<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Antiwar.com Blog &#187; Covert Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/category/covert-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:23:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Moldova&#8217;s &#8216;Twitter Revolution&#8217; a CIA Plot?</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/08/moldovas-twitter-revolution-a-cia-plot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/08/moldovas-twitter-revolution-a-cia-plot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Covert Action]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s starting to look like another Color Revolution. Daniel McAdams has the story at LewRockwell.com/blog.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s starting to look like another Color Revolution. <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/026241.html">Daniel McAdams has the story</a> at LewRockwell.com/blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/04/08/moldovas-twitter-revolution-a-cia-plot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you know Binyam Mohamed?</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/02/07/do-you-know-binyam-mohamed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/02/07/do-you-know-binyam-mohamed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 22:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>L. Reichard White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covert Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantánamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War crimes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two senior British judges accused the U.S. of threatening to stop sharing intelligence with Britain if the British Government released details of the  extraordinary rendition of British citizen, Binyam Mohamed.
Why? 
Perhaps this explains it:

So, while a few die hard &#8220;24&#8243; fans &#8212; and Alberto Gonzales, and Michael Mukasey &#8212; might still claim confusion about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two senior British judges accused the U.S. of threatening to stop sharing intelligence with Britain if the British Government released details of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_rendition"> extraordinary rendition</a> of British citizen, Binyam Mohamed.</p>
<p>Why? </p>
<p>Perhaps this explains it:</p>
<a href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/02/07/do-you-know-binyam-mohamed/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a>
<p>So, while a few die hard &#8220;24&#8243; fans &#8212; and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales">Alberto Gonzales</a>, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Mukasey">Michael Mukasey</a> &#8212; might still claim confusion about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterboarding">waterboarding</a> being torture, nearly everyone else would agree that having your penis sliced with razors once a month IS torture.  </p>
<p>According to the close-the-barn-door-late theory, should official confirmation of this behavior escape the U.S. establishment cone of silence, it would be a PR disaster.  That, not the perennial whine of &#8220;<em>National Security</em>,&#8221; is the source of the pressure the British Judges felt.  </p>
<p>There is <a href="http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/6044"> a lot of smoke </a> around the <a href="http://theenvelope.latimes.com/la-na-obama-guantanamo23-2009jan23,0,4139028.story?page=3"> L.A. Times article suggesting Barak Obama&#8217;s Executive Order ending <i>extraordinary</i> renditions</a> was bogus. </p>
<p>But even if Mr. Obama <em>did</em> end the <strong><em>extraordinary</em></strong> brand of renditions, according to a  <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2009/2/5/despite_celebrated_orders_closing_gitmo_and">Democracy Now! interview with Michael Rattner of The Center for Constitutional Rights</a>, there is still a hole big enough to drive tour busses full of victims into the Gulag.</p>
<p>Will this be another big disappointment like Mr. Obama&#8217;s plans to double the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan &#8212; and his <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/jan/29/obama-predator-drones-pakistan">authorization of Predator drone strikes on the tribal people of Pakistan</a>? And will we meet other Binyam Mohameds in the future, this time created by the Obama Administration?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/02/07/do-you-know-binyam-mohamed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The CIA is training landscapers, poolmen, and interior designers</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/15/the-cia-is-training-landscapers-poolmen-and-interior-designers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/15/the-cia-is-training-landscapers-poolmen-and-interior-designers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Swanson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covert Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US military recently accused Iran of training &#8220;death squads&#8221; whose primary goal is carrying out assassinations.  The information is being made public to supposedly &#8220;pressure&#8221; Iranian leadership into halting these operations.
So if Iranian assassins are called &#8220;death squads&#8221; what are similarly trained operatives from the CIA or Army called?
