Among the critics and reinterpreters of Fourth
Generation war, the bad is most powerfully represented by Thomas Barnettís two
Pentagonís New Map and Blueprint
for Action. What Barnett advocates is bad in two senses: first, that
it wonít work, and second, that if it did work the result would be evil.
In both books, Barnett divides the world into two parts, the Functioning
Core and the Non-Integrating Gap. This is parallel to what I call centers of
order and centers or sources of disorder, and I agree that this will be the
fundamental fault line of the 21st Century. Barnettís error is that
he assumes the Functioning Core will be the stronger party, able to restore
order in places where it has broken down. In fact, the forces of disorder will
be stronger, because they are driven by a factor Barnett dismisses, the spreading
crisis of legitimacy of the state. By ignoring Martin van Creveldís work on
the rise and decline of the state, Barnettís books end up anchoring their foundations
Barnettís second error, manifested almost comically in Blueprint for
Action, is that he thinks restoring the state in places where it has failed
will be easy. According to a Washington Post review of Blueprint for
Action by Joseph S. Nye, Jr.,
"Barnett has a six-step plan to accomplish this: First, the U.N. Security
Council acts as a grand jury to indict countries; second, the Coreís biggest
economies issue '"warrants" for the arrest of the offending party';
third, the United States leads a 'warfighting coalition'; fourth, a Core-wide
administrative force (with the United States providing 10 to 20 percent of its
personnel) puts things back together with the help of the fifth element, a new
International Reconstruction Fund; followed by a sixth step, criminal prosecution
of the apprehended parties at the International Criminal Court in the Hague.
'Thatís it, from A to Z,' Barnett notes cheerfully."
A cynic might suggest that the United States canít even do this in New
Orleans much less in foreign countries. In fact, as the FMFM 1-A, Fourth
Generation War, argues strongly, even if an outside force does everything
right, the probability of success in such endeavors remains low. Why? As Russell
Kirk wrote, there is no surer way of making someone your enemy than to announce
you will remake him in your image for his own good. To many of the worldís peoples,
what Barnett argues for in such blithe simplicity represents Hell, and they
will fight it literally to their dying breath.
This brings us to the third problem with Barnett: what his books advocate
does represent Hell, or at least Hellís first cousin, Brave New World. He would
create an inescapable new world order that bears a remarkable resemblance to
the one Aldous Huxley described in his short novel Brave
New World, published in the 1930s Ė a "soft totalitarianism"
where the first rule is, "you must be happy." Happiness, in turn,
is a product of endless materialism, consumerism, sensual pleasure and psychological
conditioning. If that sounds like a good description of American popular culture,
it is exactly that culture Barnett proposes to force down the throat of every
person on earth, with the U.S. military serving as the instrument of coercion.
What Barnettís books end up revealing is the combination of moral blindness
and international political hubris that characterizes the whole quest for American
world empire, a quest initiated by the neo-cons. Like the (other?) neo-cons,
Barnett sees the world and its cultures in Jacobin terms, as a combination of
Rousseauís natural goodness of man and Newtonian clockwork mechanism. Just twist
a few dials here, throw a couple of levers there and presto!, Switzerlands spring
up from Ouagadougou to the Hindu Kush.
Itís piffle, pure and all too simple. Unfortunately, it is dangerous piffle,
both in the evil that would result if it worked and the catastrophes that will
come when it doesnít. Real Fourth Generation theory counsels caution, prudence
and a clear grasp on the limits of American power in a world where the state
itself is in decline.
Regrettably, in the uneducated and nostrum-hungry powerhouse that is Washington,
Barnettís piffle is just the sort of patent medicine that sells. The more widely
it sells, the more Iraqs America will have to endure. At present, it looks as
if the next Iraq is spelled Iran. Itís as good a place as any for Barnettís
thesis to expire from sheer lightness of being.