We seek peace, knowing that peace is the climate of freedom.
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Original Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

July 7, 2007

Mubarak Party Faces
Fraud Allegations

by Jim Lobe

CAIRO - Doubts are being raised now over the landslide victory of the ruling National Democratic Party (NDP) of President Hosni Mubarak in midterm elections for the Shura Council last month.

NDP spokesmen attributed the results to "good electoral planning," but opposition figures and rights groups say election to the consultative chamber of parliament was marked by widespread vote rigging and coercion.

"The electoral process was subject to shameless and obvious fraud on an unprecedented scale," Saad al-Husseini, secretary-general of the opposition Muslim Brotherhood bloc in parliament, told IPS.

After two rounds of countrywide voting June 11 and 18, the ruling party secured 84 of the 88 council seats being contested. Of the remaining four seats, three went to independents and one to the opposition leftist Tegemmua Party.

The Shura Council has a total of 264 members, of whom 176 are elected and 88 are appointed directly by the president. Council members serve six-year terms, with half the seats coming up for reelection or reappointment every three years. The council is generally confined to a "consultative" role, with little real authority to effect legislation.

Although Egypt's two main secular opposition parties boycotted the elections, the Muslim Brotherhood – the country's largest opposition movement – fielded 19 candidates in the first round of voting. Despite the widespread grassroots support enjoyed by the Islamist group, it failed to win a single seat.

According to Muslim Brotherhood spokesmen, state security forces prevented voters from reaching polling stations in voting districts featuring Brotherhood candidates. A report released by three local human rights organizations shortly after the elections appeared to confirm this, noting that "voters were prevented from casting ballots" amid "a high turnout of central security officers."

Although the Muslim Brotherhood is officially banned by the state, its members – who run in elections as nominal independents – have controlled roughly one fifth of the People's Assembly since the last parliamentary election, held in late 2005. That election, too, saw widespread electoral fraud and intimidation of voters.

For the last six months, the authorities have waged a wide-ranging arrest campaign against the Muslim Brotherhood, detaining hundreds of its leading members since January. Shortly before the first round of voting, police reportedly arrested more than 700 of the group's members.

According to Husseini, final tallies for ballots cast in the Shura elections served to confirm that vote rigging had been widespread.

"In voting districts that didn't feature Brotherhood contenders, NDP candidates won by an average of 40,000 votes," he said. "In districts where Brotherhood candidates did run, however, NDP nominees won by an average of 150,000 votes. This isn't natural."

On June 24, NDP secretary-general Safwat Sherif, a veteran of the party's old guard, was reelected by sitting Shura members for a second term as council speaker. In a statement, Sherif insisted the contest had been "fair and transparent," adding that his party "respected the constitution and the law" and "didn't allow violations in the electoral process."

Government spokesmen also pointed to relatively high turnout rates as proof of the contest's legitimacy. According to figures issued by the official election council, the two voting rounds saw 31 percent and 19 percent of registered voters cast ballots respectively.

But even some government-affiliated observers questioned these figures.

"The official turnout rate wasn't accurate at all," Diaa Rashwan, senior analyst at the government-run al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies told IPS. "Although they say it was 31 percent, there were hardly any signs on the street that an election was even taking place."

Critics also pointed to the lack of judicial oversight. According to a controversial constitutional amendment made in March, the president has the authority to appoint an election council mandated with establishing electoral regulations and supervising polling stations.

"The primary goal of the constitutional amendments was the removal of judicial supervision in order to guarantee the ruling party's continued control of elections," said Husseini. "All of the electoral fraud comes as a direct result of this lack of judicial oversight."

Farouk al-Ashry, a leading member of the Nasserist Party, which boycotted the Shura races, agreed that elections held in the absence of neutral observers were destined to failure.

"Participation in an election supervised by the ruling regime is just silly," he was quoted as saying in the local press. "The methods employed by the NDP hardly encourage voter participation."

Nevertheless, the official election committee concluded that the races had been both "accurate" and "transparent," with the exception, they said, of a few minor incidents that had no effect on electoral results.

The NDP's control over the council was bolstered further on June 23, when Mubarak appointed an additional 44 council members. These included longtime party stalwarts as well as several members of the party's influential Policies Committee, headed by presidential scion Gamal Mubarak.

comments on this article?

