentleman surnamed Li crown group happens to be one of the important customers.

By: dave

dave — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:18:27 +0000

I smell false flag. TAC isn't exactly in tune with the Israeli-dominated GOP/conservative movement. TAC's readership certainly leans anti-Israeli (or simply leans "isolationist" which according to Zionists is equivalent to being Hitler), although TAC's editorial policy is more neutral (or was; I haven't read TAC in years).

Of all the conservative websites, why would Palestinians target TAC? There are thousands of American conservative websites full of Israeli-firsters – why aren't they being hacked? And how many Palestinians are there who have access to computers and the internet and who know how to hack? Anyone with any long experience on the Internet knows that any Palestinian "hackers" out there are outnumbered thousands-to-one by Israeli, Zionist, or pro-Israeli/pro-Zionist hackers. Do the math.

By: dave

dave — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:11:54 +0000

Exactly – if you were p!ssed off at conservatives, TAC is not exactly your first choice of target. It is in fact a very poor choice. TAC represents an extreme minority point of view amongst conservatives and Republicans, and mostly appeals to conservatives and libertarians who have given up on (or were kicked out of) the conservative movement long ago.

By: dave

dave — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:07:31 +0000

Glen,

If you don't want to be mistaken for a troll or a spook astroturfer, don't act like one. Putting words into people's mouths, as you did, is at the very least trollish. Go back and read what you posted:

"Wow. What a great little bit propaganda. It automatically follows that because the site was hacked, that your arguments are the strongest? ::chuckles::"

You have to be incredibly thick-headed to draw that sort of conclusion from what Eric posted. Eric did not claim that being hacked made TAC's argument the strongest. Eric merely pointed out that some people respond to speech they don't like by means of censorship or other means of stifling free speech – either with the power of government, or private violence, or in this case, hacking.

If you don't think this hacking was done by people who disagree with TAC's pov, you're pretty freaking dense. People don't hack political sites for the pure joy of hacking.

By: Walker Cumming

Walker Cumming — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:16:15 +0000

wonderful themes on here. Thanks

By: Dennis

Dennis — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 06:03:02 +0000

In broken English the hacker, identifying himself as a Palestinian, denounced Israel's policy in the territories and US support for Israel and railed a bit against the Jews generally; all barely coherent. A paragraph in Turkish appeared as well, perhaps simply repeating the same. At the bottom of the page appeared "Palestinian Copyright". The site is back up.

By: jrs

jrs — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:35:36 +0000

Maybe someone just hates American conservatives (iow Republicans). I can't blame them if they do, but they sure choose a poor target with that magazine.

By: Drain 52

Drain 52 — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:21:34 +0000

It's possible some bored 17-year-old stumbled across the AmCon website and decided to vandalize it for no reason. It's far likelier that this politically charged and decidedly minority site was chosen by specific antagonists. Perhaps Glen's been hit by too many of Quick Draw McGraw's guitars to see this.

This sort of incident also draws out my closet Luddite. Technological advances tend to promote efficiency and lower cost, but at the price of fragility and greater dependence. It's easier to wipe a website than drop an entire magazine's production down the memory hole.

By: Glen

Glen — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:03:42 +0000

Holy!?
A bit paranoid. All I was saying is that it's reaching to assume the only motivation in the universe for hacking these guys must obviously be because they couldn't possibly come up with a strong argument.

I've never even read the magazine or paper so I am not even arguing against it.

I build guitars for a living. Lighten up dude. Maybe try some critical thinking rather than being so reactionary. Everyone who doesn't automatically agree with your point of view aren't necessarily trolls…..Jaysis.
So quick to jump down peoples throats….