<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Antiwar.com Blog &#187; George W. Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/category/george-w-bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>What is the normal rate of suicides?</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/29/what-is-the-normal-rate-of-suicides/</link>
		<comments>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/29/what-is-the-normal-rate-of-suicides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 04:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Swanson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent report notes that there has been a marked increase in suicides for active duty Army personnel.  According to the study, 2007 was the worst year on record with 115 troops taking their own lives.  This was up from the previous year of 102 and the year before which was 85.
Is there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent report <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24874573/">notes</a> that there has been a marked increase in suicides for active duty Army personnel.  According to the study, 2007 was the worst year on record with 115 troops taking their own lives.  This was up from the previous year of 102 and the year before which was 85.</p>
<p>Is there any level of suicides that is par for the course?  Do megacompanies like Walmart, McDonalds, General Electric, IBM or ExxonMobile have off-years as well? </p>
<p>No.  Perhaps it is because employees of McDonalds aren&#8217;t required to force customers to purchase combo meals.  Nor does Walmart require its staff to imprison anyone that fails to submit to its no-shirt, no-shoes, no-service policy.  Has anyone recently seen a road-block from IBM forcing drivers to buy workstations before they are allowed to continue traveling?  Do employees of GE break down doors of consumers and use waterboarding to discover where the customer purchased his appliances?</p>
<p>The army and its soldiers are paying the seemingly unseen toll of occupation, of torturing, of nation-building: the very job Bush <a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1710.htm">promised</a> never to put them through. A job that no one should ever have or be asked to do.</p>
<p>See also:<br />
<a href="http://www.antiwar.com/glantz/?articleid=12728">Vets&#8217; Lawsuit Opens Door on Suicides, Poor Care</a><br />
<a href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/11/16/if-war-is-the-health-of-the-state-then-peace-is-the-health-of-civilization/">If War is the Health of the State, then Peace is the Health of Civilization</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/29/what-is-the-normal-rate-of-suicides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feeding the Gravy Train One Big Pipeline at a Time</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/28/feeding-the-gravy-train-one-big-pipeline-at-a-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/28/feeding-the-gravy-train-one-big-pipeline-at-a-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Swanson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Empire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Military spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have a chance be sure to read the latest TomDispatch piece from the Highlights section.
Researcher Frida Berrigan copiously details the geometric rise of the Pentagon&#8217;s budget and omnipotence through the concerted efforts of the current administration.   As Tom notes, it is perhaps the most powerful and concise overview on the breadth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a chance be sure to read the <a href="http://www.antiwar.com/engelhardt/?articleid=12909">latest</a> TomDispatch piece from the <em>Highlights</em> section.</p>
<p>Researcher Frida Berrigan copiously details the geometric rise of the Pentagon&#8217;s budget and omnipotence through the concerted efforts of the current administration.   As Tom notes, it is perhaps the most powerful and concise overview on the breadth and scope of the evergrowing military complex.  </p>
<p>And while frequent readers of AWC will not be surprised with the revelations, perhaps most troubling is just how meddlesome the Defense department has become in diplomatic affairs, superseding the relatively dovish State department in all negotiations.  For instance, why bother talking through civilian channels when the real decision making ultimately takes place through viceroys operating at a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Combatant_Command">Unified Combatant Command</a>?</p>
<p>As the title suggests, the Pentagon really has taken charge and as Berrigan unfortunately notes, no matter who is elected president it is a trend that shows no sign of abating.</p>
<p>See also:<br />
<a href="http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/05/26/9198/">War Immemorial Day - No Peace for Militarized U.S.</a><br />
<a href="http://mises.org/story/818">A History of Folly</a><br />
