Highlights

 
Quotable
It is always more valuable to report the truth.
Jean-Paul Sartre
Original Letters Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

 
February 2, 2007

Democrats Sidestep Defunding Demands


by Aaron Glantz

Senior Congressional Democrats are brushing off questions about cutting off funding for the Iraq war, and indicate they will do little to forcefully stop President George W. Bush from sending 21,500 additional U.S. troops to Iraq.

On Wednesday, after returning from a trip to Iraq, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi sidestepped questions over whether she would try to scuttle Bush's plan to increase the number of U.S. troops in Iraq, calling it "the one last chance" that the U.S. war in Iraq will "succeed."

Likewise, Democratic Senate leader Harry Reid of Nevada said he would focus his energies on passing a bipartisan, symbolic resolution opposing the so-called "surge" – a move President Bush has already said he would ignore.

One non-binding measure that appears to be gaining traction is sponsored by a Republican, John Warner of Virginia, and asserts that while Congress "disagrees with the 'plan' to augment" U.S. troops, legislators should not cut off or reduce funding for the military presence in Iraq.

"Two years ago, it seemed pretty lonely. Now every politician wants to be seen on television saying something bad about President Bush's handling of the war," Dr. Carolyn Eisenberg, an activist and professor of U.S. history at Hofstra University, told IPS. "The key now is to get [Congress] to do something instead of hiding behind non-binding resolutions."

Activists are setting their sights on a request President Bush is likely to submit to Congress next week for an estimated 100 billion dollars more for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Peace groups would like to see Congress vote against that measure, a move they see as more important than any progressive piece of legislation introduced in Congress this year.

"We are looking at a lot of things that are happening in the Congress right now, from a Senate resolution that opposes an escalation (sending more troops to Iraq) but will allow a war to continue, to other bills out there that talk about bringing the troops home and de-funding the war, but which George Bush can veto," said Nancy Lessing of the group Military Families Speak Out.

"The one thing that we see that can end this war is if Congress votes no money on the appropriation that's going to come before them," she added.

"Legislation is so that Congress has cover," added Michael McPherson, executive director of Veterans for Peace. "The bottom line is that we want the troops to come home and we need it to be defunded. All the other stuff is just a game."

Previous votes have been extremely lopsided, with the vast majority of the House and almost every member of the Senate supporting continued funding. Already, Congress has approved more than 380 billion dollars for the war in Iraq, according to a report from the Washington-based Institute for Policy Studies, a non-profit think tank specializing in issues of peace, justice and the environment.

Activists take some solace, however, in the fact that the Democrats' good showing at the polls in November means Pennsylvania Democrat John Murtha now chairs a key House of Representatives committee that must approve the president's request.

Murtha, a decorated Marine Corps veteran with close ties to the military establishment, shocked many in Washington last year when he came out for a "redeployment" of U.S. troops from Iraq and said the presence of U.S. soldiers there has increased the level of violence in Iraq rather than calming it.

At a press conference this week, Murtha said he would not approve the latest request for 100 billion dollars in war funding without "extensive hearings" that are slated to begin Feb. 17.

"We're going to check every cent that is spent by the United States government," Murtha said.

Analysts expect Murtha to eventually vote to approve the war funding, but with conditions attached.

At a hearing of the Congressional Progressive Caucus in January, Murtha said those conditions could include that no money be allocated for an escalation unless the military can meet normal "readiness" levels.

"We should not spend money to send people overseas unless they replenish the strategic reserve," Murtha told that hearing. "If he wants to veto the bill," Murtha said of Bush, "he won't have any money."

Tom Andrews, a former Democratic Congressman from Maine who is close to Murtha, told IPS other conditions for further funding of the Iraq war could include closing the U.S. military prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba and bulldozing the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.

Dr. Carolyn Eisenberg of Hofstra believes any increase in members of Congress voting against funding the war will make an impact.

"People forget that Congress did not vote to stop funding the war in Vietnam until after all the American troops had already left," Dr. Eisenberg said. "Instead what happened was that every year more and more members of Congress voted against the war and that pressured President Richard Nixon to pull more and more troops out every year."

"When President Nixon took office, there were half a million U.S. troops in Vietnam," she said. "By the end of his first term it was down to 35,000."

(Inter Press Service)


comments on this article?
 
