Highlights
 
Quotable
Conquest is not in our principles. It is inconsistent with our government.
Thomas Jefferson
Original Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

 
December 5, 2006

Bolton Resigns in
New Defeat for Hawks

by Jim Lobe

In a new blow to the dwindling number of hawks in top administration positions, President George W. Bush Monday accepted the resignation of his ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton.

The resignation came less than three weeks after Bush had resubmitted Bolton's nomination to the Senate for confirmation, a move that was apparently designed to reassure his hard-line constituency that he would stick by them despite the Democrats' sweeping victory in the Nov. 7 elections.

Praising Bolton's controversial 21-month tenure at Turtle Bay, Bush said he was "deeply disappointed" that a "handful of … senators" had prevented Bolton's confirmation to the post.

"They chose to obstruct his confirmation, even though he enjoys majority support in the Senate, and even though their tactics will disrupt our diplomatic work at a sensitive and important time," added Bush, who last year gave Bolton a "recess appointment" to the position after it became clear that Bush lacked the required support to defeat a Democratic-led filibuster.

Bolton's foes hailed the White House's decision to give up on its fight to get Senate confirmation and called on Bush to nominate someone who could rally bipartisan support.

"With the Middle East on the verge of chaos and the nuclear threats from Iran and North Korea increasing, we need a United Nations ambassador who has the full support of Congress and can help rally the international community to tackle the serious threats we face," said Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic nominee in the 2004 presidential elections.

"I think this really shows that [former ultra-nationalist Sen.] Jesse Helms-style pugnacious nationalism has been definitively knocked back," according to Steven Clemons, director of the American Strategy Program of the New America Foundation and a leader in the nearly two-year effort to defeat Bolton's nomination.

"While this should be seen more as a victory for Bolton's opponents than a change of heart by the White House, it does offer Bush a chance to start afresh and send someone to the UN who can be a good steward of American interests there and still be consistent with the values of the Republican Party," he added. "Whether Bush will take advantage of that remains to be seen."

Among the most frequently named possible successors to Bolton, according to Washington insiders, are Bush's current ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, and the State Department's neoconservative undersecretary for global affairs, Paula Dobriansky.

Also mentioned for the post have been three moderate Republican lawmakers who were defeated in their bids for reelection last month: Iowa Rep. Jim Leach; Ohio Sen. Michael DeWine; and Rhode Island Sen. Lincoln Chafee, whose outspoken opposition to Bolton's nomination during the past year, however, was deeply resented by the White House. State Department Counselor Philip Zelikow has also been considered a strong candidate, but he announced two weeks ago that he was leaving the administration.

A protégé of Helms who got his start in mid-level political posts in the Reagan administration, Bolton served during Bush's first term as undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, a post from which he often and with some success tried to sabotage efforts by Secretary of State Colin Powell to promote engagement with U.S. foes, notably Syria, Iran, and North Korea.

In doing so, Bolton played a key role in furthering the goals of the coalition of aggressive nationalists, Christian Rightists, and neoconservatives led within the administration by Vice President Dick Cheney, who, after Powell's departure, reportedly pressed Powell's successor, Condoleezza Rice, to promote Bolton to deputy secretary of state. All too aware of Bolton's role in undermining Powell, Rice rejected the idea but went along with the UN nomination as a compromise.

His nomination, however, proved instantly controversial, particularly in light of Bolton's long history of statements, especially during his association in the 1990s with the American Enterprise Institute and the Federalist Society, that showed little but disdain for both the United Nations and international law or any other multilateral mechanism, such as the International Criminal Court, that he thought might be used to restrain U.S. power on the world stage.

"There is no such thing as the United Nations," he once said during a public debate in New York. "If the UN secretariat building in New York lost 10 stories, it wouldn't make a bit of difference."

While such remarks clearly raised questions about his fitness for the proposed job, testimony during Bolton's confirmation hearings by several State Department officials, including one prominent Republican appointee, about his brusque and intimidating management style and his efforts to manipulate intelligence in the interests of his hawkish agenda persuaded a sufficient number of members of the Foreign Relations Committee that the nomination should not go forward.

Faced with the prospect of a successful filibuster on the Senate floor, Bush decided during Congress's summer in August 2005 to give Bolton a "recess appointment," a rare procedural maneuver that permits the president to fill a post without Senate confirmation until the end of whatever Congress is then in session. The current Congress will end in early January at the latest.

Lacking the legal authority to grant Bolton a second recess appointment for which he could be paid, Bush resubmitted the nomination to the Senate at the height of the war between Israel and Hezbollah, apparently in hopes that key Democratic lawmakers who depended heavily on campaign contributions from Jewish supporters would switch their votes, particularly in light of Bolton's strong defense of Israel at the UN at the time.

But Chafee, who had supported Bolton the previous year, moved into opposition, and, with Democrats holding firm, Sen. Richard Lugar, the moderate Republican Foreign Relations Committee chairman who had never been enthusiastic about Bolton, let it be known that the nomination was dead.

Particularly damaging was a July 23 New York Times article based on interviews with dozens of other countries' UN ambassadors. "[M]any diplomats say they see Mr. Bolton as a stand-in for the arrogance of the administration itself," it reported. Instead of furthering his mission of UN reform, the report noted, "[e]nvoys say he has in fact endangered that effort by alienating traditional allies."

In the last several months, State Department and White House lawyers considered a number of different ways that Bolton might legally stay on – such as appointing him to a post that did not require Senate confirmation and then making him "acting ambassador" – but eventually concluded that such maneuvers were likely to create more ill will, not just among Democrats, who will take over the Senate next month, but also among Republicans who increasingly see Bush's stubbornness as a major political liability.

