Highlights

 
Quotable
Preventive war was an invention of Hitler. Frankly, I would not even listen to anyone seriously that came and talked about such a thing.
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Original Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

 
February 1, 2007

Hawks and Doves Clash Over US Base in Czech Rep.


by Jim Lobe

BUDAPEST - The new right-wing government of the Czech Republic, eager to prove its "prestige" as a reliable ally of the United States, last week started negotiations for the setting up of a military base in the Czech Republic. It will not be easy.

Czech neo-liberal Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek opened negotiations with the United States just a few days after his government, in coalition with the Christian Democrats and the Greens, passed a vote of confidence that ended an eight-month electoral impasse in this nation of 10 million.

The United States claims the base, a part of the controversial National Missile Defense (NMD), will protect Washington and its allies from long-range missiles from "rough" states. The program, which already has a component in Alaska, has also sparked speculation the United States is preparing itself for possible challenges posed by Russia or China.

With public opinion divided on the issue, the United States is also negotiating with Poland, the optimal scenario involving the setting of a radar in Czech territory and of defense missiles in Poland. Yet it is not excluded that the entire installation will be built in a single country.

The Czech base could be completed by 2011 and would be operated by approximately 200 US civilian and military personnel who, in Topolanek's words, will also respond to Czech legislation.

Contrasting with the European orientation of the previous left-wing government, Topolanek's Civic Democrats (ODS) are traditionally euroskeptic and pro-United States.

The opposition Social Democrats would only accept a radar approved by popular referendum. The communists, the third largest party, oppose any type of military installation and are pushing harder for a referendum.

The government opposes referenda on security issues. A qualified majority in parliament is necessary to call a referendum, while to approve the base a simple majority would suffice.

But the Greens are now endangering the government's united stance on the military base. Green party member Ondrej Liska said his party will only support a facility "which is politically integrated into a multilateral security framework," and passed in referendum.

Soft critics of the base have complained the United States and the Czech Republic are damaging plans to create a common European defense policy, and warn negotiations are occurring outside the framework of the North-Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), to which both belong.

Topolanek has reacted to criticism by insisting the base would be included in a future NATO missile defence system yet to be developed.

The Czechs, similarly to the Poles, are negotiating with the United States a number of conditions which would benefit the Czech Republic not only in economic and scientific terms, but also in what Topolanek called the country's "prestige".

Prague and Warsaw are also keen on influencing US visa policy towards their citizens.

Supporters of the base argue Iran and North Korea could pose a direct or indirect threat to the country's national security, adding that the possibility of future attacks by militants from territories under no government control should be checked.

"The risk of our country being threatened by a ballistic missile in the foreseeable future is very real," Defense Minister Vlasta Parkanova wrote in the newspaper Pravo.

But some experts have noted missiles from Iran or North Korea cannot reach the United States through the Czech Republic or Poland, and many share popular fears the base could antagonize Russia while turning the Czechs into a target for terrorists.

"In the event of a hot military conflict, the first strike aims at radar systems," Social Democrat shadow foreign minister Lubomir Zaoralek reminded the public.

"Washington wants a missile defense installation that is situated closer to the Middle East," John Reuter, fellow at Emory University in Atlanta told IPS. "Any of the new NATO states are attractive options, although it is not clear why Turkey wouldn't be the best location for such an installation."

Some voices were also raised arguing the setting up of a ballistic defense system should follow consultations with Russia. Russian officials are citing fears of a renewed arms race and express concern over the radar's ability to monitor military movements in practically the entire territory of Russia.

Czech President Vaclav Klaus, who supports the idea of the base, will meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in April possibly also to discuss the NMD program, but Reuters claims "Russian objections have more to do with international prestige and domestic pressures than anything else."

The civic role in the opposition to the base has mostly been performed by the "No to the Bases" initiative, a group encompassing some 40 Czech and international civic organisations. Several hundred protesters gathered in Prague Jan. 29 under the initiative.

NATO approval would not satisfy the demonstrators, who are "against the base because it is an armament effort, not because it is a plan of the United States," Jan Tamas, head of the initiative, told IPS.

"We believe that world peace and security can only be achieved through disarmament, not by creating new military bases and installing new military equipment," Tamas said.


comments on this article?
 