Perhaps the euphemisms that Pentagon officials [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US military recently <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/08/15/iran.death.squads/index.html">accused</a> Iran of training &#8220;death squads&#8221; whose primary goal is carrying out assassinations.  The information is being made public to supposedly &#8220;pressure&#8221; Iranian leadership into halting these operations.</p>
<p>So if Iranian assassins are called &#8220;death squads&#8221; what are similarly trained operatives from the CIA or Army called?</p>
<p>Perhaps the euphemisms that Pentagon officials use are: customer service representatives, safety patrol officers, personal assistants, and make-over specialists.</p>
<p>While the actions of both sides are essentially premeditated murder, the CIA and Army special forces should also come clean about their decades old operations involving the execution of foreign nationals.  Come clean on operations in <a href="http://www.anusha.com/ciastudy.htm">Guatemala</a>, <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0109-06.htm">El Salvador</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Program">Vietnam</a>, and even Iran itself.</p>
<p>Contemporaneously, after deafening <a href="http://hnn.us/articles/380.html">calls</a> to reinstate the official sanctioning of assassinations, the legacy of director Richard Helms <a href="http://www.slate.com/?id=2073470">continues</a> unabated,as the Pentagon continues to fund and operate the notorious <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Hemisphere_Institute_for_Security_Cooperation">School of the Americas</a> at Fort Benning which has trained hundreds of foreign nationals with assassination tactics.</p>
<p>Furthermore, despite being banned in the 1970s &#8212; after revelations disclosed by the Church and Pike committees &#8212; with the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/dec/09/iraq.israel">assistance</a> of Israeli Defense Forces, the US Army has been actively training &#8220;hunter-killer&#8221; squads in Iraq under a program called Operation <a href="http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20040301faessay83209/jennifer-d-kibbe/the-rise-of-the-shadow-warriors.html">Gray Fox</a>.</p>
<p>And the latest act of bellicosity: this hypocritical condemnation comes a month after an <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/07/07/080707fa_fact_hersh">exposé</a> showed that last year, Congress appropriated $400 million for the CIA to conduct clandestine operations in Iran.</p>
<p>While the exact nature of the operations are undisclosed, it is difficult to fathom that the funds are financing more plumbers, carpenters, and electricians in a covert attempt to build new homes and infrastructure for local residents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/15/the-cia-is-training-landscapers-poolmen-and-interior-designers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preparing the Battlefield: Scott Horton Interviews Seymour Hersh</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/30/preparing-the-battlefield-scott-horton-interviews-seymour-hersch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/30/preparing-the-battlefield-scott-horton-interviews-seymour-hersch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 05:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Garris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Covert Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Antiwar Radio exclusive!
Download audio file (08_06_30_hersh.mp3)
Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh, author of the book Chain of Command and many important articles about the Bush administration’s Iran policy, discusses his new one for The New Yorker magazine, “Preparing the Battlefield,” Secretary Gates’s warning about long term consequences of an air attack, the turning over of much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Antiwar Radio exclusive!</p>
<p><a href="http://dissentradio.com/radio/08_06_30_hersh.mp3">Download audio file (08_06_30_hersh.mp3)</a><br /></p>
<p>Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh, author of the book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Chain-Command-Road-Abu-Ghraib/dp/0060195916/antiwarbookstore"><em>Chain of Command</em> </a>and many important articles about the Bush administration’s Iran policy, discusses his new one for <em>The New Yorker </em>magazine, “<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/07/07/080707fa_fact_hersh?printable=true">Preparing the Battlefield</a>,” Secretary Gates’s warning about long term consequences of an air attack, the turning over of much of America’s covert action under the control of the Joint Special Operations Command to avoid oversight, the backing of Sunni radicals in Iran, Baluchistan, Kurdistan etc. in order to try to provoke the Iranian government into escalating as an excuse for war.</p>
<p><a href="http://dissentradio.com/radio/08_06_30_hersh.mp3"><strong>MP3 here</strong>.</a> (6:18)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/06/30/preparing-the-battlefield-scott-horton-interviews-seymour-hersch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://dissentradio.com/radio/08_06_30_hersh.mp3" length="1512803" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Iraq at Peace with Its Neighbors</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Covert Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well it was before. Now the Turks are bombing the north again (whether actually killing PKK members or not is in dispute) and war with Iran looms. Andrew Cockburn reports in Counter Punch Bush&#8217;s new &#8220;finding&#8221; authorizing more covert support for anti-Iranian and anti-Syrian terrorist groups like the MEK, Jundullah and &#8211; irony anyone? &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it was before. Now the Turks are <a href="http://wiredispatch.com/news/?id=153758">bombing the north again</a> (whether actually killing PKK members or not is in dispute) and war with Iran looms. <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/andrew05022008.html">Andrew Cockburn</a> reports in <em>Counter Punch</em> Bush&#8217;s new &#8220;finding&#8221; authorizing more covert support for anti-Iranian and anti-Syrian terrorist groups like the MEK, Jundullah and &#8211; irony anyone? &#8211; the PKK-allied Pejak.</p>