"President Bush's decision to accept Ambassador Bolton's resignation should serve to more closely align U.S. foreign policy with the wishes of the American people," said Don Kraus, director of the Washington office of Citizens for Global Solutions, a lobby group that also opposed Bolton's appointment.

"It is our hope that he nominates a new UN ambassador who can help to return the United States to the partnership-driven, consensus-building, and problem-solving approach that characterized its first six decades of relations with the UN."

Bolton's departure is the latest in a number of prominent hawks who have resigned over the last two years, including former Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, former Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith, and Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

Since last month's election, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his intelligence chief, Stephen Cambone, have announced their resignations, and the assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs, Peter Rodman, is also expected to leave soon.

(Inter Press Service)


comments on this article?
 
 
Archives

  • US Jews Open to Palestinian Unity Govt
    3/26/2009

  • Bipartisan Experts Urge 'Partnership' With Russia
    3/17/2009

  • Obama Administration Insists It's Neutral in Salvador Poll
    3/14/2009

  • NGOs Hail Congressional Moves to Ease Embargo
    3/12/2009

  • Call to 'Resist and Deter' Nuclear Iran Gains Key Support
    3/7/2009

  • Washington Ends Diplomatic Embargo of Syria
    3/4/2009

  • Diplomatic, Aid Spending Set to Rise Under Obama Budget
    2/28/2009

  • Many Muslims Reject Terror Tactics, Back Some Goals
    2/26/2009

  • Lugar Report Calls for New Cuba Policy
    2/24/2009

  • U.S.-Israel Storm Clouds Ahead?
    2/20/2009

  • Calls Mount for Obama to Appoint 'Truth Commission'
    2/20/2009

  • Washington's Praise of Venezuelan Vote Suggests Détente
    2/19/2009

  • Rightward Shift in Israeli Polls Creates New Headaches
    2/13/2009

  • US Advised to Back Somalia Reconciliation Efforts
    2/12/2009

  • Hawks Urge Boosting Military Spending
    2/5/2009

  • More Troops, More Worries,
    Less Consensus on Afghanistan
    2/4/2009

  • Report: Most Citizens Kept in Dark on Govt Spending
    2/2/2009

  • Obama Raises Hopes of
    Mideast Experts
    1/28/2009

  • Obama Picks Israel-Arab, Afghanistan-Pakistan Negotiators
    1/23/2009

  • Rights Groups Applaud Move to Halt Gitmo Trials
    1/22/2009

  • Obama Offers Internationalist Vision
    1/21/2009

  • Around the World, High Hopes for Obama
    1/20/2009

  • Liberals, Realists Set to Clash in Obama Administration
    1/19/2009

  • Obama Urged to Take Bold Steps Toward Cuba Normalization
    1/15/2009

  • Clinton Stresses 'Cooperative Engagement,' 'Smart Power'
    1/14/2009

  • Bush Foreign Policy Legacy Widely Seen as Disastrous
    1/14/2009

  • Networks' Int'l News Coverage at Record Low in 2008
    1/6/2009

  • Amnesty Calls on Rice to Drop 'Lopsided' Gaza Stance
    1/3/2009

  • Israeli Attack May Complicate Obama's Plans
    12/30/2008

  • Report: Recognizing Hamas Could Help Peace
    12/19/2008

  • Business Groups Support Dismantling Cuba Embargo
    12/8/2008

  • Mumbai Massacre Seen as Major Blow to Regional Strategy
    12/5/2008

  • Obama Urged to Quickly Engage Iran, Syria
    12/3/2008

  • Diplomacy, Multilateralism Stressed by Obama Team
    12/2/2008

  • Obama Foreign Policy: Realists to Reign?
    11/28/2008

  • Hemispheric Group Calls for Major Changes in Americas Policy
    11/25/2008

  • Greybeards Urge Overhaul of Global Governance
    11/21/2008

  • Intelligence Analysts See Multi-Polar, Risky World By 2025
    11/21/2008

  • Obama Urged to Strengthen Ties with UN
    11/20/2008

  • Obama-Tied Think-Tank Calls for Pakistan Shift
    11/18/2008

  • Obama Advised to Forgo More Threats to Iran
    11/17/2008

  • First, Close Gitmo,
    Say Rights Groups
    11/11/2008

  • Obama's Foreign Policy:
    No Sharp Break From Bush
    11/11/2008

  • Coca Cultivation Up Despite Six Years of Plan Colombia
    11/7/2008

  • Obama to Seek Global Re-engagement, But How Much?
    11/6/2008

  • Two, Three, Many Grand Bargains?
    11/3/2008

  • Moving Towards a 'Grand Bargain' in Afghanistan
    10/19/2008

  • Top Ex-Diplomats Slam 'Militarization' of Foreign Policy
    10/16/2008

  • Bush Set to Go With a Whimper, Not a Bang
    10/15/2008

  • Pakistan 'Greatest Single Challenge' to Next President
    10/8/2008

  • Senate Passes Nuke Deal Over Escalation Fears
    10/3/2008

  • Brief Talks With Syria Spur Speculation
    10/1/2008

  • Iran Resolution Shelved in Rare Defeat for AIPAC
    9/27/2008

  • Bipartisan Group Urges Deeper Diplomacy with Muslim World
    9/25/2008

  • White House Still Cautious on Georgia
    9/6/2008
  • More Archives


    Jim Lobe, works as Inter Press Service's correspondent in the Washington, D.C., bureau. He has followed the ups and downs of neo-conservatives since well before their rise in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks.

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2017 Antiwar.com