  • US Jews Open to Palestinian Unity Govt

  • Bipartisan Experts Urge 'Partnership' With Russia

  • Obama Administration Insists It's Neutral in Salvador Poll

  • NGOs Hail Congressional Moves to Ease Embargo

  • Call to 'Resist and Deter' Nuclear Iran Gains Key Support

  • Washington Ends Diplomatic Embargo of Syria

  • Diplomatic, Aid Spending Set to Rise Under Obama Budget

  • Many Muslims Reject Terror Tactics, Back Some Goals

  • Lugar Report Calls for New Cuba Policy

  • U.S.-Israel Storm Clouds Ahead?

  • Calls Mount for Obama to Appoint 'Truth Commission'

  • Washington's Praise of Venezuelan Vote Suggests Détente

  • Rightward Shift in Israeli Polls Creates New Headaches

  • US Advised to Back Somalia Reconciliation Efforts

  • Hawks Urge Boosting Military Spending

  • More Troops, More Worries,
    Less Consensus on Afghanistan

  • Report: Most Citizens Kept in Dark on Govt Spending

  • Obama Raises Hopes of
    Mideast Experts

  • Obama Picks Israel-Arab, Afghanistan-Pakistan Negotiators

  • Rights Groups Applaud Move to Halt Gitmo Trials

  • Obama Offers Internationalist Vision

  • Around the World, High Hopes for Obama

  • Liberals, Realists Set to Clash in Obama Administration

  • Obama Urged to Take Bold Steps Toward Cuba Normalization

  • Clinton Stresses 'Cooperative Engagement,' 'Smart Power'

  • Bush Foreign Policy Legacy Widely Seen as Disastrous

  • Networks' Int'l News Coverage at Record Low in 2008

  • Amnesty Calls on Rice to Drop 'Lopsided' Gaza Stance

  • Israeli Attack May Complicate Obama's Plans

  • Report: Recognizing Hamas Could Help Peace

  • Business Groups Support Dismantling Cuba Embargo

  • Mumbai Massacre Seen as Major Blow to Regional Strategy

  • Obama Urged to Quickly Engage Iran, Syria

  • Diplomacy, Multilateralism Stressed by Obama Team

  • Obama Foreign Policy: Realists to Reign?

  • Hemispheric Group Calls for Major Changes in Americas Policy

  • Greybeards Urge Overhaul of Global Governance

  • Intelligence Analysts See Multi-Polar, Risky World By 2025

  • Obama Urged to Strengthen Ties with UN

  • Obama-Tied Think-Tank Calls for Pakistan Shift

  • Obama Advised to Forgo More Threats to Iran

  • First, Close Gitmo,
    Say Rights Groups

  • Obama's Foreign Policy:
    No Sharp Break From Bush

  • Coca Cultivation Up Despite Six Years of Plan Colombia

  • Obama to Seek Global Re-engagement, But How Much?

  • Two, Three, Many Grand Bargains?

  • Moving Towards a 'Grand Bargain' in Afghanistan

  • Top Ex-Diplomats Slam 'Militarization' of Foreign Policy

  • Bush Set to Go With a Whimper, Not a Bang

  • Pakistan 'Greatest Single Challenge' to Next President

  • Senate Passes Nuke Deal Over Escalation Fears

  • Brief Talks With Syria Spur Speculation

  • Iran Resolution Shelved in Rare Defeat for AIPAC

  • Bipartisan Group Urges Deeper Diplomacy with Muslim World

  • White House Still Cautious on Georgia

  • US' Somalia Policy Likely to Bring Blowback

  • Iran Could Reap Benefits of U.S.-Russian Tensions

  • A Really Bad Couple of Weeks for Pax Americana

  • Success of Attack on Iran's Nuclear Program Doubtful

  • US Gets No Traction in the Middle East

  • Gates Strategy Stresses Unconventional Warfare

  • Air Force Think Tank Advises Against Iran Attack

  • Pakistani PM May Be Pincushion for U.S. Frustration

  • Realists Urge Bush to Drop Iran Precondition

  • McCain Knee-Capped by Maliki

  • Jim Lobe, works as Inter Press Service's correspondent in the Washington, D.C., bureau. He has followed the ups and downs of neo-conservatives since well before their rise in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks.

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2003 Antiwar.com