 
Archives

  • US Jews Open to Palestinian Unity Govt
    3/26/2009

  • Bipartisan Experts Urge 'Partnership' With Russia
    3/17/2009

  • Obama Administration Insists It's Neutral in Salvador Poll
    3/14/2009

  • NGOs Hail Congressional Moves to Ease Embargo
    3/12/2009

  • Call to 'Resist and Deter' Nuclear Iran Gains Key Support
    3/7/2009

  • Washington Ends Diplomatic Embargo of Syria
    3/4/2009

  • Diplomatic, Aid Spending Set to Rise Under Obama Budget
    2/28/2009

  • Many Muslims Reject Terror Tactics, Back Some Goals
    2/26/2009

  • Lugar Report Calls for New Cuba Policy
    2/24/2009

  • U.S.-Israel Storm Clouds Ahead?
    2/20/2009

  • Calls Mount for Obama to Appoint 'Truth Commission'
    2/20/2009

  • Washington's Praise of Venezuelan Vote Suggests D├ętente
    2/19/2009

  • Rightward Shift in Israeli Polls Creates New Headaches
    2/13/2009

  • US Advised to Back Somalia Reconciliation Efforts
    2/12/2009

  • Hawks Urge Boosting Military Spending
    2/5/2009

  • More Troops, More Worries,
    Less Consensus on Afghanistan
    2/4/2009

  • Report: Most Citizens Kept in Dark on Govt Spending
    2/2/2009

  • Obama Raises Hopes of
    Mideast Experts
    1/28/2009

  • Obama Picks Israel-Arab, Afghanistan-Pakistan Negotiators
    1/23/2009

  • Rights Groups Applaud Move to Halt Gitmo Trials
    1/22/2009

  • Obama Offers Internationalist Vision
    1/21/2009

  • Around the World, High Hopes for Obama
    1/20/2009

  • Liberals, Realists Set to Clash in Obama Administration
    1/19/2009

  • Obama Urged to Take Bold Steps Toward Cuba Normalization
    1/15/2009

  • Clinton Stresses 'Cooperative Engagement,' 'Smart Power'
    1/14/2009

  • Bush Foreign Policy Legacy Widely Seen as Disastrous
    1/14/2009

  • Networks' Int'l News Coverage at Record Low in 2008
    1/6/2009

  • Amnesty Calls on Rice to Drop 'Lopsided' Gaza Stance
    1/3/2009

  • Israeli Attack May Complicate Obama's Plans
    12/30/2008

  • Report: Recognizing Hamas Could Help Peace
    12/19/2008

  • Business Groups Support Dismantling Cuba Embargo
    12/8/2008

  • Mumbai Massacre Seen as Major Blow to Regional Strategy
    12/5/2008

  • Obama Urged to Quickly Engage Iran, Syria
    12/3/2008

  • Diplomacy, Multilateralism Stressed by Obama Team
    12/2/2008

  • Obama Foreign Policy: Realists to Reign?
    11/28/2008

  • Hemispheric Group Calls for Major Changes in Americas Policy
    11/25/2008

  • Greybeards Urge Overhaul of Global Governance
    11/21/2008

  • Intelligence Analysts See Multi-Polar, Risky World By 2025
    11/21/2008

  • Obama Urged to Strengthen Ties with UN
    11/20/2008

  • Obama-Tied Think-Tank Calls for Pakistan Shift
    11/18/2008

  • Obama Advised to Forgo More Threats to Iran
    11/17/2008

  • First, Close Gitmo,
    Say Rights Groups
    11/11/2008

  • Obama's Foreign Policy:
    No Sharp Break From Bush
    11/11/2008

  • Coca Cultivation Up Despite Six Years of Plan Colombia
    11/7/2008

  • Obama to Seek Global Re-engagement, But How Much?
    11/6/2008

  • Two, Three, Many Grand Bargains?
    11/3/2008

  • Moving Towards a 'Grand Bargain' in Afghanistan
    10/19/2008

  • Top Ex-Diplomats Slam 'Militarization' of Foreign Policy
    10/16/2008

  • Bush Set to Go With a Whimper, Not a Bang
    10/15/2008

  • Pakistan 'Greatest Single Challenge' to Next President
    10/8/2008

  • Senate Passes Nuke Deal Over Escalation Fears
    10/3/2008

  • Brief Talks With Syria Spur Speculation
    10/1/2008

  • Iran Resolution Shelved in Rare Defeat for AIPAC
    9/27/2008

  • Bipartisan Group Urges Deeper Diplomacy with Muslim World
    9/25/2008

  • White House Still Cautious on Georgia
    9/6/2008

  • US' Somalia Policy Likely to Bring Blowback
    9/4/2008

  • Iran Could Reap Benefits of U.S.-Russian Tensions
    8/28/2008

  • A Really Bad Couple of Weeks for Pax Americana
    8/24/2008

  • Success of Attack on Iran's Nuclear Program Doubtful
    8/9/2008

  • US Gets No Traction in the Middle East
    8/5/2008

  • Gates Strategy Stresses Unconventional Warfare
    8/1/2008

  • Air Force Think Tank Advises Against Iran Attack
    7/31/2008

  • Pakistani PM May Be Pincushion for U.S. Frustration
    7/26/2008

  • Realists Urge Bush to Drop Iran Precondition
    7/23/2008

  • McCain Knee-Capped by Maliki
    7/22/2008

  • Jim Lobe, works as Inter Press Service's correspondent in the Washington, D.C., bureau. He has followed the ups and downs of neo-conservatives since well before their rise in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks.

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2003 Antiwar.com