 
Archives

  • Winter Soldier: Domingo Rosas
    11/8/2008

  • Peace Activists Welcome Obama, Will Push Him
    11/7/2008

  • Calling Gitmo What It Is
    9/23/2008

  • These Are the
    Consequences of War
    9/22/2008

  • McCain Should Know Better
    9/9/2008

  • Revelations of an Abu Ghraib Interrogator
    9/6/2008

  • Fallujah Fall Guy
    8/21/2008

  • Iraq Veterans Describe Atrocities to Lawmakers
    5/17/2008

  • Soldier Refuses Iraq Tour, Citing 'Stomach-Churning Horrors'
    5/17/2008

  • Vets' Lawsuit Opens Door on Suicides, Poor Care
    4/23/2008

  • Army 'Rewards' Outspoken Antiwar Soldier
    4/16/2008

  • Winter Soldiers Move Toward GI Resistance
    3/22/2008

  • US Vets Testify to Torture of Detainees
    3/19/2008

  • Tune in to Winter Soldier Hearings
    3/10/2008

  • Embattled Veterans Official Resigns Post
    3/1/2008

  • Vets Break Silence on War Crimes
    2/29/2008

  • States Consider Calling Back National Guards from Iraq
    2/2/2008

  • Bush Signs Vets Bill, Won't Ban Permanent Bases
    1/30/2008

  • Dear Soldiers: Your Government Lied to You
    1/26/2008

  • Parsing the Democrats' Iraq Plans
    1/18/2008

  • Wounded Vets Trade One Hell for Another
    1/16/2008

  • Iraq, Afghanistan War Costs Top Vietnam
    12/21/2007

  • US War Vets to Speak Publicly About War Crimes
    12/1/2007

  • Canada Shuts Doors to US War Resisters
    11/17/2007

  • Outrage in a Time of Apathy
    11/14/2007

  • Case Crumbles Against Officer Who Refused Iraq
    11/10/2007

  • Peace Activist's Son Discovers Pain of War
    7/14/2007

  • Troubled Soldier Gets Demoted, Not Treated
    7/7/2007

  • US Vote Could Close 'School of the Americas'
    6/24/2007

  • Homeless Vets Struggle Long After War's End
    6/13/2007

  • Latino Soldiers Who Refused Iraq Speak Out
    5/19/2007

  • Suicidal and Facing a Third Tour in Iraq
    5/16/2007

  • Iraqis' Mental Health Suffering, Say Doctors
    5/13/2007

  • Moms Spend Their Weekend Protesting War in Iraq
    5/12/2007

  • Ex-Soldier Recalls Horrors of Abu Ghraib
    5/1/2007

  • Iraq, Afghanistan War Vets Find Relief in the Footlights
    4/24/2007

  • Civilian Court Sides With 'Conscientious Objector'
    4/6/2007

  • Congressman Trades Iraq Vote for Spinach
    3/23/2007

  • US Religious Leaders Urge Bush to Talk to Iran
    3/2/2007

  • US Ill-Equipped to Deal With Wave of Troubled Vets
    2/16/2007

  • Reprieve for Officer Who Denounced 'Immoral War'
    2/9/2007

  • Officer Who Refused Iraq Tour Goes on Trial
    2/6/2007

  • Democrats Sidestep Defunding Demands
    2/2/2007

  • US Military Spied on Hundreds of Antiwar Demos
    1/26/2007

  • Antiwar Groups Plan Surge on Washington
    1/25/2007

  • A US Soldier Speaks Out
    From Baghdad
    1/23/2007

  • Sick, Literally, of Fighting in Iraq
    1/12/2007

  • More Subpoenas Come Down in Watada Case
    1/9/2007

  • Iraq Vets Come Home Physically, Mentally Butchered
    1/4/2007

  • Saddam's Death Leaves Unanswered Questions
    12/31/2006

  • Reporter Summoned to Testify Against War Resister
    12/16/2006

  • Experts Expect Democrats to Increase Military Spending
    12/15/2006

  • Natives of Guam Decry US Expansion Plan
    12/13/2006

  • Democrats Let Gates Slide
    12/9/2006

  • Spying Won't Deter Us,
    Peace Groups Say
    11/30/2006

  • Rural America Suffering High Death Toll in Iraq, Afghanistan
    11/29/2006

  • Military Plea Bargains Raise Questions of Justice
    11/19/2006

  • Antiwar Voters May Get Less Than They Bargained For
    11/11/2006

  • Active-Duty GIs Call for Withdrawal
    10/31/2006

  • Iraq Brings Wounds That Deepen With Time
    10/12/2006

  • More Dissension in the Ranks
    10/5/2006

  • Iraq Violence Leading to Academic Brain Drain
    10/5/2006

  • In Iraq, Strife Follows US Military Wherever It Goes
    9/28/2006

  • I'm a Veteran, and I Support/Despise This War
    9/27/2006

  • Doctors Under Fire in Iraq
    9/20/2006
  • Aaron Glantz is a reporter for Pacifica Radio who spent much of the last year in Iraq. His radio documentary, "Iraq: One Year of Occupation and Resistance," can be accessed online at www.fsrn.org.

     

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2003 Antiwar.com