<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Antiwar.com Blog &#187; Guantánamo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/category/terrorism/guantanamo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:08:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Do you know Binyam Mohamed?</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/02/07/do-you-know-binyam-mohamed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/02/07/do-you-know-binyam-mohamed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 22:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>L. Reichard White</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covert Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantánamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War crimes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=5271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two senior British judges accused the U.S. of threatening to stop sharing intelligence with Britain if the British Government released details of the  extraordinary rendition of British citizen, Binyam Mohamed.
Why? 
Perhaps this explains it:

So, while a few die hard &#8220;24&#8243; fans &#8212; and Alberto Gonzales, and Michael Mukasey &#8212; might still claim confusion about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two senior British judges accused the U.S. of threatening to stop sharing intelligence with Britain if the British Government released details of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_rendition"> extraordinary rendition</a> of British citizen, Binyam Mohamed.</p>
<p>Why? </p>
<p>Perhaps this explains it:</p>
<a href="http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/02/07/do-you-know-binyam-mohamed/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a>
<p>So, while a few die hard &#8220;24&#8243; fans &#8212; and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales">Alberto Gonzales</a>, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Mukasey">Michael Mukasey</a> &#8212; might still claim confusion about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterboarding">waterboarding</a> being torture, nearly everyone else would agree that having your penis sliced with razors once a month IS torture.  </p>
<p>According to the close-the-barn-door-late theory, should official confirmation of this behavior escape the U.S. establishment cone of silence, it would be a PR disaster.  That, not the perennial whine of &#8220;<em>National Security</em>,&#8221; is the source of the pressure the British Judges felt.  </p>
<p>There is <a href="http://qwstnevrythg.com/archives/6044"> a lot of smoke </a> around the <a href="http://theenvelope.latimes.com/la-na-obama-guantanamo23-2009jan23,0,4139028.story?page=3"> L.A. Times article suggesting Barak Obama&#8217;s Executive Order ending <i>extraordinary</i> renditions</a> was bogus. </p>
<p>But even if Mr. Obama <em>did</em> end the <strong><em>extraordinary</em></strong> brand of renditions, according to a  <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2009/2/5/despite_celebrated_orders_closing_gitmo_and">Democracy Now! interview with Michael Rattner of The Center for Constitutional Rights</a>, there is still a hole big enough to drive tour busses full of victims into the Gulag.</p>
<p>Will this be another big disappointment like Mr. Obama&#8217;s plans to double the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan &#8212; and his <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/jan/29/obama-predator-drones-pakistan">authorization of Predator drone strikes on the tribal people of Pakistan</a>? And will we meet other Binyam Mohameds in the future, this time created by the Obama Administration?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2009/02/07/do-you-know-binyam-mohamed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hamdan Given 66 Months, Less Time Served, Plus Life</title>
		<link>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/07/hamdan-given-66-months-less-time-served-plus-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/07/hamdan-given-66-months-less-time-served-plus-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Horton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guantánamo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antiwar.com/blog/?p=4518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait. A man was sentenced to 66 months in prison, most of which he&#8217;s already served and then when he gets out he stays in forever?
Right.
The White House-chosen military panel &#8211; not a jury &#8211; at Camp Justice at occupied Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, issued a split decision Wednesday in the case of the notorious driver [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait. A man was sentenced to 66 months in prison, most of which he&#8217;s already served and then when he gets out he stays in forever?</p>
<p>Right.</p>
<p>The White House-chosen military panel &#8211; not a jury &#8211; at Camp Justice at occupied Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, issued a <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/outrage-as-us-military-convicts-bin-ladens-driver-of-war-crimes-887127.html">split decision</a> Wednesday in the case of the notorious <em>driver</em> of Osama bin Laden, Salim Hamdan. The panel acquitted him on the original conspiracy charges, but convicted him of material support for terrorism.</p>
<p>It was the first &#8220;trial&#8221; under the Military Commissions Act of 2006.</p>
<p>Today, on the panel&#8217;s recommendation, the &#8220;judge&#8221; in the case sentenced Hamdan to a mere <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/46750.html">66 months</a>, minus the time he&#8217;s already spent in detention. Though the &#8220;prosecutors&#8221; had asked for 30 years to life, it would seem he would be free to go after about 5 months, according to McClatchy Newspapers who&#8217;ve apparently counted.</p>
<p>But as <a href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/08/us_to_keep_hamdan_even_if_acqu.html">announced</a> by the military on Tuesday, even if Hamdan had been acquitted, they would still hold him as an enemy combatant for the rest of his life anyway &#8211; as they will after he&#8217;s served his 5 months.</p>
<p>Hail Caesar!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/07/hamdan-given-66-months-less-time-served-plus-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
