War remains the decisive human failure.
John Kenneth Galbraith
Original Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

June 30, 2004

US Increases Colombian Involvement

by Jim Lobe

BOGOTA - Shrouded in silence in Colombia, the Plan Patriot has begun to emerge as the most ambitious military offensive to date against the leftist guerrillas, in which the U.S. military is providing tactical and logistical support.

Taking part in the operation, which according to press reports involves 17,000 soldiers deployed in southern Colombia, are mobile forces and special jungle commandos trained by U.S. advisers and backed up by modern technology from the United States.

The offensive is being carried out in a vast territory under the control of the main rebel group, the 18,000-strong Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), which rose up in arms four decades ago.

According to a memorandum sent to the U.S. Congress by the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), the government of President George W. Bush "is offering substantial new levels of military aid in support of a massive Colombian military offensive against the FARC insurgents."

WOLA describes the Patriot Plan as "the most ambitious counter-insurgency offensive ever undertaken by the Colombian government."

"The Patriot Plan signals the entrance of the U.S. into a new, more intense phase of military involvement in Colombia's internal armed conflict," says the memorandum dated May 14 and addressed to Foreign Policy and Defense Policy Aides in the U.S. Congress.

WOLA, which is pressing Congress not to approve an increase in the U.S. military presence in Colombia, says that unlike Plan Colombia – also financed by Washington – Plan Patriot "makes no pretense of furthering U.S. counter-drug objectives."

Instead, Plan Patriot "underscores the potential for escalation beyond the mission understood by Congress and beyond the appetite of the American public," adds the group.

Unlike its predecessor, Plan Colombia, "this strategy has no humanitarian component," said Jorge Rojas, director of the local Consultancy on Human Rights and Displacement (CODHES).

Former president Andrés Pastrana (1998-2002) secured U.S. military support for Plan Colombia while engaging in peace talks with the FARC in a 42,000-sq. km (16,216 sq. mi.) demilitarized zone in El Caguán, in southern Colombia.

But when the talks collapsed in February 2002, the army was sent back into the area, which had been cleared of government security forces in 1998 to pave the way for a peace process.

It is the same region where Plan Patriot is being carried out today.

Plan Colombia, which many observers have declared a failure, sought to reduce the supply of drugs to the United States – the world's largest market for illegal drugs – by attacking production of coca and the jungle labs that convert the leaves into cocaine, a strategy that was simultaneously supposed to reduce the revenues of the leftist insurgents.

Critics of the two plans say they were designed by Bogota in conjunction with the U.S. departments of State and Defense, and the U.S. Southern Army Command.

While Bogota has avoided making public references to the new U.S.-backed offensive against FARC, the Quito-based Latin American Human Rights Association (ALDHU) warned of the impact of Plan Patriot on Ecuador, which shares a 640-km (398 mi.) border with Colombia.

ALDHU warned that the Plan could lead to an increased flow across the border of Colombian civilians fleeing the conflict, and that it could push drug and arms traffickers into Ecuador as well.

Plan Patriot is seen as complementary to the U.S. Andean Regional Initiative, which is focused on Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia and Panama, and aimed, among other things, at beefing up controls along the borders with Colombia.

Last week, General James Hill, in charge of the U.S. Southern Command, confirmed what Colombian authorities have not admitted: the magnitude and extent of the offensive against FARC.

Hill, who in the past year has held 13 meetings with Colombian military officers and has visited Ecuador six times, passed through Bogota on June 23 after touring the Larandia military base in the southern department of Caquetá, where Plan Patriot is coordinated.

The general praised the progress of the offensive that, it has now been revealed, began in June 2003 with an attack on rural areas where local peasant farmers support FARC, south of Bogota.

The U.S. Congress is now voting on an increase in U.S. military personnel in Colombia. Currently the cap is 400 military troops and 400 civilian contractors at any given time.

But the Bush administration has requested an increase in the limit on military personnel from 400 to 800 and on civilians contracted by the Defense Department from 400 to 600.

The challenge facing the Colombian army is to recover and maintain control for at least a year over a vast territory that has long been under FARC influence.

Hill explained that the U.S. military is providing the Colombian armed forces with fuel, logistical support, and planning.

He warned that the operation will be "long and difficult", but said that in the end, victory will be won, and the guerrillas will be forced to demobilize or to sit down at the negotiating table by 2006.

But according to WOLA, "U.S. and Colombian military analysts recognize that the FARC has not suffered heavy losses, that its leadership is intact, and that it appears to be biding its time by engaging in a tactical retreat. There should be no illusions of a quick and decisive military campaign in Colombia."

Hill said he backed the request for more U.S. troops, to support deeper military engagement in Plan Patriot by the Colombian armed forces.

He added that success depended on the continued leadership of right-wing President Alvaro Uribe and continued aid from the United States. (Colombia is the world's third-largest recipient of U.S. military aid, after Egypt and Israel.)

Meanwhile, the Uribe administration has begun negotiations with another armed group, the right-wing United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC), the paramilitary umbrella, whose leaders are wanted on drug trafficking charges in the United States.

AUC, which is held responsible by the United Nations for the great majority of atrocities committed against civilians in the armed conflict, has been offered a sort of amnesty in exchange for demobilizing.

