The first weapon of choice for the Israeli lobby
when someone with prestige publishes a soundly researched paper or book critical
of Israel or its powerful lobby is silence. If it's a book, it rarely gets reviewed;
its author doesn't get interviewed. If it's a paper, there are no news stories
in the big corporate press, no interviews with the authors, no television appearances.
For the average American who depends on the press to tell him what's going on,
it's as if the criticism never existed. The second weapon is, of course, to launch
vicious personal attacks.
Both methods are being used against an astounding paper titled "The
Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy." It was written by two renowned
academics, John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago and Stephen M. Walt
of the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.
So far as I've been able to determine with the help of Google, while the paper
and talk about it are all over the Internet, they are missing from the big corporate
press as of this writing. It was published in the London Review of Books,
and you can read it or download an edited version at www.lrb.co.uk. There was
one news story about it in the Christian Science Monitor and an attack
on it by David Gergen in U.S. News & World Report. Gergen is editor
at large of the magazine, which is owned by an ardent Zionist, Mortimer Zuckerman.
Gergen is a professional spinmeister who has always served the people who have
the butter for his bread.
The essence of the paper, which is thoroughly footnoted, is that Israel's lobby
has so skewed American foreign policy in the Middle East that the U.S. places
the security of Israel ahead of security for the United States.
"This situation has no equal in American history," the authors state.
The Anti-Defamation League was quoted in a Jewish publication as saying that
if the paper gained the attention of the mainstream media, then a "more vigorous
attack" would be launched. So far, it has not, though in the Christian Science
Monitor story one of the attack dogs of the Israel lobby branded these two
esteemed academics from prestigious universities as "incompetents."
This paper isn't the first to criticize the Israeli lobby. There have been
lots of papers and books written by distinguished individuals, none of which
you've probably ever heard of. They
Dare to Speak Out, by former Rep. Paul Findley, and The
Passionate Attachment, by George W. Ball, one of America's most distinguished
diplomats, are two that come to mind. It was the late Sen. William J. Fulbright
who first called Congress "Israeli-occupied territory."
What the authors of the current paper hope to do is start a sensible public debate
about the Israeli lobby and America's policy in the Middle East. Of course, avoiding
an honest debate is one of the primary objectives of the lobby. That's why it
uses silence and, if that doesn't work, vicious personal attacks. It has certainly
buffaloed Congress and most of America's news media.
Another author given the silent treatment as well as vicious personal attacks
is Norman Finkelstein, a professor at DePaul University. He's written three
outstanding books you've probably not heard of: The
Holocaust Industry, Image
and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict, and his latest, which
got not a line of review, Beyond
Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History. Finkelstein,
by the way, is Jewish and the son of Holocaust survivors.
This is a most serious issue and deserves an honest public debate. Whether you
agree with any of the above authors and academics, you should read what they have
to say and not be deterred by cheap ad hominem attacks.
You've heard the same message from me, of course, but I'm only a country boy
turned journalist with no fancy degrees. If you're impressed with credentials,
Finkelstein, Findley, Walt, Mearsheimer and Ball have them up to their armpits.