<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Antiwar.com Blog &#187; 9/11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/category/terrorism/911/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:48:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Jane WAS Right!</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2010/01/30/jane-was-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2010/01/30/jane-was-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>L. Reichard White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=6695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After all these years, Jane WAS Right!
British political news has been consumed for the last several weeks by a formal inquiry into the illegality and deceit behind Tony Blair&#8217;s decision to join the U.S. in invading Iraq&#8230;. A major focus of the investigation is the illegality of the war. &#8230;  &#8211;Remember the illegal destruction [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>After all these years, <a href="http://www.antiwar.com/orig/reichard.php?articleid=6684#fromNote_8">Jane WAS Right!</a></strong></p>
<blockquote><p>British political news has been consumed for the last several weeks by a formal inquiry into the illegality and deceit behind Tony Blair&#8217;s decision to join the U.S. in invading Iraq&#8230;. A major focus of the investigation is the illegality of the war. &#8230; <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/01/29/iraq/index.html"> &#8211;Remember the illegal destruction of Iraq?, By Glenn Greenwald, Salon, Friday, Jan 29, 2010 07:30 EST </a> </p>
<p>The day of accountability is at hand. The International Criminal Court at the Hague has acknowledged receipt of Prof. Francis A. Boyle&#8217;s complaint&#8230; <a href="http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/49647">The Hague Acknowledges Francis Boyle On His Filing Against Bush et al For War-Crime: Extraordinary Rendition, Thu, 2010-01-28 18:08. </a>
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2010/01/30/jane-was-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WHICH &#8217;safe haven,&#8217; Mr. Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/11/30/which-safe-haven-mr-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/11/30/which-safe-haven-mr-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>L. Reichard White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4GW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military-industrial complex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War at Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al-Qaeda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=6522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If things run on schedule, Mr. Obama will announce tomorrow that he and his organization will be sending approximately 34,000 more U.S. troops to harass and sometimes kill men, women and children (as &#8220;collateral damage&#8221;) in Afghanistan.&#160; And then he has to sell his unpopular decision. If previous statements are any guide, his main excuse [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><big>If things run on schedule, Mr. Obama will announce tomorrow that he and his organization will be sending approximately 34,000 more U.S. troops to harass and sometimes kill men, women and children (<a href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/05/03/what-would-that-be-like/">as &#8220;collateral damage&#8221;</a>) in Afghanistan.&nbsp; And then he has to sell his unpopular decision. If previous statements are any guide, his main excuse will be &#8220;<i>We have to deny al&#8217;Qaeda &#8217;safe haven&#8217;</i>.&#8221;&nbsp; </p>
<p>Question: &#8220;If you believe the official mythology, </p>
<p>1. &#8220;In what country did the <a href="http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/13/flight.schools/">911 al&#8217;Qaeda pilots get &#8216;<i>safe haven</i>&#8216; to train</a>?&nbsp; </p>
<p>2. &#8220;In what country did the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Madrid_train_bombings">Madrid train bombers</a> get &#8216;<i>safe haven</i>&#8216; to prepare? </p>
<p>3. &#8220;In what country did the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk/4676861.stm">London bombers</a> get &#8216;<i>safe haven</i>&#8216;?&#8221; </p>
<p>HINT: It&#8217;s <b>NOT</b> Afghanistan.</p>
<p>The answers to the three questions are:</p>
<p>&nbsp;1. <b>U.S.A</b>. </p>
<p>&nbsp;2. <b>Spain</b></p>
<p>&nbsp;3. <b>England</b></p>
<p>How many troops will Mr. Obama send to THESE terrorist states to deny al&#8217;Qaeda &#8216;<i>safe haven</i>?&#8217;</p>
<p>By way of context, there are approximately 193 countries in the world, each of which can supply al&#8217;Qaeda with equivalent &#8216;<i>safe haven</i>.&#8217;</p>
<p>According to CIA and military intelligence sources, currently there aren&#8217;t 100 al&#8217;Qaeda operatives in all of Afghanistan.&nbsp; So, Mr. Obama, what are your <i>other</i> excuses?<br />
&nbsp; </big></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/11/30/which-safe-haven-mr-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
