War should be made a crime, and those who instigate it should be punished as criminals.
Charles Evans Hughes
Original Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

September 29, 2008

US War on al-Qaeda Widely Viewed as a Bust

by Ali Gharib

The U.S. is failing to rein in its primary target in the "global war on terror" – al-Qaeda – according to a new poll [.pdf] of 23 countries across the globe.

Conducted for the BBC World Service by the University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) and Globescan, the poll reveals that in every country surveyed but one, respondents think that the U.S.' actions have failed to weaken the international terror group.

It was al-Qaeda's attacks on New York and Washington on Sept. 11, 2001, that sparked the U.S.' international war. Al-Qaeda's then-refuge, Afghanistan, has been engulfed in a war of varying intensity since then. The U.S. opened a second front in its war on terror in 2003 with the invasion of Iraq, which apparently had no ties to the al-Qaeda terror network.

"Despite its overwhelming military power, America's war against al-Qaeda is widely seen as having achieved nothing better than a stalemate, and many believe that it has even strengthened al-Qaeda," PIPA director Steve Kull said in a statement that accompanied the release of the report.

Averaged across all the nations surveyed, only one in five respondents think that al-Qaeda has been weakened, 29 percent think the war on terror has had no effect, and fully three in 10 think that the effort has made al-Qaeda stronger.

Nearly half of the respondents think that neither side is winning the war on terror.

Over the past year, top Pentagon brass and the U.S. intelligence community have expressed concern that al-Qaeda, despite having been initially put on the run by the U.S. offensive, is gaining strength and that the greatest terrorist threat to U.S. soil will likely come from al-Qaeda strongholds in the border regions between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The Taliban, the al-Qaeda sympathizers who initially gave the terror organization safe haven when they controlled Afghanistan ahead of the late 2001 U.S. invasion, is blamed for increasing violence in both Afghanistan and Pakistan. Particularly in Afghanistan, the Taliban has stepped up its anti-government and anti-U.S. insurgency.

Even in the U.S., according to the BBC poll, only a third of those surveyed think that al-Qaeda has been weakened, and a third said that the U.S. war on terror has made al-Qaeda stronger. Slightly over a quarter of U.S. respondents think that it has had no effect on al-Qaeda.

Notably, many U.S. allies think that the war on terror has been ineffectual or actually strengthened al-Qaeda.

"Together with the French, Mexicans have the highest number (nearly half) saying that the U.S.-led 'war on terror' has made al-Qaeda stronger, and the largest number rejecting the idea that it has weakened al-Qaeda," said the report announcing the poll results.

Other allies with the perception that the war on terror has strengthened al-Qaeda include Italy, with 43 percent; Australia, with 41 percent; and Britain, with 40 percent.

Nearly three quarters of respondents in U.S.-allied Australia, Canada, Mexico, Britain, Italy, and France think that "neither side is winning" in the conflict between al-Qaeda and U.S.

While 15 countries said that the conflict is a stalemate, in only three countries was the most widespread view that the U.S. is winning. Nearly half of Kenyan respondents, a third of Nigerian respondents, and nearly four in 10 respondents in Turkey held this view.

The poll also considered respondents' views of al-Qaeda.

"On average, 61 percent of those in countries surveyed say their feelings about al-Qaeda are negative, 8 percent say they are positive, and 18 percent say they are mixed," said the BBC report.

In 15 of the countries surveyed, a clear majority of respondents holds a negative view of al-Qaeda. In five other countries, China, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, and the Philippines, negative views of al-Qaeda were most common, but not held by majorities.

Nigeria, despite having 42 percent of respondents with a negative view of al-Qaeda, had the largest number saying that they hold a positive view toward the group – a quarter of respondents felt this way.

Egypt is the only country where a clear majority holds either positive or mixed views about al-Qaeda.

Turkey was among the largest majorities with negative views of al-Qaeda, and the largest of countries polled with "predominately Muslim publics."

In the U.S., an unsurprising 84 percent of respondents had negative views of al-Qaeda, but 9 percent had mixed feelings, and 2 percent held positive views of the group.

Broken down worldwide by this preference, just over half of those with a positive view of al-Qaeda said that the war on terror has made the group stronger, whereas a third of those with negative views on al-Qaeda felt the same way.

Of those who thought that the war on terror had made al-Qaeda weaker, the spread between those with positive and negative views of the group was significantly less (22 to 28 percent, respectively). There was also a smaller spread for those who thought the war on terror has had no effect – 21 percent of positive views on al-Qaeda and 31 percent of negative ones.

The largest percentage of respondents who think al-Qaeda is winning its conflict with the U.S. is in Pakistan, where the terror group – likely including its leader, Osama bin Laden – is given safe haven by an increasingly assertive Taliban. Pakistan and Egypt are the only publics where the most common response to the preference question was not to admonish al-Qaeda with a negative view.

The BBC World Service poll used responses from 23,937 adults in 23 countries. Globescan did the fieldwork between July 8 and Sept. 12.

(Inter Press Service)

comments on this article?

  • Perils Seen in Obama's Afghan Strategy

  • Afghan Civilian Casualties May Surge as Well

  • Hoping for a Spontaneous Regime Change in Iran

  • Iraqi Elections Dawn on Changed Political Landscape

  • Jewish Organizations Call For End to Gaza Bombings

  • Overcoming the Zero-Sum Hurdle in Israel-Palestine Negotiations

  • Deaths Down, But Iraq Still Top Danger Zone

  • US Arms Deployed in Wars Around the Globe

  • An Outside Insider Probes the Iranian Psyche

  • Hawks Campaign to Preempt Iran Talks

  • Regional Players Key to Salvaging Peace Process

  • No Amnesty for Bush Administration, Say Torture Opponents

  • Pundits Debate the Inevitability of a Nuclear Iran

  • Iraqi Detainees May Go From Frying Pan to Fire

  • Analysts Question Timing of Syria Raid

  • Judge Orders Release of Uighurs at Guantanamo

  • US War on al-Qaeda Widely Viewed as a Bust

  • Neocons, Ex-Israeli Diplomats Push Islamophobic Video

  • Kosovo Casts Shadow on
    South Ossetian Standoff

  • Iran in the Spotlight at Christian Zionist Confab

  • Critics See Vendetta in Al-Arian's Legal Limbo

  • A Blueprint for Iraq Withdrawal

  • Tangled Web of Allegiances Leads Back to Tehran

  • Iraq 'Divide and Rule' Strategy Called Shortsighted

  • Chaos Hardening Sectarian Fiefdoms

  • McCain's Vietnam Lessons Unlearned

  • Iraqi Shi'ites: Calm on the Surface, Simmering Beneath

  • Campaigns Spar Over Where to Focus Troops

  • Opening the Door to Hamas

  • Strategic Alliances Remain Elusive in Iraq

  • Overstretched Forces Concern US Officers

  • Surge Exposing Iraqi Political Tensions

  • Critics Fear Pact Will Tie Next President's Hands

  • Contractor Abuses Rarely Punished, Groups Say

  • Al-Arian Documentary Highlights Real Cost of Indefinite Detentions

  • Much Ado About Annapolis

  • Bell Tolls for Bush's 'Freedom Agenda'

  • Dialogue Undermined by White House's Iran Sanctions

  • Still Flogging a Dead Cuba Policy?

  • Pentagon Gives Blackwater New Contract
  • Ali Gharib writes for Inter Press Service.

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2015 Antiwar.com