After victory, you have more enemies.
Original Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

August 21, 2007

US Arms Create New Divisions in Mideast

by Jim Lobe

CAIRO - Last month, Washington approved massive military-aid packages and arms sales to its Arab allies, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and a number of smaller Gulf States. But while U.S. officials say the deals aim to bolster the "forces of moderation" in the region, some local commentators see the move as an unnecessary – and dangerous – provocation.

"The arms deals represent a continuation of U.S. policy aimed at creating tension and polarizing the region," Ahmed Thabet, professor of political science at Cairo University, told IPS.

On July 28, the Bush administration announced its intention of providing Egypt with a $13 billion military assistance package, to be paid out over the next 10 years. The deal comes within the framework of the Camp David peace accord, to which Egypt, along with Israel, has been a signatory since 1979.

The White House also announced its willingness to sell some $20 billion worth of advanced U.S. weapons systems to several Gulf States, including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. Despite a degree of domestic opposition, the sales are expected to be approved by the U.S. Congress next month.

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was quoted as saying that both the aid package and weapons sales reflected Washington's commitment "to provide for the security of our allies." She added that the deals were intended to "counter the negative influences of al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran."

Under the terms of the arrangement, however, Arab capitals will only be eligible to purchase defense-oriented technologies, such as anti-missile defense and early-warning systems.

The announcements of weapons sales were followed by a high-powered tour of the region by both Rice and U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who together visited Egypt and Saudi Arabia. From Riyadh, Rice went on to Israel and the West Bank, while Gates continued to Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates.

En route to Egypt on July 31, Gates said that the unusual joint visit represented a sign of "the importance of this region in terms of U.S. vital interests."

Aside from announcing the arms deals, Rice and Gates also sought to secure Arab backing for U.S. policies in the Palestinian territories and Iraq. The two officials reportedly laid the groundwork for a U.S.-sponsored Israel-Palestine peace summit, scheduled to be held later this year, and pressed Arab governments to open embassies in Baghdad.

According to local observers, however, the overriding objective of the visit – and of the proposed arms deals – was to promote a Sunni-Arab axis against Iran, which Rice has described as the primary "strategic challenge" to the U.S.

"The goal of their trip was to cement an alliance of moderate Arab nations in advance of a U.S.-led war against Iran," Ibrahim Eissa, political analyst and editor-in-chief of independent daily al-Dustour, told IPS. "Rice did a lot of talking about the need for a Palestinian state, but that was just window dressing."

Eissa went on to warn that a U.S.-led war with the Shia Islamic republic would be "a catastrophe" for the region. "All the American military bases in the Arab world – in Qatar, Bahrain, and other countries – could become targets of Iranian retaliation."

Essam al-Arian, a leading member of the opposition Muslim Brotherhood movement, agreed that the visit by Rice and Gates had been less about Iraq or Palestine and more about rallying Arab allies against Tehran.

"Despite all their talk about the peace process, little of value came out of the visit," Arian told IPS. "The U.S. is simply preparing the region for another war."

According to Thabet, the proposed weapons sales, geopolitics aside, will also result in a major financial windfall for the U.S. arms industry.

"The arms deals were made to boost the American military economy, which currently faces enormous competition from France, Russia, and China," he said. "The U.S. is hoping to make as much money as possible from the Gulf States, all of which are flush with record petroleum revenues."

"In the past, Washington exploited the perceived threat posed by Saddam Hussein – despite his obvious weakness – to justify arms sales to the Gulf," Thabet said. "Now, it's playing up the Iranian menace to sell weapons."

Further vexing local observers, the White House announced earlier this month its intention to provide Israel with $30 billion of military assistance over the next decade, with the stated aim of offsetting the proposed arms sales to Arab capitals. The arrangement, approved by Washington on Aug. 16, represents a 25 percent increase from current levels of U.S. military aid to the Jewish state, which has traditionally been the foremost beneficiary of U.S. financial largesse.

Unlike the planned arms sales to its Arab allies, U.S. military aid to Israel will reportedly include a good deal of offensive weaponry, including high-precision F-22 fighter jets.

At a signing ceremony in Jerusalem, U.S. Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns made no secret of Washington's policy of maintaining Israeli military supremacy in the Middle East. Pointing to Israel's position in a "violent and unstable" region, he said that Israel's military edge was "of interest to our country, and we've committed to that."

According to Gamal Mazloum, retired general and specialist in geo-strategic and defense issues, the development comes as no surprise, given Washington's long-standing bias toward the Jewish state.

"Israel will quickly obtain the latest American weapons from the closest U.S. or NATO [North Atlantic Treaty Organization] arsenals," he told IPS. "Arab countries, meanwhile, will only receive their defense systems after four or five years."