Plan Patriot is an ambitious program that will take a long time to implement, said Hill, who added that the Colombian armed forces have been doing a good job.

But a spokesman from the Boliviaran Movement, FARC's clandestine political arm, told IPS that despite the impressive U.S. technology, "the popular resistance remains unbeatable."

According to the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, the ceiling set by the U.S. Congress on the number of military advisers has already been far surpassed. He said there are "around 2,000 U.S. mercenaries. People recognize them by their accent."

"They walk around the town of Cartagena del Chairá (in Caquetá), and are very heavily protected. They don't go into the jungle but stay on the edges, very exposed."

The Colombian army "has not even got past the first ring" of the guerrillas in the area where Plan Patriot is being implemented, he said.

The military are committing "a strategic error by moving into the deep rearguard" of their adversary, he argued.

Many soldiers are asking to be discharged because of the pressure from the war, and the armed forces are suffering "troop fatigue", but the insurgents "never get tired, because they live there," the source added.

comments on this article?

  • US Jews Open to Palestinian Unity Govt

  • Bipartisan Experts Urge 'Partnership' With Russia

  • Obama Administration Insists It's Neutral in Salvador Poll

  • NGOs Hail Congressional Moves to Ease Embargo

  • Call to 'Resist and Deter' Nuclear Iran Gains Key Support

  • Washington Ends Diplomatic Embargo of Syria

  • Diplomatic, Aid Spending Set to Rise Under Obama Budget

  • Many Muslims Reject Terror Tactics, Back Some Goals

  • Lugar Report Calls for New Cuba Policy

  • U.S.-Israel Storm Clouds Ahead?

  • Calls Mount for Obama to Appoint 'Truth Commission'

  • Washington's Praise of Venezuelan Vote Suggests Détente

  • Rightward Shift in Israeli Polls Creates New Headaches

  • US Advised to Back Somalia Reconciliation Efforts

  • Hawks Urge Boosting Military Spending

  • More Troops, More Worries,
    Less Consensus on Afghanistan

  • Report: Most Citizens Kept in Dark on Govt Spending

  • Obama Raises Hopes of
    Mideast Experts

  • Obama Picks Israel-Arab, Afghanistan-Pakistan Negotiators

  • Rights Groups Applaud Move to Halt Gitmo Trials

  • Obama Offers Internationalist Vision

  • Around the World, High Hopes for Obama

  • Liberals, Realists Set to Clash in Obama Administration

  • Obama Urged to Take Bold Steps Toward Cuba Normalization

  • Clinton Stresses 'Cooperative Engagement,' 'Smart Power'

  • Bush Foreign Policy Legacy Widely Seen as Disastrous

  • Networks' Int'l News Coverage at Record Low in 2008

  • Amnesty Calls on Rice to Drop 'Lopsided' Gaza Stance

  • Israeli Attack May Complicate Obama's Plans

  • Report: Recognizing Hamas Could Help Peace

  • Business Groups Support Dismantling Cuba Embargo

  • Mumbai Massacre Seen as Major Blow to Regional Strategy

  • Obama Urged to Quickly Engage Iran, Syria

  • Diplomacy, Multilateralism Stressed by Obama Team

  • Obama Foreign Policy: Realists to Reign?

  • Hemispheric Group Calls for Major Changes in Americas Policy

  • Greybeards Urge Overhaul of Global Governance

  • Intelligence Analysts See Multi-Polar, Risky World By 2025

  • Obama Urged to Strengthen Ties with UN

  • Obama-Tied Think-Tank Calls for Pakistan Shift

  • Obama Advised to Forgo More Threats to Iran

  • First, Close Gitmo,
    Say Rights Groups

  • Obama's Foreign Policy:
    No Sharp Break From Bush

  • Coca Cultivation Up Despite Six Years of Plan Colombia

  • Obama to Seek Global Re-engagement, But How Much?

  • Two, Three, Many Grand Bargains?

  • Moving Towards a 'Grand Bargain' in Afghanistan

  • Top Ex-Diplomats Slam 'Militarization' of Foreign Policy

  • Bush Set to Go With a Whimper, Not a Bang

  • Pakistan 'Greatest Single Challenge' to Next President

  • Senate Passes Nuke Deal Over Escalation Fears

  • Brief Talks With Syria Spur Speculation

  • Iran Resolution Shelved in Rare Defeat for AIPAC

  • Bipartisan Group Urges Deeper Diplomacy with Muslim World

  • White House Still Cautious on Georgia

  • US' Somalia Policy Likely to Bring Blowback

  • Iran Could Reap Benefits of U.S.-Russian Tensions

  • A Really Bad Couple of Weeks for Pax Americana

  • Success of Attack on Iran's Nuclear Program Doubtful

  • US Gets No Traction in the Middle East

  • Gates Strategy Stresses Unconventional Warfare

  • Air Force Think Tank Advises Against Iran Attack

  • Pakistani PM May Be Pincushion for U.S. Frustration

  • Realists Urge Bush to Drop Iran Precondition

  • McCain Knee-Capped by Maliki

  • Jim Lobe, works as Inter Press Service's correspondent in the Washington, D.C., bureau. He has followed the ups and downs of neo-conservatives since well before their rise in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks.

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2003 Antiwar.com