Woodward’s latest book, Plan
of Attack, exposes the underbelly of the build-up to the US war
with Iraq. In it Woodward reveals that the "CIA
hired the leaders of a Muslim religious sect at odds with Saddam, but nonetheless
with numerous members highly placed in Saddam's security services. The CIA's
code name for them: the Rock Stars."
Asked to reveal the identity of this sect, Woodward refused. But to observers
of the scene looking at the various possibilities, it is not difficult to
pinpoint exactly who this group is… the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK)
led by arguably the best conman in the Middle East, Massoud Rajavi. If that is
the case, it really does call into question some decision-making at the top.
The MEK, although listed as terrorists
in the USA since 1997, still maintained a high profile presence as a "democratic
alternative to the Iranian regime" in the heart of the US government and had
powerful friends, such as Richard
Perle and Illeana
Ros-Lehtinen, in the Pentagon, Congress, and the House.
Jafarzadeh as Massoud Rajavi’s permanent representative in the US, and Mohammad
Mohaddessin his "foreign minister" travelling back and forth on a weekly
basis from Baghdad to Washington, this group was the only one with which the CIA
had contact in Iraq. Certainly it ahs been the only group which had simultaneous
open access to Washington’s corridors of power and to the top levels of the
Iraqi regime. But whose side is Rajavi on?
In reality, Rajavi’s MEK is an isolated quasi-religious
military cult which, based in Iraq for 20 years, had taken arms, training,
and orders directly from Saddam Hussein. Saddam trusted the MEK completely, more
so than the Iraqi’s surrounding him. After all, Rajavi’s stated goal was to
grasp power in Iran. Hussein knew that Rajavi wasn’t trying to topple him, and
knew also that Rajavi totally relied on Saddam’s help to achieve his goal.
Saddam gave Rajavi a free hand to undertake intelligence and security
operations inside Iraq and as much logistical help as needed to run terrorist
operations over the border into Iran, their common enemy. Ordinary Iraqi
agencies didn’t dare to challenge MEK activities in their own country, so close
was the organization to Saddam. It meant that MEK was acting right inside the
Iraqi security system.
In a recently exposed videotape
of Rajavi and some of Saddam’s top echelons, we get a picture of their
relationship. After Rajavi had ordered his National
Liberation Army to help suppress the Kurdish and Shiite rebellions
in March 1991 after Gulf War I, Saddam praised and rewarded him. In a meeting
with General Saber, Rajavi made a revealing speech:
"I think that the relations between us and you and Iraq, being the
government of Iraq or the Baath Party and at the top of it Mr President
[Saddam]. And on the other side the Iranian Resistance and the Mojahedin and the
National Liberation Army.
I think that our relation is not a purely political
relation and one cannot interpret our relations like that any more. And I think
that the brotherhood relation has been completed. Such brothers that would not
come short of anything for each other.
Whatever is against you, it is
obviously against us, and visa versa. Our security is one. When we receive a
blow, it is to both of us. And when there is progress, it affects us both...
…As far as we are concerned I have only one thing to say. In my mind and in
my heart, I cannot separate the account of our interests from your interests.
They are exactly matching each other. We may have some differences in our views.
The reality is, that our interests match each other and are closely mixed
together. Therefore I would ask you to send my sincere regards to Mr. President
[Saddam] and say to him that there is no need for him to thank us or anything
else. And tell him on my behalf that we have been in your house and we are with
you and will be with you as far as is in our power."
If the CIA had heard this speech, would they have been so ready to believe
that Rajavi would help them? Even if they thought Rajavi’s co-operation with
Saddam was cynically pragmatic, did it not occur to someone that his
relationship with the US might be the same?
Rajavi most probably passed all the information he had from the CIA straight
to Saddam. Why wouldn’t he? As he said himself "Whatever is against you [Iraq],
it is obviously against us, and visa versa. Our security is one. When we receive
a blow, it is to both of us." Rajavi didn’t believe before the war that Saddam
would, or even could, be toppled. He believed his Iraqi protector was invincible
and would shelter him until he reached Tehran in some unforeseeable future. Rock
Stars they may have been, but it was Saddam who rocked Rajavi’s world, not the
Woodward points out, the CIA is still not sure whether the intelligence they
got from the sect was reliable or not. Why are we not surprised? It should have
been obvious that a man who had already prostituted himself to anyone and everyone
in his quest for power, a man who proudly headed ‘Saddam’s
Private Army’, would not be an entirely reliable associate.
Even so, when it became obvious to Rajavi that Saddam would go, he turned
around and promised the Americans full cooperation in exchange for protection.
And he got it. Although the MEK bases were bombed and some of his fighters
killed, this was most probably stage managed so that the group could surrender
to the US without arousing the suspicion of the Iraqis. Rajavi was protected in
his largest base, Ashraf, with 4,000 of his fighters around him and those
fighters and the base itself protected
by several hundred US soldiers. In Iraq, Rajavi couldn’t have found a safer
place. The Iraqi people were ready to attack the MEK as remnants of Saddam’s
regime. Even now, the Iraqi
Governing Council has unanimously asked the US to get rid of the sect and
remove them as soon as possible from Iraq.
When Ari Fleischer, the president’s spokesman, publicly praised
the MEK on March 10 2003, it was widely interpreted as the result of a CIA
Because of this deal, the MEK couldn’t believe their bases were being bombed
and claimed these were Iranian airplanes. But when the US army confirmed that
MEK in the camp had returned fire, Mohaddessin, shocked at the news panicked and
in an interview announced that they had a deal with the Americans not to be
When the State Department quite logically added an MEK alias,
the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), to the list of terrorist
entities on August 15, 2003, because of its close alliance with Saddam Hussein,
Jafarzadeh, the MEK contact in Washington, suddenly gave up his job as MEK
representative and was appointed top Iran Advisor for Fox News
in Washington! Coincidence? We think not.
And what has the US got from this deal to protect the MEK? Intelligence in
Iraq? A mouthpiece in the US media?