There's a lot of talk these days about splitting
Iraq into three parts. It's coming from almost every direction.
Democratic Sen. Joe Biden, with an eye on his run on the White House, wrote
in the New York Times that the U.S. government should create
a new Iraq along the lines of Bosnia: the idea "is to maintain a united
Iraq by decentralizing it, giving each ethno-religious group — Kurd, Sunni Arab,
and Shi'ite Arab — room to run its own affairs, while leaving the central government
in charge of common interests."
The White House, meanwhile, contends that only a "unity government"
of Kurd, Shi'ite, and Sunni Arabs can pull Iraq together and defeat the terrorists.
Where in this debate are the desires of the Iraqis themselves? During the debate
on the formation of the new government, Shia politicians complained that President
Bush himself called Baghdad to say that Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari (whose
slate won the most votes in the elections we organized) was unacceptable to
Washington.
As many Iraqis ask: Where is the democracy? Where is the freedom?
Even Kurdish politicians, who have benefited most from Washington's largess,
are sick of meddling from the U.S. government.
"It would be more appropriate if they would leave us alone," well-respected
Kurdish lawmaker Mahmoud Othman told
the Los Angeles Times after Donald Rumsfeld and Condoleezza Rice paid
surprise visits to Baghdad.
"Let us solve our problems by ourselves," he added.
A sheik affiliated with the Shi'ite Sadr movement agreed: "Enough is enough,"
he told the Times. "Rice's trip to Iraq at this critical time is just
another desperate move by the Americans to try to impose themselves on our new
government. But they have lost their influence."
It's time that politicians in both parties in Washington showed a little bit
of respect for the 25 million people of Iraq and allowed them to decide on their
own how to run their country. If the Kurds in northern Iraq want to secede and
create their own country, that's their business – but they should have to face
the difficult political, economic, and security situation that would develop
if they took that drastic step.
Democracy and freedom for Iraq means letting the Iraqi people decide how to
plan their future, whether or not it happens to coincide with "American
interests." Maybe if Washington politicians gave Iraqis a little more space
to make their own future together, they wouldn't shoot and bomb American soldiers
so much.
Iraqis know that "American interests" are different from their own.
When politicians in the U.S. pretend otherwise, it only makes the situation
worse.