"The U.S. is trying hard to convince its Arab allies that Iran represents a greater danger to them than Israel. When, in fact, Israel remains the overriding military threat to the Arab world."

Thabet, however, noted that the Arab-Israeli military equation could no longer be seen as a zero-sum game between rivals.

"None of the Arab governments, including Damascus, are seriously contemplating war with Israel," he said. "After all, Israel has become an ally of the ruling Arab regimes, with both working against the interests of the wider Arab public."

comments on this article?

  • US Jews Open to Palestinian Unity Govt

  • Bipartisan Experts Urge 'Partnership' With Russia

  • Obama Administration Insists It's Neutral in Salvador Poll

  • NGOs Hail Congressional Moves to Ease Embargo

  • Call to 'Resist and Deter' Nuclear Iran Gains Key Support

  • Washington Ends Diplomatic Embargo of Syria

  • Diplomatic, Aid Spending Set to Rise Under Obama Budget

  • Many Muslims Reject Terror Tactics, Back Some Goals

  • Lugar Report Calls for New Cuba Policy

  • U.S.-Israel Storm Clouds Ahead?

  • Calls Mount for Obama to Appoint 'Truth Commission'

  • Washington's Praise of Venezuelan Vote Suggests D├ętente

  • Rightward Shift in Israeli Polls Creates New Headaches

  • US Advised to Back Somalia Reconciliation Efforts

  • Hawks Urge Boosting Military Spending

  • More Troops, More Worries,
    Less Consensus on Afghanistan

  • Report: Most Citizens Kept in Dark on Govt Spending

  • Obama Raises Hopes of
    Mideast Experts

  • Obama Picks Israel-Arab, Afghanistan-Pakistan Negotiators

  • Rights Groups Applaud Move to Halt Gitmo Trials

  • Obama Offers Internationalist Vision

  • Around the World, High Hopes for Obama

  • Liberals, Realists Set to Clash in Obama Administration

  • Obama Urged to Take Bold Steps Toward Cuba Normalization

  • Clinton Stresses 'Cooperative Engagement,' 'Smart Power'

  • Bush Foreign Policy Legacy Widely Seen as Disastrous

  • Networks' Int'l News Coverage at Record Low in 2008

  • Amnesty Calls on Rice to Drop 'Lopsided' Gaza Stance

  • Israeli Attack May Complicate Obama's Plans

  • Report: Recognizing Hamas Could Help Peace

  • Business Groups Support Dismantling Cuba Embargo

  • Mumbai Massacre Seen as Major Blow to Regional Strategy

  • Obama Urged to Quickly Engage Iran, Syria

  • Diplomacy, Multilateralism Stressed by Obama Team

  • Obama Foreign Policy: Realists to Reign?

  • Hemispheric Group Calls for Major Changes in Americas Policy

  • Greybeards Urge Overhaul of Global Governance

  • Intelligence Analysts See Multi-Polar, Risky World By 2025

  • Obama Urged to Strengthen Ties with UN

  • Obama-Tied Think-Tank Calls for Pakistan Shift

  • Obama Advised to Forgo More Threats to Iran

  • First, Close Gitmo,
    Say Rights Groups

  • Obama's Foreign Policy:
    No Sharp Break From Bush

  • Coca Cultivation Up Despite Six Years of Plan Colombia

  • Obama to Seek Global Re-engagement, But How Much?

  • Two, Three, Many Grand Bargains?

  • Moving Towards a 'Grand Bargain' in Afghanistan

  • Top Ex-Diplomats Slam 'Militarization' of Foreign Policy

  • Bush Set to Go With a Whimper, Not a Bang

  • Pakistan 'Greatest Single Challenge' to Next President

  • Senate Passes Nuke Deal Over Escalation Fears

  • Brief Talks With Syria Spur Speculation

  • Iran Resolution Shelved in Rare Defeat for AIPAC

  • Bipartisan Group Urges Deeper Diplomacy with Muslim World

  • White House Still Cautious on Georgia

  • US' Somalia Policy Likely to Bring Blowback

  • Iran Could Reap Benefits of U.S.-Russian Tensions

  • A Really Bad Couple of Weeks for Pax Americana

  • Success of Attack on Iran's Nuclear Program Doubtful

  • US Gets No Traction in the Middle East

  • Gates Strategy Stresses Unconventional Warfare

  • Air Force Think Tank Advises Against Iran Attack

  • Pakistani PM May Be Pincushion for U.S. Frustration

  • Realists Urge Bush to Drop Iran Precondition

  • McCain Knee-Capped by Maliki

  • Jim Lobe, works as Inter Press Service's correspondent in the Washington, D.C., bureau. He has followed the ups and downs of neo-conservatives since well before their rise in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks.

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2003 Antiwar.com