Rep. Nancy Pelosi's recent speech to the Israeli-American
lobby (AIPAC) ought to be a clarion call for peace activists. Her address did
not contain any big surprises. But it is, nonetheless, remarkable for its transparency.
The speech (see below for the text) affords a up-close look at what Pelosi thinks
about Israel, the Palestinians, the Mideast, and nukes.
It's worth a look too because Pelosi's beliefs on these matters are not a
departure. Most of the Democratic Party leadership espouse similar ideas. The
bipartisan voting record of Congress in recent years on Mideast issues proves
this to be the case. Remember, this is the party that's supposed to represent
the grassroots, i.e., we the people. So what is the Democratic leader of the
House doing, anyway, giving a pep talk to the second largest lobby in Washington?
Indeed, to the lobby of a foreign power? It's a question more Americans ought
to be asking.
Most of the speech is the same old stuff. I draw your attention only to several
points:
Pelosi denies that the key issue is Israel's occupation of the West Bank and
Gaza at a stroke repudiating numerous UN Security Council Resolutions
that the US voted for and supposedly still supports. But clearly, that's no
longer the case, and hasn't been for many years.
The real issue, she states, is the survival of Israel. This is the familiar
mantra by which anything and everything becomes possible. Only, there's a minor
catch: The statement isn't true and hasn't been since probably 1949.
If nothing else, Pelosi is well-versed. She recites another familiar line,
the one about how there was no partner for peace until Arafat expired, when
light suddenly came flooding in. Pelosi makes it clear that in her view the
Palestinian leader Abbas' real job is to serve as policeman for Israel. Evidently,
his legitimacy largely depends on this. Looking after the best interests of
his own people comes in a distant second.
But her most revealing statements concern nuclear proliferation, and they
show why the Democrats (who don't get it) are no improvement over the Republicans
(who always get it wrong). In fact, the Democrats may be even more dangerous,
precisely because there is still the perception in the land, however mistaken,
that the Democrats are the party of enlightened ideas. I would be willing to
bet that most registered democrats are not aware of how extreme their elected
Democratic representatives are on these key issues. Nor can most thus have a
true sense of how dire the situation is.
According to Pelosi, the biggest danger to Israel today comes from Iran, whose
nuclear ambitions, though still unproved, also threaten the US. Her perspective
contains the seed of ominous things to come, because, after all, something
will have to be done about Iran, right? Yes, and soon.
Meanwhile, Pelosi manages to overlook Israel's brutal treatment of the Palestinians,
which undoubtedly is the greatest danger to Israel, by far, and comes from within.
Nor does she mention Israel's massive nuclear, chemical and biological weapons
arsenal. But her statements additionally contain the tacit and troublesome assumption
that the only people in the region who matter are Israelis and Americans. Everyone
else, virtually the entire population of numerous countries, though no less
imperiled by nuclear weapons (arguably even more so), simply don't count in
this calculus. In fact, Pelosi's remarks are implicitly racist for this reason.
The shocker, though, also near the end, is where Pelosi takes the US and Israeli
nuclear monopoly in the region for granted, as if this were a good and necessary
thing. The purpose of the NPT in her view is to shut down the rogue proliferators,
who by definition are always those other guys, never us. It's the stuff of which
nuclear nightmares are made. I would also bet that the vast majority of people
who live in the Mideast take sharp issue with Pelosi's thinking, and probably
have a bone to pick with her about where the actual threat lies.
George Washington, our founding father, who warned against entangling alliances,
must be turning over, about now. But don't take my word for it. Read Pelosi's
speech and draw your own conclusions.