Letters to
Antiwar.com
 
We get a lot of letters, and publish a representative sampling of them in this column, which is updated as often as possible by our "Backtalk editor," Sam Koritz. Please send your letters to backtalk@antiwar.com. Letters may be edited for length (and coherence). Unless otherwise indicated, authors may be identified and e-mail addresses will not be published..

Posted November 7, 2001

Innocent Blood

Justin Raimondo is one columnist I rarely miss so I can only hope that his idea of sending the Russians back into Afghanistan ["Attack of the McCainiacs," October 31] was tongue in cheek. You see, even with American help, the Russkis are not going to whip the Afghanis, nobody ever has. It is too far away from anyone's supply lines, the terrain is very inaccessible, and the people there are born to the sword like politicians are born to the trough. To turn on a major war there would be to start a bloodbath of terrifying proportions. The Russkis did not lose last time for lack of murderous intent.

My own question about dealing with Bin Laden, assuming our government is not lying about his involvement, is based on a simple question. If that same government could murder 70 or more people at Waco without collateral damage to Dallas and Houston, why don't they do that to Bin Laden and leave the Afghanis alone? If it turns out that the Afghanis were indeed actively supporting Bin Laden, well then blast 'em, but somehow this whole thing is not ringing true.

If Raimondo's piece on Saudi Arabia ["A Saudi 9/11 Connection?," October 12] is as accurate as I fear it is, we may well be bombing the wrong folks -- I for one don't like the feel of innocent blood on my hands.

~ Michael Peirce


The Moorish Empire

[Regarding Mario de Solenni's letter of November 5, "The Right Idea":]

His [letter] indicates that he might be just a little bit ignorant of the past. Up until Ferdinand (along with wife Isabella) engineered the defeat of the Moors in 1492, the Moorish Empire was a thrivingly educated entity. They knew as much about anatomy as in Gray's Anatomy today. They had developed air conditioning using the natural breezes of the Mediterranean. I believe that our system of mathematics is derived from the Arabs. Some of the universities, such as Cordoba, are still in existence.

Of course, he said in the last half of the millennium nothing has been done, but after being driven out of Spain these achievements continued on the South shore of the Mediterranean.

It is, also, interesting to note that after Spain drove out the Moors and the Jews they began to disintegrate. The Jews had brought order to the fiscal part of Empire, and the Moors brought government.

~ J. P. Schediwy, California


The Drug Suppliers

[Regarding Justin Raimondo's column of October 29, "Osama in the Balkans":]

Regarding the Taliban and heroin, a year ago, they decreed that growing opium violated the tenets of Islam, and they pretty well shut down opium poppy cultivation. According to the UN, last year's crop was 3,300 tons; this year, it was only 50 tons. The Taliban has also burned down labs where opium was refined into heroin. On the other hand, the Northern Alliance produced a crop this year of 150 tons, even though they control only 5-10% of the country, and even though the prime land for opium poppy cultivation is mostly in the Taliban-controlled 90-95% of the country.

Under Batista, with US support, Cuba was the western hemisphere point of entry of heroin for the original French Connection. Castro cut it off, which is why the US turned against him. During the Vietnam war, the CIA's Air America C-130 transport planes carried opium from Laos to Saigon. After the US Congress cut off the CIA's funding of the Contras in Nicaragua, the CIA financed the "freedom fighters" through the cocaine trade. There is a long-term history in US foreign policy -- we side with the drug suppliers. The situation in the former Yugoslavia is not an anomaly.

~ Martin M.


The Antiwar.com Constituency

One thing that intrigues me about conservatives and libertarians is the fact that you are intellectually open to forming coalitions and debating ideas. This sets you apart from the Left, which, in too many cases, still insists on doctrinal purity.

Believe me, I've been burned more than once by this essential fundamentalism on the Left. I'm a Democratic Socialist, who happens to be pro-life; feels strongly about my religious persuasion (Christian); has an innate respect for the rank and file of our military (as opposed to its leadership); am disgusted by the government's overreaction in Waco and Ruby Ridge; am skeptical about the anti-second amendment movement (the second amendment ensures the viability of the first); and who has a certain fondness for Israel. The moment these subjects come up, I'm persona non grata.

...The Antiwar.com constituency is well placed to work on and through initiatives that come from the Left. You can add your energies, and perhaps open the door to further cooperation.

~ Erich W.


Viewpoints

You have a great website. I have been trying to get everyone I know to become more educated by forwarding them your Viewpoints page.

~ B.W.


Misleading Name

Your site is great, but I think the name is misleading. I almost glossed over it as a left wing pacifist site. I'm happy I read further.

~ John H.


The 17th Amendment

[Regarding Justin Raimondo's column of October 31, "Attack of the McCainiacs":]

It is not only McCain who is dangerous. Many of his Senate colleagues are dangerous zealots to one cause or another (Kennedy, Shumer, Daschle, Clinton, ad nauseum). The only answer is to repeal the 17th Amendment!

~ D.S.

Back to Antiwar.com Home Page | Contact Us