<a href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/02/14/military-handouts-and-financial-aid-in-africa/">Military Handouts and Financial Aid in Africa</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/28/feeding-the-gravy-train-one-big-pipeline-at-a-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What would that be like . . .</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/03/what-would-that-be-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/03/what-would-that-be-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 07:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>L. Reichard White</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intervention]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[War crimes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[War party]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[al-Qaeda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marc Garlasco helped target laser-guided bombs during the Iraq invasion, and he claims in an NPR interview entitled &#34;Assessing the Human Cost of Air Strikes in Iraq,&#34; that the military does a careful calculation of how many innocent civilians will be killed for each bomb dropped. According to Garlasco, they&#8217;re VERY careful. If more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc Garlasco helped target laser-guided bombs during the Iraq invasion, and he claims in an NPR interview entitled &quot;<a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89460867"><em>Assessing the Human Cost of Air Strikes in Iraq</em></a>,&quot; that the military does a careful calculation of how many innocent civilians will be killed for each bomb dropped. According to Garlasco, they&#8217;re VERY careful. If more than 29 innocent civilians are calculated to become &quot;<i>collateral damage</i>,&quot; they have to get White House approval.</p>
<p>What would that be like . . . . </p>
<p>FC [Field Commander]: Mr. President - we&#8217;ve got the 3rd highest ranking al&#8217;Qaeda commander in Iraq lined up in our sights, but if we bomb, we might kill more than 29 civilians. What should we do?</p>
<p>W [Dubya]: 3rd highest? Didn&#8217;t we already get him?</p>
<p>FC: Sir - this is the new, new 3rd highest in command.</p>
<p>W: Oh, well that sounds serious. I hate to butcher so many innocent Iraqis everyday. On the other hand, maybe that madman will someday muster the capacity to kill more than 29 people, so &#8230; let&#8217;s bring Dick in on this &#8230; Dick?</p>
<p>DC [Dick Cheney]: Look George, I thought we agreed that we were used to collaterally damaging Iraqi civilians by now, and that it&#8217;s worth it in our epic battle of good vs evil.  After all, your predecessor set the precedent.  </p>
<p>W: Huh?</p>
<p>DC: Remember the <a href="http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1084">Leslie Stahl 60 Minutes interview with Madeline Albright</a>?  </p>
<p>[DEAD SILENCE]</p>
<p>DC: Where she said the death of 500,000 Iraqi children in pursuit of U.S. foreign policy was O.K.?</p>
<p>W: Ah, . . .</p>
<p>DC: Here, look at this video again - - -</p>
<p>.</p>
<div align="center">
<table width="425" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0" border="10">
<tr>
<td align="center"><strong>Richardson: 500,000 dead kids OK in pursuit of U.S. policy</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="vvqbox vvqyoutube" style="width:425px;height:355px;">
<p id="vvq48adc3c068ca9"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5S1YkQs5nXQ">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5S1YkQs5nXQ</a></p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center"><strong><a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2005/9/22/governor_richardson_calls_for_an_exit">Democracy NOW!, Sept. 22, 2005</a></strong></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p>.</p>
<p>W: Oh. Right. I guess if Clinton&#8217;s UN Ambassadors think 500,000 dead kids in pursuit of U.S. foreign policy is  O.K. - - - - But don&#8217;t some of those Iraqis have families friends and loved ones who might turn into terrorists against us?</p>
<p>DC: No, they don&#8217;t. And anyway, remember, we agreed that all Iraqis are potential terrorists.</p>
<p>W: Oh yeah. Well go ahead FC. You have my authorization.</p>
<p>[Minutes pass]</p>
<p>FC: Sir - we obliterated the terrorist-nest village, but the madman seems to have escaped. Don&#8217;t worry, we&#8217;ll get him tomorrow. That&#8217;s one village that will never again harbor terrorists.</p>
<p>W: Weeee! Heck-of-a-job, FC! How many potential al&#8217;Qaeda recruits did we bring to justice?</p>
<p>DC: I&#8217;ve asked you before to stop asking that. Remember we aren&#8217;t supposed to keep count.</p>
<p>FC: Oops!  They&#8217;re saying we targeted the wrong new 3rd highest in command.  Apparently the real new 3rd isn&#8217;t in this part of the country.  He was having a secret meeting with Condy.  </p>
<p>W: Rat feathers! How many times have we missed like that?</p>
<p>DC: We don&#8217;t keep track of that either.</p>
<p>&#8211;And thanks to Fileman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/03/what-would-that-be-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