<p>The Sunday <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article3868063.ece"><em>Times</em></a> says the military is renewing plans for strikes at Quds Force targets in Iran, a further irony since the Quds Force is the <a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080310/dreyfuss">father organization</a> of the Badr Corps (AKA: Bush&#8217;s &#8220;Iraqi Army&#8221;).</p>
<p>And Secretary Rice has laid down the gauntlet, <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iVp6OcsznLJpeFv8SenE_EhxIpmgD90D79B00">accusing Iran</a> of <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jrWyl2jEs9TS6ornrqO9eyrwn4Pw">everything under the Sun</a>.</p>
<p>Any strikes against Iran seem almost certain to escalate into full scale war in southern Iraq, Iran&#8217;s nuclear facilities and who-knows-what else.</p>
<p>One notable portion of Cockburn&#8217;s article:</p>
<blockquote><p>Interestingly, despite the bellicose complaints, Petraeus has made little effort to seal the Iran-Iraq border, and in any case two thirds of U.S. casualties still come from Sunni insurgents. &#8220;The Shia account for less than one third,&#8221; a recently returned member of the command staff in Baghdad familiar with the relevant intelligence told me, &#8220;but if you want a war you have to sell it.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Cross-posted at <a href="http://thestressblog.com/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/">Stress</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/04/an-iraq-at-peace-with-its-neighbors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Lied and I&#8217;m a Coward</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/20/i-lied-and-im-a-coward/</link>
		<comments>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/20/i-lied-and-im-a-coward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Henderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Covert Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon propaganda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/20/i-lied-and-im-a-coward/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not a big fan of the New York Times, but today&#8217;s front-page investigative report on the Pentagon&#8217;s managing of the news is absolutely first-rate.   One of the Pentagon officials, Torie Clarke, the Pentagon&#8217;s main propagandist, said her goal had been to achieve &#8220;information dominance.&#8221;  In other words, she wanted the Pentagon&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of the New York Times, but today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/20generals.html?_r=2&amp;ex=1366344000&amp;en=196b27df83cc255c&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">front-page investigative report</a> on the Pentagon&#8217;s managing of the news is absolutely first-rate.   One of the Pentagon officials, Torie Clarke, the Pentagon&#8217;s main propagandist, said her goal had been to achieve &#8220;information dominance.&#8221;  In other words, she wanted the Pentagon&#8217;s message to get out and crowd out the independent information from others.  To do this, the Pentagon recruited retired military officers and fed them select information that was often at odds with reality.  Wow!  I&#8217;m already sounding like a spin doctor.  What I mean in the earlier sentence is that the Pentagon lied.<br />
The payoff for many of these retired officers was that various &#8220;defense&#8221; contractors for whom they worked got a better shot at military contracts.  [Why "defense" in quotation marks?  Because most of what the Department of Defense does has nothing to do with defense: it's offense, much of which makes us less safe.]<br />
Interestingly, some of the retired military knew they were being lied to and passed the information on as truth nevertheless.  In other words, they lied.  One, General Paul E. Vallely, a FOX News analyst from 2001 to 2007, stated, &#8220;“I saw immediately in 2003 that things were going south [in Iraq.]&#8221;  But on his return, Vallely told FOX&#8217;s Alan Colmes, “You can’t believe the progress,” and predicted that the number of insurgents would be &#8220;down to a few numbers&#8221; within months.  Of course, it wasn&#8217;t.  And it turned out that Vallely didn&#8217;t &#8220;believe the progress.&#8221;<br />
How did they rationalize their lying?  Take Timur J. Eads.  Please.  Eads is &#8220;a retired Army lieutenant colonel and Fox analyst who is vice president of government relations for Blackbird Technologies, a fast-growing military contractor.&#8221;  Eads said he had withheld the truth on television for fear that a four-star general would call and say, &#8220;Kill that contract.&#8221;  I&#8217;ve heard of people running from battle because they might be literally killed.  And I&#8217;m sympathetic.  But lying because the consequence of telling the truth is that your employer might lose business and you might get fired?  Wowee.  Pretty scary.<br />
The whole article is well worth your time.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/04/20/i-lied-and-im-a-coward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
