As the new Democratic majority in the U.S. Congress
considers whether to revisit the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA), the
administration of President George W. Bush is proposing still more restrictions
on detainees in U.S. custody.
The government has proposed limiting contact between defense lawyers and detainees
at Guantanamo Bay because it says detainees' communications, such as news of
world events, could incite the prisoners to violence.
The U.S. proposal to limit lawyers' contacts with their Guantanamo clients
was contained in a filing to a federal appeals court in Washington. The case
deals with an Afghan detainee, but the government wants the restrictions to
apply to other prisoners at Guantanamo. The prison camp currently holds some
Among the more controversial provisions of the MCA, which President Bush signed
into law in October, is one that strips U.S. courts of jurisdiction to consider
writs of habeas corpus filed by detainees classified as enemy combatants. The
administration contends that the president may classify any person, even a U.S.
citizen, as an enemy combatant.
But Sen. Chris Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, has already introduced legislation
called the Effective Terrorists Prosecution Act that would restore habeas corpus
rights to military detainees and make other amendments to the MCA. The amendments
would also narrow the class of detainees identified as unlawful enemy combatants
who are affected by the MCA's habeas restriction.
The Democratic Party won control of both the House of Representatives and the
Senate when they defeated Republicans in midterm elections last month.
Since its passage, the MCA has come under fire not only from Democrats but
also from the judiciary, human rights groups, some Republicans, and other countries.
Last month, lawyers representing detainees at Guantanamo Bay petitioned the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to declare the suspension
of habeas rights unconstitutional. In an amicus friend of the court brief
in the case, seven retired federal judges urged the appeals court to rule that
parts of the MCA violate the U.S. Constitution.
The principle of habeas corpus, originally contained in the Magna Carta, has
been one of the cornerstones of U.S. law since the nation's founding. It gives
a detainee the right to go to court to challenge the authority of the prison
or jail warden to continue to hold him or her.
Dodd's bill would also provide for expedited review of the MCA to ensure its
An alternative strategy is being proposed by Prof. Peter Shane of Ohio State
Law School and director of the Center for Interdisciplinary Law and Policy Studies.
"The constitution limits the suspension of habeas to occasions 'when in
cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it,'" he told
IPS. "Because our public safety is not now at risk from either rebellion
or invasion, the MCA is unconstitutional in suspending habeas."
"I'd be happy for Congress to amend the MCA, but they may fear a veto.
An alternative strategy would be a concurrent resolution proclaiming 'the sense
of Congress that public safety is not now at risk from either rebellion or invasion.'
This could be a powerful aid to anyone bringing litigation to challenge the
MCA," he said.
The proposed new rules for detainee-lawyer contacts would apply to detainees
pursuing court challenges to their designations as "enemy combatants,"
and would tighten censorship of mail from attorneys and give the military more
control over what lawyers can discuss with their clients, according to the filing.
The number of face-to-face meetings between defense attorneys and detainees
would be limited to four total. There are now no restrictions on the number
of times they can meet, although lawyers' access to the base is already hampered
because it is so remote.
The government says current rules have allowed detainees to receive books or
articles about terrorist attacks in Iraq, London, and Israel, as well as details
of the prisoner abuse investigation at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison.
In the court filing, a military lawyer said security at Guantanamo Bay has
been threatened by the introduction of a book on Abu Ghraib, a speech given
at an Amnesty International conference about the war on terror, and other materials.
"Such materials could incite detainees to violence, leading to a destabilization
of the camp," wrote Navy Cmdr. Patrick M. McCarthy.
The government petition was filed this summer but only recently discovered
by the Boston Globe. It relates to the case of Haji Bismullah, an Afghan
who is among several Guantanamo detainees represented by the New York-based
advocacy group, the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR).
Currently, mail from lawyers is examined only for physical contraband. The
proposed rules call for all of a detainee's mail to be examined for forbidden
A CCR attorney said he suspects the proposal is aimed at controlling the information
coming out of Guantanamo. Accounts from defense lawyers who have visited Guantanamo
have cast doubt on government assertions that most detainees are hardened terrorists.
Many other human rights organizations have weighed in on this issue. For example,
Mary Shaw of Amnesty International USA told IPS, "With passage of the Military
Commissions Act, human rights violations perpetrated by the Bush administration
in the 'war on terror' have in effect been given the congressional stamp of
approval. This raises serious questions about the U.S. government's commitment
to due process and the rule of law."
She added, "The 'war on terror' must not be used as an excuse to deny
the basic human rights of any person. Amnesty International will continue to
campaign for U.S. 'war on terror' detention policies and practices to be brought
into full compliance with international law, and for repeal of any law that
fails to meet this test."
In 2004, the Supreme Court said detainees can contest the legality of their
detentions. But, while the MCA bars detainees from protesting their detentions
in court, they still have a right to challenge their designations as "enemy
combatants." The new rules would restrict legal representation for those
Meanwhile, lawyers for dozens of Guantanamo Bay detainees have asked a federal
appeals court to declare a key part of President Bush's new military trials
The detainees' lawyers challenged the military's authority to arrest people
overseas and detain them indefinitely without allowing them to use the U.S.
courts to contest their detention.
In written arguments, attorneys for more than 100 detainees who would be locked
out of the regular judicial system asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit to let the detainees keep their legal challenges going in
(Inter Press Service)